Coaching Rumours/Potential Openings

Submitted by ghost on

Jason La Confora is reporting that Bill O'Brien is ready to return to the NFL and that the Vikings, Texans and possibly the Redskins are interested.  La Confora states that O'Brien's potential buyout is less restrictive this year and that PSU may face litigation if they attempt to collect a buyout from O'Brien because of he NCAA sanctions that were levied against them.

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/jason-la-canfora/24375967/ready-to-…

 

Edited: previously said Eagles instead of Vikings.

Reader71

December 15th, 2013 at 2:02 PM ^

Is that something we believe now, that the AD is in charge of the offense? Regarding a passing spread: we don't have the receivers for it yet. Gallon, Funchess, Dileo, Chesson, Jackson, Reynolds, Jones. That's it. That's all the bodies we have at WR. That's not even a full 2-deep of 4-WR sets. I'm all for a passing spread with Gardner at QB, but we don't have the requisite number of bodies at WR yet.

Magnus

December 15th, 2013 at 2:16 PM ^

Huh? Why can't we run a passing spread (like the one used against Florida in 2008) with those guys?

Here are the wide receivers who caught passes against Florida in that game:

1. Adrian Arrington (9 catches, 153 yards, 2 touchdowns)
2. Greg Mathews (7 for 62)
3. Mario Manningham (5 for 78 and 1 score)
4. Junior Hemingway (1 for 4)

Mike Hart, Carson Butler, and Mark Moundros also caught passes. You just listed Gallon and Funchess, which is arguably a better duo than Manningham and Arrington. Mathews was decent, but I think Dileo and/or Chesson could be just as effective if targeted. And I think Jackson or Reynolds could probably catch a pass for a measly 4 yards.

We're fully capable of running a passing spread at this point, and we will likely be more ready next year (if everyone stays healthy), despite the loss of Gallon. Next year we have Funchess, Chesson, Darboh, Jones, Dukes, York, Harris, Canteen, and Ways...plus whatever Hayes and Norfleet can provide.

Mr. Yost

December 15th, 2013 at 2:48 PM ^

Not a WR, but Butt will also facotr in the passing game.

IMO we need to run this offense because it puts less pressure on the OL, it allows DG to see the field better. It could allow our offense to really gash defenses with the running game. You can still run screens and play action.

IMO, it's the perfect offense for the personnel we have. You can include 2 TE sets out of it as well and run the zone-read.

BraveWolverine730

December 15th, 2013 at 2:59 PM ^

Funchess/Gallon 127 rec 2011 yds 15 TDs
Manningham/Aarington (jr year) 139 rec 2056 yds 20 TDs
                                            (so year) 78 rec 1373 yds 17 TDs

It's very much a fair statement, especially when considering the quality of OL.  People here don't appreciate Jeremy Gallon nearly enough. He ought to go down as an all-timer at WR. Desmond and AC were clearly better, but he's in the conversation IMO with everyone else. 

bronxblue

December 15th, 2013 at 3:45 PM ^

As pointed out below, what's so crazy about that comparison?  Manningham and Arrington were good college WRs, but Gallon and Funchesss are no slouches and had the added burden of a dodgy offensive line and crappy running game restricting what the playcalling capabilities to a good degree.  Gallon is one of the better WRs this school has seen, and just because he doesn't look the part shouldn't diminish his dominance.

Reader71

December 15th, 2013 at 2:49 PM ^

I think we could run a passing spread as a one-off, end of season game, ala Lloyd's Swansong. I just don't think it would be possible to run it as our base offense, for a whole season, with only 7 receivers, particularly when Jackson, Reynolds, and Jones offer so little as pass catchers. I'm with you on next year, assuming 2 of the three incoming receivers can actually play. Even still, we'd be short on little slot guys, of which there are two in any 4-wide set. I'm not saying its impossible, and I actually said I'm all for it. I just don't really think it was an option this season. I dunno. I've been wrong before.

Magnus

December 15th, 2013 at 3:15 PM ^

I don't really think Jones and Reynolds offer little as pass-catchers; I think they were under-utilized. They could have had more catches if Gardner didn't have eyes only for Gallon. Regardless, I think running a passing spread would simply necessitate breaking the seal on a couple other guys as wideouts, like Norfleet, Hayes, York, Jones, etc. I don't think most teams who run passing spreads have 8 established wide receivers; they count on young guys being able to step in and complement the established guys.

Victors5

December 16th, 2013 at 12:28 AM ^

So if a "spread" QB is all we need, why will it take us 5 years? It doesn't take that long to recruit a QB. Plus since this is about Chip Kelly it seems like Nick Foles is doing just fine in his offense.

UMgradMSUdad

December 15th, 2013 at 10:28 AM ^

Perhaps it's pointless to make projections based on speculation like this, but isn't O'Brien the main reason Hackenberg ended up at PSU?  If BOB is gone, I wonder what Hackenberg's plans are.

trueblueintexas

December 15th, 2013 at 2:52 PM ^

I can assure you that answer is no. UT swings for far bigger fences. Not saying they will connect and they may end up with a lesser candidate because there is some serious behind the scenes turmoil at UT right now.

Don

December 15th, 2013 at 10:56 AM ^

I don't know why this seems so surprising to so many people. You've got a 57-yr-old guy with recent heart troubles and the personality of an ulcerous hemorrhoid who has spent his 33 coaching years in the Midwest, all but four of those within the footprint of the Big Ten.

Don't get me wrong—I think Dantonio has proven that he's a damn good coach, but that doesn't automatically mean he's attractive to prominent programs in other parts of the country.

Lionsfan

December 15th, 2013 at 11:26 AM ^

Because Butch Jones is only 45, and Tennessee can expect that he'll be there for the next 10-15 years or so. And I also bet that one way or another, through his agent or other people, Dantonio has put out there that he's not interested anywhere else

mackbru

December 15th, 2013 at 2:11 PM ^

There's no chance Dantonio is being considered for Texas. That program wants a guy who fits its brand: a charismatic, telegenic leader and recruiter, preferably one with a drawl. The Horns coach is, in essence, the face of Texas.

Since Texas isn't on the cusp of a championship, it presumably wants someone who'll be at height of his powers for another 10-15 years. Absent the two A-listers, Saban and Meyer -- and maybe Briles, the local hero -- Texas won't hire a guy who's pushing 60 and has heart issues. 

Finally, for all of Dantonio's great work, his offense remains Paleolithic; Texas's current roster is built for the spread, not gruntball. And Texas wants results yesterday, so it's not about to succumb to the whole three-year scheme-change transition thing.

IMO, they should grab Charlie Strong. 

 

pb1234

December 15th, 2013 at 10:44 AM ^

I only care if Michigan has a good coach. I actively hope every other team in the conference is a flaming tire fire. It would only ever matter if we got good enough that conference perception would hurt us in getting selected for the playoff - but since we're about a million miles from there, here's to hoping everyone else loses their coaches and has their facilities destroyed by freak tornado.