CC: Some Good Words about Hoke

Submitted by Soulfire21 on

Well,

I honestly have no idea how to feel about the coaching situation other than "OMFGWTF", but I did stumble across some good words about Brady Hoke, and since his name is in the mix, I thought I'd share.

Fox Sports' Jason Whitlock wrote:

"Hoke and his coaching staff know how to develop players. I've seen it.

"They know how to recruit and identify talent that works in their system. At Ball State and San Diego State, Hoke assembled coaching staffs more qualified and skilled than the schools' budgets allow.

"Good coaches love working for Hoke.

"Jim Harbaugh is the sizzle hire in all of football. He's not a better college football coach than Brady Hoke.

If Michigan would love Hoke with half the passion Hoke loves Michigan, beating Ohio State and returning to the top of the Big Ten wouldn't take more than three seasons."

There's a link to the full column, etc. there.
 
It allowed me to get out of the fetal position and, for the time being, I don't say "FUCK NO" like tourettes guy every time I hear "Brady" or "Hoke" or "Brady Hoke".

PurpleStuff

January 8th, 2011 at 3:43 PM ^

Dave Brandon didn't want to give a proven head coach a chance to see what might happens when his recruits reach their junior season.  That is fine if he feels it is in the best long term interests of the program.  But it he botches the search and hire (and hiring Hoke would mean he completely fucked up both) he doesn't get the benefit of the doubt.

On the other hand, I'm still optimistic that Brandon will make a smart hire so all this talk is hypothetical nonsense fueled be message boards that assume Hoke is the default candidate.

HeadAsplode

January 8th, 2011 at 4:44 PM ^

Right now I'm trying to remain patient, like you (jmblue).  I'm trying to withhold judgement until I see who he brings in and how the new coach fits with the culture, recruits, and performs on the field.

It's very difficult to be patient as a fanbase considering the last three years of drama and on-field performance though, so I don't blame anyone calling for Brandon's head; I'm just not one of them because it's too early for me to judge him on a hire that hasn't been made yet.

Soulfire21

January 8th, 2011 at 3:29 PM ^

Personally, I don't want Hoke here -- at least not yet.  However, who the fuck else is going to walk into this mess that we have now?

Also, firing a coach we brought in to change everything after just 3 short years (and 2 recruiting classes) sends a pretty bad message out to potential coaches, and the message is this:

We don't care what you are doing, how much "time" you need to set up your system, etc.  You better win here, and you better do it fast (1-2 years)

J.Swift

January 8th, 2011 at 3:40 PM ^

He did change quite a few things, unfortunately not the ones that count the most.

Michigan is not the only school where "You better win here, and better do it fast."  Do you think it's different at OSU, PSU, or Wisconsin? 

Had Rich posted a respectable B10 record, he would still be here. 

You ask, "who the fuck else is going to walk into this mess that we have now."  Bottom line, Rich left the mess and did not have a plan to fix. 

I doubt that many ADs at programs like Michigan would have acted differently.

Ernis

January 8th, 2011 at 3:48 PM ^

some points that need to be cleared up, about which you seem confused.

1. RR had 3 recruiting classes.

2. The window for success is 3 years at least. If you lose games but are at least competitive against good teams, you'll pobably get 4. If losing to a good team is a foregone conclusion, 3.

lots of sand  lowing up people's skirts these days

AMazinBlue

January 8th, 2011 at 3:19 PM ^

and Carr was against RR, and Hoke comes in with no "power" or major rep of his own then would he be a pawn of LC and how he wants the program to run?  It certainly seems that Carr won the battle of RR.  If Hoke gets the job, it'll be interesting to see if Carr starts making publice comments about how great of a hire he is and becoming more involved.

I said it a few days ago, MUllen wouldn't be a bad hire fomr an X-Os standpoint and he runs a spread as well.  He might get better talent here.  There are negatives on every candidate.  JH's only negative was he might go to the NFL eventually.

Wow.  The more you think about it, the more screwed we are.  If DB doesn't get this right, the consecutive streak of 100k+ plus end as well.

thethirdcoast

January 8th, 2011 at 3:22 PM ^

...is a ton of IFs, but I agree 100% with your sentiment that DB had better get this hire right.

The largest issue right now is that the perfect candidate for Michigan's head job is out of the running, and there is a serious paucity of excellent, very good, or even good candidates out there.

At this point, I really hope DB has a rabbit stashed in a hat somewhere...

SA

January 8th, 2011 at 3:22 PM ^

I also prefer Hoke to Miles.   I can't see how we consider Miles due to his lying about players he cut - this is not a trait we want in our coach.

I know that Hoke gets ripped for not being qualified (e.g. not coming from a big-time school).  While coaching is surely different at a BCS conference vs the MAC or MWC - what I think needs to be looked at is this:  Is Hoke a good coach regardless of where he has coached?

 

From reading articles, his players play tough and play hard for him.  They bought in early when he arrived at SDSU.  I think these are all traits of a good coach.   If he is hired, then time will tell....

Topher

January 8th, 2011 at 3:48 PM ^

I concur - Miles is radioactive and unless the school wants to put a hard ethics clause in his contract and risk a Mike Leach instant-firing circus, I find it hard to believe DB can hire him given we're on probation already.

People need to wake up to reality - this search is going to involve a huge risk one way or another. Hoke is qualified for the job. He's done two impressive turnaround jobs. There's no evidence he's going to return the program to a "conservative" risk-averse Lloydball mindset  (which would be preferable to the abject failure we see today on D and ST). He's down with the program tradition but having been a head coach he knows what will need to be changed for the good of the program. I actually think his resume and demeanor are very similar to Jim Harbaugh. He's not a guy who has coached at a lower conference for a decade without getting a sniff at a big job, he's definitely moving up the coaching ladder.

Would he be a "safe" hire? Yes. That doesn't mean he isn't the best one, or couldn't take the program to the top. 

uminks

January 8th, 2011 at 3:24 PM ^

However, he wants to shred our spread and many of our good players including DROB will transfer. It will be a total rebuilding process with a coach who really has not proved himself. But if we want to be a nice clean program that finishes in the bottom of the big 10 and occasionally wins 6 or 7 games and go the the pizza pizza bowl, then Hoke is our man. It is starting to look that way. May be I'm wrong and in 4 or 5 years he will have the program back in competition for the b10 title?

bighouseinmate

January 8th, 2011 at 3:51 PM ^

....about Hoke. SDSU had two thousand yard wr's on the year, a RB with nearly 1500 yds, and two other receivers with over 300 yards. Hoke's 2010 SDSU team has the top yardage QB, top rusher, and top two receivers in the MWC, a conference that includes TCU and Andy Dalton, and Utah with it's spread type attack.

SDSU this season was a quick-strike offense that would rather kill you quickly than try to grind it out. As such, they were able to score 35 points on TCU(who averaged allowing only 11 points/game).

I have to believe, from what I've read about SDSU and Hoke now, that he would find a way to keep Denard and all the other parts RR is leaving us with in order to make a workable offense.

Soulfire21

January 8th, 2011 at 3:25 PM ^

Thinking about Hoke, there's stuff I like.

He was an assistant at Michigan (DLine coach), part of the staff for the .'97 championship team.  ("Michigan Man", Check)

He also says Michigan is his dream job -- this implies he wouldn't be here just for the money/fame/glitz/etc., I'd assume he'd want to genuinely do a great job.

He's quite young, if he does well, could be around for a while.

And, a few things I don't:

Wouldn't adapt his offense, as he seems morally opposed to running a spread option like Rich Rod and the players we currently have.

Lack of major college coaching experience.

His name doesn't strike fear into peoples' hearts (unless you're Navy, apparently).

maineandblue

January 8th, 2011 at 3:32 PM ^

The guy who wrote this article used to be at Ball State.

In any case, I don't doubt that Hoke is a great guy and his players love him. I'm not thrilled about his overall losing record in crappy divisions, but my biggest concern is attrition. We just spent 3 years dealing with attrition and losing. Now we finally had a chance to field a team that isn't mostly frosh and sophs, and I'm really really worried that unless DB pulls a big name guy with a history of success out of his butt, we'll lose recruits and current players, setting us back at least another 3-4 years. Hiring Hoke would likely mean losing players, which in turn would lead to more losing seasons, in turn leading to U of M = ND.

I'm normally a cup half full kind of guy, but this is becoming a nightmare.

MichiganStudent

January 8th, 2011 at 3:34 PM ^

Why does everyone think its just down to Hoke and Miles? 

 

There are still wildcards out there: Gruden, Patterson, etc. 

 

Remember, Rich Rod was not on our radar until the very end. 

Soulfire21

January 8th, 2011 at 3:36 PM ^

Good point, even though Rich Rod ultimately failed.

Patterson has been working on an extension with TCU, although no reports as to whether he has signed it, the deal he was trying to work out was before Michigan had a coaching vacancy.

Don

January 8th, 2011 at 3:38 PM ^

There isn't an ice particle's chance in Hell that Jon Gruden will ever set foot in Schembechler Hall, unless it's to interview the next Michigan coach. David Brandon is not going to hire a guy whose last contact with the college game was twenty years ago.

bighouseinmate

January 8th, 2011 at 3:35 PM ^

.......a hire of Hoke would be a win for Carr. Yes, Hoke was an assistant under Carr, but nothing I hear about Hoke steers me to believing that he is just a "crony" of Carr's. To me, whether or not Carr likes him is completely irrelevant to the situation. The players he has coached rave about him, he absolutely wants to be UM's HC, not as a step up from his current assignment, but because he bleeds maize and blue.

Those who simply look at his overall won/loss record are failing to look deeper into just how good a coach he is. He didn't take two perpetually winning schools and eventually bump them up in wins. He took two losing doormats of programs to at or near the top of their conferences, completely turning them around in his time there.

To me, Hoke shouldn't be a "fallback" plan, but should be mentioned near the top of the list as DB considers who our next coach should be.

The Denarding

January 8th, 2011 at 4:38 PM ^

He would bust his ass for Michigan, he would recruit like a mad man, he has a very traditional mind set that the grey hairs who basically run the university would love and he would hire highly competent coordinators to execute.  

It is time to accept that Brady Hoke will be our next coach by next week.  It is almost a guarantee.  He is the only coach that the entire athletic department truly feels comfortable with, and trust me he will get some really heavy hitter coordinators because that will be the key.  There will be coaches in waiting (specifically Scott Loeffler).

b-diddy

January 8th, 2011 at 4:41 PM ^

the problem with hoke is that its an underwhelming hire.

had brandon sold it, maybe had some people in the press write some stories lauding him. hired him early so it didnt look like we're settling like he's left over pizza. maybe then it would have worked.

personally, from what i've gathered, i think hoke could be a good hire. but if we learned one thing from the rodriguez era its that the support of the extended UM familly is necessary to success. i get the sense hoke would be a tough sell.

one thing is for sure, i bet michigan is regretting adding SDSU to start next year's schedule.

bigkegs

January 8th, 2011 at 4:54 PM ^

What would make me mad is if Michigan doesn't at least have conversations with Mullen, Patterson, etc.  Especially after Patterson's comments in the media, he at the very least didnt seem opposed to the idea of a conversation about the Michigan HC job.  That would make me very frustrated as a fan if Michigan didn't at least try to talk to him and settled on Miles or Hoke only because they've overtly expressed interest in the past.

chatster

January 8th, 2011 at 6:18 PM ^

Two years ago, another BCS team fired its head coach after the worst four seasons in the school’s history. That coach had succeeded a very successful head coach who was considered to have reached the end of his line after having had a few down seasons and having been thoroughly embarrassed in a bowl-game loss.

The new coach had come to the team in 2005 with the caché of having been an assistant coach on Super Bowl championship teams. He was hailed as a savior when he was hired. Not only was he expected to revamp and re-energize the offense so that it would become more exciting, but he was considered to be a "defensive guru" who would instantly develop one of the top college football defenses in the nation. The new coach’s first team finished with the first double-digit-loss season in the school’s history (1-10 with no conference wins). He finished 10-37 (3-25 in conference) in four seasons. His last three defenses – using his hand-picked assistants, schemes and most of his own recruits all were ranked in the bottom 20 of FBS teams.

When that coach was fired, few followers of Syracuse football expected that Greg Robinson would be hired as a football coach ever again. Yet within weeks of his firing, Robinson was hired to take over the Michigan defense. You know the rest of that disastrous story for Michigan.

To replace Robinson, Syracuse hired Doug Marrone, then an assistant coach with the New Orleans Saints. Marrone was a Syracuse alum who once had captained the Syracuse team as an offensive lineman. Marrone considered the Syracuse head coach position to be his dream job – so much so that for years he had compiled a notebook filled with suggestions for how he would handle the Syracuse job if it ever was offered to him. The reaction to Marrone’s hiring was greeted by many Syracuse fans with a collective, "Huh, WTF?"

In two seasons, helped by instilling a no-nonsense, "act like professionals" attitude among his players, and fortunate to have hired former Stanford and Michigan defensive coordinator Scott Shafer to run the Syracuse defense, Marrone unloaded most of Robinson’s players and used former Duke point guard and high school All-American QB Greg Paulus who had become a Syracuse graduate student, to quarterback his first team (one that matched the best win total that Robinson had achieved in any of his four years). He also converted two of Robinson’s running back recruits, Doug Hogue and Derrell Smith, into very good Big East linebackers who have a decent chance of getting NFL tryouts. He recently finished his second season at Syracuse with an 8-5 record and a win in the inaugural New Era Pinstripe Bowl at Yankee Stadium, blocks away from where Marrone grew up. He has begun to make Syracuse fans start to forget The Greg Robinson Error.

There are few positives to take from Brady Hoke’s candidacy to succeed Rich Rodriguez. Although I don’t consider Rodriguez to be a great head coach (winning 59% of his games as a head coach doesn’t raise him to the level of greatness; Bob Stoops has won 80% of his games as a head coach*), it might have been better for Michigan to allow Rich Rodriguez to have another year with entirely new defensive assistants and a special teams assistant.

But Brady Hoke considers Michigan to be his dream job. If he’s hired, Hoke may lose several experienced players and not gain many good recruits. He may not have instant success, especially if he’ll be losing Denard Robinson and Devin Gardner and starting 2011 without an experienced QB on the roster – assuming, but not knowing, that either Tate Forcier will be leaving or that he won’t regain academic eligibility at Michigan.

Hoke may be greeted with the same negative reaction that Syracuse fans gave to Doug Marrone. But if Hoke gets the job and shows the same passion and desire to succeed in turning around Michigan’s recent fortunes that Marrone has shown in winning more games in two seasons than his more-celebrated predecessor won in four seasons at Syracuse, then maybe the dark days of the Rich Rodriguez experiment at Michigan (except for the Brock Mealer and "Shoelace" successes) soon will be forgotten.

*Considering the uncertainty surrounding the Big XII’s future, Bob Stoops might be the best choice to succeed Rich Rodriguez at Michigan – a defensive-minded coach with proven success as a head coach in a BCS conference, and willing to run a high-powered, hurry-up offense.

BlueSocrates

January 8th, 2011 at 6:28 PM ^

it's that someone's reputation and record is not a guarantee they will be a good fit at Michigan. 

Desire to be at Michigan and to win FOR Michigan is invaluable.  While I'm not on the Hoke team (call me an Independent), I would prefer someone who wants to be at Michigan and fix the program than someone who wants DB's promised paycheck.