Competition for jersey numbers!

Submitted by Blue_42 on

This is interesting. Found it over on Maize 'n Brew.  

"There was a battle for jersey No. 9, and Grant Perry lost his number through competition to Donovan Peoples-Jones. Perry is now No. 88."

I love it! If you want it you have to earn it. I wonder how many other battles went on?

Mr. Yost

August 30th, 2017 at 2:13 PM ^

And what number should he get?

Your comment is asinine. He should lose a number because he got in trouble? I'm trying to wrap my mind around that one.

If it was Tillman's number and this was Arizona St.? I'd understand...but that's not the case here.

MadMonkey

August 30th, 2017 at 12:42 PM ^

It comes down to the definition of "number," as well as the definition of "infinity." Personally I don't think it's worth having an opinion on this subject; there are more precise words than "number" and "infinity" in mathematics. Historically the word "number" has come to mean an increasingly general list of things:

The word "infinity" has also come to mean an increasingly general list of things: it might refer to

Some of these meanings are compatible, as the above list demonstrates. But again, there are more precise words than "number" and "infinity" in mathematics, and if you want to get anywhere you should learn what those words are instead.

Here are some of those more precise words.

  • set is a formalization of the intuitive notion of a bag of objects, and we can talk about finite or infinite sets. For example, {1,2,3} is a finite set, whereas the set of natural numbers is an infinite set. One can do arithmetic with sets in a way that leads to the arithmetic of the natural numbers: for example, taking the disjoint union corresponds to addition, and taking the Cartesian product corresponds to multiplication. These ideas lead to the arithmetic of the cardinal numbers, and similar ideas lead to the arithmetic of the ordinal numbers.
  • ring is a formalization of the intuitive notion of a set of things you can add and multiply, so in some sense one can regard elements of rings as "generalized numbers" (but note that not every generalization I listed above can be interpreted in this way). When certain people say that "infinity is not a number," what they mean is that you can't adjoin an element called  to the ring R of real numbers such that addition and multiplication do what you want them to do, the basic problem being that  can't be consistently defined to satisfy the other rules of arithmetic if you also want it to be true that n+= for any finite n.
  • field is a commutative ring in which it's also possible to divide by nonzero elements. Some people would like to say that 10=, but by mathematical convention the element 0 never has a multiplicative inverse in a field, the basic problem being that 0 can't be consistently defined to satisfy the other rules of arithmetic. However, one can make sense of the expression 10 in projective geometry; it describes the point at infinity on the projective line.
  • topological space is an abstract setting for ideas like nearness and taking limits. Sometimes we don't want to view R as a ring, but as a space (the real number line), and we can talk about embedding this space into a larger space where more limits exist: this is known as compactification, and is an extremely useful tool in mathematics and physics. For example, we would like to say that the sequence 1,2,3,... has limit  in some sense, and we can do this compactifying 

victors2000

August 30th, 2017 at 11:38 AM ^

Don't you get a little attached to your number on a team? I only got as far as Junior H.S. football but I associated myself with my number. If I found out I'd lost it to someone else I think I would have been a little butthurt. Kind of like losing a girlfriend to some other guy. That filthy whore. Sorry, mixing memories.