Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (48)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 6 days ago
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 1 week ago
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 1 week ago
  • MGoAcceptance: Another MGoAnecdote
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 week ago
  • OT - Kentucky Derby 2012
    k.o.k.Law - 2 weeks ago
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,547 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 793 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 702 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 683 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 665 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 13 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 12 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    25 replies
  • Plaxico Burress is designing a men’s "luxury hosiery line"
    34 replies
  • BTN Tourney Baseball
    7 replies
  • OT: I love High School football
    34 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    96 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    37 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    39 replies
  • (Ole Miss) Hugh Freeze seems to be claiming BCS titles now
    45 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    71 replies
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    28 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    134 replies
  • Our footballs are made in the USA but not in Ohio
    28 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    40 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us (UPDATED WITH PHOTOS FROM TONIGHT)
    67 replies
  • Pizza Pizza Bowl Fires Back!
    27 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    25 replies
  • Plaxico Burress is designing a men’s "luxury hosiery line"
    34 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    96 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    37 replies
  • BTN Tourney Baseball
    7 replies
  • OT: I love High School football
    34 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    71 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    39 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    134 replies
  • (Ole Miss) Hugh Freeze seems to be claiming BCS titles now
    45 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us (UPDATED WITH PHOTOS FROM TONIGHT)
    67 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    40 replies
  • Are TV sets the only reason for RU and MD?
    53 replies
  • Rivals 250 notes
    57 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    134 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    96 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    82 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    2 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Does Georgia have to lose...

By SpreadGuru — December 3rd, 2011 at 6:00 PM — 183 comments
now that Houston has lost for is to get a BCS bid?
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:01 PM | basically, yes.   (Score:3 Normal)
SFWolverineFan
Joined: 09/27/2011
MGoPoints: 88

basically, yes.  

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:31 PM | not necessarily.     TCU (Score:2)
orobs
Joined: 10/03/2010
MGoPoints: 1729

not necessarily.  

 

TCU needs to be a top 16 team to get an auto bid.

 

So, Michigan still goes despite a georgia win if they break the top 14, which only happens if:

 

Scenario 1:

1) Houston AND MSU/Wisc loser drops below Michigan (and doesn't get jumped by Baylor)

2) Two of: Baylor, Houston, MSU/Wisc loser stay above TCU (but still behind MIchigan)

 

Scenario 2:

Bama or LSU get jumped by Okie State for the BCS title game

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:45 PM | Scenario 2 is the only viable (Score:1)
MichiganExile
Joined: 01/12/2009
MGoPoints: 1109

Scenario 2 is the only viable option. If LSU loses this game and they and Bama are still 1-2 they go to the title game and Georgia gets the autobid to the Sugar Bowl. Michigan making it into the top-14 won't help if there are no spots available.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 7:03 PM | LSU's defense has a case to (Score:1)
BsGriffin1
Joined: 11/29/2010
MGoPoints: 101

LSU's defense has a case to be ranked number one with a loss..

LSU's offense has a case to be ranked real low with a loss..

..defaintly not a number one team if they can't get a first down in the first half..

 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 7:32 PM | Unfortunately we don't rank (Score:1)
MichiganExile
Joined: 01/12/2009
MGoPoints: 1109

Unfortunately we don't rank teams offenses and defenses separately.

Otherwise #1 Houston/Alabama would be playing #2 Baylor/LSU

I would pay a lot of money to see that game btw.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 7:05 PM | LSU's defense has a case to (Score:1)
BsGriffin1
Joined: 11/29/2010
MGoPoints: 101

LSU's defense has a case to be ranked number one with a loss..

LSU's offense has a case to be ranked real low with a loss..

..defaintly not a number one team if they can't get a first down in the first half..

1st half : 12 total yards LSU

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 7:19 PM | I'm glad this is such a (Score:1)
evenyoubrutus
evenyoubrutus's picture
Joined: 11/04/2008
MGoPoints: 4718

I'm glad this is such a simple process that any average American can understand.

Not that I loved Rich Rod less, but that I loved Michigan more.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:02 PM | I'm not sure but I'm (Score:1)
IncognitoWolverino
IncognitoWolverino's picture
Joined: 07/08/2011
MGoPoints: 1043

I'm not sure but I'm worried.

This link may kinda help, not sure how accurate it is: 

http://www.sports-ratings.com/college_football/2011/11/2011-2012-bcs-bow...

"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:02 PM | Not basically, yes. (Score:1)
Jskohl88
Jskohl88's picture
Joined: 03/25/2011
MGoPoints: 255

Not basically, yes.

You fell victim to one of the classic blunders. The most famous is never get into a land war with Asia. But only slightly less well known is this: never go in against a Sicilian, when death is on the line!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:02 PM | No, we need LSU to get their (Score:1)
dothepose
dothepose's picture
Joined: 12/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4256

No, we need LSU to get their head out of their asses is what we need.

You know, Dude, I myself dabbled in pacifism once. Not in 'Nam of course.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:02 PM | Yes (Score:2)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7196

If Georgia wins, and the national championship game is still LSU/Bama, there will be no available at large BCS spots for any team.  All 10 spots will be going to teams that are guaranteed a bid.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:05 PM | 3 SEC teams cannot play in (Score:-1 Overrated)
OSUMC Wolverine
OSUMC Wolverine's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 1104

3 SEC teams cannot play in the BCS bowls

 

Reality is an illusion created by an unsafe drop in blood alcohol levels that exposes one to the idiocy of others.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:10 PM | Yes they can (Score:4 Normal)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7196

If 2 teams from the same conference are in the national championship game, and neither is the conference champ, the conference champ still gets to go to a BCS game.  If Georgia wins and LSU/Bama is the champ game, Georgia still gets a BCS bid.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 7:21 PM | It's a great system we have (Score:1)
evenyoubrutus
evenyoubrutus's picture
Joined: 11/04/2008
MGoPoints: 4718

It's a great system we have here that the 2nd and 3rd ranked teams IN THEIR CONFERENCE will be the two who play for a national championship.

Not that I loved Rich Rod less, but that I loved Michigan more.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:18 PM | Yes they can (Score:1)
Fhshockey112002
Fhshockey112002's picture
Joined: 11/08/2010
MGoPoints: 1278

Under the rule that if a conference has the #1 and #2 teams and neither win their conference. So Georgia would be the SEC auto-bid while LSU and Bama would take at-large spots.

Also, if Iowa State can beat K-State (currently down 7 in 4th quarter) we would still be in after a Georgia win.

Edit: Iowa State lost...

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:06 PM | Not so sure (Score:2)
Isaac Newton
Isaac Newton's picture
Joined: 09/16/2009
MGoPoints: 495

Six BCS champs, Bama and LSU, maybe TCU. That still leaves one. Am I missing something?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:10 PM | Stanford (Score:2)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7196

They're in the top 4 of the BCS standings, and therefore guaranteed a bid.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:16 PM | i didn't realize this (Score:1)
umchicago
Joined: 02/05/2009
MGoPoints: 3532

however, if LSU loses and OK St wins, i think OK St gets the nat'l title game if they beat Okla.  then LSU would be out of the BCS.  correct?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:17 PM | LSU's resume is absurd (Score:3 Normal)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7196

neutral field win over Oregon, win over WVU in Morgantown, win over Bama in Tuscaloosa, win over Arkansas.

If LSU is not in the national championship game it will be a massive error.  If any SEC team falls out it should be Alabama.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:42 PM | "If any SEC team falls out (Score:1)
ND Sux
Joined: 10/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3131

it should be Alabama."  Really?  I see Alabama as the 2nd best team in the country.  Who is your #2? 

"I promise you we would have walked to the University of Michigan."  - Brady Hoke

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:58 PM | Alabama lost to LSU at home. (Score:2)
1 percent
1 percent's picture
Joined: 09/09/2010
MGoPoints: 292

Alabama lost to LSU at home. They may be the 2nd best team in the nation but so were we in  2006 and we lost on the road. I wouldn't be upset if Bama was in the title game but I'm not sure they deserve another shot since they lost at home to the #1 team already. Either way, whatever. If I was to give it to someone else it would be Okie St or Stanford.

BEAT OHIO

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 7:00 PM | He's responding to someone (Score:2 Insightful)
MichiganExile
Joined: 01/12/2009
MGoPoints: 1109

He's responding to someone talking about Ok State getting a shot at the national title. The implication is that if you are going to put Ok St in the title game the SEC school that should drop out of that would be Alabama as opposed to LSU. Unfortunately for Alabama if they aren't in the title game they aren't in the BCS because Georgia would be taking the second SEC bid.

I kind of think if Georgia wins then Alabama should be knocked out of the title game. They didn't win the SEC and they didn't even represent their division. If Georgia wins then it basically shows that LSU is beatable. If LSU is beatable why be subjected to a rematch with a team they already proved they could beat? LSU's resume is very impressive so they belong in the title game regardless of the outcome of the SEC title game. This wouldn't be a situation where there are a ton of one loss teams and one undefeated team who happened to beat one of those one-loss teams (like 2006). So if Georgia wins I think I'd much rather see one-loss LSU versus one loss Ok St. for the national title. Now if Ok St. loses tonight it changes things drastically.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:06 PM | Not so sure (Score:1 Redundant)
Isaac Newton
Isaac Newton's picture
Joined: 09/16/2009
MGoPoints: 495

Six BCS conference champs, Bama and LSU, maybe TCU. That still leaves one. Am I missing something?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:03 PM | I don't get why we NEED (Score:1 Overrated)
Swazi
Swazi's picture
Joined: 08/13/2010
MGoPoints: 2556

I don't get why we NEED Georgia to lose now.  Houston will fall out of the top 14, and lump that in with one other team ahead losing due to the B1G game and we jump two spots into thhe top 14.

If you need drugs to be a good writer, you're not a good writer.

-Rod Serling

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 7:01 PM | Merely being in the top 14 (Score:1)
TIMMMAAY
TIMMMAAY's picture
Joined: 09/08/2008
MGoPoints: 5951

Merely being in the top 14 doesn't guarantee us a spot. There has to be a BCS slot available. 

not just "douchey" MGoBlog user, but now TRUSTED MGoBlog user

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 7:18 PM | I keep hearing we would be (Score:1)
OmarDontScare
OmarDontScare's picture
Joined: 08/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1489

I keep hearing we would be the first at large BCS selection. Is that not correct?

I got the shotgun. You got the briefcase. It's all in the game though, right?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 7:40 PM | LSU, Bama, Georgia, Oregon, (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11301

LSU, Bama, Georgia, Oregon, MSU/Wisc, OSU/OU, VaTech/Clemson, WVU, TCU, Stanford. That is 10 guaranteed teams if LSU and Bama are still in the title game and TCU makes it into the top 16. There is no room for at-large teams.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:04 PM | posted from iPhone (Score:0 Overrated)
mackbru
mackbru's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3067

No. We take rankings vacated by Houston and either MSU or Wisky. I don't know why anyone sees it otherwise. Voters will drop a 3-loss Sparty team, no question. And nobody will vote Houston into a BCS position.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:05 PM | posted from iPhone (Score:2 Normal)
Here2CWoodson
Here2CWoodson's picture
Joined: 11/16/2011
MGoPoints: 349

I agree with this, but no one else seems to agree. I just dot see how Houston could get in without winning their conference.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:06 PM | TCU (Score:0 Overrated)
goblue7612
Joined: 03/02/2010
MGoPoints: 1018

TCU

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:12 PM | What about TCU?  Them beating (Score:1 Normal)
Swazi
Swazi's picture
Joined: 08/13/2010
MGoPoints: 2556

What about TCU?  Them beating UNLV isn't going to jump them two spots over Michigan.

If you need drugs to be a good writer, you're not a good writer.

-Rod Serling

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:13 PM | They don't have to jump Michigan (Score:3 Normal)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7196

they just have to be in the top 16.  If a non-automatical qualifying school is ranked in the top 16, and is ranked above the conference champion from an automatic qualifying conference (West Virginia), and there is no higher ranked automatic qualifying team (which there won't be because Houston lost), that school is guaranteed a bid.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:22 PM | So would the Big East get (Score:0 Overrated)
Swazi
Swazi's picture
Joined: 08/13/2010
MGoPoints: 2556

So would the Big East get shut out of the BCS?  If that happened I'd be pretty OK with it.

If you need drugs to be a good writer, you're not a good writer.

-Rod Serling

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:24 PM | No, the Big East still gets a bid (Score:2)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7196

what it would mean is that all 10 BCS slots go to teams that are guaranteed a bid.  There will be no at large teams.  Under the rules, the 6 conference champions, LSU, Alabama, TCU, and Stanford (top 4 in the BCS standings) would all be guaranteed a slot.  No at large teams, Michigan goes to the Cap One Bowl.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:05 PM | Its not about top 14. With (Score:1)
Hokemania
Hokemania's picture
Joined: 03/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2139

Its not about top 14. With Georgia winning SEC should get three spots plus TCU in the top 16 leaves no spots left. No room at the table regardless of our ranking.

Whatcha gonna do, little brother?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:22 PM | Thank you (Score:1)
FGB
FGB's picture
Joined: 09/24/2009
MGoPoints: 1732

Yes, it has nothing to do with top 14 anymore (probably).

It is now only about available at large spots

This seems to be lost on a LOT of people

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:06 PM | The problem is that if TCU is in the top 16 (Score:2)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7196

they are GUARANTEED a bid under the rules because they're ranked ahead of WVU.  In that scenario, LSU, Georgia, Bama, TCU, Stanford (top 4 of standings), Oregon, Va Tech, WVU, winner of Wisky/MSU, and the winner of OSU/Oklahoma are all guaranteed bids.  

There are no at large bids for anyone in that scenario.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:47 PM | I agree (Score:1)
ND Sux
Joined: 10/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3131

Voters are always looking for the undefeateds like Houston (Boise St in prior years), so they can say "see, they were only unbeaten b/c of their schedule".  Michigan will leapfrog Houston, and rightfully so.

If Sparty loses, and I believe they WILL lose, I can't WAIT to see the Sparty tears if/when Michigan moves ahead of them.  They will be DELICIOUS!

"I promise you we would have walked to the University of Michigan."  - Brady Hoke

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 7:00 PM | I agree with you but I think (Score:2)
1 percent
1 percent's picture
Joined: 09/09/2010
MGoPoints: 292

I agree with you but I think people are wqorried about Baylor jumping us.

BEAT OHIO

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:04 PM | Yep... (Score:1)
Hokemania
Hokemania's picture
Joined: 03/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2139

Yep...

Whatcha gonna do, little brother?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:04 PM | LSU has 11 total yards. wtf? (Score:2)
Gorgeous Borges
Joined: 10/07/2011
MGoPoints: 680

LSU has 11 total yards. wtf?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:04 PM | I dont understand why it (Score:-1 Overrated)
OSUMC Wolverine
OSUMC Wolverine's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 1104

I dont understand why it makes a difference...Houston dropping out of the top 14 and either MSU or Wisconsin dropping out puts us at 14.  14 and we are in. Georgia winnng makes no difference because only 2 sec teams can go to bcs games. LSU or Bama would get screwed.

Reality is an illusion created by an unsafe drop in blood alcohol levels that exposes one to the idiocy of others.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:08 PM | posted from iPhone (Score:3 Normal)
Here2CWoodson
Here2CWoodson's picture
Joined: 11/16/2011
MGoPoints: 349

I thought I've been hearing that there could be 3 this year

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:13 PM | I thought the rules were that (Score:1)
Swazi
Swazi's picture
Joined: 08/13/2010
MGoPoints: 2556

I thought the rules were that only two teams per sonference can be in BCS games?

If you need drugs to be a good writer, you're not a good writer.

-Rod Serling

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:08 PM | Wrong- the SEC can get 3 teams in if (Score:2 Normal)
93Grad
Joined: 07/26/2011
MGoPoints: 823

LSU and Alabama go to the National champ game as 1 & 2.  The only way this doesn't happen is if Okie State jumps Bama and Bama is no longer in the champ game.

 

I suppose the other way we could get in with Georgia winning would only be if TCU did not make it into the top 16.  I''m not sure how likely that is to happen though.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:08 PM | No, much of this is wrong. (Score:3 Normal)
JClay
JClay's picture
Joined: 09/14/2010
MGoPoints: 2095

No, much of this is wrong. The SEC can get three if Georgia wins and LSU and Bama are still 1&2. This is what every expert expects to happen if Georgia upsets them. Yes, we will still be in the top 14 and qualify for an at-large spot, but THERE WOULD BE NO AT LARGE SPOTS.

6 BCS conference champions + LSU and Bama (as the #1 and 2 teams in the title game) + TCU (automatic) + Stanford (guaranteed a spot if finishes in the top 4).

"Here we are at Ohio Stadium, in front of 10,000 alumni and 74,000 truck drivers." - Bob Ufer

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:10 PM | That widget isn't great (Score:2)
kmedved
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 157

It assumes that Michigan can't make the top 14 without Georgia losing for one thing. (And puts Kansas State into the Sugar Bowl).

I believe if Georgia wins, if Michigan can still sneak into the top 14 (which could happen still with a Houston loss, an MSU/Wisconsin loss, maybe a Kansas State loss, maybe an Oklahoma loss), then Michigan and Stanford are battling for a single at at large selection. Previously everyone had Stanford in the Fiesta after the Sugar picked Michigan.

With a Georgia win, the order of selection might get confusing, but I still think Michigan probably gets in over Stanford?

EDIT- Nevermind. Forgot that Stanford is in because they're top 4. Yeah - we'd need TCU to stay out of the top 16 if Georgia wins.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:06 PM | If geo wins (Score:0 Offtopic)
preed1
preed1's picture
Joined: 03/08/2009
MGoPoints: 1187

and iowa st beats ksu then we are back in sugar

UM vs osu 2011 bring your keys and make noise (get it keys!)

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:12 PM | That assumes TCU doesn't make (Score:2 Underrated)
Hokemania
Hokemania's picture
Joined: 03/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2139

That assumes TCU doesn't make the top 16 which is a poor assumption.

Whatcha gonna do, little brother?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 3rd, 2011 at 6:18 PM | You are a poor assumption (Score:0 Offtopic)
preed1
preed1's picture
Joined: 03/08/2009
MGoPoints: 1187

i kid i kid...ibut i plugged that scenerio in that projection app and it had um in the sugar bowl. But who the hell cares because iowa st lost

UM vs osu 2011 bring your keys and make noise (get it keys!)

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.