I don't want to debate on if the 3-3-5 is a good idea, or if GERG is the guy. My question is this:
A point was made that we went to the 3-3-5 out of necessity and looking at our defensive line and lack of playmaking linebackers, that makes sense. So part of me thought maybe they would rather not run that setup ideally. But, RR seems to believe in it number one and recruiting seems to target some of those hybrid areas number 2
Do you think the coaches have a prefered idea of what they would want the defense to be? I hate hearing you cant do this or that in the big ten, because, the big ten is a pretty diverse league, scheme wise. So, I can see where hybrid guys are valuable.
So this is a, if you had the players you wanted, whould they (the coaches) still want the 3-3-5?