Demar Dorsey open thread

Submitted by Bosch on
So the rest of us can move on.

Bosch

February 5th, 2010 at 10:28 AM ^

So on your "necessary" scale how does my topic compare to your response to my topic? For the record, I wasn't really soliciting conversation about this. I was making a point. When I refreshed the page, I was disappointed to see that there were two entries about Dorsey (one has since been deleted). This has been beaten to death. Lets move on.

Geaux_Blue

February 5th, 2010 at 10:45 AM ^

you creating this thread is not going to prevent the next 5 events involving Dorsey to get their own threads. Fuck, if he gets blasted on radio today, it won't be put in here - it will be put in its own forum thread. you literally did nothing you were aiming for, instead furthering it.

NorthSideBlueFan

February 5th, 2010 at 10:23 AM ^

Well then DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR, DEMAR and DEMAR. Alright, I'm all good now.

modaddy21

February 5th, 2010 at 10:37 AM ^

understandable that everyone is talking about Demar, he was a surprise commit, the highest rated, and the most controversial. Plus the Sharp article added fuel to the fire. Bosch, why does your opinion matter more than everyone else's? Do you have a topic timer?

Bosch

February 5th, 2010 at 11:01 AM ^

track record for posts, I don't exactly expect you to understand. I'm not forcing anyone to accept my opinion. I have no control over this site. If people want to continue rehashing this story, I cannot stop them. I am honored that you think I have that much influence though. If I am in the minority here and people want to see more Dorsey posts, not talking about new info, just old info discussed in new ways, I'm sure the majority will put me in my place. EDIT: If you would like to discuss Dorsey's potential as a player, please do. I figured the point of this thread was clear and didn't need to be spelled out.

Seth9

February 5th, 2010 at 10:41 AM ^

I would have been able to make Star Trek references that 99.9% of you wouldn't understand for the next four years. Of course, I'll probably do that anyway...

M-Wolverine

February 5th, 2010 at 10:41 AM ^

Actually, I wish the Freep and media et al could go a day without some new crap coming up. I need to get away from my computer and MGoBlog for more than 2 hours at a time...