BlockM

November 19th, 2010 at 4:30 PM ^

We'll need all those guys playing at the top of their game to win this one. 

Also, thanks again to all the seniors who stuck by the program. Must have been tough to stomach for a while there, but you all really helped to bring us back from oblivion.

Captain

November 19th, 2010 at 6:11 PM ^

But the "Coner-Tate Debate" was also the name of one of the Coner's masterful freestyles.   In it, we learned the following:

  • Not to hate the great debate
  • To contemplate and celebrate the sedimentation rate of tectonic plates
  • To donkey mate (whatever that means)
  • To investigate the State inmate (Winston, I believe)

Some things cannot be left to forever rust in the past.

joeyb

November 19th, 2010 at 4:36 PM ^

It makes me feel better about the game knowing that Martin is probably going to play. At the same time, if Lewan isn't ready to start, he probably shouldn't play at all.

Deified

November 19th, 2010 at 5:10 PM ^

Has anyone found a link for this week's Inside Michigan Football?  I didn't find it on Comcast, BTN online, and haven't seen Boys n da Pahokee's usual post. 

MinorRage

November 19th, 2010 at 6:01 PM ^

of film study? I guess I never really considered how much time was spent by the coaches on this. After thinking about it that sounds about right when you factor in a couple hours practice a couple hours in the weight room, but man that's a lot of time in front of a tv watching plays. That thread earlier today pointing out using MGoblog to figure out opponents tendencies seems laughable when taking this into consideration. If all of the coaches are spending 5-6 hours a day and a fan finds something they dont then they wouldn't have their jobs.

Don

November 19th, 2010 at 6:58 PM ^

(not sure Lou Holtthshs qualifies as an "analyst") who are picking Michigan. Makes me feel even less optimistic than I already am, which is not very. I'd much rather the entire world be picking against us.

Don

November 19th, 2010 at 7:03 PM ^

that there are people who still assert that RR is "bad with the media" or "has problems with the media."

It's like looking at a dog and calling it a vacuum cleaner. What the hell are they seeing?

NateVolk

November 19th, 2010 at 7:19 PM ^

He doesn't have perpetual tensed jaw like he is trying to clear the pipes. He doesn't speak in ridiculous platitudes or pedestal himself by talking about God. He doesn't get into adolescent tit for tats with opposing players.   He doesn't boast or take pot shots.

He basically acts like a normal adult comfortable in his own skin. 

Half-ass fans want him to be as tipped over as they are.