Frank Clark dismissed from the program

Submitted by Laser Wolf on

Per Nick Baumgardner via UM

Avon Barksdale

November 17th, 2014 at 11:46 AM ^

Felony larceny just means he had good taste by getting an expensive Apple. He could've went with the ACER in the next room and been much better off with the misdemeanor. Let's not make his first screw up out like he robbed a bank. He made a poor decision by taking a laptop out of a dorm room.

This second charge, if true, is obviously much worse. I look forward to him having his day in court and getting to explain his side of things. I will hold all judgement until the dispute is settled in a court of law.

I Like Burgers

November 17th, 2014 at 11:54 AM ^

C'mon man...don't write off stealing a laptop like he stole someone's can of Diet Coke from the fridge.  He went into a dorm room, and stole a laptop.  There's no downplaying that.  If it was a 50" LED TV would you downplay that too?  Costs the same as a laptop.

Mr. Yost

November 17th, 2014 at 6:32 PM ^

I'll add that State Street's comments are WAY out of line. Get off your high horse. Not every 18-19 year old is going to be perfect on a team of 115 college young men and 30 new faces every year.

College kids do dumb shit and there are consequences whether that is stealing or sliding across the hood of a car. Beating a woman (allegedly) doesn't fall into a dumb mistake. Neither does punching a security guard.

But you and your arrogance is ridiculous. "My University?" Man fuck you - and with the utmost sincerity. That's bullshit and get out of here with that nonsense. You can disagree that Clark deserved a second chance but for you to pull an "I told you so" after a woman was allegedly beaten is beyond bush league...it's a bitch move.

Mr. Yost

November 17th, 2014 at 6:41 PM ^

Anyone blaming this on Hoke or using it to prove why he should be fired should also slap themself.

Hoke's done A LOT of things to get fired. This isn't one. We don't need to make this about football or a football coach. We also don't need to fill that urge of finding a scapegoat or person to blame...we'll know who's to blame when the legal system plays itself out. I can't be certain, but I'm pretty sure Coach Hoke will not be involved with this case. He isn't the one being charged, he wasn't the one in jail.

Sure, he recruited the guy. But he in no way has a history of recruiting high numbers of players with issues with the law. Good families have people who get in trouble with the law, good companies have people who are arrested, this is no different.

Shake your head, pray for those involved and hope that justice is served.

This isn't a Penn St. "culture" issue. From what I've read it's not like Clark had a past of (documented) domestic abuse and Hoke was allowing him to continue to remain part of the program. So let's keep Hoke out of this one. He's got enough problems with things he DOES impact...Shane Morris' health, PR around his program and most importantly, wins and losses. He's done, but it's got nothing to do with Frank Clark.

Princetonwolverine

November 17th, 2014 at 7:22 PM ^

Mr. Yost., I am glad I am not the only one to hit save and have multiples (in my case 50+) of the same thing posted. No way could I have used all 50+ for "good" without being sent to Bolivia. You played it well.

I would still like the option of  a delete button to make my multiples posts disappear. 

MGoRob

November 17th, 2014 at 3:11 PM ^

Stealing a laptop is more than just stealing a pricey item.  I had a friend in my Master's program who had his laptop stolen out of his car, which contained all his data from his lab.  Despite my friend being an idiot for not backing it up... he lost everything and couldn't complete his degree.  Not to mention all the pictures and other stuff that was sentimental.  So you've got to also think of it as someone rifling through your DVD collection, your music CDs, your photo albums and just ganking all of it.

freejs

November 17th, 2014 at 3:47 PM ^

I guess I'm old enough that I finally back up, but at that age - you could have ruined my life by stealing my laptop. Actually, wait, I think I'm just a year or two too old to have had a laptop during college. Fuck, I'm old. I may not have had a laptop and I'm too old to remember if I did. 

MLaw06

November 17th, 2014 at 12:02 PM ^

I think they're just pointing out that it's a technicality why it was deemed a felony as opposed to a misdemeanor charge of larceny.  For example, would it be no big deal to steal a $100 dollar laptop vs. a $500 laptop vs. a $1500 laptop.  At some point, the item is de minimis as determined by the legal system and not covered by the higher charges, etc.

ijohnb

November 17th, 2014 at 1:06 PM ^

conducted every year to determined if the fluxuation in the price of certain goods results in the re-classification of crimes from felony to misdemeanor or vice versa.  Every year the Judge receives a Walmart catalog and every person convicted of larceny comes in front of the Judge to see it there conviction remains the same.  Of course the defendant has the opportunity to present evidence that the Walmart price is not indicative of the actual price, they can bring catalogs of their own, Best Buy, Target, etc.

This is a well established part of American jurisprudence.

Reader71

November 17th, 2014 at 12:42 PM ^

Oh, come on. He's not saying that it is morally right or that the property law should be changed. He is saying that he understands the temptation. I do to. Most people do. Everyone is tempted from time to time.

MLaw06

November 17th, 2014 at 1:03 PM ^

Ok, fine.  Let's just say "better off" or "upper middle class" or whatever defintiion you prefer instead of the word "rich".  I guess I just have a different definition because I grew up in a family where my parents made less than $10k a year so I thought that everyone else was "rich" compared to me.  Sorry, I often make the mistake of speaking from my own perspective.

 

MLaw06

November 17th, 2014 at 12:56 PM ^

Obviously, larceny remains a crime.  Any one citizen is afforded the same protections under the law as another. 

From personal experience, I've been both "poor" (literally) and "rich" (or well-off).  When I was poor, I was tempted by "wanting what others had"; now that I'm well-off, I can just buy whatever I want without thinking much about it.

All I'm saying is that I can understand what it feels like to be poor and to be in want.  Of course, people shouldn't act on those feelings and stealing is bad, etc.

WolvinLA2

November 17th, 2014 at 1:11 PM ^

I understood what you meant, and you're right.  A lot of people want to sit on high horse and say what is "right" or "wrong" without thinking about why some people sometimes do wrong things.  You can understand why someone did a wrong thing or have empathy for that person while still maintaining that the thing is wrong.  

Frank Clark comes from a different world than I come from.  I don't know what his is like, but I can acknowledge that it's different and may impact a lot of his actions or decisions.

jmdblue

November 17th, 2014 at 1:52 PM ^

Stealing the laptop - whether it's worth $250 or $3K is wrong and should be punished.  It's also really easy to see where a kid  might make a mistake like this.  For me though, it's pretty easy to forgive that sort of offense.  Put a couple strong years in doing right by people and the story of your crime rightly becomes the story of your redemption. 

Clark still has a path to such redemption, but it's a hell of a lot steeper than the one he made for himself by stealing a kid's computer.

kscurrie2

November 17th, 2014 at 12:02 PM ^

Your right, I did think it was a state run institution.  With that being said, if you guy by his criteria of if you have commited a crime, you should not be able to graduate, there would be a lot less alumni!  Look at the guy who donates millions to the business school.  He donated so much that they put his name on a building.  Well he was just charged in some "money crime" and ordered to pay the largest single fine in history!  I wonder if Michigan will take his name of the building?  Better yet, give the money he donated back because it was probably illegal.  Its almost like drug money.  Either way, tragic situation and Hoke did the right thing..

flashOverride

November 17th, 2014 at 11:17 AM ^

Absolutely shitty situation, but absolutely correct decision. Hope Frank gets help and gets his life together. But first I'm afraid he's going to have a debt to society to pay. 

The2nd_JEH

November 17th, 2014 at 11:17 AM ^

Two games left in his senior season, a week before senior day. have to lie in the bed you make. He doesn't deserve to be on this team, but wish him the best in the future and hope he finds the help he needs