Game Day: The Compromise
One of the reasons that people want Dave Brandon gone is because of the changes that he's either instituted or furthered to the gameday experience. As evidenced by the regents' fireworks vote, this is a big deal. And while the fan base is mostly united about the fact that Brandon needs to go, I don't think we're at all on the same page about his successor should do to this experience. I think this disconnect may mean that further in-fighting is inevitable, and this may prove to be a very big challenge for whoever replaces Brandon as an AD (assuming, of course, that he IS replaced).
Let's unpack that conflict for a minute. You could frame this in a nearly infinite set of ways, but I assert that Michigan's football experience was, from 1960 until probably around 2006, defined by stability, schedule, and adherence to tradition. Each game had the same pattern - kickoff is at noon, or, with much exasperation, 3:30 in a pinch. Team comes out for pre-game walkthroughs, band comes out, banner goes up, team goes out, band plays at halftime. The same great traditional cheers every time. The team wears the same uniform, or, if the uniform changes, the change is slight and is phased in gradually. Carl Grapentine's voice from the heavens. The Victors is played after points and turnovers.
The rigidity and consistency of the "schedule" of a Michigan football game that simply isn't there for other programs, even those with a similar age to their legacy and tradition like Alabama, USC, or, notably, Ohio State. Only Notre Dame really tries to define game day the same way. As another poster put it, our tradition is the spectacle that carries the gameday experience. As John Bacon put it, Michigan football is the antidote to the cultural excess of the Super Bowl or the Olympics. At Michigan, we jump to touch the banner and we know it will live forever.
I think the essential conflict that is coming is this: Group One thinks that this rigid order is the "essence" of what makes us Michigan from a fan experience perspective. Group Two thinks that Michigan is about winning and sees the "schedule" as a side-car to it; something awesome that must be changed up every now and again. Group One sees change as heretical to the tradition that defines us. Group Two sees change as an exciting possibility to impact an antiquated experience that feels long in the tooth.
These groups need each other. We can't just cater exclusively to one. I needn't explain why.
So here's what I'd propose: let's make the night game the dividing line. It was a big success because it was different, so let's play that up.
1.) All games, with the exception of one per year, "roll back" to the "schedule" of the traditional stadium experience. We "unwind" the piped-in music, video features that play between plays, third-down hype music that doesn't come from the band. No special uniforms during these games. The Ohio State game is always one of these games. The focus here is on the tradition and power of Michigan football, with the removal all elements of the game day experience that weren't around between 20 and 15 years ago. What Bacon described as "excess" is forbidden and the past is revered with respect.
2.) We continue having one night home game per year, and all the "schedule" rules disappear completely for this game. Maybe we keep elements of the "schedule," but nothing is off limits; the "Super Bowl atmosphere" we strive to avoid 7 Saturdays a year is actually the goal we try to acheive during this game. This home game should be against a marquee opponent - maybe MSU for the years when they're on the slate or our big out-of-conference game/PSU for years when they're not. During this game the apparel sponsors present the players with three choices and the players vote on a special uniform that they'll get to wear. Even the helmets are subject to change. We could even push the boundaries by inviting star performers to perform during the half-time show. Katy Perry's gameday appearance was awesome last week; let's wind her up and let her be bizarre in the middle of the marching band. Students are given a special "one-game" shirt that they design and wear. I'd even support something like a fireworks show for this game and this game only. This game should also remain our marquee in-season recruiting event. You can't argue with the impact UTL I and II had for our Rivals ranking.
We cannot ignore this divide, and we can't have one Group win out completely. So this is my idea of compromise. What's yours?
October 10th, 2014 at 11:07 AM ^
October 10th, 2014 at 11:11 AM ^
Wait - has this seriously been proposed already?
I read this Board all the time, but perhaps I still managed to miss it.
If it's a redundant post, please take it down, mods.
October 10th, 2014 at 11:22 AM ^
It hasn't been proposed. Just ignore everything that comes from that account.
October 10th, 2014 at 12:08 PM ^
October 10th, 2014 at 11:09 AM ^
No thanks
October 10th, 2014 at 11:13 AM ^
Is what you're suggesting any different from what is going on right now, aside from Uniformz and piped in music? Do you really think those things are the source of our problems?
October 10th, 2014 at 11:31 AM ^
1.) I wouldn't say it is any different than what's going on now, but today I hear lots of people complaining about how things are changing. While I don't agree that all of these changes are negative, the experience has definitely changed. What if we could offer the flexibility of change with the stability of deliniating where change can and cannot occur? This is what I propose.
2.) No. "Those things" are not the "source of our problems." But, as I explain in the post, it will be the next problem we will have to confront if and when a new AD takes over. Do we unwind the Brandon era completely? I offer the approach I described.
October 10th, 2014 at 11:38 AM ^
The Uniformz and piped-in music would be an annoyance if we were a perennial contender for the B1G championship.
But were not. And so you can expect the howling. And there's no reason not to complain about the annoyances while we're at it.
October 10th, 2014 at 11:38 AM ^
I blame the entity this guy represents:
This is Red Hat Guy that comes out when there are media time outs. He is a pretty visible indication of the choke hold that TV coverage has on a game. For the EMU games that I photograph at where they are ESPN3, he's not out that long. However, at games where there is actual coverage, he's out for much longer. It is TV that dictates when the games are held but it also TV that brings in the gobs of cash to the teams, so it is something. Maybe if universities would start saying, "No....you want to show our product...games are at noon and 3:30...." things would get better. But that's about as likely as a city telling an NFL owner to go pound sand when he wants a new stadium.
October 10th, 2014 at 12:49 PM ^
October 10th, 2014 at 1:15 PM ^
I don't have a problem with him. He's doing a job.....but how is it that they can show a soccer game with no media timeouts?
October 10th, 2014 at 2:59 PM ^
they don't pay that much for the soccer rights.
October 10th, 2014 at 3:13 PM ^
haha, well one, it's built into the play of the game that there is continuous play, only breaking for the ball going out of bounds, mere seconds, less with ball-boys.
Basically, Football's "minor" stoppages of play, have now been "foot-in-the-door"-ed, and now they are taking advantage of further and further and further delays.
I hate to say it, but if they could make the game 6 hours long (the NCG nearly is) they would. Its advertising, the goal is to get your attention. 6 hours, is better than 5 hours, which is better than 4 hours, etc.
My guess is every year the advertiser's meet (or whenever the contracts are re-signed) to try to push for more and more stoppages, and lengthened stoppages, trying to go from a contract-negotiated 15 seconds, to 16, pushing for more time in any space they can get.
Such is the "life of a professional", lawyer/business guy. They don't get their reputation (though not all deserve it) from nowhere.
And two, this is what soccer jersey's look like:
all the jersey's are PLASTERED with advertisements. You'd think the two best teams were the Sharp's and Fly Emirate's or XBOX's
October 10th, 2014 at 4:03 PM ^
Sorry to be that guy, but plural nouns don't have apostrophes. Advertisers, jerseys, etc.
October 10th, 2014 at 12:23 PM ^
So, we get to bring in our own water for 6 o 7 games and have to buy Absopure on the "Super Bowl" experience day - the same with seat cushions?
Are giant Kraft noodles, AllState Good Hands extra point nets, and mascots are allowed on the "Super Bowl" experience day, along with all manner of rent the Big House for this or that public service announcements - and the band gets a day off - or do they wear UPS delivery uniforms?
Are prices on non-"Super Bowl" days lower?
What about student seating? Is it GA seating where you have to arrive seven hours early and sit in an assigned location on "Super Bowl" days, and can they "oversell" the student section on "Super Bowl" days, and then revert to more traditional seating policy the rest of the time?
Can Coke buy up all the unsold tickets at a discount for "Super Bowl" days, and give them away with the purchase of a Coke product?
Is it the J. Ira and Nicki Harris Family Head Football Coach on "Super Bowl" days, and just Head Coach the rest of the season?
Do we only get Chobani tweets and Cadillac box scores on "Super Bowl" days?
We get fireworks on every first down, a tripped out Eminem at half time, jet pack guys and Amazon ball delivery drones, and F-35Bs VSTOL landing and takeoffs (brought to you Lockheed Martin and the US Marine Corps) on "Super Bowl" days right?
October 10th, 2014 at 12:34 PM ^
October 10th, 2014 at 12:38 PM ^
Noon kicks were not prevalent until the mid to late 1980s or later. Most of Bo's games kicked at 1pm.
October 10th, 2014 at 12:54 PM ^
Back in the day, we'd get up, get dressed, get on the road, get to Ann Arbor, have our little tailgate, and get to the game by 1. When they started having noon games, we'd have to get up an hour earlier, and nobody wants to get up early on a Saturday. And it's too early to have lunch at the car, so you get lunch in the stadium. Hooray $7 mini-pizzas and $5 sodas. (It's been so long since I've been to a game I have no idea what the actual concessions cost anymore.)
October 10th, 2014 at 1:12 PM ^
About three times that...
October 10th, 2014 at 1:49 PM ^
One of the first things that Angels owner Arte Moreno did when he bought the club was reduce the beer prices by 50 cents to a dollar. The man is my hero. After that, no one cared if he messed up a little thing here or there.
October 10th, 2014 at 11:31 PM ^
I have noticed that the more drunk people are the more money they spend. Something to remember if you ever run a food or entertainment establishment.
October 11th, 2014 at 9:22 AM ^
Good fact, did not know this.
This post, by the way, is an example of why the institutional memory of Group One is so important.
October 10th, 2014 at 12:42 PM ^
October 10th, 2014 at 1:09 PM ^
"I wouldn't ask too much of her," I ventured. "You can't repeat the past."
"Can't repeat the past?" he cried incredulously. "Why of course you can!"
He looked around him wildly, as if the past were lurking here in the shadow of his house, just out of reach of his hand.
"I'm going to fix everything just the way it was before," he said, nodding determinedly. "She'll see."
October 10th, 2014 at 1:36 PM ^
I would like to see this happen. It allows for both the old and the new. It allows fans to have the "white space" to which they were accustomed for regular games and it allows for one spectacle game per year.
If a majority of fans starts complaining that they miss piped in music and an artificial game experience, then the current "enhancements" could be easily revisited.
October 10th, 2014 at 4:27 PM ^
October 10th, 2014 at 4:36 PM ^
October 10th, 2014 at 8:41 PM ^
October 11th, 2014 at 9:19 AM ^
Thanks for this post.
Also, if I'm wrong, correct me! Let's learn about this and present a good proposal based on solid premises.
October 10th, 2014 at 10:34 PM ^
October 10th, 2014 at 11:27 PM ^
Here's a compromise:
We don't care what you do at the Big House when Michigan is not playing football there.
i'm all for getting more use (and revenue) out of it when it's not being used. Nobody has complained about the Hockey and Soccer events. We're even cool with other football games like Slippery Rock.
Knock yourself out. Have these be your Super Bolw events. Hell, have the actual Super Bowl in the Big House. Sell beer, advertise, have fireworks, unifomz, half-time shows by Katy Perry, Kiss cams, piped in music, . . . . have it all.
Then let college football be college football.
October 11th, 2014 at 9:17 AM ^
...that's not a compromise, because the division is over the way football games are presented.
Has this logic ever worked for you in any context?
YOU: "I want to buy this car for $1,000 dollars."
ME: "I want to sell you this car for $3,000 dollars."
YOU: "Okay, let's make the natural compromise - you sell me this car for $1,000 dollars and sell another car that I assume you have to some other sap who I assume you'll meet for $4,000."