Carlos Hyde suspended first 3 games of season.

Submitted by The Baughz on
Yes I know there is already a Carlos Hyde thread, but I figured I post this anyways.

The game at Cal just got a little more interesting. Im surprised Urbz went with 3 games. I was expecting 0-1 since the charges were dropped.

Link=all over twitter

stephenrjking

July 30th, 2013 at 9:57 PM ^

Yet another illustration of why teams are insane to schedule ultra-hard non-conference games early in the season, especially the first game. I'm not sure why all teams don't just pad their schedules with at least one creampuff at the beginning now. Not to get an easy win or some game experience, but to absorb many of the small suspensions that inevitably occur over the long, long offseason.

Not that Cal is going to be that tough. We're talking about a low-tier Pac 12 team that OSU should beat by two touchdowns here, Hyde or no Hyde. 

hart20

July 30th, 2013 at 9:58 PM ^

he's not guilty either, if that makes sense. The Cal game will be interesting, especially if Cal can key in and stop Miller. Wisconsin could also be interesting if Hyde is still rusty after playing only a cupcake the week before. But still, unless they drop one to Northwestern, I see them rolling into Ann Arbor undefeated.

NFG

July 30th, 2013 at 10:10 PM ^

I'd rather him be charged with a crime and not suspended one game. This is a horrible example to our youth when the justice system doesn't take action. I know the female swung first, but I just don't have patience for male on female violence.

Michigan4Life

July 30th, 2013 at 11:30 PM ^

if you expect a guy to take it like a bitch he is if a girl punch a guy and does it repeatedly. Can't do it and not expect retailation. What Hyde has done is perfectly normal for a human behavior. The double standard is stupid IMO.  He just slapped her face which is nothing compared to the girl who initated the contact by punching him.  Saying Hyde should've been charged is silly.

That being said, there's no place for human on human violence whether if it's a guy or a girl.

Elmer

July 31st, 2013 at 1:27 AM ^

After watching the video, it's worse than I imagined.  That looked like a punch to the face.  Yes, she tried to slap him, but how can man, let alone a 245 lb football player, hit a woman like that? 

If I was the coach, he would have gotten more than 3 games.

 

Cope

July 30th, 2013 at 10:19 PM ^

Doesn't mean he didn't commit a crime. I am not on the attack Urban bandwagon, but my understanding is the girl chose not to press charges. That really isn't the same thing as Hyde didn't hit her. It could mean many different things from a non-contact swing to contact but no desire for continued press or hounding by the girl over the issue. There is a lot of grey with this issue. I certainly didn't expect zero suspension for clear misconduct, and don't know how much he should've gotten, but three isn't a statement, in my mind. I'll forego any personal judgment with how much is unclear, but I'm not going to begin passing out Urban bracelets over this one.

gbdub

July 31st, 2013 at 12:20 PM ^

Honestly, the video shows as much evidence that she committed assault (and possibly battery) as it does that Hyde did. Certainly she appears to have made the first escalation from verbal to physical altercation. That may have something to do with her decision not to press charges, and I think it's wrong to assume (as many seem to be) that she chose to drop the charges because she was paid off or something.  

 

Go Blue Rosie

July 30th, 2013 at 10:25 PM ^

As football players, especially for high profile programs, you have to be held to higher standards. Hyde made a bad decision even if it wasn't an actual crime and he's paying a price. Not a huge one in the grand scheme of things, but pretty big. I don't like Urban but I can't fault him for this.

MGoLifer

July 30th, 2013 at 10:28 PM ^

 It should make no difference whether charges were filed or not. The video is out there, he hit a girl, closed fist or not, hard as he could or not; it wasn't playful and it's quite clear from the video that the girl was hurt and upset afterward. So Hyde sits 3 games, and everyone's good with that?! This is utterly ridiculous and an indictment on society in general if you ask me.

Were charges filed against Will Hagerup? And all the kid did was smoke grass, a non-violent, almost anti-violent mistake, yet the kid is still out and won't be back this year.
 
So violence against women = 3 game suspension, smoking grass = maybe someday you'll play again. Don't get me wrong I'm not trying to play the holier than though M vs ohio card...b/c everyone, M and ohio fans alike seem to think this how it should be. It's whack

Lokee11_GoBlue

July 30th, 2013 at 10:55 PM ^

I agree, what the f*@! - I had to check the browser address to make sure I am on the correct site.  Urban is a slime ball & I do not not see how this can make people act like he did what needed to be done, if not more.  Hyde smacked the girl plain and simple, pressing charges or not does not make any difference, so to say a 3 game suspension is about right or too much, makes me just wonder if I'm the f'n idiot.  

Know this, I would bet my life that had OSU been playing Bama in the first game, good ol' Urb wouldn't have did anything but said he sat down and had a bible study with Hyde and now everything is fine and dandy.

 

Is this 11W?

UMGoRoss

July 30th, 2013 at 10:44 PM ^

This is not the first, nor second time Haggerup has had issues, so that's in no way an accurate comparison to make. 3 games is more than I would have expected (from Urban, or Hoke if it was someone on Michigan) for this. While I agree you never hit a woman, she assaulted him first, and it doesn't look like he punched her. He'll hopefully learn his lesson and won't make the mistake again.

MGoLifer

July 30th, 2013 at 11:49 PM ^

Your missing the main point, but I agree that there's no comparison. You're also right that it wasn't Hagerup's first time. Let's try this, exactly how many joints does one have to smoke before it's worse than hitting a woman in the face? 

Is it two.. or three?

 

falco_alba15

July 30th, 2013 at 10:30 PM ^

Three games sounds reasonable. However, honestly, I don't think they'll miss Hyde much. I would say that it will impact the Cal game, but I don't think so. Remember, Hyde didn't play that game due to an injury he suffered in the offseason. Jordan Hall took the carries and managed to pick up 87 yards, with Braxton getting 75 on his own. Hall is a senior and Dunn is a viable backup, so barring any surprises, their running game will be fine. It's the defense that will make a difference. If Roby is suspended, that may tip the scales in Cal's favor. I still think they'll drop a game to an underdog, but all reliable predictions will still have them undefeated going into The Game. At least Urban punished Hyde. It's better than saying, "No harm, no foul." Setting a trend with the starting tailback might actually make them think twice before doing something stupid.

WingsNWolverines

July 30th, 2013 at 10:35 PM ^

AND CAL?! The sky is falling THE SKY IS FALLING.

and they'll still win all 3 by 15 or more...

Wolverine Devotee

July 30th, 2013 at 10:53 PM ^

Who cares? 

They play nobody all year until northwestern and Michigan. They will be exposed in both of those games. 

That horrendous defense of theirs is going to get shredded in Evanston at night. And don't be surprised if purdue if beats them too. They haven't won in WL since 2007 and needed a miracle to win at home last year.

Their 12-0 was only smoke and mirrors. Michigan shot themselves in the foot repeatedly in the 2nd half due to the offense & Borges deciding to take a Siesta.

That WON'T happen this year.

MaizeMN

July 30th, 2013 at 11:00 PM ^

...the girl instigated the altercation. That is a crime. Hyde's response was not proportionate or reasonable IMO. Nonetheless, I ask myself: would I want this kid on my team, based on the environment and occurrance? What message would I want my alma mater's head coach to send in response? I keep hearing Hoke in my mind saying one word: accountability. I have always believed THAT is the MICHIGAN Difference.

Cope

July 31st, 2013 at 7:32 AM ^

Clearly Hyde instigated what happened. Call me old school, but I believe a woman slapping a guy is the appropriate and necessary response to him verbally disrespecting her. Not assault, whatever the law says. Throwing a punch or kicking him is different. But if a girl slaps in response to an inappropriate comment--totally appropriate. So his hit is the first assault. And it is also socially wrong. Hyde should be on women's future domestic abuser radar, and that should be Urban's main concern, not "distractions" he keeps complaining about in the media. A guy who hits a girl in public who he just shamed will do it in private for whatever reason he wants. And to me, teaching him to change and respect women takes more than three games. And I agree, Hoke would've done more than three. Three cupcakes is a wrist slap. Hoke has taken guys out for whole seasons, huge impact players like Stonum, and little is worse than swinging on a woman, especially after instigating the conflict.

gbdub

July 31st, 2013 at 12:28 PM ^

Stonum wasn't suspended for multiple games until after he had committed a string of offenses related to DUI.

DUI is much more dangerous than a slap to the face.

Frankly, since 1 game seems to be the going rate for a first alcohol related infraction, 3 games for a minor bar altercation seems reasonable to harsh.

Bigfoot

July 30th, 2013 at 11:02 PM ^

-Carlos Hyde is a scumbag.

-He was likely drunk

-The girl tried to slap him

-He didn't think about his options for a long amount of time before he attempted to? succeeded to? slap her, his career shouldnt be permanently derailed for a baited, reactionary offense.

-3 games at the beginning of the season is nothing, but his name is soiled forever, ohio looks bad, and he is feeling that night much more than the girl.

-Ubrz issued a fair punishment. The zero tolerance thing is BS, but what from him hasn't been? It is clear that he has already lost most of his credibility (check the headlines), and that sign is more of a PR gimmick than an actual code of ethics. That being said, the punishment fits what is shown on tape.

-If the speaker wasn't blocking the camera, it could have looked a lot worse, but it isn't fair to Hyde to speculate what it may have looked like. 

-If they suspended Hyde for the season, the girl would have had to move to Nashville.

-If this happened at UM, I would want him gone. UM is different from Ohio. If you haven't learned that by now I don't know what to tell you.

4godkingandwol…

July 30th, 2013 at 11:05 PM ^

... how divided this board is about this.  I fall on the side of you never hit a woman unless you're in real danger.  Clearly, he was not in danger.  His swing was one of anger and hostility, provoked or not.  If Hoke only suspended a player on our team for 3 games for assaulting a woman I'd lose all respect for him... regardless of how good a recruiter he is.

Cope

July 31st, 2013 at 7:51 AM ^

a non-factor. Coaches punish for crimes as a PR machine, nothing less--because they have to. Coaches punish for wrong behaviors because they actually care about molding young men and doing what's right. Crimes are a result of charges pressed, not necessarily behaviors clarified. In many cases, yes, but not in assault. So if he hit her but she chose not to pursue it, he's off legally. Still, the coach's responsibility is to discipline the behavior for the purpose of character development, not discipline to spin a nice ending onto a sad story for the public. Valuing whether it actually becomes criminally prosecuted is Meyer's way of thinking about punishment because it's now a "distraction" to the team, which he called this many times. Good coaches don't see players' issues as distractions; they become the main thing for that player as they try to mold their character.

TESOE

July 30th, 2013 at 11:40 PM ^

Josh Furman was suspended indefinitely... but reinstated after his case went to court and he was acquitted...now that there aren't going to be charges and there's damning video... it's a statement punishment for Ohio.  3 games is about right IMO.  These are young people who make mistakes.  If it went to court - I don't think Hyde would have played until it was done.

Prince Lover

July 30th, 2013 at 11:40 PM ^

I suppose I can't argue one side or the other if fair or not. And yes Hyde has been dragged through the mud of public opinion. But time and winning heals all wounds. No one will remember this in 5 years if he goes on to be a heisman winner, national championship winner or a super bowl winner.

MGoManBall

July 30th, 2013 at 11:43 PM ^

Does the punishment fit the crime? Probably. That said, had this been some freshman nobody, he would have been gone for the year. Keep punishments consistent.