Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon
If after the game, Brady came out and said:
"Waaaahl, we played Devin because we just realized that he has more potential to be an NFL qb than Denard does, and after all, the reason both of them are here is to play in the NFL. Sure, Denard may have given us a better chance to win, but he won't be an NFL QB in 5 years, so it was really an easy decision."
is a huge difference between a kid dreaming of the NFL and wanting to be developed so he can make it there, and coaches using NFL potential as a basis for making decision for a college team's best interests. They should not do that.
No, this isnt about coaches using NFL potential as a basis for who starts but it is about parents of current and future recruits thinking these coaches are making decisions that is in their children's best interests.
It's not like the OP's super special and unique reasons could be made into a comment on the first thread.
In his defense, he just got to 100 points, so what better reason to re-post a pointless discussion from yesterday and provoke flamewars?
Threads like these are why M-Live exists - BILG, I encourage you to go there and find some wise, like-minded individuals to converse with.
Negbombs don't exist anymore, so it's impossible for you to lose points from the MGoMob just because you post "I want Devin to start" or "You're all complete morans for not agreeing with me." Mods are the only ones with the power to neg you at this point, and they almost certainly won't do it because you say something they disagree with. They might do it if you feel the need to create a pointless thread when this has already been discussed, however...
You can't forget the sheep.
I don't agree with BILG, but posting what he did is not an M-Live rant. He was thoughtful and did not attack Denard or any other kid. Again, I disagree with him, but it's wrong to write off these opinions as only worthy of the dolts at M-Live
