Chris Wormley - Central Catholic @ Whitmer notes

Submitted by Blazefire on

I would like to preface this by saying that I am a football fan in the more conventional sense. I watch the ball when I watch football, generally. Watching a player specifically was an entirely different animal for me. I really enjoyed it, but though I have studied the game for a long time, my observations could easily be mistaken. Anyhow...

Tonight, I watched Whitmer host Central Catholic, the two high caliber teams in the Toledo, OH area. This was a big tilt, and the stands were full. I did not stay for the whole game, because it was cold, and it was starting to turn into a bit of a rout. I went to observe Chris Wormley, DE for the Whitmer Panthers and 4-star Michigan verbal. Ace also attended this game. I think I saw him come in, but he was in a hurry and got away from me in the crowd. Ace, were you wearing some M gear and carrying some electronics in a shoulder bag? Did you finish a can of something and throw it away as soon as you arrived?

Continuing on to Wormley, first a note on his size. He's a big kid, but a lot of room for muscle, it looks like. He's well built, but not THICK in the chest, so I think he can hang some big slabs on there. THe only kid bigger than him on the field was one Whitmer OT who spent most of the time at LT, fantastically named Storm Norton. Norton is 6'8", 290 lbs and committed to Toledo, so it's a good thing Wormley isn't that big. You don't want a 6'8", 290lb DE. Norton had some great power but was easily beaten by some simple swim moves. WIth some coaching, he will be a GOOD player for Toledo.

On the first series of the game, Wormley recorded 2 half-TFL's, by my count. One sack and one on the RB. He blew though the line and backers followed him in. It was fantastic. Following this, he played on the o-line a bit, where I didn't pay much attention. He is NOT going to play O-line. Didn't seem interested in it. If he didn't have anyone to block, he didn't look for anyone.

Starting with the second offensive series, he seemed to diappear a bit. Many people have questioned his motor, and I somewhat agree. However, I believe that in part, he is being coached not to run down plays away from him. Whitmer has a good defense all across the line, for the most part.  He was able to rely on his teamates to shut things down away from him. On one play I noted, Central ran away from him, only to reverse field. Wormley had been jogging lightly towards the ball carrier prior, but when it turned back, he put on some speed and followed him all the way down the LOS, until a corner caught the ball carrier right near the edge of the field. there was no lack of effort. I believe the DE's are being coached to stay a bit wide when the play goes away from them, just in case.

Plays often went away from Wormley. They didn't run at him, and they didn't throw to his side. Chris was getting a very good pass rush for the most part. I saw him defeat double teams with ease. I saw him blast a single block by literally throwing his blocker back about 2 yards with one push. Even when his blocker got into him, they went backwards, not forward, whether it was a pass or run. He had little opportunity to peel off his blocker and make a tackle because they so rarely ran to whichever side he was on (It varied). I did see a ball carrier slip his grasp on one or two occasions.

Both teams ran the shotgun with a variety of one and two back looks, mixing in two, three and four reciever sets, mostly with one or no TE's. I saw 4 wide on a few occasions. I think Chris would have more success against an under center O, as he had a good/ not spectacular first step and consistendly drove his blocker at least a yard back. With the shotgun setup, CC was going to 4 and 5 yard sideline routes with incredible regularity, which didn't give Chris' pass rush time to hit home. He will need to work on his speed off the ball to get to faster moving O's, OR have more help at NT to split the line so he doesn't have to go around.

Overall, I was impressed with the size and ablility, but less so with the actual product, which I think was a result of offensive scheme and the talent he had around him. In a defense that doesn't easily allow short routes and consistently running away from him, he'll be a star.

mgoblue52

October 28th, 2011 at 10:18 PM ^

Ace, were you wearing some M gear and carrying some electronics in a shoulder bag? Did you finish a can of something and throw it away as soon as you arrived?

 

Blazefire

October 28th, 2011 at 11:02 PM ^

because you guys really seem to appreciate it. I was afraid those two sentences where I tried to confirm if someone was who I thought they were would override the whole thing. I'm glad my efforts are appreciated.

Gobluegr

October 28th, 2011 at 11:08 PM ^

Ace, were you that guy in the teal superhero costume with an A on it. And if that was you, what's with your friend Gary? He put off some weird vibes. Joking aside, thanks for the update. It's always good to see how our recruits are doing as they prepare for the big leagues.

Mr.Mario86

October 28th, 2011 at 11:21 PM ^

Can we seriously stop being complete assholes about this post. All in all, Blaze great info thanks man.

Blazefire

October 28th, 2011 at 11:25 PM ^

Admittedly, it does sound a bit like Creepy McCreeperston. But I honestly just wanted to know if that was Ace, and I figured I'd offer as much info as possible.

Don't care if people joke, but maybe a comment on the rest of the post as well? Or not. Whatever. It's cool.

Ace

October 28th, 2011 at 11:36 PM ^

First of all, this thread made me laugh—funny stuff in the comments, guys.

Second, nice post, Blazefire—I have a slightly different take on the game, which you'll get on Monday (apologies, but I'm exhausted and still need to eat dinner). The person you saw was not me, and I'm not just saying that or anything. I don't wear Michigan gear to high school games (I find that a bit unprofessional), but if you saw someone with a camera wearing a gray fedora huddled right next to the press box, that was me.

No need to feel like a creeper when it comes to me. As long as you're not bugging recruits (potential recruiting violation) and you don't mess with me while I'm filming during plays, I'm always happy to chat with people at high school games—one of my favorite parts of the job is actually shooting the breeze with the locals while I'm filming from the bleachers. Hope the people that made it to Whitmer enjoyed the game.

BlueSince5

October 29th, 2011 at 12:04 AM ^

At the game and saw up close how much bigger he can actually get. Could not run down plays from behind so he may need to work on that.

What I found interesting is that Joe Palka, the Whitmer coach kept his starters in until 2:00 left in the game. It could have been a disaster if one of his top players had gotten hurt.

BTW, Central scored two touchdowns with their 2nd teamers against the Whitmer 1st teamers (including Wormley). Central pulled their starters down 31-7 at the beginning of the 4th. 

Paly33

October 29th, 2011 at 1:08 AM ^

Since TomVH has left too many random people have tried to be the HS recruiting analyst. ACE you need to lock this shit down. This blog is completely watered down since Tim & TomVH left. Sad to say, but I miss the old days!

GBOD79

October 29th, 2011 at 1:25 AM ^

Blazefire went to a game and offered his take. There is nothing wrong with this and adds to the board. You will get Ace's take on the game as well. I dont see why you would view this as a problem. 

Blazefire

October 29th, 2011 at 1:27 AM ^

You're complaining about additional free content? I suppose you bitch at the Costco sample people too because last week's samples were smoked turkey and this is just crackers?

I, and everyone else who strives to add a little value to a site we love around here, appologize.

MGoSoftball

October 29th, 2011 at 8:21 AM ^

enjoy the perspective of a non-professional.  It gives some realism to the post.  Yea there might be a slant here but Blaze was not asked to go and preview the game.  He did it on his own.

Thanks Blaze for you effort and analysis.  It did not go unnoticed.

Palazzola123, you certainly have a right to your opinion and I have the right to call you a dick. TomVH was admired by most of us on the board, we can agree.  However, how dare you critisize an admitted rookie and compare him to Tom?

 

 

michgoblue

October 29th, 2011 at 9:22 AM ^

The guy went to a game and specifically observed one of our more important 2012 recruits. He then posted his thoughts on Sao recruit.
<br>
<br>I, for one, was happy to read it and thought that he did a great write-up. And as to your point about watering down the blog, he posted it in the mgoboard, not the front page. If you only want professional write-ups, stick to the front page or posts marked ACE. Besides, I would rather read this than yet another board post about three and out debating the merits of RR and his tenure here.
<br>
<br>Thanks blaze.

jerasaurus

October 29th, 2011 at 1:59 AM ^

Thanks for the recap, Blaze.  Rivals' Josh Helmholdt had a similar take, though it sounds like he might have been a little less impressed than you (only a preview is posted so far.)  

I'll be interested to read what Ace says on Monday.