Comparing Forcier to other QBs

Submitted by letsgoblue213 on
Throughout this season, Tate has had plenty of ups and downs. He looked great at the beginning of the year, but clearly wasn't very impressive against Ohio State earlier today. I think that most Michigan fans understand that he is just a freshman and expect him to make these mistake, but I thought it would be interesting to compare him to other dual-threat freshmen quarterbacks over the past few years: Tate Forcier------2050 yards, 13 TD, 10 INT, 240 rush yards, 3 TD, 132.84 RAT, 58.7% Colt McCoy-------2570 yards, 29 TD, 7 INT, 170 rush yards, 2 TD, 161.82 RAT, 68.2% Tim Tebow--------358 yards, 5 TD, 1 INT, 469 rush yards, 8 TDs, 201.73 RAT, 66.7% Tyrod Taylor-----927 yards, 5 TD, 3 INT, 420 rush yards, 6 TD, 119.68 RAT, 53.7% Jacory Harris----1195 yards, 12 TD, 7 INT, 101 rush yards, 2 TD, 125.77 RAT, 60.8% Terrelle Pryor---1311 yards, 12 TD, 4 INT, 631 rush yards, 6 TD, 146.50 RAT, 60.6% Juice Williams---1489 yards, 9 TD, 9 INT, 576 rush yards, 2 TD, 92.60 RAT, 39.8% Jake Locker------2062 yards, 14 TD, 15 INT, 986 rush yards, 13 TD, 105.01 RAT, 47.3% Pat White--------828 yards, 8 TD, 5 INT, 952 rush yards, 7 TD, 132.41 RAT, 57.0% Vince Young------1155 yards, 6 TD, 7 INT, 998 rush yards, 11 TD, 130.6 RAT, 58.7% I know these stats don't come close to showing everything that matters, but I just thought it would be interesting to compare Tate with some of the other successful mobile quarterbacks from recent years. It is also important to understand that Tate is one of the only QBs mentioned here to be the full-time starter as a true freshman. Most of these quarterbacks either split time with other players at QB (Tim Tebow and Pat White for example) or were red shirted and had a full year in the system to prepare before seeing game action (like Colt McCoy and Vince Young). Many of these players also had much better players around them than Forcier did this year. Overall, I think that Forcier is on track to become one of college football's next great dual-threat quarterbacks like some of the other players mentioned on this list. He was just forced to adapt faster than most of the others and that's where a lot of those interceptions come from.

quality shows

November 22nd, 2009 at 12:34 AM ^

Okay, first of all, full disclosure: I am a Buckeyes fan. I always root for Blue in Bowls and have a ton of respect for your program and your school. (I must say, I've endured the ignorance of some of your fans, and have a real scar to show for it from a beer bottle, but I know all teams have ignorant drunks, just as you notice the worst of ours.) Tate is a great athlete. I watched the first game and said to friend who's a UM fan, “you guys are finally gonna beat us this year.” The offense was crisp and fast and I saw the promise. I really think the difference between Tate and Terrelle is not necessarily athleticism but a different approach in coaching. Tressel coaches with an emphasis on eliminating mistakes and an emphasis on game management, getting coached on schemes, reads, etc. and relying on the whole team, not just his “athleticism”. He reins him in to build toward unleashing him. I think your coach likes to unleash athleticism (which Tressel has not done with TP or with Troy Smith, another comparable athlete, until he let Troy get bulked up on Heisman Prime Rib and added 22 pounds before the Florida game! That is bad coaching.) Pryor has gotten so much more mature with each game, even while his instincts to make every play were kept in check. The really Vince Young comparisons will emerge next year and if he stays around for senior year. JT develops quarterbacks. I really wish Rich Rod would focus on eliminating mistakes. If he would have coached Pryor last year maybe he would have thrown four picks against you last year too. Your other QB should maybe be a wide receiver. All year I've not seem him improve as a passer. So easy to read. I hear you've got a great kid coming in next year so let's hope he pans out so we can get this rivalry back to where it belongs -- the whole country on the eidge of their seats with national title implications. OSU can't get respect without UM being good, and Penn State and MSU being good, and hey, Iowa too. I want improvement in the whole conference. By the way, the one other thing I noticed, and so did national commentators, was the way the UM players “went rogue”. Shaw's elbow smash on an OSU trainer was a little uncalled for. I think Brandon Graham (a great player) really gave us bulletin board material (or Twitter these days) with his comments. Boren said nothing. And Tate talking to the press after the game directly and making all these brash promises. While at times our fan base goes nuts over the Senator's conservative approach, he sure does manage the young men on the team to avoid shooting themselves in the foot. I think Rich could be a good coach, but one final observation: the smaller, faster players he recruits were okay in the first half of the season, but they sure seemed beat up once they got into the heavier, stronger smashmouth of the Big Ten. Hurry up and get back to where the Maize and Blue belong, just behind the Buckeyes :). Oh, and you played a hell of game today. The horrible part is your defense played the best I've seen them this season and, the agony of it is, you still lost. Trust me, I've felt that too. Go Blue, recruit like hell!

petered0518

November 22nd, 2009 at 1:13 AM ^

I don't detect any sarcasm in your post, but I still have to ask. Are you looking at where Forcier is now and where Pryor is now and concluding that Tressel has developed Pryor better? Srsly? I am usually try not to be mean, but this is one of the stupidest things I have read on this blog. I don't care if I get negged for being an asshole, but you seriously have must have no ability to analyze a game if that is your conclusion. Pryor is an all world athlete with all the tools to be one of the best quarterbacks in the nation, and yet in his second season as the quarterback of a more experienced team he has less passing yards, a lower completion percentage, more interceptions, less yards per attempt, and a lower rating than Tate Forcier. You honestly read Brandon Graham's comments and say that he "went rogue." Are you implying that Boren is a good guy for "saying nothing" when he attacked the program that had given him a scholarship and a playing spot. You honestly think that Tate Forcier is good because of his athleticism. You honetly think that smaller faster players can't excel in the Big Ten when they excel in every single conference besides ours(the ones that keep winning national titles). I am just rambling now but I can't get over the stupidity of the thoughts you just posted. I am sorry someone threw a bottle at you, because that should never be done. But still, please don't post if this is the best you have to offer.

ATrain32

November 22nd, 2009 at 4:13 AM ^

Welcome to the board. I hear ya on restoring the rivalry and M getting back on its feet. I too would like to see the Big 10 stronger and specifically M-OSU having national implications every year. Of course, I also want to see M winning every year so we probably don't agree on that point. :P We did play well today. I was glad to see the D step up but our turnovers obviously hurt. It seemed like we saw some 'freshman' mistakes out there but the good news is that we also saw some young talent make some plays to give us some hope for next year. Either way, today OSU was the better team. As for the Shaw incident, I'd agree that was unpleasant and really not what we'd like to see from either team. Relative to Graham, I really can't imagine that his comments 'fired up' OSU with bulletin board material. Tressel is very focused on the rivalry and 'gets it'. As we have all heard, he has the clocks counting down to the game and the players are constantly reminded of the importance of the game etc. OSU has been 'ready' under Tressel's watch, unfortunately for us. Losing to the Buckeyes always is disappointing. We'll be back, it will take some time, but we'll be back.

Shaqsquatch

November 22nd, 2009 at 4:14 AM ^

"everybody kills people, murders people" vs. "i lost that game for us, i will improve over the offseason and we'll never see a repeat of that". yeah, richrod really lets his players run rampant with their ridiculous comments to the media. let see how your "heavier, stronger smashmouth" handles against a spread team that isn't all freshmen in your bowl game. although i think history can already tell us how tOSU will continue to embarrass the big ten nationally. anyways, my venting is done, troll on.

willis j

November 22nd, 2009 at 7:18 AM ^

OSU can gain respect nationally if they would stop losing to all of the premier teams that they play. Michigan's current status has nothing to do with it. You have lost every big game you played basically for what, 5 years now? Thats why you have no respect. I dont get what your saying about Rodriguez, like he coaches them to take risks and turn the ball over? I love Tate but a couple of his picks were just him not thinking or not seeing. His last one was terrible. His guy was wide open and it was really an easy pass. This isnt coaching. Its a freshman who plain and simple made a mistake. Same with the INT to Matthews in the endzone. I dont think our players broke down. Minor is a big back with a history of injury problems. Brown isnt a tiny guy but also the history. Tate is a freshman who needs to add some pounds. We really havent had too many more injuries. Also Shaw didnt elbow your dude. They were both walking and neither wanted to give ground. Neither went out of the way to hit the other.

Wendyk5

November 22nd, 2009 at 8:46 AM ^

I think the point about RR keeping a lid on the talk is well taken. The freshman QB should not have a direct texting line to the press. All communication about the program, an individual's performance, etc... should go through AD channels. As to QB coaching, these are two different styles. RR is all about getting creative, letting the guy improvise, and JT isn't. With RR's approach, you just have to have the guy who can do it. That's Tate, 50% - 60% of the time at this point. I think JT has to coach Pryor like that because Pryor hasn't shown he can improvise other than running. His arm isn't accurate enough, and he doesn't seem to have that "certain something" - vision, maybe - to be able to let him go. Maybe we'll see that in him next year. If so, then I'll revisit your post and reevaluate.

griesecheeks

November 22nd, 2009 at 12:57 AM ^

some of that's pretty true. I think in rich rod's system, game management kind of goes out the window... his spread RELIES on a quarterback doing more than just managing a game. the qb has to make plays for it all to work. when it's clicking, things look awesome. when it bogs down, it's not pretty at all. if we had minor today, i think we win the football game. he takes a little heat off Tate by being a physical presence. Still, though, Tate was productive, and even with the fumble and the first 2 ints, had us in position to get back within striking distance for the win. But argh, that pass to hemingway will haunt us for awhile. the last pick was just a typical mistake by a frazzled freshman trying to do anything to make a play. it can't be said enough, i think Roundtree's emergence could lead to a McCoy-Shipley-esque connection down the line. OSU won this game because, as the buckeye poster said, they played within a conservative team approach. Herron and Saine were solid all game (Saine is a surprisingly STRONG runner... i was impressed by him today). no single player on that team is really capable of being a one-man show, save Pryor when he's unleashed.

DoctorSherwin

November 22nd, 2009 at 1:41 AM ^

Due to his lack of height, he has trouble seeing the second level of receivers. That plus the fact that he is not particularly fast (averaged 2.1 yards per carry) and does not possess a strong arm.... it all means that he has to really make up for these serious limitations in other areas. And right now he is not.... his decision making is very poor. He plays the game as if he were playing in high school.... carrying the ball like a loaf of bread, throwing into double coverage, throwing across the field on a short field.... bad habits that are going to be hard for him to break because that is the way he has ALWAYS played the game. But at a point, the game catches up with you when you are dealing with superior athletes, and Tate has to play more conservative.... be smarter. Cut back a little on the undisciplined, cavalier style of play. But a more conservative style sort of cuts against who he is as a player so, unfortunately, this is a QB that is bound to make many of these same mistakes for years to come.

wolverine1987

November 22nd, 2009 at 10:41 AM ^

it still is clueless, uninformed and embarrassing. Every single one of your criticisms are either freshman mistakes, that unlike your assertion, can EASILY be corrected, or physical limitations that will likely keep him out of the NFL but do not prevent him from being an excellent QB in college.

Tater

November 22nd, 2009 at 1:42 AM ^

...anybody home? Forcier is a freshman playing hurt. His arm seemed to have plenty of zip when it was 100 percent. Part of the problem is that his supporting cast has been inconsistent. I do agree that he may be a little short to be standing in the pocket, though, and think he should roll out like Flutie used to. AFAIC, Forcier has done a great job for a freshman this year, especially playing through pain and brain fog. I hate to break it to those who are taking such twisted glee out of throwing him under the bus, but Forcier is not the only QB who ever threw an interception or lost a game. And he is not the only player on the team. Let's see how he does next year when he, like the rest of the team, is bigger, stronger, and more experienced. Hopefully, he will be healthy, too. I have a feeling he will have enough zip on the ball to satisfy his critics. Forcier will never have an NFL arm, nor will he ever have a chance to play there unless he has a six inch vertical growth spurt in the next three years. But he will be a great college QB if he fully recovers and manages to stay healthy, and could end up as a coach. Also, I will take his attitude over that of Mallett or Pryor anytime.

quality shows

November 22nd, 2009 at 2:18 AM ^

Sorry if that wasn't clear, but I think Tressel's conservative approach in developing Pryor is very similar to the way (his friend) Mack Brown developed Vince Young. First eliminate all the freshman and sophomore errors then let him go, as Tressel did with Troy Smith. Obviously neither Smith nor Pryor are NFL quarterbacks, but this is college football. You're right, Tate probably won't be either. Coach Rod also declined to name his as the starter for next year, which is understandable I guess since you guys seem to have a phenom from Inkster coming in. If you don't understand that I am a fan of Tate, despite his size and his freshman inexperience, you are misreading my post. I think he tries to do too much, which is the opposite of what Tressel has let Pryor do -- and many of our fans say “too little”. I have no idea where you got the idea that I said a small fast athlete can't be successful. I did point out that a lot of the smaller players (Tate, Vince Smith) were hurt against the bigger players in the Big Ten. Pryor, who is much bigger, also was playing with a leg injury (and OSU does not disclose a lot about injuries.) I also understand how you guys might feel about Boren. My point was, don't bring that out before game day. You made your point in the pre-season. I'm sure I'd feel the same way if we had one of our key guys defect. I wish Minor had been in the game too. Must be tough as a senior to miss out on this one. He's been underrated. As for Pryor being an “all world athlete” you are wrong. He has “all world potential.” Compare Pryor's sophomore season to Vince Young. Fine for Tate to have better stats in a pass-happy spread offense, but neither Pryor nor Vince threw four picks to lose a huge game. I'm sorry if you don't like it, but while Tressel is putting a lid on Pryor's youthful penchant for mistakes and “I can make this play -- I did it in high school” false confidence, I wish I could have seen Forcier get better in the last game. It's not about yards or stats, it's about game management. There are ten other guys on the field and Pryor used them and, other than Roundtree, I don't think Tate did. Like I said, after your opening game, I fully expected him to be what you expected Pryor to be. I was sure that by The Game, he'd be even better. The real difference was that he didn't get better. Sure he had injuries. He's small and quick and talented and there are some big guys pounding on him. If you want to call my comments “stupid' then I suggest you explain why your team has a freshman QB give us five turnovers. I suggest something behind that game plan might also share that term. I wouldn't say that, it's just a coaching gamble because you didn't have many other options. Draft some defense. Get back in The Game. That's all I want. I'm not out dissing you, just sharing the view from the other side.

jmblue

November 22nd, 2009 at 12:31 PM ^

I think there is some truth to what you say about the way Tressel and RR have handled their QBs, but I'm not sure, in the case of Pryor, if this reflects growing maturity on his part. It seems to me that Tressel has actually lost some confidence in Pryor's passing ability and has really scaled down the passing game. Pryor has attempted just 17 passes in each of his last three games, and has recorded only 285 passing yards combined in them. And the Michigan game aside, Tressel hasn't been calling all that many designed QB runs for Pryor recently, either. I don't think Vince Young followed this progression. Mack Brown allowed him more and more leeway to freelance as time went on; Tressel seems to be doing the opposite with Pryor. Also, while Pryor may have never thrown four interceptions in a single game, his INT percentage this season (3.9%) is actually higher than Forcier's (3.6%). He just hasn't been asked to pass as often.

KidA2112

November 22nd, 2009 at 3:21 AM ^

If Michigan would have pulled ahead in the game today Pryor would have made a couple of the same mistakes Tate made. Michigan just wasn't able to accomplish this. Cutting it to a 1 possession game with a little over 8 min. to go would have put some pressure on him. His throws were all over the place.

RagingBean

November 22nd, 2009 at 4:42 AM ^

Going way back to the original topic, I think Tate has played amazingly well this season and I think he will make a significant jump next year, making better reads, cutting down on turnover, etc... That being said, I think Tate's physical limitations, his lack of height and real speed, will always make him susceptible to being overtaken by Denard or Devin. If either one of those players can get enough handle on the reads and passing system then I think we will see them leap over Tate on the depth chart. I don't know that it ever will happen, and if it does I certainly wouldn't expect it next year, but that's just my gut feeling.

section44

November 22nd, 2009 at 8:19 AM ^

Second, you left off at least one great example of a true freshman who did play a lot and developed into a very good big ten quarterback. Kurt Kittner. Kittner was 72 of 162 passes (44.4%) for 782 yards with one touchdown and seven interceptions. By his second season, he threw 24 TDS and had 5 INTs. Was honorable mention all big ten and MVP of his bowl game.

SoCalM

November 22nd, 2009 at 11:15 AM ^

The competition at QB next year will make everyone better. Whoever gives the program the best chance to win should play, even if it is a freshman, like this year. Physically DG may have an advantage right now but the ability to handle the mental part is usually the most difficult as a freshman. It's also one of the most complex offenses to pick up. Tate's actually done a fairly remarkable job as a true freshman, given the numbers posted in the original topic. Size at the college level can be overrated. There's all kinds of highly successful 6'1" and under QB's at the major college level. Oregon's Masoli is an impressive dual threat QB. He's only 5'11" and 220 lbs but he's 21 and a junior. Everyone has to remember that Tate's only 19 and never lifted a weight until 9 months ago. His body will mature over the next couple years and he will get stronger and faster as a result of the strength and conditioning program. Hopefully, he will also progress from a mental standpoint and just having another year in the offensive system. Most people usually learn from their mistakes and my bet is that he does and we see a lot more of the good things he did this year and much less of the stuff that drove us crazy!