We all realize what a physical speciman and talent Denard is and how much he has improved from '09 - '10. I wonder how much better Tate would be in '10 vs 09' with our clearly improved O-line play. If I recall last year, it seemed like 1/2 the time, Tate was scrambling for his life and using his 'moxie' (or was it 'mojo') to make plays instead of operating the offense.
My question for you stat geeks and smart people, is there anyway to compare except to actually see Tate on the field this year? My thinking is that even if Tate has minor improvement from '09, he'd seem much improved due to O-line play.
Is this an example of posts getting dumber and dumber as the week progresses or a valid question? Inquiring minds want to know.