Coach Hoke's Final Top 25 Ballot

78 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
December 5th, 2011 at 10:15 AM
#1
Mr. Yost
Mr. Yost's picture
Joined: 07/25/2011
MGoPoints: 5537
Coach Hoke's Final Top 25 Ballot

1.LSU
2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma State
4. Oregon
5. Stanford
6. Boise State
7. Arkansas
8. Wisconsin
9. South Carolina
10. Kansas State
11. Michigan
12. Virginia Tech
13. Michigan State
14. TCU
15. Baylor
16. Georgia
17. Clemson
18. Nebraska
19. Oklahoma
20. Penn State
21. Southern Mississippi
22. Houston
23. West Virginia
24. Florida State
25. Cincinnati

For those curious, Mark Dantonio has Michigan State No. 12 and Michigan No. 13. And Virginia Tech coach Frank Beamer had the Wolverines at No. 14.

Also interesting, LSU coach Les Miles was one of three coaches to have Michigan at No. 8 in his final poll -- joining Air Force's Troy Calhoun and Fresno State's Pat Hill. Wake Forest's Jim Grobe and San Diego State's Rocky Long had Michigan at its lowest position, No. 18. 

Very weird/bitter Long would put Hoke at 18 after losing to the Wolverines and working for/with Coach Hoke and Borges.

“True loyalty is that quality of service that grows under adversity and expands in defeat. Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise — the other, loyalty.”

Top
Tags:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 5th, 2011 at 10:18 AM | Here is EVERY coach (that votes)... (Score:5 Normal)
Mr. Yost
Mr. Yost's picture
Joined: 07/25/2011
MGoPoints: 5537

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/story/2011-final-coaches-ballots/51647436/1

“True loyalty is that quality of service that grows under adversity and expands in defeat. Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise — the other, loyalty.”

December 5th, 2011 at 10:32 AM | Now my neck hurts. (Score:4 Normal)
bdsisme
bdsisme's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 5480

Now my neck and eyes hurt.

"It would be a travesty, it would be ridiculous to all of a sudden come back and get the feeling back, get the health back, feel good again and then all of a sudden go throw some other colors on my shirt and go coach."

December 5th, 2011 at 12:14 PM | beyond miles having us at 8, (Score:1)
switch26
Joined: 02/04/2010
MGoPoints: 2638

beyond miles having us at 8, saban, spurrier, and zook had us at 9 surprised

December 5th, 2011 at 1:17 PM | Zook? I thought he got (Score:1)
DaBigDaddy
DaBigDaddy's picture
Joined: 08/11/2011
MGoPoints: 581

Zook? I thought he got zooked, how can he still be on the ballot. Correct me if I'm wrong, cause I don't know that much rule.

Playing football on Wall Street

December 5th, 2011 at 1:29 PM | changing horses in midstream (Score:3 Normal)
whitedawg
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 704

I would bet they assign the ballots at the beginning of the year for the entire season.  Keeping up with head coach firings and hirings, especially in these final few weeks of the year, could be a nightmare for the polls.  For example, Illinois hasn't hired anyone yet - who would you give the ballot to?

December 5th, 2011 at 10:24 AM | What a cool graphic. (Score:2 Normal)
Firstbase
Firstbase's picture
Joined: 09/30/2009
MGoPoints: 3120

That Flash file of all the coaches votes is really fascinating. It's interesting to see the wide deviations on some schools -- M included -- vis-a-vis others.

 

December 5th, 2011 at 10:24 AM | Saban's is interesting too (Score:2 Normal)
Haxel Rose
Haxel Rose's picture
Joined: 10/07/2010
MGoPoints: 684

He had OK ST at #4 with Stanford at #3

Troy calhoun (air force) had OK ST all the way down at 5!

December 5th, 2011 at 10:26 AM | Saban (Score:5 Normal)
Mitch Cumstein
Mitch Cumstein's picture
Joined: 10/02/2009
MGoPoints: 9641

That is really a classless move by him.  There is no excuse for voting OSU 4th if you're in that position.  

"A flute with no holes is not a flute. A donut with no hole is a danish"

December 5th, 2011 at 10:33 AM | He made up for it by putting (Score:5 Normal)
Hokemania
Hokemania's picture
Joined: 03/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2139

He made up for it by putting us nine and Sparty 17 haha.

Whatcha gonna do, little brother?

December 5th, 2011 at 10:44 AM | Interesting note on Saban re: (Score:2)
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 2906

Interesting note on Saban re: UM -- Saban voted UM #9 and MSU, his former employer, #17.

 

(EDIT: Oops, I did not refresh the page before making my post. Redundant!)

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

December 5th, 2011 at 11:10 AM | No love lost (Score:2 Normal)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10378

Saban once referred to MSU as his dream job.  He left because of constant meddling and micromanagement by the MSU administration.  There is definitely not a warm, fuzzy feeling between Saban and Sparty.  

 

 

 

December 5th, 2011 at 1:12 PM | This is true (Score:2 Interesting)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4378

From my brother who went to MSU, what essentially happened is Saban wanted a raise (he wasn't making bank at MSU, probably around league average but was on the cusp of making MSU a consistent top 25 team and competing for Big 10 titles) for him and his assistants and the president or administration said "no football coach will ever make more money than the school president."

What happened is what unfortunetly would probably happen at most universities with the way things seem to work: Saban left for LSU and a raise, the administration probably gave the president a nice raise and then raised tuition while cutting faculty and then hired a new coach for less money.  Now, after a decade of crapping the bed, they have Dantonio, who has gained some respect for MSU on the football field and probably still isn't making more money than the president because they probably gave the president another raise while raising tuition for students and cutting faculty and other things to help pay for it. the president and stand by the claim that "no football coach will ever make more money than the school president."

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

December 5th, 2011 at 12:18 PM | Saban's personal neg-bomb of Okie State... (Score:2 Normal)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14307

...is a repeat of Tom Osborne's doing the same to Michigan in '97, right?

 

 

December 5th, 2011 at 12:51 PM | Fat Phil (Score:2 Normal)
mmp
Joined: 08/04/2009
MGoPoints: 109

I am not sure about Osborne, but I always thought Phil ranked us 4th as retaliation for Woodson beating Manning for the Heisman.  

December 5th, 2011 at 10:27 AM | Hoke (Score:3 Normal)
BrownJuggernaut
BrownJuggernaut's picture
Joined: 10/02/2010
MGoPoints: 2791

I think Hoke had the fairest rankings of anyone.

Avatar is a reference to this. Go Blue!

December 5th, 2011 at 10:28 AM | I knew I liked Pat Hill for (Score:2)
BlueVoix
BlueVoix's picture
Joined: 06/25/2009
MGoPoints: 5546

I knew I liked Pat Hill for something other than his glorious mustache.  Too bad he got fired.

December 5th, 2011 at 10:38 AM | It is too bad that he got (Score:2)
APBlue
APBlue's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 1146

It is too bad that he got fired.  I always appreciated his "anyone, anytime, anyplace" motto.  He really seemed to have nice momentum built up there for a while, but then it seemed like he lost it.  I'm not sure if it was a result of BSU's progress, or what.  I'm curious to see where he winds up.  

December 5th, 2011 at 10:36 AM | Anybody have an over/under on (Score:1)
Mr. Robot
Mr. Robot's picture
Joined: 10/27/2009
MGoPoints: 1458

Anybody have an over/under on number of coaches who actually filled out their ballet instead of handing it to an assistant?

"Good evening, and welcome to Michigan Stadium for this the one-hundred thirty-second season of Michigan football, and the thirty-ninth meeting between Michigan and Notre Dame." -Carl Grapentine, September 10, 2011

December 5th, 2011 at 10:49 AM | I'm not the expert at betting (Score:2 Normal)
Jeff
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1262

I'm not the expert at betting lines that jamiemac is but I believe the over/under would be set at 0.5

2012 Pick Six Standings | 2011 Pick Six Standings | Twitter

December 5th, 2011 at 11:55 AM | I'll take the over (Score:1)
BrewCityBlue
BrewCityBlue's picture
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 1468

because of one man who I feel must have time to vote for himself - Zooker!

HAIL.

"Where's the threat? Oh, it's right here, and it's devouring us alive." -Ace<

December 5th, 2011 at 12:36 PM | To get his ballot that would (Score:3 Funny)
Jeff
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1262

To get his ballot would require Zook to have correctly filled out his forwarding address during the exit interview.

Quite a risky gamble...

2012 Pick Six Standings | 2011 Pick Six Standings | Twitter

December 5th, 2011 at 11:11 AM | I hope (Score:5 Normal)
OHbornUMfan
OHbornUMfan's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 1887

the assistants of every program are in charge of ballet, leaving time for the head coaches to fill out the ballots.

December 5th, 2011 at 1:37 PM | posted from iPhone (Score:1)
jonvalk
jonvalk's picture
Joined: 07/19/2009
MGoPoints: 2037

Agreed. How can a coach properly rank teams if he's worried about which player (Gholston, Worthy or Cousins) will get the lead in Swan Lake?!

December 5th, 2011 at 10:37 AM | Bielema (Score:5 Normal)
Yorzinlax
Joined: 07/05/2008
MGoPoints: 15

Bielema seems to have Michigan at 9, MSU at 15. Maybe he's not as dumb as he looks.

Wolverine in Badgerville

December 5th, 2011 at 2:09 PM | That is really something (Score:2)
Bodogblog
Bodogblog's picture
Joined: 06/08/2010
MGoPoints: 7586

a slap in the face

December 5th, 2011 at 10:39 AM | Its funny to see some of (Score:2)
go16blue
go16blue's picture
Joined: 04/28/2010
MGoPoints: 3428

Its funny to see some of these ballots given a coach's history (like Saban ranking MSU 17, or Rocky Long (SDSU) ranking Michigan 18)

COYS and lets go Detroit FC!

December 5th, 2011 at 1:27 PM | I thought once Long said Hoke (Score:1)
DaBigDaddy
DaBigDaddy's picture
Joined: 08/11/2011
MGoPoints: 581

I thought once Long said Hoke will win a national championship at Michigan, so I was expecting some support there.

Playing football on Wall Street

December 5th, 2011 at 10:46 AM | Wow (Score:1)
Tshimanga Cowabunga
Tshimanga Cowabunga's picture
Joined: 08/09/2009
MGoPoints: 818

I can't believe 5 coaches has Oklahoma State 4th (including (former) Big 12 coach Gary Pinkel) and one had them 5th!! Also funny that MSU was ranked 21st by 3 coaches!

December 5th, 2011 at 10:49 AM | Pinkel is already trolling hard for the SEC (Score:2 Normal)
Tacopants
Tacopants's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 2242

U MAD BIG 12?

December 5th, 2011 at 11:02 AM | Oh well. We're in, and we deserve to be. (Score:1 Normal)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10871

Rocky Long is an idiot though. Boise at four? TCU at eleven? MSU at twelve? Georgia at fifteen? Southern Miss and Houston both ahead of us?

Maybe if we had beat his ass by four touchdowns instead of three he'd be convinced we're better.

Go Blue!

December 5th, 2011 at 10:52 AM | A couple of my favorites (Score:3 Normal)
83tilinfinity
83tilinfinity's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 453

Larry Fedora('s SID) ranked VT 9th and Clemson 22nd.

Tom O'Brien('s SID) ranked Georgia 7th. Had to go somewhere midway through the second quarter of the SECCG?

 

December 5th, 2011 at 10:54 AM | Art Briles (Score:1)
Tshimanga Cowabunga
Tshimanga Cowabunga's picture
Joined: 08/09/2009
MGoPoints: 818

Art Briles may have the wackiest thing on his ballot and is definitely the biggest homer. Michigan at 11 and Wisconsin at 16! MSU is at 21 on his ballot. His Big 12 rankings Oklahoma St 2, Kansas State 6, Baylor 12, and Oklahoma 14! Guess he had to justify his losses

December 5th, 2011 at 11:03 AM | Seeing Kansas St. rated so (Score:3 Insightful)
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 2906

Seeing Kansas St. rated so highly (by many media members/coaches) is absolutley mind boggling. KSU has 10 wins this season and 8 (!) of them are by a TD or less. KSU actually has a negative yardage margin this season (345 ypg offense vs. 400 ypg defense) and is only +5 in point margin (33 ppg offense vs. 28 ppg defense). KSU isn't good, they are just incredibly lucky.

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

December 5th, 2011 at 12:07 PM | No such thing as luck (Score:3 Normal)
AZBlue
AZBlue's picture
Joined: 09/14/2008
MGoPoints: 971

Tebow just wins games.

.

.

What were we talking about?

December 5th, 2011 at 2:18 PM | Hah (Score:1)
awnitsol
Joined: 08/04/2009
MGoPoints: 241

My favorite post of the day

December 5th, 2011 at 12:52 PM | 21? (Score:1)
96goblue00
96goblue00's picture
Joined: 08/17/2008
MGoPoints: 384

I was a bit surprised. I mean, I really don't like MSU and their douche of a coach, but ....21? I think they are pretty good team. They barely lost to Wisconsin (by a field goal), a team they beat earlier in the season. My guess is that it has something to do with the second half of their schedule. They lost against Nebraska in a bad way (they scored only 3 points against the huskers) and had, sort of, some uninspiring wins against Minnesota (by a td), by two tds against Northwestern, and closed out with a loss in the conference championship.

 

 

December 5th, 2011 at 10:55 AM | I think the people that are (Score:1)
Look Up_See Blue
Look Up_See Blue's picture
Joined: 07/06/2011
MGoPoints: -452678

I think the people that are upset about Michigan making a BCS Bowl need to look at some of the different polls and actually study them.  I can't tell you how many people I know that are bitching about how so and so go screwed this, and unfair that.  I think the nation got used to Michigan not being very good for three years and now they are just upset that Michigan is back to itself.  It's funny watching people when they are in a state of denial.

Remember Who You Are!

December 5th, 2011 at 10:56 AM | I just thought of something. (Score:1)
denardogasm
Joined: 09/11/2011
MGoPoints: 1861

I just thought of something. Why is the Coach's poll used over the Media poll for the BCS? What are the coaches even basing their votes on?  Hoke has given me the impression that he doesn't have time to watch any games besides the teams he's playing and I'd assume it's the same for everyone else. Seems like the AP would be more informed.

"Michigan Defense" is dominating everything, in every aspect of life. That's a rough definition.

-Craig Roh 10/29/2011

December 5th, 2011 at 10:59 AM | Coaches Poll (Score:2)
EGD
EGD's picture
Joined: 09/16/2009
MGoPoints: 1888

Not to mention the ridiculous conflct-of-interest that the coaches poll presents.

"You will suffer humiliation when the team from my area defeats the team from your area." -- The Onion

December 5th, 2011 at 11:00 AM | The AP Poll (Score:1)
Mr. Yost
Mr. Yost's picture
Joined: 07/25/2011
MGoPoints: 5537

I believe the AP Poll backed out or got kicked out because they crown their "own" national champion.

They don't have to vote the national champion #1. I may be completely off, but I think USC won the AP National Championship the year they beat us in the Rose Bowl ('06) and Florida won the BCS National Championship for beating Ohio.

“True loyalty is that quality of service that grows under adversity and expands in defeat. Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise — the other, loyalty.”

December 5th, 2011 at 11:14 AM | USC won the AP title after (Score:2 Informative)
Trebor
Trebor's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1006

USC won the AP title after beating us in the '04 Rose Bowl when LSU beat Oklahoma in the Sugar Bowl for the BCS title.

December 5th, 2011 at 11:46 AM | The AP withdrew itself in (Score:2 Normal)
Lionsfan
Lionsfan's picture
Joined: 06/03/2011
MGoPoints: 3908

The AP withdrew itself in 2004/05 after Mack Brown lobbyied like no other for voters to put Texas in the Rose Bowl over Cal. And after it happened, the AP was disgusted by the system and pulled itself

If you're doing nothing, how do you know when you're finished?

StraightDave owes me a steak dinner

December 5th, 2011 at 10:57 AM | coaches should NOT (Score:2 Normal)
Elno Lewis
Elno Lewis's picture
Joined: 12/05/2008
MGoPoints: 1143

be allowed to vote in any polls. 

Time wounds all heels. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwGXMryTbwE

December 5th, 2011 at 11:29 AM | I disagree. I don't mind (Score:2 Normal)
QVIST
QVIST's picture
Joined: 08/22/2009
MGoPoints: 695

I disagree. I don't mind coaches voting but the system needs to be changed. I believe in the coaches ranking teams that they have played only. I can't remember who, but some columnist made a formula out of this idea and it made a lot of sense and took the guesswork out of it for busy coaches who don't have time to watch games. I'm not sure how to quantify it with every ranking together, but would look something like this for us:
1. MSU
2. Iowa
3. Ohio
4. ND
5. Nebraska
6. Northwestern
7. Illinois
8. Purdue
9. SDSU
10. WMU
11. Minn
12. EMU

Sure, teams could still be screwed over, but if it's all public knowledge anyway, what's the difference?

December 5th, 2011 at 11:47 AM | How is a 6-6 OSU team and a (Score:2)
Syyk
Syyk's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 2032

How is a 6-6 OSU team and a 7-5 Iowa team ahead of Nebraska here?

December 5th, 2011 at 12:03 PM | Uh, duh (Score:1)
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2678

because we lost to Iowa, and came a whole lot closer to loosing to OSU than Nebraska.

December 5th, 2011 at 11:50 AM | There are enormous holes in that system. (Score:2)
Mr Miggle
Mr Miggle's picture
Joined: 10/07/2010
MGoPoints: 1606

It gives a major advantage to schools in weak conferences and discourages non-conference games with AQ conference opponents. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if it would have Houston ranked either #1 or #2 now.

Eating is murder.

December 5th, 2011 at 11:51 AM | while this idea makes no (Score:1)
ccdevi
Joined: 08/08/2010
MGoPoints: 326

while this idea makes no sense to me, whats up with your ranking, it seems to be purely a recap of how our games actually went....Iowa over Nebraska or ND?

December 5th, 2011 at 12:00 PM | I think that's the point.  (Score:2)
elaydin
elaydin's picture
Joined: 04/17/2010
MGoPoints: 2199

I think that's the point.  Each coach would rank their opponents based on what they saw when they played them.  That's the best data point a coach can use.  The ranking above is based on how teams played against Michigan, so to me, it would make sense.

One the other hand, Iowa and OSU would get ranked lower by coaches that beat them.  In theory, it would balance out.

December 5th, 2011 at 12:20 PM | Do you need coaches to do that? (Score:1)
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 14307

Isn't that what computers are for?

 

 

Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.