College football friday thread

Submitted by ThadMattasagoblin on

Iowa vs. Nebraska 12 pm ABC

WMU vs. NIU 11 am ESPNU

South Florida vs. Central Florida 12 pm ESPN2

Marshall vs. WKU 12 pm FS1

Houston vs. SMU 12 pm CBSSN

Arkansas vs. Missouri 2:30 PM CBS

Stanford at UCLA 3:30 PM ABC

Arizona State at Arizona 3:30 PM FOX

Colorado State at Air Force 3:30 PM CBSSN

Virginia at Virginia Tech 8 PM ESPN

East carolina at Tulsa 8 PM ESPNU

 

LSAClassOf2000

November 28th, 2014 at 12:52 PM ^

That was a phenomenal pass by Tommy Armstrong except for the part about it getting tipped, caught by Loudermilk and then returned for a pick six. Other than this, I am sure Nebraska totally meant to do that. 

WMUgoblue

November 28th, 2014 at 1:00 PM ^

I know they probably won't get the help needed to make the MAC Championship game but this season has to considered a huge success for PJ Fleck and my Broncos.

pinkfloyd2000

November 28th, 2014 at 1:11 PM ^

Wow. 56 total points in the Marshall-WKU game, with 13 minutes still left in the second quarter.

I think Marshall's defensive players are still in a food coma from yesterday.

Former_DC_Buck

November 28th, 2014 at 1:45 PM ^

The longest drive (in time used) by either team is a 9 play, 62 yard drive that took 3:02 off the clock.  This looks almost like EA Sports kinds of drives. 

RSH: 2 plays, 0 yards, 0:26 - Interception

WKU: 1 play, 17 yards, 0:09 - Touchdown

MRSH: 8 plays, 75 yards, 2:27 - Touchdown

WKU: 1 play, 75 yards, 0:11 - Touchdown

MRSH: 5 plays, 68 yards, 1:43 - Touchdown

WKU: 8 plays, 75 yards, 2:53 - Touchdown

MRSH: 4 plays, 64 yards, 1:42 - Touchdown

WKU: 6 plays, 40 yards, 2:35 - Punt

MRSH: 3 plays, 6 yards, 0:00 - Interception

WKU: 4 plays, 31 yards, 1:08 - Touchdown

MRSH: 1 play, 0 yards, 0:00 - Interception

WKU: 6 plays, 63 yards, 2:29 - Touchdown

When I started writng this post: the score was 42-21.   In the few minutes it took to write, this happened:

MRSH: 8 plays, 69 yards, 2:47 - Touchdown

WKU: 2 plays, 0 yards, 0:00 - Interception

MRSH: 1 play, 48 yards, 0:07 - Touchdown

LSAClassOf2000

November 28th, 2014 at 1:26 PM ^

It is almost as if the spirit of every Big Ten game ever has converged in Iowa City today...

Tommy Armstrong throws one up and it gets picked off, then Iowa promptly fumbles. The strategic exchange of turnovers as is customary in Big Ten play. 

....and Nebraska makes Iowa pay for being all butterfingers. Abdullah nabs one in the back of the end zone, free of the constraints of the Iowa secondary. 

 

jhackney

November 28th, 2014 at 1:27 PM ^

How much thought would it take to realize the correct trophy for the Iowa-Nebraska game should be a golden ear of corn? A giant one. With a slab of butter at the bottom of it.....

....sorry. Thanksgiving flashbacks.

ThadMattasagoblin

November 28th, 2014 at 1:47 PM ^

Yes he's better than Callahan but no big ten titles or big 12 titles which isn't acceptable at a place like Nebraska. His teams are consistently a 8-9 win team because they feast on Illinois, NW, and Purdue every year. With that being said, I hope they hang onto him and we're not battling them for a coach this year.

ThadMattasagoblin

November 28th, 2014 at 2:03 PM ^

In his tenure in the big ten the only big win he has is against MSU 3 years ago. He got walloped the one time he got to the BTCG and it doesn't say much that he's better than us. Rutgers and Maryland are better than us and they're not good either. If you're Nebraska or Michigan you need to win conference championships.

gwkrlghl

November 28th, 2014 at 2:30 PM ^

Nebraska's in a tough spot. Historically, they've been much better than they are now but they have no recruiting base. The don't have the same access to Texas anymore. A bad hire could have Nebraska looking like some of the other plain states schools in a hurry (Kansas State, Iowa, Iowa State, Minnesota, etc)

Without the same access to Texas & Oklahoma talent, you need great coaching to excel. Nebraska should be careful

bacon1431

November 28th, 2014 at 1:54 PM ^

But he's 9-16 against top 25 teams (including 2-9 vs the top 10; 3-10 vs the top 15; 6-15 vs the top 20), which is who he should be evaluated against because Nebraska is historically a top 10 program, and even in today's college football landscape, I'm sure they see themselves as a top 15/top 20 program. 

When facing teams that are supposed to be his equal, he has failed. 

Former_DC_Buck

November 28th, 2014 at 2:01 PM ^

Earle Bruce at Ohio State, .755.  But most of those were 9-3 and folks expected more.  And we got John Cooper.  Earle actually did make a bowl game in his first year that likley would have been an MNC.  Outside of that, Cooper had higher highs a few times, but defniitely lower lows and of course and was awful against you guys.  The question is are you willing to give up a good thing for perhaps a better thing. 

When you are a Michigan or a Nebraska or an Ohio State, I think you do have to take those chances or you have to change your expecttions.  Just be willing to pay the price if it doesn't work. 

ThadMattasagoblin

November 28th, 2014 at 2:12 PM ^

Yeah I think you have to take those chances. They do that in the SEC and it pays off sometimes and doesn't other times but they have a lot more national titles than we have in the big ten in the long run. I did like Lloyd Carr. I just know that they aren't going to win a conference championships with pelini if they haven't in 8 years. You may have some rough years like we're having or make a Zook to Meyer type turnaround. Personally, I think that if you're not first you're last so if you're losing 4 games a year it's the same as losing 7 games a year.

UMxWolverines

November 28th, 2014 at 2:06 PM ^

So you wanted to continue to get owned by Tressel every year? Losing games at home to Appalachain State and Oregon? We had to change something. We failed to find a suitable replacement but that's no reason to use revisionist history. In college football you're either going backward or forward and we were going backward under Lloyd. 

Pelini has been there 7 years and has no conference titles because his teams don't win big games. He's 9-17 against top 25 teams. 

Since we have you know, 42 big ten titles I kind of think if we had a coach here for 7 years with no big ten titles that would be unacceptable, but that's just me. 

clarkiefromcanada

November 28th, 2014 at 2:23 PM ^

Did getting owned by Tressel have anything to do with tats, money, blunt and cars? How might that have played out if Lloyd had stayed?

If Lloyd had stayed (vs. the Rod experiement) Michigan would still be winning B1G titles. It's not like 2006 didn't happen or that quality players weren't on the roster. Mallett stays etc. going forward.

Last I looked, Lloyd was carried off the field after shaking Urban Meyer's hand in victory.

"We had to change something"

Yeah, and thanks to that we stopped winning.

 

clarkiefromcanada

November 28th, 2014 at 1:59 PM ^

Lloyd Carr deserves more respect. Pelini is a decent coach (.710) but Carr's career achievements are miles better:

1 MNC in 1997, a career .753 winning percentage, 5 B1G titles and 19-8  versus teams ranked in the top 10

If Pelini wins the next 5 B1G titles, throws in a MNC and starts killing it versus the top ten then you'd have a comparison. 

Also, remember how it went the last time Lloyd Carr played Urban Meyer...

UMxWolverines

November 28th, 2014 at 2:13 PM ^

Cool. Carr still underachieved. Most of those top ten wins were from early in his career. We put like the 2nd most players in the NFL of any school during his tenure and besides 1997 and 2006 our ceiling was 3 losses. 

That being said he was much better than Pelini is or ever will be. 

bacon1431

November 28th, 2014 at 1:40 PM ^

Iowa-Nebraska game is one of the most awful things I have ever laid eyes on. It's a contest of impotency. Pelini and Ferentz are trying to up each other on how little they can get out of their offenses.