Gregg Robinson is t-e-r-r-i-b-l-e, terrible

Submitted by blueadams on
He never blitzes/puts any pressure on the QB...yet...someone is always open!? That's not a talent issue - especially against EMU/Indiana - it's a scheme issue. His schemes didn't work at Syracuse, and they don't appear to be working here. This isn't the NFL. Look for RichRod to go after his old DC if WVU's staff gets canned this year.

tomhagan

September 26th, 2009 at 4:19 PM ^

Actually he dialed up some pretty nice blitzes today. Forget about Syracuse. It is irrelevant now. What is relevant is that this defense lacks depth, lacks "playmakers" and overall talent...and is very young as well. Thats not on GRob... Its just not!

SpreadGuru

September 26th, 2009 at 4:24 PM ^

I thought GR dialed up pressure late on Chappell after watching him stand back there and find open receivers. A lot of people may call GR out but the reality is that we have a weak, weak, weak corner and when other teams find it, that's going to be where the action is.

petered0518

September 26th, 2009 at 4:24 PM ^

Yeah, Robinson likes to make his blitzes count. He only uses them occasionally. I think that he does this so that it is very hard to scheme against, since there is very little indication as to when the blitz is coming. Robinson is here to stay. Look deep into his magical white hair and say this to yourself, you will be happy in no time.

jrt336

September 26th, 2009 at 4:20 PM ^

Blasphemy. Get ready to be negbanged. But I do agree somewhat. We need more pressure. We need five guys coming on almost every down. We rush just 3 way too much. It'll only get worse when we play against big OL. We should move be starting another DT in addition to Martin.

WoodleyIsBeast

September 26th, 2009 at 4:21 PM ^

I think you have to give him a little more grace. Changing to this D is not that much different than our O changing from a pro-style to the spread. I do agree with you that the talent is there to be much more successful than this. I don't think enough attention was given to this transition with all the talk surrounding Tate and this offense. Today is a perfect example of why defense wins championships.

Musket Rebellion

September 26th, 2009 at 4:22 PM ^

When RVB is starting in the interior of the line you don't have the players to run your scheme. RVB should be backing up BG, but he is stuck playing DT because we have no depth. This is WAY BEYOND PREMATURE.

Huss

September 26th, 2009 at 4:22 PM ^

First off, Robinson blitzes often. I don't know what the fuck you're watching, but it's not Michigan. He's been trying to bring it. And FYI, the talent we have on defense is not exactly top-notch. You have two dreaded Walk-on White Guys playing significant minutes at LB and in the secondary. Morris' 85 yd TD was the direct result of a non-D1 athlete(#32) not being able to just tackle him after 15 yards. We are SEVERELY disadvantaged, talentwise, in the back 7.

Huss

September 26th, 2009 at 4:22 PM ^

First off, Robinson blitzes often. I don't know what the fuck you're watching, but it's not Michigan. He's been trying to bring it. And FYI, the talent we have on defense is not exactly top-notch. You have two dreaded Walk-on White Guys playing significant minutes at LB and in the secondary. Morris' 85 yd TD was the direct result of a non-D1 athlete(#32) not being able to just tackle him after 15 yards. We are SEVERELY disadvantaged, talentwise, in the back 7.

Hapa

September 26th, 2009 at 4:23 PM ^

The schemes are fine, but there's only so much you can do when a freshman is 3rd on your depth chart at corner... and Cissoko is 2nd. We could talk about the linebacker talent too, but I think people have covered it enough.

tmiller

September 26th, 2009 at 4:23 PM ^

it's not a talent issue. It's an execution issue. GERG (BTW) can't do it for the guys. Always look to the players first, then go to the coach. I will agree that he needs to make some mental adjustments, but I would implore you to look back on the defensive UFR's at our linebacker play. If they would tackle and plugs gaps properly, we might not be talking about this. **edit** Be happy man, we are 4-0! GO BLUE!

TIMMMAAY

September 26th, 2009 at 4:24 PM ^

I think he's doing fine. Our defense has looked pretty ugly at times, but the calls have been pretty good. I didn't agree w/ the decision to go cover two against ND right from the start, but I think he's doing a good job overall.

Viper

September 26th, 2009 at 4:26 PM ^

Keep in mind the defense was going to be an issue all season given their lack of depth. It wouldn't matter if Buddy Ryan was their defensive coordinator right now. They'll get better but they need some of the underclassmen to step up.

jrt336

September 26th, 2009 at 4:27 PM ^

The thing I don't like is that the D steps it up when they need to-like in the Red zone. Why can't they play like that the entire game. And we are playing our CBs 10 YARDS off the line of scrimmage. What's with that?

jrt336

September 26th, 2009 at 4:40 PM ^

Obviously I'd rather them step it up there than not. But it would be great if they could do it more often before the other team gets to the red zone. It's so easy on 3rd and 5 to throw a quick slant before the corners even get there. We might get burned deep, but let's play closer. Because we just keep giving up 8 yards on most passes anyway.

BlueinLansing

September 26th, 2009 at 4:27 PM ^

what game were you watching? First off, IU had a nice gameplan, they kept Michigan off balance alot today, the pistol offense is not an easy offense to defend. Especially when you have poor linebacker play and right now Michigan has the absolute worst linebacker play in the conference and it is a talent issue. I would bet IU gave UM some looks they haven't shown so far this year and broke some tendencies as well. GROB had it dialed in better the 2nd half where I thought the D was more agressive and made some plays. They actually saved UM's bacon with their stops for FG's instead of TD's. The only really disappointing play in the 2nd half was the long run.......and that was a run blitz, called to that side and a terrible angle by the only LB who didn't get sucked inside. GROB's 2nd half pressure helped turn the game around, our offenses continued sputtering made it a nail biter.

Magnus

September 26th, 2009 at 4:29 PM ^

Greg Robinson is fine. I refuse to judge a DC when he has a walk-on and a position switcher at safety, plus a backup corner in for most of the game. We also have inexperienced players at Quick and very little depth anywhere at all.

CPS

September 26th, 2009 at 4:31 PM ^

I also hate being 4-0 with an exciting offense going into a huge rivalry game. It's getting harder and harder to find things to complain about. It even got pretty scary there for a while. I was actually starting to take some joy in watching the team play. Thanks for grounding me.

SWFlaBlue

September 26th, 2009 at 4:33 PM ^

We bent, but broke a lot less than most feared while watching the game, and we did it with a couple of walk ons, some freshmen, and a linebacker who just can't graduate soon enough and you want to run GERG out of town?

sca1zi

September 26th, 2009 at 4:33 PM ^

The three and outs and the turnovers didn't help the D at all. There were lapses, without a doubt; but if you look at the overall picture, and not one long TD run at the end, you SHOULD be moderately pleased with the defense.

rlew

September 26th, 2009 at 4:35 PM ^

We know there's a lack of talent at key positions and almost zero depth. We know that the game plan seems to lean heavily toward "bend but don't break." We know that the last three weeks, things have looked really bad in the first half and marginal to good in the second half - those are called adjustments. We know all of this, and yet this is the second over-the-top, absurd, fire everyone because the defense is terrible thread today. Just relax. The defense isn't great. It's not even good. It's going to do enough to get us by most of the time, but not every time, this year. That's just the way it is and will be until we build some depth, get guys completely familiar with the scheme, and rebuild the program as a whole. Remember how bad the offense was last year? That was because of a lack of talent and, more importantly, unfamiliarity with the scheme. GERG is our third DC in three years. Think the guys on the defensive side of the ball don't have some catching up and growing to do, as well? The "sky is falling" stuff is just unwarranted. We're 4-0 and we should be ok with that. By all means, criticize and critique. Just stop the hysterics.

BlueVoix

September 26th, 2009 at 4:39 PM ^

While I am very much inclined to say that this is not entirely Gerg's fault, which it isn't, I do have to wonder if this thread would be different if we just lost to Indiana for the first time in 22 years.

blueadams

September 26th, 2009 at 4:40 PM ^

DO NOT give me this 'lack of talent' garbage. Are you trying to tell me that Eastern Michigan or Indiana has better talent on offense than we do on defense!? Is that really what you're trying to say!? And no, I'm not going to forget about Syracuse. Robinson's defenses always sucked there. The dude ran a good nfl scheme. That's it. I don't understand why he has been annointed as the master of college football defense by so many of you!?

BlueBulls

September 26th, 2009 at 4:44 PM ^

I can, however, blame YOU for being childish and ungrateful. I think you would have taken this result a month ago. You're the exact kind of fan that I can't stand. 4-0