house of pain

August 31st, 2009 at 10:49 AM ^

Seeing that rivals has our back, numerous parents of players have voiced their opinions on this matter, does anyone else think that RichRod/UM may get some sympathy for this? Maybe not sympthy, but maybe some leeway? This may be a blessing in disguise.

bhallpm

August 31st, 2009 at 10:49 AM ^

The athlete-students are used to working out to excess and yet Barwis has taken them to a level they didn't know could exist. Give that man a raise! Now! Those who stay will be champions! And kick some ass. So why are you readers all runnin scared, circling the wagons, being silly homers and wondering if maybe we should change? Screw that. Stand up. Get tough and ballsy like Barwis and say this is what makes champions, bitch. Urban Meyer knows it. Rich Rod knows it. Go blue!

blueloosh

August 31st, 2009 at 10:51 AM ^

Great because Chait is a preeminent journalist and author. His voice matters much more than Rivals (not that Rivals doesn't matter). He can actually pull journalist rank on Rosenberg, which, unfortunately, none of us can. He cuts Rosenberg down to size and makes him look small. Which is not hard to do, but it is great to see someone of stature make the case.

Erik_in_Dayton

August 31st, 2009 at 10:55 AM ^

When I first saw this I assumed some guy who covers nothing but U of M had written it. When I saw who had in fact written it, I was thrilled. I hope this gets referred to in the national mainstream media (I know, that's a bit like saying that I hope Santa brings me a model train).

miller

August 31st, 2009 at 10:53 AM ^

This sounds fitting: "It's as if he set out to expose an epidemic of rape, and came back with an article mainly describing the conjugal relations of happily married couples."

house of pain

August 31st, 2009 at 10:54 AM ^

Seeing that rivals has our back, numerous parents of players have voiced their opinions on this matter, and other journalists.Does anyone else think that RichRod/UM may get some sympathy for this? Maybe not sympthy, but maybe some leeway for all the shit that he has taken, that has been unwarranted. I thought it may bring out some of these sports reporters saying, "get off of his back" and/or "enough is enough".

umjgheitma

August 31st, 2009 at 11:09 AM ^

"Rosenberg filled his article with quotes from Michigan players describing how hard they work. It's meaningless. It's as if he set out to expose an epidemic of rape, and came back with an article mainly describing the conjugal relations of happily married couples."

Yinka Double Dare

August 31st, 2009 at 11:32 AM ^

Brilliant. He's basically taken all of the things we've all said were wrong with the article and said it way better than any one of us could have. Anyone who has a Yahoo account should click the "Buzz Up" link at the bottom too.

barryH

August 31st, 2009 at 11:38 AM ^

Um, dude, please just make a pretense of fairness and accuracy: the Rivals article isn't by Rivals; it's by a writer for...Wolverine.com.

a2bluefan

August 31st, 2009 at 11:40 AM ^

A small issue... "We have to trust that he interviewed the sources fairly, and didn't solicit answers that confirmed his prejudices." On the local TV interview, didn't Rosenberg pretty much come right out and say that he interviewed these guys without telling them what the piece was about?

barryH

August 31st, 2009 at 11:43 AM ^

They said what they said, clearly. Doesn't matter how the question was asked, as long as the reply was on-point re the issue now at hand. You're making a false argument.

Blazefire

August 31st, 2009 at 12:07 PM ^

That's a load of crap. When you ask a player this question: "How much do you work out?" It becomes TOTALLY different based on your premise. He told them either the truth: I'm trying to disparage your coach. OR A Lie: I'm trying to show how hard you guys work. One of them plays the ego and gets a kid to exaggerate and enlarge. The other does not.

J. Lichty

August 31st, 2009 at 12:06 PM ^

responsible for the liar Scott Beuchamp, the so called Baghdad diarist (fabulist), who made up negative stories about our our troops in Iraq. Maybe that makes Chait uniquely qualified to write about this in the "it takes one to know one vain."

J. Lichty

September 1st, 2009 at 10:17 AM ^

I am not sure what you mean by "after all that has happened" but nothing that has happened in Iraq supports Beuchamps fables which he himself admitted he made up. The leftwing New Republic so eager to discredit our troops because they did not agree with the Iraq war found anyone who was willing to say something bad about them whether it was true or not. Chait and his co-editors behaved shamefully throughout the whole process by launching into ad hominem tirades and refusing to recant the stories even after Beuchamp himself admitted he was lying -- in short they were even worse than Rosenberg. I am not here to make political arguments, only to note the irony of Jon Chait of the New Republic being the voice of journalistic integrity.