i may have altered the title
Chris Spielman on Denard Robinson (good!) and Michigan's defense (uh, not good)
There's no way it can get worse with these kids getting more experience, stronger, etc. But d@mn, he layed it to us pretty good about the lack of talent!
I would like to examine the lack of cultivating talent that osu does, for someone who recruits so well they aren't that high powered in any phase of the game.
I wouldn't even remember the defense when we Win Saturday...GO BLUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Spielman on Michigan's defense, ranked 112th nationally giving up an average 445.2 points"
...but I didn't think we were that bad. Almost 450 points per game, damn. Good thing we have such an explosive offense.
Are we going to have walk-ons from outside of Toledo be our starting safety (Jordan Kovacs) or are we going to get kids who can play?
Ouch. He's obviously selling Kovacs short, but I get where he's going with this. Our depth at Defense is hurting.
Touchdown Michigan!
Fuck Spielman. Seriously. He keeps saying we have no talent. We have plenty of talent. We out-recruit, or at least recruit on par with Wisconsin, Iowa, and Michigan State on the defensive side of the ball. They all have pretty solid defenses. I can't stand when commentators (especially Buckeyes) talk shit about the talent level of our players. I love our players, and am excited to see what they can do when they have some more beef, and possibly better coaching on that side of the ball.
Sure, we've recruited talent on par with those schools, but we've also lost that talent: attrition and injury. The talent on our roster is less than those schools in my opinion, not just more youthful. It would be different if we could have kept those bodies committed, accepted, enrolled, and intact.
WOW. He ripped into us. And I can't even be mad, he's either mostly right, or absolutely right, about everything.
eenie meenie miney mo, catch a WR by his toe. if he scores six, let him go
Also, from the years '85-'88 we went 3-1 against OSU, which I believe was when Spielman played there (not sure if he stayed 4 years). So he can go fuck himself.
Michigan to smack the ever loving $#it out of Ohio State as much as I want it this year since David Boston called out Woodson.
"I figure if I can get two degrees from Ohio State, it might be close to Elliott’s undergraduate degree" -- Brock
I think Spielman was deliberately trying to give the Michigan players some bulletin board material.
He knew what he was doing when he talked smack like this. He's clearly trying to stoke the flames of a smoldering rivalry.
Go Blue
is that our defense is bad, but denard is good. thanks spielman!
so regardless of how you feel about Spielman, this week, fuck him and fuck osu.
I agree with him. It will be interesting to see what rich rod does this offseason as far as scheme, coach and philosophy.
All hail Hoke!
a "fake" buckeye. I suppose it depends on if he gets somebody to read the comments to him.
We can't tackle. I made this point on the 3 man line thread. We can play whatever scheme we like but we do not know how to tackle. Arm tackles at the backs shoulders when a good shoulder to the chest and arms around the middle will suffice.
I hope they teach tackling during the 15 bowl practices. JHC.
3-time all big ten, 2-time all american, lombardi award winner, 4-time pro-bowler...
he's forgotten more about football than I know. the Indiana subs bit is questionable but the rest of it is pretty agonizingly accurate.
"Play hard and with great effort"
I knew our defense was bad, but can anyone confirm this number:
Spielman on Michigan's defense, ranked 112th nationally giving up an average 445.2 points.
I guess it has been worse than I though.
"Those who stay will be champions."
"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."
Chris Spielman and Kirk Gibson get my official Buckeye and Spartan exemptions. They are both awesome. As mentioned above the two-handed spike from Spielman against the Bears is my favorite Lions memory.
Forget about where our defensive players (outside of martin) would be on osu's depth chart. Name one defensive player, whose name is not mike martin, who would even get offered by osu. While I have serious issues with scheme and coaching, the problem has to start there.
Who is this Spielman character?
Is that the emaciated dude I saw on TV this weekend? To hell with him and his Columbutt brethren.
Go Blue. Beat Ohio State.
"the Spirit of Michigan...is based on a deathless loyalty to Michigan and all her ways....and a conviction that nowhere is there a better university, in any way, than this Michigan of ours" - Fielding Yost
Suck on that, Spielman!
It is spelled HOKEAMANIA. Our coach is an ass-kicking American citizen, not one of the Beatles, for Christ's sake!
Spielman is one of the best color guys working today.
Sev. things stood out.
- Cupboard left bare. I agree, and think this has set us way back.
- Talent deficiency. Partly agree. Partly, think it is age, size, strength, seasoning, which doesn't happen overnight.
- Scheme. Disagree. Think the combination of lack of high end talent and lack of experience make it impossible to fully evaluate the scheme.
- Coaching. He didn't focus on this. Either he doesn't want to publicly bash Gerg, or he doesn't see a huge problem with the coaching. I personally believe that the jury is out, and that you can't evaluate this adequately with our current lack of talent and experience.
"It does not matter how many times you get knocked down, but how many times you get up." Vince Lombardi
we all see different reasons for the suck, well Gerg just sees a teddy bear.
our package is our package, and it’s pretty big. - Greg Mattison, Bowl Practice Presser Tr. 12-13-11.
I read the article. As much as I hate to say it I cannot disagree with Speilman's take. We are indeed a talent depleted defense. With regard to Kovacs - Spielman is spot on. I love the kid but he's tiny and normally this is not the type of guy you see as a starter on a Michigan defensive roster. The fact that Kovacs is one of our better players speaks volumes. Our issues will be solved on the recruting trail. Let's just hope RRod can close big...
And I kind of agree with him. We've been getting some impact players on the O but the D has been embarrassing this year. Recruiting on the D has to focus on guys with size and speed. 4-5 star recruits who go out there and know how to tackle, get off the line fast and low and pursuit at the right angle.
Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value.
It's no wonder we've been struggling on defense so much. We simply don't have the size in the trenches. Look at Ohio State's recruiting class this year. They have 3 DTs already signed: 1. Michael Bennett (6-3, 275); 2. Chase Farris (6-6, 270); 3. Joel Hale (6-5; 295). i'm not sure we have an O lineman with that kind of size much less a DT. We need Chris Bryant in the worst way!!
OSU has also signed the #3 DE in the country (according to Scout) - Steve Miller (6-4, 230).
I'm thrilled to get Justice Hayes but until we start bringing in size (in waves) for our trenches and/or our front 7 this program will continue to struggle against the B10's elite...
another idiotic post about how we lack size and only go after undersized players. Do me a favor and go look at our roster on mgoblue and get back to me.
Our defense is comically bad. But I do think we have some good young talent to build on.
Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.
Looking positively from here, you see young talent that isn't physically big enough or strong enough to compete... yet.
Looking negatively from here, you question the talent of the recruits we have landed and wonder if size and strength will actually make a difference at any point.
To be honest, I'm still stuck at the fork. I can see down both paths a very short way and I'm not sure which one looks more like the path of what will happen and what will not.
Positively, we get Woolfolk and Floyd back at corner along with Avery, Roh and Martin back on the D-line, and Johnson, Demens, and Gordon back who have showed ability with little experience. Overwhelmingly, defenses get better with age and experience, something they've all managed this season. But will it be enough? That's where I just don't know. Is Woolfolk really a lockdown corner? I think Avery could be, but how long will it take? Gordon has been streaky with play at times. Demens looked great when he was utilizing his strengths but got crushed this week through no fault of his own (at least I think it wasn't his fault). Martin will be man-beast again next season but will injuries linger and will anyone be able to spell him for a break occasionally? Roh needs to put on a little weight to be a more effective pass rusher, but has he capped out? So many questions and so few answers. ARGH!
"I figure if I can get two degrees from Ohio State, it might be close to Elliott’s undergraduate degree" -- Brock
I'm very concerned about our interior line next year sans Martin. We have some guys waiting in the wings (Talbott, Ash, Q and Wilkins) but will they actually be an upgrade over the players who are departing?
Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.
I will try to phrase this as delicately as possible: Is Floyd coming back that good of a thing? I have NEVER seen worse coverage meltdowns than I have from him. I guess part of it is that I follow Michigan football that closely, but I watch a lot of non-Michigan football as well, and I have yet to witness or recall any coverage breakdowns as awful as those by Floyd. I really want the kid to mature and develop into a great piece of the D, but I just don't know. Their should be improvements from game to game, and I am not seeing it.
"And they'll never catch him!"
I think you would find Spielman knows what he is talking about vs. a majority of people who think they know by studying a board. Also, he was very close to wearing the Maize n Blue out of HS, Bo almost convinced him to come to Ann Arbor.....his father did not support that choice which is how he ended up a Buckeye.
Most people I think regardless of side want to see two of the best teams play in this game and really go head to head for the B10 championship and possible NC. If it is truly competitive with two great teams and one is on a streak of wins it is one thing.....being dominated for years at a time is another.
"You're gonna eat lightning, and you're gonna crap thunder!"
unintelligent and idiotic. By this logic, talent can be identified and conclusively determined by the time a player is a freshman. Just about all All-Conference type of players are either on the bench the first couple years or playing and not wrecking people. It's a rare player that is dominant as a freshman. Likewise, if he's watching our young players and can't see flashes of talent that will likely grow into great players in the future, he is simply blind.
I'm willing to bet that if you took a great defense like Iowa and sent a top junior to the draft early, knocked out the top 2 players with injuries and transformed another 8-10 on the 2-deep into freshman they would suck horribly. That doesn't mean Iowa can't recruit talent.
Spielman needs to wait until these young players are juniors and seniors. If they still can't hang with anybody in the B10, then you can talk about how the defense lacks talent.
I don't care if this quote comes from Drew Sharp or a defensive genius, the point stands.
Everyone assumes the entire defense is young. The dline is mainly upperclassmen with the exception of Roh and the reserves. Mounton is a senior, Ezeh's senior, Fitzgerald's a jr. I understand the secondary is extremely young but there's upperclassmen on the front 7, which got manhandled by Wisky. It's like Speilman says - other than Martin they aren't that good.
Name me the starters in the front 6 or 7 who haven't been in the program for at least 3 years.
Craig Roh.
That's it.
Wow, we're so young up front.
STFU.
Go Blue
I'm not saying everyone on D is good or everyone is young. Clearly that is not the case. Each player and position deserves a case-by-case analysis and Spielman failed to do that. It was lazy and stupid.
A good chunk of our "seniority" on D are career backups that have been forced into action due to our young talent on D not being ready or injuries. Rogers would not be on the field if not for Woolfolk/Floyd injuries. Fitz would not be on the field if Mike Jones wasn't injured or Bell/Furman was ready. Banks/Sagesse are career backup types that were forced into action because Will/QWash aren't ready. We have the talent; it's either not ready or injured.
It's a lot like the OL last year and in 2008. We were forced into playing some experienced guys that weren't great. Result? Mediocrity. Everyone at the time recognized that the guys waiting in the wings were the future and were better than the starters....when they were physically ready. Today? Line is great and getting better.
Are you seriously telling me that guys like RVB, Roh, Demens, and Woolfolk aren't good? Are you also telling me that guys like Furman, MRob, Mike Jones, Cam, Avery, Ash, QWash, etc. etc. have very low talent and no cance of being capable B10 players? I happen to disagree.
WOW! I wonder if coach will make an exception and use this to fire up our "special teams players" for saturday. I respect spielman for giving his honest opinion and we have definitely been bad on D, but we have talent they just aren't developed. Good motivation for our 'indiana" defense.
"Only fat people wear hawaiian shirts in Tennessee" -co worker
Uh, yeah, Chris you're right, a lot of the players wouldn't start for many teams because they are freshman. That is kind of the whole point. They are freshman. Name me a successful, hell even average defense in any conference who has half the freshman in the two deeps as we do. I won't even mention the lack of experience all over the place. Let's just stop at freshmen.
I just don't like that he is claiming that there isn't any talent. On defense, experience matters a lot. You can be a great RB or WR without experience because it is so much talent based, but on defense experience is king.
... but I love Chris Spielman. He was a great player for the Lions, he respects the hell out of the rivalry, he speaks his mind, and from a couple personal interactions with him when I was younger and he was playing for the Lions he was just a great guy.
He says nothing in this article I would take offense to -- knowing he is a Buckeye and talking on a buckeye radio talk show.
There, I said it.
Do Something. If it works, do more of it. If it doesn't, do something else.


... what he is saying is that kids don't learn? I would like to believe that we do have talent and simply the coaches on defense have not put these kids in a better position to at least be ranked 80th in the nation. Is being ranked 112th just a result of poor talent? I don't think so...
“Meeeshigan wins, 27-21. They aren’t even going to try the extra point. Who cares? Who gives a damn?”