M-Wolverine

December 16th, 2011 at 3:21 PM ^

But I can see arguments that someone else in the whole Country did as good a job as he did.  Not winning Big Ten coach of the year would have been more of a "huh?" moment. 

But Mattison not winnng assistant of the year is still a travesty.

LSAClassOf2000

December 16th, 2011 at 4:14 PM ^

...Mike Gundy did have a pretty damn good year at Oklahoma State, and Snyder had what seems like sudden success at KSU after barely breaking .500 for a few years. Gundy put Oklahoma State (traditionally not a program that got national attention on a regular basis) in the National Championship discussion too, so it is hard to argue with that. 

Willhouse

December 16th, 2011 at 4:33 PM ^

or even Bret Beilema deserved it over Gundy! I am not surprised Hoke did not win it, but it was an absolute SHAM that Mattison did not get the Broyles Award.

coastal blue

December 16th, 2011 at 4:40 PM ^

Snyder, Hoke, Gundy or Miles. 

I think Gundy was a fine choice. Their one loss came away on a Friday night game that was basically Iowa State's whole season on the back of a school tragedy. His team next went out and beat the living hell out of Oklahoma.

Had Hoke won, no one could complain about that either. 

Miles for the obvious reasons.

Snyder...eh. KSU's ten wins are impressive and all, but I wasn't wholly impressed with their body of work. They edged so many of their games (10-7 over E. Kentucky), got blown out by 41 points at home...I personally think they were the most overrated team in the final polls excluding Virginia Tech. 

Reader71

December 17th, 2011 at 3:55 AM ^

But doesn't the fact that K-State was in a position to be over-rated imply that Snydar did a great job?

Who the hell thinks K-State should be rated at all? 

I don't even think he deserved the award, but don't people see the enormity of K-State getting 10 wins? That's akin to Illinois getting 10 wins. It is probably that schools cieling, or damn close to it. 

salami

December 16th, 2011 at 4:52 PM ^

I'm a little surpised Kevin Sumlin isn't getting any love from the voters.  Granted, the conference they're in isn't the most challenging, but they did roll just about everyone their schedule.

 

Magnus

December 16th, 2011 at 10:08 PM ^

He totally could have won it if he had beaten Southern Mississippi.  Unfortunately, Houston totally bombed in that game.  You can't end on that note at a school like Houston and expect to win awards.

96goblue00

December 16th, 2011 at 5:53 PM ^

 

Arguing against Gundy is silly. The truth is, there were a number of deserving candidates this year, including Hoke.  What about Snyder at K-State? Or the Hat?

Perkis-Size Me

December 16th, 2011 at 6:07 PM ^

I understand Gundy getting the award. Oklahoma State was Little Brother 4.0 compared to Oklahoma when he took over. They've won somehwere between 15-20 times in the history of the rivalry if I'm not mistaken. Still, I'd like to think Coach of the Year should be based on who exceeds expectations rather than meets them. Oklahoma State was a national title contender at the beginning of the year and stayed that way.

Who could have possibly expected Michigan or Kansas State to be where they're at right now?

mcberry

December 17th, 2011 at 10:25 AM ^

I think Brady should have won it, but all of these postseason awards are a farce anyway. Even the Heisman has no criteria for how to vote, so it's all based on opinion, PR, location, etc. Granted, I think it's fine this way, at least better than letting the BCS computers decide awards, but it will lead to "controversy" at times.