ESPN FPI Team Efficiencies Update, Wk. 6
The updated FPI team efficiency ratings have been posted and Michigan, overall, seizes the #2 position,while OSU dropped from #2 to #6 overall. The U-M splits are offense, #9 (up from #18); defense, #3 (up 5 spots from #8); and special teams inches back up to #12 from #15.
Of U-M's 2016 opponents, Colorado at #12 still remains the highest rated team U-M will have faced before meeting OSU in November. Wisconsin is two spots behind Colorado at #14. The already vanquished UCF is currently rated above 6 of Michigan's other opponents this season, including Sparty, which alas, is not saying as much as it once was. Maryland remains the second most challenging opponent remaining on Michigan's schedule after OSU.
Here's the selectively abbreviated synopsis of the ratings. Click the link above to see the whole list &/or sort by category:
RK | TEAM | OFF | DEF | S/T | O'ALL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Louisville, ACC | 94.9 | 84.2 | 36.0 | 94.3 |
2 | Michigan, Big Ten | 80.3 | 94.7 | 70.2 | 94.1 |
3 | Washington, Pac-12 | 87.4 | 87.3 | 71.4 | 93.8 |
4 | Alabama, SEC | 69.2 | 97.8 | 59.2 | 93.5 |
5 | Clemson, ACC | 77.3 | 91.7 | 44.8 | 90.1 |
6 | OSU, Big Ten | 72.2 | 92.5 | 58.5 | 90.0 |
7 | Boise State, MW | 85.5 | 79.6 | 41.3 | 86.9 |
8 | Texas A&M, SEC | 78.0 | 78.9 | 63.3 | 85.1 |
9 | Miami, ACC | 73.6 | 80.3 | 67.0 | 84.6 |
10 | Houston, American | 73.5 | 81.4 | 49.8 | 81.6 |
12 | Colorado, Pac-12 | 76.0 | 80.6 | 35.0 | 81.0 |
14 | Wisconsin, Big Ten | 49.3 | 92.1 | 62.3 | 80.1 |
20 | Maryland, Big Ten | 62.3 | 70.7 | 64.3 | 73.3 |
42 | Iowa, Big Ten | 49.2 | 62.2 | 67.2 | 61.2 |
47 | UCF, American | 34.3 | 73.4 | 69.8 | 59.1 |
52 | Penn State, Big Ten | 54.1 | 59.3 | 48.5 | 57.9 |
73 | Indiana, Big Ten | 41.2 | 58.9 | 39.6 | 47.7 |
78 | Michigan St, Big Ten | 43.3 | 46.9 | 58.7 | 45.5 |
93 | Hawai'i, MW | 41.5 | 43.7 | 46.9 | 40.4 |
97 | Illinois, Big Ten | 35.2 | 37.3 | 54.7 | 34.6 |
115 | Rutgers, Big Ten | 19.1 | 35.5 | 53.8 | 23.3 |
October 10th, 2016 at 1:34 AM ^
VaTech has a better defense than Michigan? Haha, ESPN you so crazy. Everything else about their methodology is obviously legit though.
October 10th, 2016 at 2:14 AM ^
I do understand why. The algorithms see "VT really shut down UNC on Saturday; that was a UNC offense which had been lighting up scoreboards against pretty good competition."
Of course, the UNC/VT game was played in an on-going tropical storm. The algorithms are pretty good, but extreme situations like that (similiar for NCSU/Notre Dame) are pretty hard to control for.
October 10th, 2016 at 7:36 AM ^
October 10th, 2016 at 9:37 AM ^
Along with injuries.
October 10th, 2016 at 2:54 AM ^
lol Michigan State is significantly worse than Penn State.
October 10th, 2016 at 4:03 AM ^
But I want to see Harbaugh start wearing more hats. Not like, switching into different hats every game... I want him to stack hats. Imagine: a Tigers, Wings, Lions, and Pistons hat all facing different directions on his head, with the Michigan hat on top facing forward.
He should do that against Ohio State. Meyer won't be able to take his eyes off him and coach. The crowd won't pay attention to the game. Barrett's throws would automatically veer towards the Michigan bench as he takes his eyes off his targets. This strategy could trump "X's and O's" any day of the week.
October 10th, 2016 at 6:32 AM ^
October 10th, 2016 at 9:25 AM ^
Last year?
October 10th, 2016 at 10:24 AM ^
October 10th, 2016 at 4:23 AM ^
October 10th, 2016 at 7:16 AM ^
I think you can see that downweighting in Michigan's offensive efficiency rating in particular, at least in ESPN's formula. The hit we take for running away with a few games early explains - to some extent - why the offensive rating is only about 80 despite Michigan having the #4 or #5 scoring offense by points per game.
October 10th, 2016 at 7:35 AM ^
October 10th, 2016 at 7:11 AM ^
FPI, ESPN's main computer rating, has Michigan first. If Team Efficiencies includes pre-game winning probabilities in its determination of what it considers "garbage time", that would produce some weird/counterintuitive/wrong results--like, say, rating Maryland #20 and Penn State #53.
October 10th, 2016 at 7:30 AM ^
October 10th, 2016 at 8:15 AM ^
Looking at the remaining schedule, I think Iowa and MSU will be challenging. But judging from the "eye test," Indiana is playing well. They gave OSU all they could handle for almost three full quarters on Saturday.
October 10th, 2016 at 8:24 AM ^
October 10th, 2016 at 8:30 AM ^
It can only go off the games played. Up until the Penn St game, Maryland had been pretty good. And any system that wildly swings teams from 60 to 20 based off of one game, probably isn't a good one.
October 10th, 2016 at 10:47 AM ^
October 10th, 2016 at 11:00 AM ^
Is it okay to call everyone in our division after UM and OSU the "B1GE Smalls?"
Thanks, and I'll show myself out.
October 10th, 2016 at 8:22 AM ^