Hello: Darrin Kirkland Jr.

Submitted by Jack Daniels on
According to Steve Lorenz of 247, Darrin Kirkland Jr. has committed to Michigan. He was at Michigan for an overnight visit.

LSAClassOf2000

May 18th, 2014 at 1:13 PM ^

Well, this is the sort of thing that can brighten up what is already a bright and sunny afternoon in southeastern Michigan, and with so little warning too - an excellent surprise indeed! 

Welcome to Michigan, Darrin Kirkland, Jr.!

beevo

May 18th, 2014 at 1:24 PM ^

I guess we can have nice things again.  Look, too much talent is coming in to not win consistently.  I still see the missing piece as being the DL.  We need some dominant DL prospects.  There are no excuses at the LB and DB positions......we have recruited very well there for 3 years now. 

Bodogblog

May 18th, 2014 at 2:05 PM ^

DT is going to be great, starting this year and getting even better over the next two (at least).  At least that's what I believe based on the spring game.  Pipkins and Wormley, our presumed starters at 1T and 3T, didn't even play and still we were loaded.  Mone looks incredible.  Hurst and Henry looked outstanding.  Even have Glasgow behind them, and I believe Godin has good potential in the long run.  Strobel adds even more depth.  

We need outside pass rushers, but interior DL should be great, starting now.  They will force double teams and allow Bolden (who I think beats out Morgan) and especially Ryan to roam more freely than in recent years. 

A Fan In Fargo

May 18th, 2014 at 1:26 PM ^

I don't care if people say my life is lame because I pay attention to this stuff. OH HELL YEAH, OH HELL YEAH!!!!! Go Blue Baby! Malzone and now him? You gotta be kidding me.

A4chris2

May 18th, 2014 at 1:57 PM ^

Why dont we switch to a 3-4 until our DL gets better. Seems like were incredibly deep at LB and lacking on the DL due to size (which is due to youth) and production. I believe we did that in 2005.

A4chris2

May 18th, 2014 at 2:10 PM ^

Not permanent. Just until our young D-lineman add some weight and strength. I think Bolden, Ryan, Morgan, Ross, and Gedeon are good enough to start on most B1G teams. Plus Clark, Taco, and Mario could stand up at LB to rush.

Space Coyote

May 18th, 2014 at 2:25 PM ^

Michigan was weak on the interior of the DL last year. Assuming that the majority of them don't take a year 2 jump (which is the conclusion you're making) means sticking more of them on the field at one time both at NT and DE. You're asking them to take on more responsibility to take on more double teams and keep the LBs cleaner (a problem last year). On top of now having three of those players on the field rather than two, you are depending on rotation more, meaning you also need more depth with those interior DL types.

So while Michigan seems to have very good talent a LB, moving to a 3-4 would hurt those LBs a lot as far as protection for them to make plays. That's not even addressing moving to that without ever practicing it going into Fall camp. They at least worked on the Over front last year, and had a spring to improve on it, moving to a 3-4 makes little sense for this team's personnel or for the current timing.

You also don't plan on a scheme switch completely for a temporary fix, otherwise you stall the improvement of the entire team for a temporary thing. You may incorporate some of those things (similar to an offense incorporating some spread scheme concepts), but you don't do something like change to a 3-4 for one year while the DL improves and then move back to what you're planning on doing.

A4chris2

May 18th, 2014 at 4:12 PM ^

I agree its too late to switch at this point. I just remember them doing it in '05 to play to their strengths and this year seemed like it would work too. rotate our 3 & 5 techs at the end position. Hurst, Poggi, Wormley, and Godin seem like they would fit in at DE in a 3-4 scheme. Make our rush ends stand up, and keep our NTs as is. In any formation its always going to come down to taking on and beating blockers to make the play.

michiganfanforlife

May 18th, 2014 at 8:36 PM ^

Yet another reason mgoblog is awesome - coaches on here spitting knowledge left and right. I never thought about how both interior D line and linebackers increase in that D. I'm psyched to have Kirkland in the fold! The fact that we don't have to throw him out there immediately is even better. Depth is coming all over the roster and it will show late in games this year.

ilah17

May 18th, 2014 at 2:38 PM ^

I saw his comments about waiting until August too, so this is a big pleasant surprise! Congratulations to him, and welcome! 

MGoStrength

May 18th, 2014 at 3:13 PM ^

For those in the know...I happened to notice that he doesn't appear to have an OSU offer (according to ESPN).  Are we at all worried that if/when they come calling he may have interest?  I hate to say it, but I'd rather know now he has interest in them than be dissapointed later.

MGoStrength

May 18th, 2014 at 6:57 PM ^

To many UM is a dream school.  But, the reality is that the last decade has allowed OSU to distance itself quite a bit in terms of success from UM.  So, when a guy is recruited by one they are often recruited by both...especially a defensive player from the mid-west.  So, if he all of a sudden get an OSU offer I'm just curious what the overall concensus would be regarding the strength of his commitment to UM and his interest in OSU.  I hate to say, but just because a guy says he's firmly committed doesn't make it so.

BlueCube

May 18th, 2014 at 3:59 PM ^

I had a feeling he might commit just from his comments that he wasn't going to do it. It seemed like he had it on his mind and he seemed to like Michigan a lot already.

jmambro13

May 18th, 2014 at 11:59 PM ^

Welcome Darrin! This recruiting class is stacking up to be quite the unit with the potential to be beastly. Kirkland is a beast. He's a great asset. Roseboro is next. Now get Justin Hilliard, KLS, and Jashon Cornell on campus!