The "Harbaugh Bump" - How Harbaugh Improves Teams vs Prior Regimes
You've heard of the Beilein bump. I present to you the Harbaugh bump.
Below are Harbaugh's 3 previous coaching stops and the winning % of the previous 2 coaches at each stop, versus what Harbaugh did at those locations. I then did a straight variance of the winning %s - note this is not "percent improvement".... just a subtraction of the Harbaugh!!!!!!!!!!!!!! winning % versus the prior 2 coaches.
I then subtly applied the average of those 3 prior stops improvement to what would happen if he could repeat that improvement at UM. i.e. the Harbaugh bump.
The results were positive. Don't doubt it. It's science math.
USD | ||
Fogarty/McGarry | 55.4% | |
Harbauuuugh! | 82.3% | |
26.9% | Improvement | |
Stanford | ||
Teevens/Harris | 28.5% | |
Harbauuuugh! | 58.0% | |
29.5% | Improvement | |
SF | ||
Nolan/Singletary | 37.9% | |
Harbauuuugh! | 76.6% | |
38.7% | Improvement | |
Ave Improvement | 31.7% | |
Rodriguez/Hoke | 52.2% | |
Harbauuuugh! | 83.9% | <---profit |
31.7% |
For perspective Bo was 80%, Tressel/Carroll/Spurrier types 81-82%.
December 28th, 2014 at 7:17 PM ^
December 28th, 2014 at 7:19 PM ^
Sounds about right.
December 28th, 2014 at 7:20 PM ^
Absolutely correct.
December 28th, 2014 at 7:18 PM ^
You forgot to add an extra 10% for The Michigan Difference (tm).
December 28th, 2014 at 7:24 PM ^
Is it as good as the Colbert bump?
December 28th, 2014 at 7:25 PM ^
December 28th, 2014 at 7:25 PM ^
December 28th, 2014 at 7:25 PM ^
December 28th, 2014 at 7:32 PM ^
Well his last year was 92.3% at Stanford. So you can do the math.
December 28th, 2014 at 7:26 PM ^
December 28th, 2014 at 7:26 PM ^
Man...the guys on the team better be ready....they are in for a shock to the system. And a shock is exactly whats needed to instill a winning mentality throughout the locker room
December 28th, 2014 at 7:28 PM ^
Hoke had the slump.
December 28th, 2014 at 7:35 PM ^
December 28th, 2014 at 7:42 PM ^
Willingham might have been the last coach of relatively recent note to lead Stanford to a winning record overall as well as in the conference - the seasons were up and down and the bowl record was something like 1-3, as I recall. Teevens and Harris were both atrocious, but then they land Harbaugh and he might be the only coach there in a long time under whom Stanford got better every year he was there. Definitely hard to deny the program David Shaw took over was in excellent shape.
December 28th, 2014 at 8:17 PM ^
December 28th, 2014 at 8:03 PM ^
December 28th, 2014 at 8:23 PM ^
nothing of substance. Just evidence that I was able to get a post in during the Great Harbaugh Outage
December 28th, 2014 at 8:46 PM ^
December 28th, 2014 at 10:08 PM ^
10 wins would be nice. (That's essentially what that winning percentage is)
December 28th, 2014 at 11:00 PM ^
Wisco had an elite RB with a great Oline and QBs who were borderline horrific. If we can get close to their production from RBs and average QB play we can get 10 wins.