Danny O'Brien to Wisconsin? (EDIT: Confirmed by Bruce Feldman)

85 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
March 28th, 2012 at 12:30 PM
#1
mzerbib
mzerbib's picture
Joined: 09/22/2010
MGoPoints: 479
Danny O'Brien to Wisconsin? (EDIT: Confirmed by Bruce Feldman)
BFeldmanCBS
JS Online reporting exMaryland QB Danny O'Brien is "poised to transfer to Wisconsin" RT @BTNTomDienhart http://t.co/lGisUh26
3/28/12 12:22 PM

 

Doesn't really matter for us for a few years, but will definitely help Wisconsin. He had a great first season at UMD before Randy Edsall killed the entire program

 

EDIT: Confirmed

BFeldmanCBS
Ex-Terp QB Danny O'Brien is headed to WISC. A release on it is expected this afternoon. Big get for Bagders: http://t.co/iSetwhGX
3/28/12 12:49 PM

 

Top
Tags:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
March 28th, 2012 at 12:36 PM | Well it's likely who we'll (Score:5 Normal)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17661

Well it's likely who we'll see in the BTCG so it does affect us.

March 28th, 2012 at 12:40 PM | He's not eligible to play (Score:2 Normal)
RagingBean
RagingBean's picture
Joined: 10/29/2008
MGoPoints: 955

He's not eligible to play this year is he? Unless he is a grad school transfer he will have to sit a year.

March 28th, 2012 at 12:43 PM | He's graduating this spring (Score:3 Normal)
Hoke-ish
Joined: 01/30/2012
MGoPoints: 72

He's graduating this spring and will be immediately eligible to play as a grad student

"Gentelmen, this is football"

March 28th, 2012 at 1:15 PM | Everyone seems to accept this (Score:1)
LandonC
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 1998

Everyone seems to accept this as fact.  But, he still has to actually go through the process, right?  Couldn't Maryland prevent it, in a similar manner as to the basketball player that tried to transfer from St. Joe's to UAB this year?  Also, doesn't the NCAA at least give a cursory review to make sure this was for "academic purposes"?  Since he has two years of eligibility remaining, are we sure that he's going to be allowed to suit up right away?

March 28th, 2012 at 1:23 PM | Maryland's already given him (Score:2)
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 11813

Maryland's already given him his release, so there's no more say there.  Remember there was that biggish hubbub when Edsall tried to be a dick and put Vanderbilt on the list of no-gos just to spite James Franklin.

"We've beaten Michigan the last four years.  So where's the threat?"

- Mark Dantonio

Blogging the Virginia Cavaliers at http://fromoldvirginia.blogspot.com/<

March 28th, 2012 at 1:30 PM | Right, but I thought that was (Score:1)
LandonC
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 1998

Right, but I thought that was simply for his innitial release, just like any other potential transfer.  I'm obviously unsure of the mechanism, but I thought after a player was released, he still has to go through an additional process with the NCAA for imediate eligibility, at which point, the releasing school could object.

Eh, maybe I'm way off-base on this.  I guess I'm just a little annoyed at the possibility of having two years to play at his chosen school.  Seems way to much like pro-style free agency.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:37 PM | You may be right about the (Score:2)
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 11813

You may be right about the technicalities, I'm not exactly sure, but in truth whatever's left is the mere formalities.  Maryland's already got enough bad press over this thing, can you envision them objecting at this stage of the game?

At any rate, the guy graduated in three years, which seems like the kind of thing the NCAA ought to encourage, so I have no problem if a pseudo-free agency is the reward for that kind of hard work.

"We've beaten Michigan the last four years.  So where's the threat?"

- Mark Dantonio

Blogging the Virginia Cavaliers at http://fromoldvirginia.blogspot.com/<

March 28th, 2012 at 7:40 PM | I believe the only thing that (Score:1)
IndyBlue
IndyBlue's picture
Joined: 09/13/2008
MGoPoints: 287

I believe the only thing that matters is that the school he's going to offers a grad program that the school he's graduating from doesn't offer.  And obviously he has to enroll in that program.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:30 PM | I believe (Score:2)
Fitz
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 47

Maryland has already granted the release.

March 28th, 2012 at 12:47 PM | O’Brien is on pace to (Score:3 Informative)
death by trident
death by trident's picture
Joined: 08/31/2011
MGoPoints: 1036

From the article. 

 

"O’Brien is on pace to graduate this spring and under NCAA rules will be eligible to play immediately.
He has two seasons of eligibility remaining. """""""""""""""""""

 

 

March 28th, 2012 at 12:48 PM |  So Bielma would get lucky (Score:2)
bluebyyou
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 2682

 So Bielma would get lucky and find another Russell Wilson clone?  The NCAA needs to change the grad student immediate eligibility rule.

March 28th, 2012 at 12:55 PM | "The NCAA needs to change the (Score:5 Normal)
jonny_GoBlue
jonny_GoBlue's picture
Joined: 09/05/2009
MGoPoints: 4417

"The NCAA needs to change the grad student immediate eligibility rule."

Why?  This seems like a good thing for the student-athlete.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:05 PM | From my perspective, it would (Score:1 Flamebait)
bluebyyou
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 2682

From my perspective, it would seem to raise the potential to have schools/coaches tamper with the set of eligible players to get them to program-hop.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:11 PM | There's a really small subset (Score:2 Normal)
Zone Left
Zone Left's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 13963

There's a really small subset of players who are:

A) Good enough to make a big difference

B) Have a good reason to transfer. 

Typically, Russel Wilson type players aren't going to leave their programs just to play elsewhere for a year. Personally, this is one of the few rules designed to actually promote academics in the entire NCAA rulebook. It's open for abuse, but there are much bigger fish for the NCAA to fry first.

It's all John Navarre's fault.

 

March 28th, 2012 at 1:26 PM | Also (Score:4 Normal)
Hardware Sushi
Hardware Sushi's picture
Joined: 03/08/2010
MGoPoints: 3490

Also they both (Wilson, O'Brien) graduated. You know, the main tangible goal of college. I think the transfer rule is an acceptable reward of sorts.

Intensity is a lot of guys that run fast.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:43 PM | Good for the student athlete? (Score:-1 Flamebait)
March 28th, 2012 at 2:19 PM | The NCAA... (Score:1 Offtopic)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10867

claims 380,000 athletes currently competing at all three levels. If having this rule in place for 379,900 of these students to be able to attend the grad school they choose (if they redshirted), I'm completely fine with 100 going to the Wisconsin's of the world (and possibly Michigan basketball next year) to play football or MBB for one extra year.

Go Blue!

March 28th, 2012 at 2:31 PM | Russell Wilson and Danny (Score:3 Normal)
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7575

Russell Wilson and Danny O'Brien earned their college degrees in three years, all the while being high-profile athletes in what is the most time-intensive collegiate sport.

How in the hell is this not a good thing?

"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."

- Jack Handey

March 28th, 2012 at 1:44 PM | I think the rule is a good (Score:2 Normal)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10867

I think the rule is a good one. Why tell a runner or a tennis player they can't get a scholarship to play in grad school (which is exactly how this is used most of the time) because Beilema and a few other coaches in football and MBB take advantage of the rule*? If anything, it just shows how perverse the incentives can get in football and MBB compared to the rest of the NCAA, and why some of the rules should be changed for those two sports.

*not that there's anything inherently wrong with taking advantage of the rule; I think we're all hoping Beilein finds a grad-year to help us in 2012-13.

Go Blue!

March 28th, 2012 at 2:11 PM | If he was a TE or DT (Score:2)
Mr Miggle
Mr Miggle's picture
Joined: 10/07/2010
MGoPoints: 1605

and interested in Michigan, would we be opposed to taking him? Lots of schools routinely plug their holes with Jucos. I don't see what Wisconsin is doing as anything different except they are only taking one player a year.

Eating is murder.

March 28th, 2012 at 2:22 PM | I agree, although I don't (Score:0 Offtopic)
March 28th, 2012 at 12:51 PM | Waiver Wire? (Score:2)
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 8737

It seems like Wisconsin is making a thing of getting QBs from the NCAA equivalent of the waiver wire. I would hate to see the Badgers actually go to the trouble of recruiting and developing talent at the position during a year when there was a thin stock of disaffected QB talent.

That being said, this actually is not a bad get for the Badgers.

"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."

Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3

March 28th, 2012 at 12:46 PM | Edsall was a really respected (Score:5 Normal)
Argyle
Joined: 09/26/2009
MGoPoints: 1179

Edsall was a really respected coach at UCONN. What happened? All I can gather is that most of the kids he inherited have an almost unsatiable hatred for him. And we thought RR's first year was rough.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:30 PM | Edsall was a really respected (Score:3 Normal)
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 11813

Edsall was a really respected coach at UCONN. What happened?

- He went 2-10.

- He's following an anything-goes kind of coach and did so by instituting a bunch of rules that 19-year-olds really hate, like no hats indoors, no earrings, etc.

- He went 2-10.

- He managed to alienate half the high school coaches in the DC area.

- He went 2-10.

- He was brought in to turn a year-to-year inconsistent team into a consistent performer and get them over the hump from Champs Sports Bowl every other year and nothing in between, to Champs Sports Bowl every other year and Orange Bowl in between.  But he came in talking like he had to rebuild from the ground up.

- And then turned it into a self-fulfilling prophecy.  Have I mentioned he went 2-10?

"We've beaten Michigan the last four years.  So where's the threat?"

- Mark Dantonio

Blogging the Virginia Cavaliers at http://fromoldvirginia.blogspot.com/<

March 28th, 2012 at 1:49 PM | Anecdotal evidence (Score:3 Normal)
mschol17
mschol17's picture
Joined: 10/08/2009
MGoPoints: 1884

Last year I ran into a couple fb players in the gym at Maryland and asked them what they thought of Edsall.  Immediately, to a random guy in the gym, they both said, "He's an a*****."

March 28th, 2012 at 2:39 PM | I'm seriously baffled by (Score:3 Normal)
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 4890

I'm seriously baffled by that. It seemed everybody thought so highly of him at Uconn. Mandel did a huge fluff piece on him building the program the 'right' way at Uconn, and he had the results to back it up for the most part. I wonder if they rip off an unexpected ACC championship will that additude make a 180.

March 28th, 2012 at 12:50 PM | This would officially signal (Score:4 Normal)
mackbru
mackbru's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3066

This would signal that Wisky, which has always been a model of rectitute, is becoming kind of a sleazy and mercenary program. Do you really want to be known for annually signing soldiers of fortune? How about actually, say, recruiting.

March 28th, 2012 at 12:57 PM | don't know about that (Score:5 Normal)
Mr Miggle
Mr Miggle's picture
Joined: 10/07/2010
MGoPoints: 1605

O'Brien is on pace to graduate in three years. That makes him a pretty impressive student-athlete in my book, and the type of player any program should be proud to have.

Eating is murder.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:39 PM | I don't mean to know O'Brien. (Score:-1 Overrated)
March 28th, 2012 at 2:05 PM | I think it's a fine loophole. (Score:2)
Mr Miggle
Mr Miggle's picture
Joined: 10/07/2010
MGoPoints: 1605

Look at the alternative. Most players in a position to use this grad student exception are going to have one year of eligibility left. If they are a superstar, then they are probably going straight to the NFL. If they aren't they might have a hard time finding any good program that will give them a scholarship for two years just so they can play the second. Plus it would be much harder for them to make a decision based on playing time. Making them stay might put them behind in their education. Rewarding them for graduating early or on time is infinitely better than punishing them for it, even if it may work to the benefit of certain schools.

I hope there is another clause that allows players the same opportunity if they aren't accepted into the grad program at their current school.

Another way to look at it is the NCAA is simply giving college graduates the same opportunities as HS graduates. That's assuming they can get a release. Doesn't that seem fair?

 

 

Eating is murder.

March 28th, 2012 at 3:14 PM | I think Mack's point was (Score:1)
PatrickBateman
PatrickBateman's picture
Joined: 02/16/2012
MGoPoints: 199

I think Mack's point was geared more towards PROGRAMS using this rule to THEIR BENEFIT, with the benefits of the athlete just an afterthought.  Although it isn't wrong, it certainly seems to be a rule that can at least be QUESTIONED.  How would you feel if you were a QB recruited by Wisco three years ago and now a guy who has had no vested stake in the program, hasn't worked hard with the team for the past three years, has no affiliation to the school, and might simply be transferring because of the FOOTBALL circumstances at his last school steps in at the 11th hour an takes your job?  Hell, the original QB might have not redshirted to position himself to take the job for just one year.  "Sorry bud, but we found a new guy from New Mexico State who just graduated and we're bringing him in.  Thanks for all the hard work these past 3-4 years, but this random guy gives us the best chance to win, so have fun riding the bench.  Maybe we'll blow out Indiana and you can get a chance in the fourth quarter!" 

Maryland is a fine school and remember that (I believe) the athlete has to find a graduate program at the new university his old one doesn't offer.  I'm not an expert on grad schools, but I'd imagine there are limited choices for programs, he might end up entering into a South American Anthropology program based only on the fact that Maryland doesn't offer it, instead of pursuing a program that is more suited to their interest.  If O'Brien was say... an Economics major, he can't pursue graduate work in say... accounting because Maryland offers it as well.

Craig James was my wingman in '82.

March 28th, 2012 at 4:07 PM | a few points (Score:2)
Mr Miggle
Mr Miggle's picture
Joined: 10/07/2010
MGoPoints: 1605

Although some programs may use the rule for their own benefit, I think you could say the same for just about any rule. While the programs may or may not be concerned about the educational benefits to the players, I don't think that really matters. The players can benefit academically from it if they choose to and that's the intention of the loophole.

Whatever position you play, your school is going to continue to recruit your position in CFB. I suppose the player in your example wouldn't be happy to see a highly ranked Juco or a 5* freshman come in either. He should expect stiff competition for a starting job.

Maybe it would be even better O'Brien didn't have to find a program that Maryland doesn't offer, but there are a lot of specialized programs to choose from. My understanding is that Wisconsin would just have to offer a particular program within the economics department that Maryland doesn't. He still has the option to stay at Maryland if the academic opportunities are better there. For some players the difference could be great. For example, UM is recruiting a player that wants to be a vet. He would have to go somewhere else to pursue that career after he graduates from UM.

 

 

Eating is murder.

March 28th, 2012 at 7:13 PM | You make some good points.  I (Score:1)
PatrickBateman
PatrickBateman's picture
Joined: 02/16/2012
MGoPoints: 199

You make some good points.  I think it eventually boils down to the ultimate question (which everyone secretly knows the answer to but no university will admit).  Which is more important, football or school?  The answer for both the student-athlete in question and the school is (95% of the time) football.  The reality is, when playing football at a D-1 school the players are "athlete-students" not "student-athletes".  I'm not knocking the players, I'm just saying the reality of the situation isn't as high-minded and well-intentioned as the NCAA would lead us to believe.  I guess I'm just bothered by the apparent potential for this sort of practice to become commonplace and a "free-agent" market to develop among guys unhappy with the football program at their chosen schools or guys who graduated and still have year(s) of eligibility.  I mean, it is possible for a school from a low-level conference to simply recruit players who weren't given a fifth year at bigger schools (granted, that could be more free education for the players).

Regarding your last point, it seems like schools could very easily beat this rule by simply allowing transferring players to essentially create their own major.  I know it is possible for undergrads and though it'd probably be harder for grad schools, I'd bet you could simply adjust a program ever so slightly to get the player in (i.e. create European History (1918-1945) to establish a different program than Maryland's plain old European History).     

Craig James was my wingman in '82.

March 28th, 2012 at 3:16 PM | can't say i know the details (Score:1)
BK-bloo
BK-bloo's picture
Joined: 01/07/2009
MGoPoints: 223

can't say i know the details of wisconsin's situation, but i highly doubt this is their long-term strategy. granted, it's two years in a row, but i think they now have some promising young guy(s) they're looking to develop. since they also just went through some turnover in the staff, an experienced qb is a good get for them.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:03 PM | I don't blame Wisc too much (Score:2)
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 4890

I don't blame Wisc too much at this point. The reason they've had to so this is because literally every other option will be either a true freshman or recovering from surgery. I think the unexpected setbacks of Wilson's back-ups made them go after O'brien. Otherwise I don't think they would have pursues him nearly as hard.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:45 PM | You can lean on the (Score:1)
mackbru
mackbru's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3066

You can lean on the youth-and-injuries thing once. But not twice in a row. If they've got no able bodies, it's because they recruited badly. Over these two seasons, they've had 5 scholarship QBs. I don't think all of them have been injured.

March 28th, 2012 at 12:54 PM | 2012 B1G "West" final standings: (Score:2)
jtmc33
Joined: 04/15/2009
MGoPoints: 4915

1.  Wisconsin

2.  Ohio State (banned from post-season play)

.

.

.

.

.

3.   Purdue

4.   Penn State

5.   Illinois

6    Indiana

Class of '97: 4 Years -- 4 Four-loss seasons

March 28th, 2012 at 1:03 PM | Legends and Leaders (Score:1 Normal)
Inertia Policeman
Inertia Policeman's picture
Joined: 10/28/2011
MGoPoints: 95

How can we be victors of the west if we're not in the "West" division?

Big gulps huh? Alright! Well, see ya later.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:14 PM | By winning the B1G championship game (Score:1)
befuggled
befuggled's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1021

I do see your point, though, in that we won't play at least two of those teams even if we do play in the B1G championship game.

Where's Charlie Bauman when you need him?

March 28th, 2012 at 3:18 PM | I'm fairly certain the poster (Score:1)
Clarence Beeks
Clarence Beeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 3451

I'm fairly certain the poster that you were responding to was referring to attracting QB recruits...

March 28th, 2012 at 3:20 PM | This was supposed to be a (Score:1)
Clarence Beeks
Clarence Beeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 3451

This was supposed to be a response to different poster. I have no idea why it posted here. Sorry...

March 28th, 2012 at 1:16 PM | victors of the west? (Score:5 Normal)
GoBlue
GoBlue's picture
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 303

Do you mean "Champions of the West!"?

March 28th, 2012 at 1:30 PM | NFSW (Score:2)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38797

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

March 28th, 2012 at 12:54 PM | What grad program does (Score:1)
Dix
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 261

What grad program does Wisconsin offer that these seniors are signing up for? Is O'Brien going for the same grad program Wilson did?

I don't really want to blame Wisconsin for shenanigans because the loophole is legit and it's allowing the players an opportunity to continue playing in a better situation.  I'm just curious if the players are using the grad program loophole just for football purposes, or if they're serious about the subject matter of the degree.  I suppose there's no way to know. 

March 28th, 2012 at 1:59 PM | The UW website states that (Score:2)
RakeFight
RakeFight's picture
Joined: 02/21/2012
MGoPoints: 1369

The UW website states that Russell Wilson is a "communications major." 

March 28th, 2012 at 1:00 PM | If he has 2 years of (Score:1)
samsoccer7
samsoccer7's picture
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 906

If he has 2 years of eligibility left, the real question is, can he play 2 years for the Badgers as long as he is a grad student those 2 years? Or is this "loophole" maxed out at 1 yr? Not sure if there is a precedent bc he's finishing undergrad in 3 yrs which is not common.

March 28th, 2012 at 1:04 PM | I don't like it.  I don't (Score:2)
triangle_M
triangle_M's picture
Joined: 03/09/2011
MGoPoints: 1615

I don't like it.  I don't like it one bit.  Seems like shenanigans to me.   I swear to God I'm going to pistol-whip the next guy who says, "Shenanigans"

 


And when we play as a team, when the old season is over, you and I know it’s going to be Michigan again. Michigan!

 

March 28th, 2012 at 1:04 PM | Not again.  Bielma is such a (Score:2 Insightful)
WolverineHistorian
WolverineHistorian's picture
Joined: 08/10/2009
MGoPoints: 5125

Not again.  Bielma is such a massive tool.  It would be nice to see him have to actually break in a new/freshman quarterback for once.     

Go Blue!  Always!

http://www.youtube.com/user/WolverineHistorian

March 28th, 2012 at 1:09 PM | I wonder if Madison is too (Score:3 Funny)
DrunkOnHiggins
DrunkOnHiggins's picture
Joined: 06/16/2011
MGoPoints: 682

I wonder if Madison is too liberal for him?

"And if that doesn't wet your appetite, you're watching the wrong channel."

You can usually find me bumping some Reggae, hammered on Higgins Lake with the goon squad. #HALOL

Go Blue!

March 28th, 2012 at 1:14 PM | NTDOB   (Score:5 Normal)
triangle_M
triangle_M's picture
Joined: 03/09/2011
MGoPoints: 1615

NTDOB

 

 


And when we play as a team, when the old season is over, you and I know it’s going to be Michigan again. Michigan!

 

Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.