Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

CC: Rivals mods seem to be expecting some changes

153 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
December 24th, 2010 at 1:58 PM
#1
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 37515
CC: Rivals mods seem to be expecting some changes

The mods over at Rivals posted an Inside the Fort (super-premium info) article today.  And while I won't quote any exact information because of its premium nature, it seemed to be hinting at some big things going on in Ann Arbor:

- It sounds like an NFL coach plans to be in Ann Arbor next year (they wouldn't say whether it's a head coach or a coordinator)

- It sounds like there might be some academic ineligibility for the bowl game

- From my interpretation, it sounds like they believe Rodriguez will be here next year.

As you might expect, there's a lot of reading between the lines to be done.  So take this for what it's worth.

Have a good holiday, everyone!

Twitter - Recruiting Update: April 14

Top
Tags:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 24th, 2010 at 2:01 PM
#2
Papochronopolis
Papochronopolis's picture
Joined: 09/17/2009
MGoPoints: 1568
Hopefully the next DC

that has NFL experience can make things happen here

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 3:19 PM
(Reply to #2) #3
ken725
ken725's picture
Joined: 10/26/2008
MGoPoints: 7722
Maybe it is Bill Sheridan who

Maybe it is Bill Sheridan who is currently in the inside linebacker coach for the Miami Dolphins.  He obviously has some ties through his current employer and his son.  What if it was a package deal with him and Nick.  Nick would come back to be one of those graduate assistant coaches.  

Greetings from Bolivia.

"It's special how the real true people hang together. And if you don't support the program you're not a true Michigan guy. It's that simple."  - Gary Moeller

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 3:42 PM
(Reply to #63) #4
allezbleu
Joined: 11/02/2008
MGoPoints: 337
limited sample size obviously

but I know a lot of Giants fans who thought he was a terrible DC and I totally agree.

the giants defense regressed tremendously under him despite all the talent they had. he took a pressure-based, man-to-man defense under steve spagnuolo with all that pass rush talent they had (umenyiora, tuck, kiwanuka, pierre-paul, cofield) and made them into a dropback zone coverage defense.

the results were disastrous and he was let go after a year. the father-son connection or not, i would be very disappointed if he were hired. i would rather get a proven, or even unproven guy rather than a guy who failed spectacularly in his only try...

"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." -Evelyn Beatrice Hall

Top
December 25th, 2010 at 1:44 AM
(Reply to #81) #5
Communist Football
Communist Football's picture
Joined: 09/18/2010
MGoPoints: 3958
If this info is true, then RR is returning

Then it is almost certainly a new DC.  There is no way DB would bring in an NFL coach to become M head coach: he is too well aware of the mixed performance of NFL coaches at the college level.

"I call that Communist football. I'm so tired of it. Good, red-blooded Americans snap the ball, hand it to the guy and have a normal run game or pass game."

—Steve Szabo, Michigan linebackers coach, November 2007

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 11:01 PM
(Reply to #68) #6
jerseyblue
jerseyblue's picture
Joined: 12/20/2008
MGoPoints: 1266
Please no

I am a Giants fan and I do not want to see Bill Sheridan on the sideline of any team I am ever rooting for again.

Top
December 25th, 2010 at 5:43 AM
(Reply to #127) #7
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 02/18/2009
MGoPoints: 3251
I agree...

No offense to the kid, I know he did his best under the circumstances, but Nick gave me all the Sheridan I can take on the UM sideline. One was enough.

Top
December 25th, 2010 at 3:27 PM
(Reply to #140) #8
ken725
ken725's picture
Joined: 10/26/2008
MGoPoints: 7722
I have nothing to back this

I have nothing to back this up. but I think he will make a good position coach.  

Greetings from Bolivia.

"It's special how the real true people hang together. And if you don't support the program you're not a true Michigan guy. It's that simple."  - Gary Moeller

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 4:48 PM
(Reply to #63) #9
bluesouth
bluesouth's picture
Joined: 11/02/2008
MGoPoints: 2345
not to

agree or disagree anybody they get in as the DC, or even if Gerg stays the D will be better.  How much better is the real question.

 "Runnnn!!! get to da choppa"

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:03 PM
#10
JT4104
JT4104's picture
Joined: 10/25/2008
MGoPoints: 2561
Looking at NFL coaches that

Looking at NFL coaches that might have a michigan tie-in....brings us back to Turgo again. Have to imagine the changes on the staff will be strictly on the D side of the ball.

 

Hopefully it's not a lot of kids who are having academic problems.

All in all the bowl cant get here fast enough and getting all this CC crap behind us will be nice.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:05 PM
(Reply to #3) #11
switch26
Joined: 02/04/2010
MGoPoints: 2886
Hopefully it isn't anyone of

Hopefully it isn't anyone of huge importance to offense or defensive side of the ball..

 

I know shaw struggled this summer..

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 3:49 PM
(Reply to #7) #12
mgoSk
mgoSk's picture
Joined: 06/09/2010
MGoPoints: 1154
I hope you're right, but I'm

I hope you're right, but I'm thinking at least one starter/contributor is in trouble or else they probably wouldn't bring it up. My guess is that it's a freshman who is still getting acclimated to the football/acamedic workload.

Leaders and Best

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 4:03 PM
(Reply to #72) #13
Lutha
Lutha's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 4541
Maybe it's dyslexia

Maybe it's dyslexia

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 3:00 PM
(Reply to #3) #14
mgowake
mgowake's picture
Joined: 11/23/2009
MGoPoints: 685
I said this in the past, but

I wouldn't be surprised if Reggie Herring from the Cowboys comes in as dc. He was DC at Clemson when RR was OC. Dallas runs a 3-4. Him and RR are good friends still.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 3:01 PM
(Reply to #3) #15
ChosenOne
Joined: 09/17/2010
MGoPoints: 266
3-3-5

I don't think the coach necessarily has to be a Michigan Man but more so a 3-3-5/3-4 guy. Now look into coaches that run those sets and I think u will be on to something.

HE16MAN

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 3:04 PM
(Reply to #51) #16
08mms
Joined: 07/02/2009
MGoPoints: 1710
I'd imagine the friendship

I'd imagine the friendship with RRod probably counts more than the Michigan Man thing in the search unless DB is using his magic to pull someone we might not otherwise get.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:03 PM
#17
Dallas Wolverine
Joined: 01/04/2010
MGoPoints: 937
I hope

its just a new DC! I know that would make alot of us real happy.

GMW

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:24 PM
(Reply to #4) #18
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 3112
I'm confused

I'm confused as to why so many posters are quick to villify GERG for the defensive woes and at the same time complain about a) RR's "interference" on the defensive side of the ball (e.g. forcing the 3-3-5) and b) the youth/inexperience in the defensive personnel.

Which is it? Is the defense bad because of GERG or is it bad because of youth/RR's meddling? If it is the latter, then why should GERG get the axe?

The other thing I find confusing is that many posters are advocating ANOTHER change in defensive co-ordinator when many of those same posters have proclaimed that the constant changes in DC's/defenses is a major contributor to the defensive woes.

There just seems to be a lot of inconsistency/logic errors in the complaints re: the defense.

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:32 PM
(Reply to #23) #19
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 37515
I really don't think changing

I really don't think changing defensive coordinators is that big of a deal.  It has been blown out of proportion at Michigan over the past few years.  Defenses often improve when a new coordinator comes to town.

I'm certainly annoyed that Rodriguez has meddled in the defense as much as he has, but I don't think it's so much that Greg Robinson is a horrible coach/coordinator...

...it's more that Greg Robinson doesn't fit what Rodriguez wants, so it's pointless to keep Robinson around.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: April 14

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:38 PM
(Reply to #28) #20
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5198
Evidence

Do we really have evidence he is meddling in the defense?   Other than the supposed overthrow of Schaefer at Purdue what evidence do we have of this?   From everything we see RR handles the offens and Gerg handles the defense and if there is a problem(lots this year) RR talks with Gerg.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:47 PM
(Reply to #34) #21
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 41705
The fact we run a defense

That the D-coordinator has never run before. Much like we did in the Purdue game.

free chitownblue2

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:49 PM
(Reply to #34) #22
Run 2 Daylight
Run 2 Daylight's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 3861
Gerg going to the 3-3-5 isn't

Gerg going to the 3-3-5 isn't enough evidence for you? And I would say completely hijacking your coordinators scheme at the end of the season to put in a defense that is almost unique to Rich Rodriguez coached teams was evidence enough that he does a lot more on defense than we think. 

My sources are unreliable, but their info is fascinating. 

 

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 7:16 PM
(Reply to #37) #23
skunk bear
skunk bear's picture
Joined: 03/09/2010
MGoPoints: 1969
Or else

Gibson and Tall want to run the 3-3-5 because it is all they know, and RR goes along with it.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:53 PM
(Reply to #28) #24
briangoblue
briangoblue's picture
Joined: 08/03/2009
MGoPoints: 5040
What do you think

about position coach changes (Gibson, for example)? Would that be more impactful than a D coordinator change, or do you think the D coordinator change doesn't make as much difference because the position coaches would stay the same? If the D coordinator brought his own staff would he be capable of making a more sweeping difference?

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 4:37 PM
(Reply to #28) #25
tenerson
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 1754
I agree with you and it will

I agree with you and it will be kind of sad  to read the "Look what happens when GERG isn't here" posts next year. It won't matter who the DC is next year. The defense is going to get better under any coordinator simply because we probably won't be running a bunch of freshman or at least highly inexperienced players out there not to mention we get our best two cornerbacks back next year.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 4:52 PM
(Reply to #28) #26
bluesouth
bluesouth's picture
Joined: 11/02/2008
MGoPoints: 2345
again

not to agree or dis agree on DC coordinator change I just believe that the Def. will improve.  If these kids work out as hard as DRob and Twolf worked in the off season.  The D will be okay/

 "Runnnn!!! get to da choppa"

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 5:03 PM
(Reply to #23) #27
TheManDownTheHall
TheManDownTheHall's picture
Joined: 12/04/2008
MGoPoints: 776
This is why GERG should be gone...

The instant this stuffed animal idea was thought of should have been GERG's last as coach.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 6:43 PM
(Reply to #102) #28
JD_UofM_90
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 2440
Come on...

Everyone thought Picasso was a mad man, and he turned out to be a genius.  Well, that was after he died, of course...

(read signature line....;-)

"We've all got to do a better job. I like the play calling, we just have to execute better. I like the attitude of our guys. We had a great practice. Guys were fighting, guys were doing things. - Brady Hoke every press conference past and future.

Top
December 25th, 2010 at 12:50 AM
(Reply to #23) #29
PIJER
PIJER's picture
Joined: 07/12/2009
MGoPoints: 384
My opinion is

It's not only the inexperience, but the defense has been alligned incorrectly on many of the big plays that they gave up. It's one thing to have young players, but a good coordinator should at least have them in good positions to make plays. Too many times this year that wasn't the case. Any time you have your linebackers line up 3 yards off the ball you are asking for trouble.

"Homey don't play dat"

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:03 PM
#30
switch26
Joined: 02/04/2010
MGoPoints: 2886
thanks for the info

thanks for the info magnus..

 

This makes me think about what RR said in an article several wks ago.  He mentioned how he himself has been taking notes and grading his assistants coaches this past year and will evaluate them at the end of the year similiar to Brandons decision.  Should be interesting to hear if there is truth to this

 

If there is indeed truth to an NFL coach of some kind coming to mich and RR staying, i would obviously expect greg robinson to be gone, because someone has to take the fall if it isn't RR who goes

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:27 PM
(Reply to #5) #31
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 3637
Scapegoat

I don't see how finding a scapegoat makes the team any better.  Further, who cares if an assistant comes from the NFL.  Wasn't GERG a former NFLer?  And now he's supposed to be the scapegoat?  

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 3:03 PM
(Reply to #24) #32
switch26
Joined: 02/04/2010
MGoPoints: 2886
He's also a coach who has had

He's also a coach who has had a history of terrible Defenses everywhere he has gone, other than Texas(a team loaded with nfl talent) and the bronco's where he won a superbowl..with again incredibly talented team.. 

Everywhere else he has been his defensive stats have not been very good.  Someone posted them all on here a while back and it was alarming

 

You ask why does he have to be the scape goat?  Hmm.. well maybe you didn't watch our defense this year..  I know we had young talent, injured players and gerg was running a system he has never run before..  But i fail to believe that there isn't a D coordinator out there that couldn't make our guys play with more fire, and more desire..

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 4:30 PM
(Reply to #49) #33
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 3637
Our defense

Of course I watched our defense!  That's why I think it's unfair to scapegoat GERG (as Shaffer was scapegoated before).  The defense is bad because RR neglected it.  We have unrivaled attrition, losing 32% of defensive commits during the RR-era.  RR insisted on a scheme and then stepped away from that side of the ball.  The defense is a mess for a number of reasons.  Youth and injury and two reasons.  RR is another.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 5:52 PM
(Reply to #84) #34
BLUEFBFAN
Joined: 11/02/2010
MGoPoints: 102
What inside information and proof?

What inside information and proof do you have that RR "stepped away " from the defense?

Top
December 25th, 2010 at 9:27 AM
(Reply to #112) #35
Mitch Cumstein
Mitch Cumstein's picture
Joined: 10/02/2009
MGoPoints: 10028
RR

I don't know why people are so defensive of criticism of RR (like in this post), yet so willing to throw GERG under the bus.  What proof does anyone have that RR didn't and that its ALL GERG's fault?  I'm pretty sure the head coach is responsible for the team's performance (on both sides of the ball), so even if you want to completely blame GERG, RR still holds some responsibility for hiring him. 

"A flute with no holes is not a flute. A donut with no hole is a danish"

Top
December 25th, 2010 at 1:03 PM
(Reply to #112) #36
dahblue
dahblue's picture
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 3637
his own words

You're talking about the coach who, after realizing that his defense sucked, publicly said that he'd spend "more time" with the defense, "maybe fifteen minutes", right?  The guy who had a total of 9 defensive recruits stick with the program through his first two years?  When the coach admits that he doesn't spend time with the defense, inside info isn't needed.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:05 PM
#37
Monocle Smile
Monocle Smile's picture
Joined: 09/17/2009
MGoPoints: 4820
C'mon, Magnus

This is basically playing a game of "just the tip."

Suitception.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:21 PM
(Reply to #6) #38
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 37515
You know you like it.

You know you like it.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: April 14

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 3:13 PM
(Reply to #21) #39
Vivz
Vivz's picture
Joined: 12/14/2010
MGoPoints: 1136
c'mon

TWSS

to easy...

History is written by the victors-Winston Churchill
Top
December 24th, 2010 at 5:36 PM
(Reply to #59) #40
Kal
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 4599
Using that's what she said

Using that's what she said when the entire context of what you were replying to was already intended to be sexual kind of defeats the purpose of using it. 

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:05 PM
#41
TPryor
TPryor's picture
Joined: 12/23/2010
MGoPoints: 3525
diffrence btwn me and UM is

i don't make change - if it says $20, u give me $20. only have a $50? not my problem.

If this site were any other, I would be dominating it with MGoPoints

Im on that Twitr

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 6:58 PM
(Reply to #8) #42
UMAmaizinBlue
UMAmaizinBlue's picture
Joined: 09/23/2009
MGoPoints: 7309
I Almost Hope

That Pryor does well in the NFL so that he has more chances to say/do stupid shit, and that you can stick around and let us know how you feel about things through his eyes. Please never go away. This is my Festivus wish. Now, on to the Feats of Strength!

"Blame no one. Expect nothing. Do something. That is attitude." -Bo

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:09 PM
#43
OMG Shirtless
OMG Shirtless's picture
Joined: 08/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2192
That's not how the majority

That's not how the majority of Rivals posters interpreted the RR info, but obviously they left a lot of room for interpretation.

I would, however, pay good money to watch the staff of TheWolverine, GoBlueWolverine, and GBMWolverine participate in a cage match to the death. They all seem to royally despise each other.

I put up a tough front, but deep down I just want to be held.

March 21, 2014 - Greatest Day in MGoBlog History.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:22 PM
(Reply to #9) #44
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 37515
Well, there was a particular

Well, there was a particular line that made me read it that way.  I don't want to get into quoting the actual text, but like I said, it made me think that the ultimate goal is to retain Rodriguez.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: April 14

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:55 PM
(Reply to #22) #45
me
me's picture
Joined: 12/26/2008
MGoPoints: 2265
Yeah

I definitely didn't read it that way especially when combined with other things they have said in the past.  But who knows.  The intentional vagueness is annoying, however.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:57 PM
(Reply to #44) #46
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 37515
I agree that the intentional

I agree that the intentional vagueness is annoying.  Unfortunately, there's not much else to go on.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: April 14

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 3:05 PM
(Reply to #44) #47
GRWolverineFan
Joined: 02/04/2009
MGoPoints: 193
IMHO it is because no one

IMHO it is because no one truly knows what is going to happen and everyone is just throwing out their opinions with their own particular biases.  TheWolverine doesn't like RR because they don't have the same level of inside access like they did with Carr.  GBW likes RR because they have more inside info than ever with their carry-over insider. GBMW dislikes anything to do with GBW (and grammar/spelling) because their writers got banned by the Beav.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 3:42 PM
(Reply to #22) #48
Michigasling
Michigasling's picture
Joined: 11/21/2009
MGoPoints: 3648
I'm glad I can't read the original

because I'd like to believe your interpretation.  And I like believing in you because you look so much like Brandon Graham.   And you're always smiling.

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 5:31 PM
(Reply to #22) #49
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 12143
Well, can you at least post

Well, can you at least post that particular line with any necessary context so that we know why you have a different opinion from those on the rivals board?

Top
December 25th, 2010 at 10:33 PM
(Reply to #106) #50
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 37515
What’s being floated

What’s being floated today is that there’s more than one potential outcome here, but that would mean plenty of work to do following the bowl game (starting with Rodriguez’s evaluation) - and we’re not seeing it based on what we’ve heard from everyone who knows how Brandon operates.

I took this to mean that there would be plenty of work to change regimes, and that behind-the-scenes work does not seem to be happening.  In other words, the groundwork isn't being laid to start things over again with a new coach.  I can maybe see how people would interpret that line otherwise, but that's my take on it.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: April 14

Top
December 24th, 2010 at 2:49 PM
(Reply to #9) #51
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 41705
Heh

The different staff dynamics (heck, throw in MGoBlog) are very interesting...

free chitownblue2

Top
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.