Noon ET, 11am CT. BTN
http://www.mgoblue.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/mich-m-footbl-sched.html
Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon
Finally: Minnesota game set for Noon ET on BTN
October 28th, 2012 at 1:00 AM
#1
Finally: Minnesota game set for Noon ET on BTN
October 28th, 2012 at 7:22 AM
#2
Three safeties?
Three safeties?
October 28th, 2012 at 1:07 AM
#3
We will
We will score multiple touchdowns in this game and Denard will come back and do Denard.
October 28th, 2012 at 1:09 AM
#4
(No subject)
October 28th, 2012 at 1:14 AM
#5
So
How is Bolivia this time of year?
October 28th, 2012 at 1:41 AM
#6
Are you 13?
Are you 13?
October 28th, 2012 at 1:58 AM
#7
Says the guy who has -99780
Says the guy who has -99780 MGoPoints. And gets every post negged as trolling.
Yes.
October 28th, 2012 at 9:47 AM
#8
Ah, the
Ah, the you're-so-old-and-still-live-with-your-parents quip. Very creative, you are.
October 28th, 2012 at 11:48 AM
#9
anyone who visits enough to get that many negs
and says they don't CARE about this blog. . . ? Psychologists call that denial. Clinical-level. DSM-IV.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:42 PM
#10
please take heed
October 28th, 2012 at 2:35 AM
#11
For someone who's a coach
For someone who's a coach you're pretty immature.
October 28th, 2012 at 2:37 PM
#12
I don't
usually weigh in on interweb fights, but are you aware that your signature states that you are a coach of not 1, but 2 different football teams? Anyone with a first grade reading level can determine that. It doesn't take a psychologist to figure this out.
EDIT: a cursory look at the Finger Lakes Impact website reveals that all coaching positions are available. Guess this means you don't coach at least one of those squads any more. Too bad you potentially still mold high school boys' minds on the field.
October 28th, 2012 at 3:35 PM
#13
You need a timeout, "coach."
You need a timeout, "coach."
October 28th, 2012 at 1:10 AM
#14
First noon game is in
First noon game is in November. Wow.
October 28th, 2012 at 9:56 AM
#15
Looking Ahead...
We've got at least two. "The Game" is at noon on the 24th of November as well. ABC didn't waste a lot of time pulling in that one as well, it seems. I don't remember noon starts ever being this rare for us.
In any event,the noon start next week is fine. It will be what I watch while the awning for my back patio is finally, mercifully removed.
October 28th, 2012 at 1:47 AM
#16
As much as I think we win the
As much as I think we win the next 3, Minnesota, NW, and Iowa aren't that bad where they don't need to be taken seriously. Minnesota and Northwestern actually look okay.
October 28th, 2012 at 1:50 PM
#17
NW scares me. They WILL
NW scares me. They WILL score. We can't just sit on the ball and hope to win 17-10. And that's regardless of who our QB is.
October 28th, 2012 at 1:59 AM
#18
Fire. Borges. I dont actually
Fire. Borges. I dont actually believe that but it would feel sooooo good right now. and I'm not even drunk anymore. Bellomy is his kind of guy, right? That's why we recruited him? to be...this? the future of our offense? Woooooo!
October 28th, 2012 at 2:03 AM
#19
Gophers
look like little offensive juggernauts! If Robinson is not back we may lose the LBJ!
October 28th, 2012 at 2:07 AM
#20
You must have forgotten that
You must have forgotten that Michigan plays defense unlike purdue.
minnesota gave up 31 to iowa. iowa.
October 28th, 2012 at 2:11 AM
#21
That's true but if Denard
That's true but if Denard isn't back Michigan may need to punt on first downs to get the Defense back out there. They are probably the best chance of scoring without him.
October 28th, 2012 at 2:10 AM
#22
Yeah.
I'm on a floor in Lincoln. The world is dark and cold. I drank a lot. I can't believe I made this trip. I need new hobbies.
October 28th, 2012 at 2:13 AM
#23
I don't think I've ever seen
I don't think I've ever seen a quarterback's stat line worse than Bellomy's. I'm not trying to condemn him; the coaches bear the responsibility for that. It's just frustrating to see...whatever that was
October 28th, 2012 at 10:45 AM
#24
Keep I mind that he probably
Keep I mind that he probably had a 1/2 dozen drops last night by the receivers - I was more frustrated with them then Russ
October 28th, 2012 at 11:04 AM
#25
this is true. they really did
this is true. they really did not want to catch anything he threw at them. But Nebraska did the right thing by sending pressure to see if he'd freeze up and he did. He's young. but he's also as far into Borges' system as Denard, for all intents and purposes. I don't know if Shane Morris is actually any good (hopefully, but you never know with high school kids), but I would be worried about my development here under Borges if he is
[PS: did i say system? I mean random amalgamation of plays designed to...not relate to each other at all. If you run it straight upfield for 2 yards every third play, certainly the other team will relent and give you points! that's football, a gentleman's game of mutual respect for giving the ball to the running backs until nothing happens. Why was last year so much different? And I know Borges had success coaching whats-his-name at SDSU, so I know hes had success. Im mostly concerned about how he thinks the whole punch-counterpunch thing works]
October 28th, 2012 at 2:58 AM
#26
absolutely hate
11 am local time kick offs
our first outdoor game in Minneapolis in 30 years.
October 28th, 2012 at 3:40 PM
#27
I hope Denard can pay.
I'm taking my boys to the game. I promised them we'd see Denard play. HS football football games have not allowed us to get to a game in the last 3 years. Finally, we have the chance and now....
Selfishly, we need him to play. Honestly, we need him to play. I'll worry about next season, next season.
Right now I'm worried about beating the Gophers.
October 28th, 2012 at 9:07 AM
#28
There are no guaranteed wins the rest of way without
Denard. If he doesn't play, no game is better than a 50-50 proposition and one is a guaranteed loss.
October 28th, 2012 at 9:57 AM
#29
Naw, we can beat the gophers
Naw, we can beat the gophers without Denard. That is if DG plays QB. I don't see anyway he doesn't.
October 28th, 2012 at 10:17 AM
#30
About. Damn. Time.
About. Damn. Time.
October 28th, 2012 at 10:32 AM
#31
A game that originally looked
A game that originally looked to be a nice smooth saturday suddenly looks very scary. I hope some good news comes our way this week.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:32 PM
#32
I'm not sure whether to be
I'm not sure whether to be excited about this. While I haven't missed a Michigan game in 10 years I'm not sure whether I really want to watch this or not. It could be an offensive explosion with Denard or another "anemia-fest" trying to scratch out field goals to win.
October 28th, 2012 at 1:37 PM
#33
Fun Fact
Minnesota has won only three times (against Michigan) since 1968.
October 28th, 2012 at 6:44 PM
#34
That is three more than they
That is three more than they should have got.
1986: we're rated #2, they beat us in the Big House when they are 5-4, with a home loss to Pacific.
1977: we're rated #1, we go up there and lose 16-0. I am less than a year old at the time, and my dad said that this one was not televised, so I have no earthly idea how that happened.
2005: they break one up the sidelines when they are trying to run out the clock and play for overtime, right after we call a timeout to try to get the ball back in time to attempt a field goal.
October 28th, 2012 at 1:58 PM
#35
Thank the great Lord above
I swear, the next road night game we get will send me to the asylum. I don't know what it is about them, but we can not perform in that scenario.
October 28th, 2012 at 3:40 PM
#36
Good. We will know our joy or
Good. We will know our joy or misery earlier in the day
