swan flu

April 8th, 2014 at 9:49 AM ^

McGary may not be included because ESPN is using 2013-2014 performance as a metric.

 

EDIT- not neccesarily 2013-2014 NCAA experience, considering there are high schoolers on that list.

Shakey Jake

April 8th, 2014 at 10:34 AM ^

More top level talent. I don't blame JB for that. The rotten culture of the game (AAU etc) doesn't have anywhere near the high caliber type of kids that JB seeks out. Michigan has done a fantastic job with the players JB gets. The question is how long with that last now that Michigan is back.

Ali G Bomaye

April 8th, 2014 at 10:35 AM ^

Mitch McGary was ranked as high as the #2 recruit in the country as a high schooler, and GRIII was a top-20 national recruit.  We're not getting five incoming All-Americans each year like Kentucky because the culture of the program is different; guys who are looking for a quick one-and-done aren't going to go to an academic school like Michigan.

CLord

April 8th, 2014 at 3:31 PM ^

Yet after coming in #2 in the tournament two years ago and #5 this year, how is this year's recruiting class shaping up?  I'm no expert but it would have really been nice to have at minimum a top 15 class after all of this success.  However, JB has earned my benefit of the doubt for several years.

Michigan4Life

April 8th, 2014 at 8:13 PM ^

doesn't occur until class of 2016. 2014 is way too soon because they have been recruited since they were freshmen. Michigan was solid but not great program at the time.

They landed Kameron Chatman who is highly regarded recruit and landed him over Arizona and UCLA.  So Michigan got some effect from last year's run but like I said, you won't be able to see it until 2016 class.

gwkrlghl

April 8th, 2014 at 11:08 AM ^

Imagine it's 1985 and no one knows what a recruiting ranking is. Are you still displeased with John Beilein? "Golly, he's only had like 6 NBA 1st rounders in 3 years. What a disappointment. That other team had lots of tall guys who could jump a lot and now they play in the D-League. I wish we had that"

John Beilein is better at evaluating talent than Rivals or Scout or ESPN or 247 is. I truly do not care about recruiting rankings when it comes to John Beilein because guys like Caris LeVert (non-descript 3* poached from OHIO!) is outperforming plenty of 5*s from his class.

Seriously, do we think it's just random luck that guys like Nik Stauskas, Trey Burke, and Caris LeVert completely blow up at Michigan? Neither of them were in the top 50 for their class but all are/were projected to be Top 20 guys in the NBA draft (which also includes international prospects). Beilein is a damned wizard at recruiting, developing, or both. I don't care if Kentucky's players are 5*s. Caris and Nik are better than most of them and if you think that's luck then I have a tin foil hat made up for you.

MgoReader1986

April 8th, 2014 at 12:01 PM ^

A lot of truth there, but we have also tried getting some higher rated players like Blackmon, Kennard, Booker, etc and we have struck out on a lot of them. So yes, we there is still MORE talented players that our coaches have as their first choice and we aren't landing them. I love our team, but let's not pretend that we can improve our roster on a pure atheltic and size standpoint. 

bronxblue

April 8th, 2014 at 12:22 PM ^

What do you mean by "top-level" talent?  Kentucky may have had 5 freshmen this year start, but part of the reason is that Coach Cal kicked out a couple of other "big name" recruits from last year's team that didn't pan out.  Attracting top-level talent in terms of development on the court isn't the same as top-level talent according to the AAU and recruiting circuits.  

Yes, Beilein doesn't pull in a team of top-5 kids each year, but that's only if you gauge it by the services who need to keep pushing their ranking services.

socrking

April 8th, 2014 at 10:04 AM ^

Has anyone heard rumblings about whether anyone is staying through the summer to do the summer 2013 levert / stauskas super mushroom level up program? I would love to see Irvin make a sophomore leap.

ilah17

April 8th, 2014 at 10:55 AM ^

I thought Levert and Stauskas worked in A2 all summer because they weren't invited to any camps? Hopefully Levert showed enough this year to get invited to several camps, although I'm sure he'll still work out extra in A2, and hopefully help out the younger guys too. I fully expect Irvin and Walton to explode next season like Levert and Stauskas did this season.

mgofuj

April 8th, 2014 at 11:54 AM ^

That's true for Stauskas at least. Coach was calling around trying to get him into a high profile camp but none were interested. Caris was really far off the radar last year. It worked out for both, obviously. Glenn went to the camps and imo his game didn't benefit in the same way. I wouldn't mind the whole team staying for the summer based on this year's results. 

bacon1431

April 8th, 2014 at 11:07 AM ^

We have an established culture of work ethic in our basketball program. Stu and Zack got every ounce out of their potential by working hard, Trey and THJ worked to improve every offseason, JMo has been great, Caris, Nik and GR3 put in some heavy work in transforming this offseason, and it sounds like our 13 class is planning on doing the same. Long may it continue, as it is helping perpetuate our success.

Major props to JB for being a great coach and teacher and finding kids with great attitudes and work ethics. And major props to the kids that will do anything to get better.  

KAYSHIN15

April 8th, 2014 at 10:11 AM ^

Come on homie. If all of those guys leave then we do not have a shot a B1G or Tourney championship. I love Caris as much as the next person, but let's not get carried away.

umumum

April 8th, 2014 at 10:32 AM ^

Kinda depends on what plays out at the other schools. 

State obviously loses as much or more.  OSU loses Craft and Ross (I know, a great recruiting class), the way transfers are going, IU may have no one left s/, etc etc.

Other than the possible, but unlikely, loss of Dekker, Wisconsin should be the near prohibitive favorite.  But give us a healthy Mitch--even losing Nik and GRIII---and I like our prospects just fine in 2015.  Even without him, we will be very competitive--certainly as competitive as the 2011 and 2012 teams.

marco dane

April 8th, 2014 at 11:53 AM ^

Michigan found themselves behind in some games,BUT found a way to win,all but a few we came up short. BUT,we battled to the end in those too. Coach B,won't allow this program to slide cause the lack of recuriting,teaching or coaching...those days have been over.

I trust the Michigan coaching staff...you should too.

j/s

Leaders And Best

April 8th, 2014 at 10:22 AM ^

But looking at that list of players, and you have to believe Stauskas would be the Wooden/Naismith Player of the Year favorite if he came back for another year.

One can dream...

Gustavo Fring

April 8th, 2014 at 10:46 AM ^

This is no surprise considering a mock draft had him at #4 overall in 2015.  It's hard to disagree.  He's got length, quickness, shooting ability, a filthy crossover...just needs 10 pounds and a respectable mid-range game and the sky's the limit.  

That said, I hope it doesn't go to his head.  From everything I've read, he's a pretty down-to-earth guy and he obviously worked his butt off last summer.  ONe more offseason like that and...look out

Michigania

April 8th, 2014 at 1:00 PM ^

Geez.... # 4 overall ????    I predicted last year that McGary could be the top overall pick....

Wow, I hope this encourages both Stauskas and McGary and Glenn, to stay one more year... if LeVert projected at #4, then surely those two would be in lottery.... not dissing LeVert here......

I am not officially encouraged that all three will stay another year, when they see how thin it is in 2015... though I do predict that Harris stays at msu for the same reason.

LSAClassOf2000

April 8th, 2014 at 10:52 AM ^

I will say that, if you're going to make a way-too-early list for something like this, Levert has some pretty good base numbers to work from as I assume this season's performance in the metric being used. He averaged 12.9 points per game and was 43.9% from the field, including 40.8% on three-pointers. He had the third-highest total in rebounds and the second-highest number of assists, so his play has definitely been key to how Michigan performs in-game. If he even made modest improvements on some of these measures, I would think he'd be in the discussion for first-team All-American when the time actually does come next season.