Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (45)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 8 hours ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 22 hours ago
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 3 days ago
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 5 days ago
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 6 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,513 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 756 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 580 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 488 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 485 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 16 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    42 replies
  • OT: Real Estate / Renting / Land Contract gurus
    22 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    88 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    201 replies
  • OT: Guy pretends to be All American for Ohio...gets busted
    38 replies
  • Trey Burke Combine Measurements & Comparable Players
    27 replies
  • Shane Morris signed pylon on ebay
    45 replies
  • OT - Kickstarter opportunity to create new college football video game
    42 replies
  • OT: Georgia Tech is Also Bad at Photoshop
    27 replies
  • Updated Rivals100
    38 replies
  • 5-Star DT Andrew Brown Planning Visit
    70 replies
  • OT- Miguel (not that Miguel) kicks fan in head at Billboard Music Awards
    56 replies
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    3 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • OT: Game of Thrones
    57 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    88 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    42 replies
  • OT- Miguel (not that Miguel) kicks fan in head at Billboard Music Awards
    56 replies
  • OT: Real Estate / Renting / Land Contract gurus
    22 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    201 replies
  • OT: Guy pretends to be All American for Ohio...gets busted
    38 replies
  • 5-Star DT Andrew Brown Planning Visit
    70 replies
  • Shane Morris signed pylon on ebay
    45 replies
  • Question about M receiving great Jim Smith
    36 replies
  • Trey Burke Combine Measurements & Comparable Players
    27 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Updated Rivals100
    38 replies
  • OT: Georgia Tech is Also Bad at Photoshop
    27 replies
  • OT - Kickstarter opportunity to create new college football video game
    42 replies
  • Rajin Cajuns Invade AA for some Red Hot Softball (EDIT: Fri 2pm & Sat Noon)
    30 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Notre Dame's Nix fires back at Coach Hoke
    110 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • Sparty losing recruits to the rap game
    95 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    88 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  • Spectacular images of the madness that was the first FA Cup final

    And you think you're crowded at Michigan Stadium

    0 comments
  • Bear Vs. Monkey Bicycle Race Ends With Bear Eating Monkey

    IMPORTANT: Ondre Pipkins not involved.

    11 comments
  • Damon Bullock Has the Greatest Vine Account of All Time

    this is amazing

    7 comments
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 2
  •  
more

Fab Five, This is Where Your Jersey Sales go

73 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
March 21st, 2011 at 10:42 AM
#1
Blue in Seattle
Blue in Seattle's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1589
Fab Five, This is Where Your Jersey Sales go

Michigan Women's Gymnastics Big Ten Champions 5-Peat

The topic of Football and Basketball players needing to be paid because they generate so much money always irritates me.  First and foremost because if the market could sustain a professional minor league, then it would.  Baseball and Hockey don't seem to have problems doing this and co-existing with College Amateur Sports.

The student athletes of the lesser revenue generating kind put in just as much work for their scholarships as the football and basketball players.  They just aren't blessed by an abundant TV audience to generate insane amounts of revenue.  But go take a look at all the facilities on Michigan's campus.  Swimming pools, baseball fields, indoor and outdoor track, etc.  they are world class and continually being updated.  Paid for by the revenue generated from things like basketball jersey sales.

The other reason this discussion irritates me is because it's conducted by people who will also bring up Bo's "The Team The Team The Team" speech.  Clearly they've never listened to this speech, because there is a large section where Bo talks about the special and irreplaceable 4 years that are a gift to any student athlete.  Those 4 years are a time when student athletes compete for the pure joy of the sport, of their teammates, without any distractions of contracts, sponsorships, and in general the downside of money.

Accepting a scholarship is a choice and a privilege.  You can enter the NBA from high school if you are good enough.  It won't teach you to be an adult, but you will be paid if your talent is sufficient.  

That is a choice.

"That's all there is...there isn't anymore"

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • basketball
  • women gymnastics amateur athletics

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
March 21st, 2011 at 10:51 AM | "Choice?" (Score:1)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10362

The players choose schollies because they are the best deal out there, and they are supposed to follow the rules.  But that doesn't mean they don't deserve to be paid.  Shamateurism is a myth, and the NCAA makes sure they control all of the money they possibly can by perpetuating it.  

Why shouldn't a kid be allowed to take money from a booster or a local businessman?  Obviously, because of the rule, but why does the rule have to be there in the first place?  All the current system does is force clean programs like Michigan to compete on a "tipped" playing field against teams that cheat, like OSU, USC, and most of the SEC.  

The NCAA is greedy, they want all of the money for themselves, and that is why it is illegal for a kid to take $100 from a "friend."  Meanwhile, those jersey sales go into the school's and NCAA's pocket.  I don't agree with anyone cheating and taking the money against the rules, but I do think it is time for the rules to be changed.  

Maybe the players should unionize.

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 10:58 AM | Why shouldn't a kid be (Score:1)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9531

Why shouldn't a kid be allowed to take money from a booster or a local businessman?  

 

Because this will create an unfair playing field. You mentioned that Michigan has to complete on a "tipped" scale because some teams cheat... well if this were allowed kids would go where they knew they could get the most from boosters. If everyone who came to Michigan got $200 from Booster X, but everyone who went to Auburn got $180k... everyone would go to Auburn

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 10:58 AM | I really want to call you a (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17635

I really want to call you a bunch of names right now, maybe even ones with swears in them.  I won't, but I really want to.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:00 AM | Basketball (Score:1)
R Kelly
R Kelly's picture
Joined: 03/03/2009
MGoPoints: 970

Elite basketball players could choose to play in Europe for a year and get paid if they don't want the scholarship.  Worked out okay for Brandon Jennings.  

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:25 PM | No doubt.  If NCAA basketball (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17635

No doubt.  If NCAA basketball was such a raw deal, then players would go to Europe in droves, but they don't.  Soccer players do it all the time, because it's a better option for them.  Even though Brandon Jennings' situation worked out just fine going the Europe route, no other big name American players have done it.  Why?  I'm not sure, but probably because the NCAA route is still a better option.  Money is not the only thing with value.  Being on the front page of ESPN, being discussed on tons of sports radio shows and being watched on TV by half of the country during March Madness has value too.  How many Americans are watching the D-League or European basketball?  Having all the kids in your state talk about how awesome you are doesn't buy you Deisel jeans, but it sure as hell has value.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:00 AM | a couple of points (Score:1)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

First, I have absolutely no problem in principle with the idea of players being paid.  The problems arise when you start to think about the execution of it.  A first big hurdle would be Title IX, which would probably demand that you pay female athletes if you are paying male athletes.  A second hurdle would be the fact that a lot of athletic departments don't make money.  The VCUs and George Masons of the world might not have the cash to pay players the way Michigan or Duke would.   

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 1:21 PM | The Title IX argument only (Score:1)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10865

The Title IX argument only makes sense if you want the schools to directly pay the players. Going off of what Tater said, if you just took a hands-off approach to allowing athletes to work or earn money based off their celebrity, then it has nothing to do with Title IX or broke athletic departments.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 4:16 PM | that would be absolute anarchy (Score:1)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

It would make the inequality between the schools enormous.  You would literally have guys going to the highest bidder. 

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 5:50 PM | Like Cam Newton? Or Reggie (Score:1)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10865

Like Cam Newton? Or Reggie Bush? It would just level the playing field for clean schools.

Why not let Webber go on TV selling Nike's? It would have kept him from getting involved with someone running a betting ring.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 6:22 PM | Um... (Score:1)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14298

Chris Webber got invovlved with Ed Martin when he was in the seventh grade.

Chris Webber went to Detroit Country Day School.  Both of his parents had good jobs. 

He had his tuition, books, room and board, including the basketball training table, and a thousand legal perks we don't even know about, all paid for by the University of Michigan Athletic Department.

There was no good reason that Chris Webber had to get involved with a filthy numbers operator.  And if evidence that was used by the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Michigan, to secure a guilty plea from Ed Martin, was correct, it means that Chris Webber had NO reason to beg money from anyone, including Mitch Albom, because Chris got quite a lot of illegal money in addition to all of the legal benefits.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 6:30 PM | I always forget how young he (Score:1)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10865

I always forget how young he was. Okay, the Webber comparison was wrong, my bad.

However, it sticks for anyone else. You can take your pick looking at Reggie Bush, Cam Newton, whatever. You can say that they get these things all you want, and I'm glad they do. But the fact that they can't hold whatever job makes them the money they're worth is just terrible.

I really don't understand the compromising of amateurism when selling shoes or cars or whatever is only tangentially related. Do you really think it changes Tom Brady's football career that he sells Ugg's in the offseason?

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 6:58 PM | It would become the Wild West (Score:1)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

The problem is that recruiting would turn into a bidding war between boosters.  Only a small number of schools would be able to compete for top talent.   There would be a competitive imbalance that would be worse than that in professional football because there would be no salary cap.   The fact that a few schools have operated this way or are doing so doesn't justify it.

You would have a lot of unreported money flying around and it wouldn't be clear who the players should be loyal to, their schools or the boosters who pay them.   More, a good amount of those boosters would be people who were in no way interested in the kids' best interests. 

Allowing players to be paid by boosters* would turn college football into a minor league, which is fine if that's what you want, but it would be a minor league in which competitive fairness largely wouldn't exist and in which eighteen-year-olds would become beholden to dodgy characters. 

I am much more sympathetic to payment through the schools, wereby competitive balance could be taken into consideration and players could be shielded from the type of people who offer a nice-sounding favor now in return for a large piece of you later. 

 

*Have no illusion that it would be boosters who would be mostly paying the players.  A rule allowing players to benefit from jersey sales is a rule inviting boosters to offer players huge amounts of money, say, $100 for every $50 jersey that is sold. 

 

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 6:58 PM | I guess I don't see how this (Score:1)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10865

I guess I don't see how this changes anything about the game itself. Right now, there are only a handful of schools that 5* recruits are looking at, there's already huge disparity, so I don't know (and to tell the truth, nobody knows) what would happen to competitive balance.

I used to think it would be good to give players a cut of jersey sales; I no longer have that opinion. But let them take jobs that maximize their value during the times when they can take jobs (i.e. the summer). If Adidas can make 1,000,000 off of Denard and his untied shoes, why not let Denard go up on a poster in a Foot Locker and send some money home, or buy a nicer car or whatever it is Denard likes to do with money? There would be some bad apples around, but I think that goes on anyway.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 7:09 PM | I have no problem in principle with Denard making money (Score:1)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

I don't mean to suggest that I have all of the answers here, either...What would happen with your example, though, is that the market would become perverted.  You would have your standard endorsement contracts, yes, but you would also have people paying kids not because those kids make money for their businesses but just because they want those kids to play for their favorite schools. 

Likely conversations:

Michigan coach to recruit: If you come to Michigan and are a star player, you may get an endorsement contract.

Alabama coach to recruit: If you come to Alabama, you will get a cushy job in which you make a bunch of money whether you're a star or not. 

John Calapari:  Shoot, kid, I'll get you $50,000 just for taking a meeting with me.  You can take out a booster's garbage later and we'll call it a job. 

 

Granted, things like this happen now, but they are not the norm, and some schools are punished for doing it. 

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 7:19 PM | Well, this isn't exactly the (Score:1)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10865

Well, this isn't exactly the Lybian situation, so compromise wouldn't kill me. I get the change in recruiting, and realize the problems that could cause, but I feel like there would be ways to keep a lot of the sleaze out. I don't know their exact policies, but I know it's rare to see point shaving in professional sports, so something keeps those guys away from the shadier people for the most part.

You could have some sort of opt-in system where the players agree to turn in IRS documentation in exchange for the ability to keep playing while making more than, say $5,000 or whatever a normal amount for a college student is during the summer. There could also be some sort of list, where maybe you can go to work for a publicly traded company or an approved local business, but not someplace that hurts the university's reputation.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 7:29 PM | My biggest problem with stuff (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17635

My biggest problem with stuff like this isn't about recruiting, because as it stands now the top players go to the top schools.  However, when a player picks Alabama, he picks it for Alabama, for the coach, or the program, or the winning potential, or whatever, but it's for Alabama. 

Now let's say player A picks Alabama because they're offering him the best package.  Some local booster says he'll employ player A at his law firm for the same salary he pays his associates and player A only has to work 1 day a week with 52 available sick days.  After hearing this player A decides he loves Alabama and goes there.  6 months later, this booster gets into an altercation with the athletic department or retires or his firm goes out of business.  Now you have a pissed off kid who wants to transfer because he's not getting his payday he was promised.  Now the coach is dealing with player A's booster boss to get him to stay on the team because player A is set to start at CB next fall.  Or maybe after player A signs his LOI, the booster stops returning his phone calls. 

This isn't the crazy scenario you could think of for problems with boosters and money and 19 year olds.  Things would get very ugly and I wouldn't want that to happen.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 9:26 PM | Well there are certainly ways (Score:1)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10865

Well there are certainly ways to get around it. You could limit players to contracts approved by a compliance department or a third party that the employer/student would pay for (no one day a week with 52 sick days). You could also limit booster activities with players, like say that they're free to employ a student, but they can't be season ticket holders at the same time, or contributions to the AD are limited during that time.

Just a couple ideas off the top of my head; I know they aren't perfect but I think it would be a step in the right direction.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:02 PM | Williams and Jennings disagree (Score:1)
Vivz
Vivz's picture
Joined: 12/14/2010
MGoPoints: 938

Latavious Williams (NBDL) and Brandon Jennings (overseas)

show that there is an alternative path to the nba if one is talented enough and so choose. The one and done is not the only route possible.

History is written by the victors-Winston Churchill
  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 10:52 AM | The topic of Football and (Score:1)
Noahdb
Joined: 07/21/2008
MGoPoints: 344

The topic of Football and Basketball players needing to be paid because they generate so much money always irritates me.

Couldn't agree more. The overwhelming majority of college athletics teams operate at a defecit. They exist because of the combined generosity of patrons and the success of a very few group of teams. Those teams that do earn lots of money should be thanked and hailed, but to say that college athletes need to be paid because about one percent of the football or basketball players in the country are marketable athletes is myopic to the extreme.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 10:53 AM | "You can enter the NBA from (Score:1)
Desmondo
Desmondo's picture
Joined: 03/27/2009
MGoPoints: 248

"You can enter the NBA from high school if you are good enough"

 

No you can't.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 10:58 AM | Also (Score:1)
Kramer
Joined: 11/03/2009
MGoPoints: 148

Also, I don't see the connection between people wanting players to be paid and Bo's "The Team" speech.  Where did that come from?

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:26 AM | I think he was saying... (Score:1)
steviebrownforh...
Joined: 02/01/2009
MGoPoints: 2548

that the Fab 5 dont have enough of a team mentality, and therefore the gymnastics team is suffering...

or something...

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 10:58 AM | Yeah you can (Score:1)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9531

You play for a year in the D-League and then the NBA NBA the next year. 

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:56 AM | Obviously (Score:1)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9531

NBADL isn't quite the NBA, but it is pro basketball, and you can play it straight out of high school. It's like going to AAA in baseball

So you can play pro right out of high school

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:13 PM | Exactly.  Baseball players (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17635

Exactly.  Baseball players who go pro right out of high school aren't on the MLB team right away, same with hockey.  Those guys play in the minors for some amount of time until the team sees they're good enough.  That might be half a season, or it might be 3 years or more. 

And if a player goes to the NBDL right out of high school and is one of the best players in the league, no doubt they'll be getting paid. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:02 PM | he said skip college... (Score:1)
Vivz
Vivz's picture
Joined: 12/14/2010
MGoPoints: 938

latavious williams look him up

History is written by the victors-Winston Churchill
  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:04 AM | not anymore, of course, since (Score:1)
oriental andrew
oriental andrew's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4538

not anymore, of course, since 2006 when the CBA required players to be 19 and at least 1yr removed from high school.  Of course, this just results in a bunch of 1-and-done players.  

For my privacy, my new username is "non-Oriental non-Andrew"
 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:19 AM | Not anymore (Score:1)
APBlue
APBlue's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 1146

The NBA and the NBA Player's Association agreed a few years ago to require kids be at least one year removed from high school.  Like someone else posted, they could still choose to go to Europe to play pro ball there for a year. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:07 AM | Do we then pay the men and (Score:1)
aMAIZEN slot ninja
aMAIZEN slot ninja's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 245

Do we then pay the men and women tennis team, golf team, baseball team, swimming team?  If you pay one sport then you must pay everyone else.

 

Hail to the Victors Valiant!! Hail to the Conquering Heroes!!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:28 AM | rather than pay players (Score:1)
steviebrownforh...
Joined: 02/01/2009
MGoPoints: 2548

how about we just use revenue sharing for every sport?

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:44 PM | They do, it's called a (Score:1)
raiderblue
Joined: 01/23/2011
MGoPoints: 570

They do, it's called a scholarship. 96% of all the money generated by collegiate sports goes towards paying somebody's scholarship.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:06 PM | Weak sauce. (Score:1)
MCalibur
MCalibur's picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2181

The "pay one, pay them all" argument is pretty weak. Would it be unfair to pay some sports and not others? That would be a reasonable argument, but welcome to the real world kids. It could also be argued that it's unfair for unmarketable sports to ride the coat tails of the marketable ones.

When you look at what a gymnast receives vs. what he/she brings in vis-a-vis a football player, the fairness argument blows itself out of the water.

The spirit of Title IX is equal opportunity to education, not necessarily equal opportunity in funding. I'd venture to guess that the amount of revenue that is spent on men's sports outside of scholarships dwarfs what is spent on women's sports. Just think about coaching salaries.

There is no balance, and there probably will never be. Paying players has nothing to do with that.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 7:00 PM | two different things (Score:1)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

The amount of money spent on the Michigan football program is obviously much larger than the amount spent on Michigan gymnastics.  The amount given directly to football players v. gymnasts, though, is not.  Both get tuition, room, board, etc.

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:14 AM | Apples and oranges.  Baseball (Score:1)
RONick
Joined: 02/04/2009
MGoPoints: 656

Apples and oranges.  Baseball and hockey players aren't forced through the college ranks like their basketball and football counterparts.  They can play right away in their respective pro or minor leagues if they are talented enough. 

Footbally players must be 3 years removed from high school.  Basketball players, one.  The only good option for them is to go through the college ranks.  These are the defacto minor leagues in these sports and also, maybe not so coincidentally, the big money makers for (some) college athletic programs.

Next argument...

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:59 AM | Not apples and oranges, you (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17635

Not apples and oranges, you just missed his point.  His argument was that if the market demanded it, there would be minor leagues for basketball and football like there is for baseball and hockey, but there isn't. 

And I don't think most of these guys that want a bunch of money would like the minors for their sport anyway.  Minor league athletes make less than these players are getting for their scholarships when you factor in R&B, and they aren't getting an education out of it.  If a true minor league basketball league could work and make money, then players wouldn't have to play in college.  As was said above, players have the option of going to Europe instead of college.

The difference is that if you don't make it in Europe, you will spend a few years halfway across the world from your family while you figure it out, and you don't have a college degree as a consolation either. 

Personally, I think the solution is that no sport should have a minimum age to be drafted.  If a player is 18 and he thinks he can play pro football or basketball, let him.  If he fails, it's no fault but his own. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:51 AM | This is a good post. Deserving of a big pos-bang. (Score:1)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14298

I have an even more mundane question:  What portion of the Athetic Department's revenues are generated by number-specific jersey sales?

I certainly hope that Chris Webber doesn't think that he deserve(s)(d) a paycheck from all Michigan-logo apparel sales.  Chris, dude; Fielding Yost, Fritz Crisler, Tom Harmon, Bob Chappuis, Dave Strack, Cazzie Russell, Rudy Tomjanovich, Bo Schembechler and Glenn Rice all had a little something to do with the Michigan brand before you ever got here.

So my question is how much, really, has the Michigan Athletic Department profited off of sales of basketball jerseys with the Number 4?  Would we devise a formula to parse out sales of #4's for both Darius Morris and Chris Webber?

By the way, does the University get any kind of a cut from Chris' smash-hit debut recording, "2 Much Drama"?  I'll bet any amount of money,  that Mr. Webber made more money for himself in contracts with NBA franchises, Fila, and recording deals (okay, so maybe we can leave his recording-artist career out of it) than the University of Michigan made off of sales of unnamed #4 jerseys.

To answer the original question, I think that number-specific jersey sales amount to a tiny, tiny fraction of all athletic revenue.  The Webber story is apocryphal only becuase he made the mention to a writer like Mitch Albom while standing in front of a shop window on S. University where number 4 and 5 jerseys were on sale.  And Albom published it.  Chris Webber and the rest of the Fab Five were outliers in almost every imaginable way, in terms of their experiences as student-athletes.  To make nationwide rules within the NCAA based on that experience is crazy.

Chris Webber did just fine, thank you very much.  He's a millionaire.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:32 AM | Players should not be (Score:1)
GVBlue_is_still_blue
GVBlue_is_still_blue's picture
Joined: 10/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3392

Players should not be paid!

I don't understand why people argue for this. It will tip the competitive balance to a select few teams who can pay more than everyone else. Why is that good? If you want players to have spending money, give them loans that they pay back later. That way everyone has equal chance.

This will always be an argument I oppose. It is one of the dumbest right now. Right up there with a 650 team NCAA Bball tournament.

 Robinson also packed snow into a plastic bag for his return flight.
"Melted on the plane," he said.
 


 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:35 AM | The topic of Football and (Score:1)
dson04
Joined: 09/04/2008
MGoPoints: 10

The topic of Football and Basketball players needing to be paid because they generate so much money always irritates me.

wow.... then tell schools and athletic depts to stop exploiting Football and Basketball players.  Once a school is geared towards looking out for a kid's interest in academics over money.. then you argument will stand.

Also, when will you see an individual gymnastic's jersey on sale for 70 bones? 

When will bball/fball games NOT be scheduled to revolve around TV revenue and sales?

Do you think college ball players can study during march madness?

Whats the point of adding a '12th game'?

Ask conferences why they REALLY initate installing conference championship games

Ask the Big East why they schedule football games on Thursday

I saw MSU play a ball game at 9-10pm to revolved around a TV schedule.

Football players are already forced back to work as we speak... It's a year long 'job'

And also, these athletes are at a huge disadvantage when it comes to cuttroat academics that grade based off a curve.

And for those saying athletes are good enough can leave early to the pros or the NDBL or Europe?  With that attitude... Youre no better than Saban handing out offers like candy.  Just think about it

There's too much of a business aspect on the school's end... and atheletes aren't treated as students.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:09 PM | No doubt many colleges make (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17635

No doubt many colleges make certain changes that you mention, game days/times, etc to generate more money, but it's not like it's to feed the wealthy shareholders.  Do you know why the Big East schedules football games on Thursdays?  Because many of those teams' have athetic departments in the red and if they don't make more money from a Thursday night game, it might mean dropping Swimming and Diving or something like that. 

Part of being a college athlete is being a part of a college athletic department.  At every school, men's football and basketball generate the money for all the other sports.  If you don't care about the other sports at your college then don't play a college sport.  You have to take the good with the bad.  No one is forced to play college sports.  It's often the best option to train for the pro league, but it's not the best option to make money right out of high school.  Life is full of give and take, and this is one of them. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:40 AM | rights to your name (Score:1)
ploys11
Joined: 07/18/2010
MGoPoints: 93

While I'm not in favor of universities paying players beyond what they already get, I don't understand why the NCAA forbids players from making money off of their own name.  I'm not suggesting players should get a cut from university sales, but, instead, should be allowed to sell their own apparel (such as game-worn clothing, awards, etc.). 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:07 PM | The way the NCAA (Score:1)
RAWKfalcon
Joined: 05/12/2010
MGoPoints: 30

gets around it is that vendors cannot sell the NAME of the athlete.  Hence why jerseys only have #'s on them and also why there was the big deal with selling the Denard "shoelace" t-shirts. 

forgive me I can't remember the specifics of the t-shirt ordeal, but I remember Underground Printing had to stop selling them.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:18 PM | If players were allowed to (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17635

If players were allowed to sell their stuff, it would be no different than players getting paid.

Let's say Chris Wormley is being recruited by Michigan and Auburn.  Auburn says, "Hey Chris, just so you know, Auburn has a great fanbase, and we can almost guarantee that if you come here, someone will buy every one of your game jerseys for at least 3,000 dollars.  That's what (list of players) got on average last year.  We know how to take care of our players down here." 

How is that different from, "Come here and we'll hand you dollars."?  It would still result in players going to the school that would get them the most money. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:42 AM | I am not in favor a people (Score:1)
thisisme08
thisisme08's picture
Joined: 12/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1458

I am not in favor a people getting a paycheck from the sport they play but rather, if you play football/basketball chances be that your making the university a lot of money so your cut should be based on that.

Increase their monthly stipend to a level set by the NCAA but which can be declined/reduced by school.  Sure the big schools will be able to pay the max to each player but thats a benefit of going to a bigger school.  Most smaller schools also do not have access to every benefit that Mich/MSU/OSU have anyways so your really not changing anything in that respect.

As for as the equal rights thing, that gets sticky but its not like any of the women sports are loosing scholarships because your raising football/basketball stipends. 

Blue is Faster

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:52 AM | 8 times as much? (Score:1)
RAWKfalcon
Joined: 05/12/2010
MGoPoints: 30

Just curious where you're getting your numbers, I feel it would be an interesting read.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:00 PM | Ah, right you are, I remember (Score:1)
RAWKfalcon
Joined: 05/12/2010
MGoPoints: 30

Ah, right you are, I remember now.

I do wish there was a study, or chart for how much the #4 jersey specifically increased revenue.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:18 PM | Actually (Score:1)
bigmc6000
Joined: 01/12/2009
MGoPoints: 1113

I'm pretty certain that chart showed the years prior as individual years and then lumped at least 2 years together if not more for the 11M number.  It was meant to make you think exactly what it made you think despite not really being accurate.

 

I'd check the YouTube stream of it but, ya know, that's already been taken down.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:16 PM | Should we ask Desmond if he (Score:1)
Bluemandew
Joined: 11/18/2010
MGoPoints: 961

Should we ask Desmond if he thinks he had anything to do with that upswing in apparel sales? You can't forget that that was the year he won the heisman and Michigans first year after signing with Nike. While the Fab Five had a lot to do with that upswing for them or anyone else to act like there where no other factors involved is self serving.

Just do it!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 11:59 AM | OP has valid arguments (Score:1)
htownwolverine
htownwolverine's picture
Joined: 09/02/2009
MGoPoints: 3361

but I wonder how many of these gymnasts have to worry about calling home and asking for Mom/Dad to reload the ATM card so they can buy a pizza?

Everyone seems to be missing Jalen's point. Oh well, at least we got a MBB again!

Who is Jon Falk?
  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:20 PM | So you are saying the gymnast (Score:1)
Bluemandew
Joined: 11/18/2010
MGoPoints: 961

So you are saying the gymnast get a better food deal on there scholarship? Or are you saying they come from rich homes? Chris Webber went to a rich kids private school. His parents were not unemployed in fact i think they both had nice jobs. I don' t buy this garbage of I couldn't afford anything in collge cause I'm poor and michigan was getting over on me.

Just do it!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 21st, 2011 at 12:32 PM | Well since most (Score:1)
htownwolverine
htownwolverine's picture
Joined: 09/02/2009
MGoPoints: 3361

 

atheletic scholarships are not full rides, I would assume that yes, the gymnast would come from a home where there was more discretionary income than Jalen's.

Also, I do not believe Chris Webber paid to go to Country Day, he was on athletic scholarship there as well. I know they gave these out because I was offered one to Country Day and Brother Rice for hockey when I was in high school.

When you grow up on Detroit's west side, (have you ever been there?) you are probably coming from a family that barely makes ends meet so I find your garbage argument to be quite insulting. Much like Grant the Bitch.

A flat plain is an easier route than a steep climb.

Who is Jon Falk?
  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.