Historical Big Ten Standings

9 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
August 25th, 2010 at 12:36 PM
#1
RedKnedy
RedKnedy's picture
Joined: 02/04/2010
MGoPoints: 2259
Historical Big Ten Standings

I found a link that has Big Ten Standings going way back (links to different decades are in the left side column)

FYI:  going back to '93, Michigan and Ohio State have been ranked top 2 on 5 occasions, but in each of those ('97, 98', '03, '06, '07) there were ties for 2nd place (or 3way ties for 1st) so it's not clear what would have happened if there were divisions.  It depends on how the divisions are split.

They were both ranked top 3, 10 times, but two of those included ties for the 3rd place position.

Top
Tags:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
August 25th, 2010 at 1:15 PM | Um thanks, I think. (Score:1)
winterblue75
winterblue75's picture
Joined: 09/05/2009
MGoPoints: 5270

Um thanks, I think.

Sincerely,

Cpt. Ass-Hat

August 25th, 2010 at 1:16 PM | Sam Webb (Score:1)
Pea-Tear Gryphon
Pea-Tear Gryphon's picture
Joined: 10/31/2009
MGoPoints: 2271

Didn't know if anyone else heard the show this morning, but Sam said that the guys with the afternoon show looked back 17 years and found 4 times that UM/OSU would have played twice in a season. They used this as ammo for the argument behind keeping the teams in separate divisions but still playing the last week of the year. Thought that was pretty interesting.

"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about." - Peter Griffin

Twitter

August 25th, 2010 at 1:39 PM | I could live with us being in (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 28969

I could live with us being in different divisions if we were to play the last week, but I don't see the league ever going for that.   Backing that is probably a losing proposition. 

I think the only realistic way we can continue playing the last week is if we're in the same division.  That's what our "campaign" needs to endorse.  If some of us are calling for UM/OSU to be in the same division and some are calling for separate divisions, that divides the campaign and gives them an excuse to stick with the separate division/October game plan.   

August 25th, 2010 at 1:24 PM | Historical* (Score:1)
Les Miles
Joined: 03/27/2010
MGoPoints: 291

* Just sayin'

August 25th, 2010 at 1:28 PM | OK (Score:1)
RedKnedy
RedKnedy's picture
Joined: 02/04/2010
MGoPoints: 2259

+1

I'll fix it.

August 25th, 2010 at 1:26 PM | The chances that the loser of (Score:1)
bacon1431
bacon1431's picture
Joined: 07/26/2008
MGoPoints: 3288

The chances that the loser of the OSU-UM game is knocked out of the CCG are much higher than the chances of a rematch. Especially with Nebraska and PSU split as well. The CCG would probably be the winners of the OSU-UM game and the PSU-NU games.

For a' that, an' a' that, 
Our toils obscure an' a' that, 
The rank is but the guinea's stamp, 
The man's the gowd for a' that. 
August 25th, 2010 at 2:51 PM | Iowa and Wisconsin (Score:1)
BlueinLansing
BlueinLansing's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 4197

must love the reasoning behind all of this.  Little sis' is too hammered to care.

August 25th, 2010 at 6:27 PM | Every time I look at an (Score:1)
ihartbraylon
Joined: 01/03/2009
MGoPoints: 698

Every time I look at an Oregon football jersey I gain a greater appreciation for Adidas

Try and separate a man from his soul, you only strengthen his and lose your own

Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.