Denard was two picks away from being a Lion

Submitted by Red_Lee on

I know this was mentioned later in the Jaguar thread, but gosh darnit:

 

http://www.mlive.com/wolverines/index.ssf/2013/04/report_detroit_lions_told_dena.html#incart_river

 

When Detroit traded away their upcoming pick after Denard was drafted two spots ahead of theirs, I had a gut feeling that they were ready to pick Robinson and weren't prepared when he went off the board. Then they drafted Theo Riddick, who projects at a similar position, and I pretty much knew I was so close to having a dream come true.

 

I'm happy that he got drafted, especially in his home state, but you can tell he looks a little befuddled from the video clip when he's drafted. Also, my TV gets a lot more Lions games than Jacksonville.

 

Shoot.

Trey'sTrey

April 28th, 2013 at 10:45 PM ^

Not too sure the Jaguars are a better team to be on, I was hoping he was going to go to a contender. He is probably lucky that Al Davis is no longer alive, or else he would have been a Raider, simply because he can run and is a freak athlete.

Don

April 28th, 2013 at 10:08 AM ^

they had the opportunity to draft him at #132, and then gamble that Devin Taylor would be available five slots later at #137. Their decision to take Taylor at the earlier pick is an indication of what their priorities were.

Not being a Lions fan I don't regret at all that the Lions pass on drafting any Wolverine, but it's unfortunate for Denard that he ended up with one of the few franchises in the league that are actually worse than the Lions.

M-Wolverine

April 28th, 2013 at 12:08 PM ^

Without the logical media talking points question "then why didn't you draft him three picks earlier?" It's much easier to say "oh, man, they stole him from us" than tell the fans "we didn't want him." Maybe it played out EXACTLY as he said, and they took that risk. But we can say for sure they didn't want him more than Taylor (who had better still be on the roster in three years). So he was two picks away from being a Lion....but three picks away from should have been a Lion.

Doc Brown

April 28th, 2013 at 12:17 PM ^

[block] it's unfortunate for Denard that he ended up with one of the few franchises in the league that are actually worse than the Lions[/block] Sorry that statement is just incorrect. 50+ years of incompetent ownership proves your statement incorrect. I have way more faith in the Jaguars ownership of getting back to conference championship than the lions ever sniffing a first round win.

BlueHills

April 28th, 2013 at 10:43 AM ^

I would have watched Lions games only to see Denard play again.

But as a Denard fan, I'm glad he's not a Lion.

And it's good to see him achieve his dream of becoming an NFL player.

UMgradMSUdad

April 28th, 2013 at 11:18 AM ^

And watching the Lions just to see Denard play is one of the reasons the Lions should have taken him.  If he makes the team at all and there's a chance he might touch the ball 2 or 3 times per game, how many extra ticktets and tv sets tuned to the Lions would that account for?  

dahblue

April 28th, 2013 at 10:44 AM ^

Though I'm a Lions fan, it's best for Denard (and the Lions) not to have him here.  He needed to get away from the state and go somewhere where he won't feel the same level of pressure. He has enough to worry about in making a team, adjusting to a new position, etc.  He doesn't need our local press/fans adding even more expectation to his performance.  He also doesn't need the curse of the Ford family upon him.  He had a great run in A2, now lets enjoy a new QB in Michigan Stadium...and keep our fingers crossed for Denard back in his home state.

Ernis

April 28th, 2013 at 11:56 AM ^

As a team, the Lions would certainly afford him greater opportunity for success than Jacksonville. Also, I'm not sure the pressures would be greater in MI than there. Yes, M fans could have raised expectations somewhat, but I think most of us are pretty grounded regarding his ceiling in the pros. Local media will hype him wherever he goes, so that's a wash. My big concern actually is all the social pressures he'll face going home. When someone from an underprivileged area hits it big, there are all sorts of hangers-on, parasites, or even just bitter old friends who will try to drag him down. Being so close to home will only make it easier for these leeches to get access to him. Denard is a nice enough guy, as well, that he may find himself caught up in that garbage out of the best intentions. Here's to hoping he keeps his wits about him and avoids the pitfalls.

Avant's Hands

April 28th, 2013 at 11:11 AM ^

As Lions fans I'm not sure that most of you are unbiased observers here. The Lions have their issues, sure, but they have a pretty explosive offense. The Jaguars have gotten steadily worse over the last several years and are now an abyssmal team in a division with the Texans and Colts, who both seem like they are on the upswing for the foreseeable future. Jacksonville is almost the last place I wanted to see Denard end up.

Perkis-Size Me

April 28th, 2013 at 11:13 AM ^

I'm just happy Denard is going somewhere, but I was really surprised the Jags took him after drafting Ace Sanders. I know Ace wasn't being drafted as a running back, but in terms of slot receiving, punt and kickoff returning, he's a bit ahead of Denard in those departments.

I'm confident that Denard will earn a roster spot, as I'm not sure if Maurice Jones-Drew has an effective backup, but with Denard and Sanders both bringing the same things to the table, Denard will really have to earn his spot.

Michigasling

April 28th, 2013 at 12:13 PM ^

Of course one pundit's opinion is worth... Well, I don't know enough about any of them, but since the only two I read ranked Jacksonville's draft (with a new GM) among the top, here's one opinion (Will Brinson, CBSSports.com):

Jaguars: Jacksonville and new GM Dave Caldwell came into this draft with a plethora of needs. They could've gone in almost any direction in terms of their addition of talent, but I like the move to avoid going in on a quarterback and instead giving Blaine Gabbert the type of surrounding cast that forces him to either perform or pack up his bags. Luke Joeckel should provide big protection for Gabbert on the right side with Eugene Monroe on the left, and the combo of Ace Sanders and Denard Robinson is straight spicy. It gives, as Sanders pointed out, the Jaguars "weapons for days."

They add the full tweet from Ace Sanders:

We got weapons for days!! I gotta call my boy denard!!! That's like family! Im real excited

Buck Killer

April 28th, 2013 at 11:26 AM ^

How could anyone wish the Lions on Denard? May God have mercy on your soul, and get back to Sparty land. I know a Spartan fan posted this shit to piss me off.

You Enjoy Myself

April 28th, 2013 at 1:07 PM ^

Congrats Denard! You will always be the man.

IMO this is better for our recruiting than say he came to Detroit. Having him back on the 6 oclock news every night  in Florida  is not a bad thing. Admittedly JAX is not the ideal for media exposure but Florida dude Florida.

Sambojangles

April 28th, 2013 at 1:19 PM ^

I'm tired of all the negativity on this board about the Lions. They are an NFL team. There are only 32, and due to parity in the league, there is no reason they cannot be successful. Yes, they have been disappointing over the last 50 years, but that has nothing really to do with the future. They have a roster with talent, experienced coaches, and young players who are now maturing and learning how to play in the NFL. I expect success in the near future.

And really, how many teams in the league are really that "better" than the Lions, in terms of sustained success in the recent past and into the future? I can list only a few who are clearly the class of the league: New England, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Green Bay, San Francisco (and they were a mess until Harbaugh), maybe the NY Giants. How about this list? Buffalo, Jacksonville, NY Jets, Miami, Arizona, Cincinnati, Oakland. We get to see the Lions firsthand, but it's not like that list looks much better. Point is, lots of teams struggle for a time period with hiring and firing coaches, GMs, and missing the playoffs. A streak of good luck and consistency of coaches and system should help them get back to the playoffs.

I guess I get it. Everyone wants to loudly profess how much they hate watching the team, how they will never win, etc. They are just lowering expectations as a defense mechanism, so if the team does do well they can be happy, but if they lose, they just shrug it off and can say "yeah, I expected that." People did the same thing during this basketball season. If I had a dollar for every board post here during the MSU/Wisco/PSU/Indiana games that said "this team won't make it out of the first round of the tournamet" I would be rich. If that works for you as a fan, that's good, I guess. Personally though, I prefer to be a little more optimistic. I'm realistic, but it's no fun as a fan if I'm expecting the worst at all times.

yoyo

April 28th, 2013 at 1:47 PM ^

All the teams you just listed have had success relatively recently.  The Lions have 1 playoff game in 50 years!  Despite having the best RB in NFL history, we have sucked more than anyone.  The Lions also do a terrible job of developing talent or keeping players motivated and focused.  Calvin might be the exception to that if he can continue his success.

Don

April 28th, 2013 at 3:02 PM ^

In 1988, plenty of Lions fans said, "Yes, they have been disappointing over the last 25 years, but that has nothing really to do with the future."

There's nothing wrong with being optimistic; the Steelers were a perennial sad-sack franchise under the Rooney family's ownership, but then Art Rooney Sr. took the advice of Don Shula and hired Chuck Noll (Shula's DC) to be head coach starting in 1969. Jim Schwartz has yet to show that he's of that caliber, but it took Noll six seasons to get the Steelers in their first Super Bowl so it's not a foregone conclusion that Schwartz can't get it done.

I stopped really caring about the Lions about 30 years ago not because it's a way to protect my psyche, but because consistent ineptitude isn't entertaining to me. Would you purchase expensive tickets to see a musician if his performances were consistently full of missing notes, playing off-key, and showing up drunk?

Don

April 28th, 2013 at 8:00 PM ^

There've been plenty of other NFL franchises who've been as crappy as the Lions at various times in their existence, but none of them have gone as long as the Lions have without even sniffing a league title. My annual skepticism about them isn't based on thin air.

M-Wolverine

April 28th, 2013 at 8:27 PM ^

The team that has won a Super Bowl a year ago, two in the last decade, four overall, with another appearance...maybe? The Jets have made 2 AFC championship appearances in the last four years, the sad sack Cards were in the Super Bowl five years ago, and even the Jags have been in a conference championship game almost a decade more recently than the Lions, and a lot of the other teams you list have been bad for awhile but good to great franchise history.

JimBobTressel

April 28th, 2013 at 1:39 PM ^

OnPoint

April 28th, 2013 at 3:28 PM ^

Gabbert continues on his current career trajectory it might not be too long before wecould be hearing "Henne to Robinson". However, it just won't be in primetime. This could be the first season anyone's ordered the NFL package specifically to see Jacksonville.