Hell of a season
I know, the season didnt end up the way we all wanted it to. But we are so much better off now than under Hoke and Rich Rod .
We lost 3 games by a total of 5 points .
Look at the whole season , dont just look at the last part .
Dont complain and cry because we didnt win every game .
I consider this season a success and I hope it is leading to better things .
I hope everyone enjoys the off season for Football and I'll see you all next Fall .
GO BLUE
December 31st, 2016 at 2:25 AM ^
2016 was worse than 2006. At least 2006 didn't have an Iowa like loss. And we trailed OSU for most of the game in 2006. Also, USC was clearly the better team; I don't really feel that way about FSU. Not getting to have Peppers + Butt play is also disappointing. Maybe it's just acute right now but I think 2016 is worse.
I'd put 2005, 2000, 1994, 1992 and a zillion other years before 2010. That was just the sad end of an interesting but flawed idea.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:20 AM ^
"Like I said in the coaching snowflakes thread...the most disappointing team in Michigan history. "
If ypu are 2 years old. You certainly exhibit the critical thinking of one.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:27 AM ^
Otherwise this is literally the stupidest comment I've ever seen here
December 31st, 2016 at 12:35 AM ^
All you can ask of these kids and these coaches is best efforts. Be in a position to win in the 4th Q. They were in every game. Balls bounce as they are wont to do. Referees call PI or they don't. Get over yourself. Losing by 5 pts in 3 games is not the end of the world or even a crisis. Shit happens.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:51 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 1:37 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:56 PM ^
I don't know how anybody who is truly informed about the entirety of Michigan football history could believe that for one second, but disappointment is a personal and very subjective metric anyhow. To me, the 1970, '72, '73, '74, '76, '77 and '78 teams were every bit as "disappointing" as 2016 because they were just as tantalizingly close to national championship status, if not closer, than this year was.
If you thought before the season started that we were going 12-0 with our road schedule, you bought into the hype. That's on you.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:05 AM ^
In all 13 games we led in the final minute of regulation - but we lost three times. That is nuts.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:50 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 1:30 AM ^
That did not make me feel better.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:05 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:26 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:29 AM ^
Wasn't all we wanted this season to be, still the future looks bright, every year.
We are part of the national conversation, every year.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:15 PM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:54 PM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 1:26 PM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 1:06 PM ^
Within fifteen minutes of Harbaugh's hiring, expectations became unmoored from reality. From what I've seen since December of 2014, a sizeable percentage of MGoBloggers (and I suspect the fanbase at large) expect as a matter of certainty that we'll go 15-0 every year under Harbaugh. These people appear to think that going undefeated is as easy as recruiting good players and "coaching 'em up." That's nuts.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:06 AM ^
Going 1-3 down the stretch and blowing two 4th quarter leads sucks the most. It was a good season but shows there is work to done and better talent to be put in place on the offensive side.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:09 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:10 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:06 AM ^
This was a typical Michigan season from the heydey. Close but no cigar, 3 losses ... lots of bridesmaid action.
It was fine from what we expected last August. It was disappointing from what we expected in October esp with Iowa and MSU being down big time from last year.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:07 AM ^
I still love Harbaugh, and believe in the process, but these first 2 seasons have not been satisfying outside of beating Sparty. Especially when it was only marginally better than where Hoke had us after 2 years.
First 2 seasons at Michigan:
Hoke
- 19-7
- 1-1 vs. OSU
- 1-1 vs. MSU
- Sugar Bowl win
Harbaugh
- 20-6
- 0-2 vs. OSU
- 1-1 vs. MSU
- Citrus Bowl win
December 31st, 2016 at 12:09 AM ^
I can cherry pick statistics too.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:21 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 31st, 2016 at 12:24 AM ^
Yeah, it's a bit easier to go up against Luke Fickell than Urban Meyer.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:40 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:56 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 1:15 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 7:53 AM ^
Your reading comprehension is shaky.
Brian said the prognosis was better. (No kidding.) He didn't predict success on the field.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:14 AM ^
Last I checked, Hoke was our coach for four seasons, not two. How did years three and four go again?
December 31st, 2016 at 12:15 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:30 AM ^
after 2011 about the offense? Both Denard and Touissant rushed for over 1000 yds in 2011 and Denard passing for 2200 yds with 20 tds.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:17 AM ^
of a downward path.
Why am I responding to this? It's a ludicrous comparison for anyone w/ common sense.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:17 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:22 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:39 AM ^
That's a joke comparison.
Hoke's wins were all by closer margins against not as good teams and his average margin of loss was bigger too.
Yes, Harbaugh is technically only 1 game better than him, but the wins were better and more convincing and the losses were closer and more competitive (to better teams, I might add).
December 31st, 2016 at 12:06 AM ^
I THINK THE FUCK NOT.
Losing 3 of the last 4 games of a season automatically disqualify it for consideration as being a "hell of a season"
December 31st, 2016 at 12:18 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:06 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:10 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:07 AM ^
*looks at URL*
mgoblog.com/mgoboard/hell-season
I see what you did there.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:07 AM ^
Good luck selling "we only lost x games by a total of y points!" to any fanbase with high expectations. It was a letdown. You have to close. We couldn't close this game.
Pretty bad night for the Glasgow boys. Ryan the must culpable on Cook's 3rd & 22 run and Jordan with the big missed tackle on the kickoff return that set up the GW TD.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:07 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:07 AM ^
10-3 with this much talent is about as bad as it should have been record wise.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:10 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 12:11 AM ^
Just goes to show a few plays being made or missed will decide games. now there will be huge disagreements about this team because 3-5 extra plays didnt go our way. For me, we havent had a season where we were 3-5 plays away from being one of the top 4 teams in the country since 2006. I'll take it 2 years after being 5-7 but I get the frustration. Everybody is ready for the "good not great" era of Michigan football to end.
December 31st, 2016 at 12:30 AM ^
Eh. We are better than under RichRod or Hoke. In the short term, that might be enough. It's not in the long-term. Very good football team, but reminiscient of Bo teams in that they came up short in important games. 10-3 underperforms the talent.
Brace yourselves, because it will get worse before it gets better. Not bad like before, but we are probably looking at a 9-4 or 8-5 year next year. We are bring in a lot of good young talent and we have strong coaching. But the next two years are going to feature the upperclasses that were worn down from attrition and meh talent. You can't lose like 17-19 starters (pending Perry and Newsome + attrition) and not take a step back. The OL is a mess and is going to take 2-3 years to truly fix. That's the slowest area for talent to mature. We lose a shit ton of good players. We have 9 seniors next year out of 85 guys. This was the year...probably...until 2019.
And OSU is the yardstick no doubt. They lose significantly less talent than we do this offseason, and are bringing in a little bit more talent than we are. Sadly, if anything the talent gap increases (temporarily) next year. Gonna take more time for the talent deficit to close until we can replace the limited senior classes of 2017 and 2018 with younger better guys.
December 31st, 2016 at 1:48 AM ^
December 31st, 2016 at 2:03 AM ^
Next season is about development of the young guys and OSU. Need to develop the players that will compose the 2018 and 2019 teams adn get them game experience. Wins and losses are secondary, for the most part.
I don't think we beat OSU, but obviously they are the elephant in the room. It's really the only individual game that matters next season IMO. If Harbaugh loses again, and I expect OSU to be significantly better than us next year, then he is looking at an 0-3 record against OSU going into a road game in Columbus in 2018. At some point, he needs to turn that corner and start beating OSU. The pressure and anxiety in the fanbase will start to build up and at some point he'll lose favor with the fanbase if he can't win the game.
I think Harbaugh's a very good coach, but to date Urban Meyer appears to be an ever better coach. That'll probably bring out the negs, but his team' performance everywhere going back to Utah and even Bowling Green speaks for itself. I just hope either fricking Clemson or Alabama beats him.