UofM-StL

January 29th, 2014 at 4:44 PM ^

Their explanation of their methodology is vague at best. Seems like it's just a completely subjective blend between past recruiting hype and actual performance.

I think a much more interesting list would be underrated recruits who outperformed expectations. But that list would only serve to highlight ESPN recruiting's inaccuracies, so I doubt they'll make it. I'll just chalk this one up to off-season click-bait.

DealerCamel

January 29th, 2014 at 6:01 PM ^

Guess they didn't research that one too thouroughly.

I was surprised that Kellen Moore was dead last.  I didn't really have any complaints about the content of the list but the ordering was occasionally strange.