Can Michigan Turn it Around Like Auburn Next Season?
I'll spare you my position by position optimism; I'm just curious if anyone else believes that Michigan can duplicate Auburn's success this season.
I'll only add this: The interior o-line will be better, as will Green and Smith. Also, If I were a betting man, I'd bet on Devin Gardner showing what a Michigan QB is made out of next season. He won't leave this university with the legacy of being the starting QB for a team that lost at least 5 games three seasons in a row. As for the defense, like the offensive line, I believe they go into even the offseason conditoning pissed off, and with a larger than average chip on their shoulders. To me this is the recipe of a major bounce back season; whether it's as big of a turn around as Auburn's remains to be seen.
January 7th, 2014 at 9:54 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:55 PM ^
Why is MGoIronSheik wearing green and white? BOOOOOOOOOO
January 7th, 2014 at 8:58 PM ^
Frankly I fear that novelty accounts represent a "jump the shark" moment for MGoBlog, but I love this place and the voting says otherwise, so I'll play. Brown Bear is right. Watch this.
January 7th, 2014 at 7:19 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:57 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:25 PM ^
Auburn exists totally outside the program revamping argument because the of the coaching and philosophy change. If Michigan fired Borges and brought in a hot name for OC ... then maybe. As it is, I think we are looking at 9-3 at best. Hope I'm wrong but I just don't see enough indicators to think otherwise right now.
January 7th, 2014 at 7:27 PM ^
January 8th, 2014 at 8:30 AM ^
i think 8-4 at best, you forgot that one game borges gives away on the road
January 7th, 2014 at 7:24 PM ^
If the O-line doest get better, and get better fast, we will have another mediocre season. Unfortunatly, I see 2015 as our year. It is unfortunate for Gardner because he is such a good QB but came in with the wrong circumstance. Maybe if he can put some great numbers, he can get conscideration for the B1G 10 Offensive POY on an 8-4 team.
January 7th, 2014 at 7:24 PM ^
Malzahn is a wizard..Borges is not
January 7th, 2014 at 7:36 PM ^
Does Borges desire to run a west coast offense? or maybe he did at one of his previous stops.
January 7th, 2014 at 7:24 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:31 PM ^
You dream to be 11 large men executing a spread-to-run offense?
January 8th, 2014 at 12:23 AM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:26 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 8:04 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 10:23 PM ^
You mean they're going to fire coach Brandon?
January 7th, 2014 at 7:27 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:27 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:28 PM ^
As much as we sucked under RichRod, I took great pleasure in the way our offense would occasionally clown a defense by faking run and then DR would pitch it over the top to a wide open Roundtree or Dileo without anyone within 15 yards of them. Saw many glimpses of that last night by Auburn.
After 13 games this year where the greatest separation Borges schemed for one of his receivers was six inches, as opposed to most of the time when opposing DBs were literally wearing the same jersey our receivers were wearing, as they waltzed down the field together inside the same shirt, the answer I took from last night is that as long as my rotund avatar remains employed by this university, no, Michigan will never, ever be anything like Auburn was this year.
January 7th, 2014 at 7:45 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 8:18 PM ^
faking run and then DR would pitch it over the top to a wide open Roundtree or Dileo without anyone within 15 yards of them.
In 2010, Dileo caught one pass for three yards. Roundtree was the only guy we ever ran that play to under RR.
We did, however, use Dileo in that play in 2011 and '12, under Borges. (Why it seemingly disappeared from the playbook this year, I don't know.)
January 7th, 2014 at 9:46 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:30 PM ^
I think we'll see a turnaround on the order of 10 wins next year, but I don't think an offensive live composed almost entirely of sophomores is going to be good enough to make AB's plans work every game.
That said, if the defense takes a big step forward--which they should--that could put us in the conversation for the B1G East (NTBE) title. MSU and Ohio on the road? Tough to see either of those as victories, but every other game on the schedule is winnable.
FWIW, I believe a healthy Devin Gardner could break the single-season passing record next year. But if he's injured, nine wins would be a great season.
January 7th, 2014 at 8:26 PM ^
Auburn had two true sophomores and a redshirt freshman on their O-Line this season. Look at their running game.
The problem is not O-Line youth. Rather it's the philosophies and schemes that demand the linemen be older or they cannot realistically succeed.
January 7th, 2014 at 9:01 PM ^
It's not just about youth, but development--especially for the O-Line. Auburn has clearly gotten more development from their players, and I believe coaching is a big part of that.
But if you watch Auburn's O-Line block, they're really good at it. That has NOTHING to do with scheme, and everything to do with their ability to execute. It's obvious they've been coached well, but their line could block Borges' scheme just fine.
You can argue that the coaching/teaching is better at Auburn, but it's not scheme that's making their O-Line good. It's that their O-Line is good at blocking.
January 7th, 2014 at 7:33 PM ^
If it does happen, a lot of people on here will be pissed off because they'd hate Hoke even if he went 12-0. I'm not going to abandon the team and I will be there every Saturday in 105 degree weather or -15 degree weather.
January 7th, 2014 at 7:51 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 8:02 PM ^
I don't remember too many people being pissed off after we went to the Sugar Bowl. People are pissed at Hoke because he has put together two mediocre seasons in a row and "seems" unwilling to change course. If Hoke starts winning again, I doubt you hear much in the way of grumbling.
January 7th, 2014 at 8:32 PM ^
Honestly, I didn't even think 2012 was that bad. The team was simply not good enough for such a schedule that year and did have some exciting flashes. But 2013 was so bad it is a truly decent reason to lose a lot of faith.
January 7th, 2014 at 9:04 PM ^
I'm afraid the RR era has created a schism that won't heal without sustained success. There are so many spread zealots out there who won't feel good until they get their way or the program is so good they don't care about getting their way.
Even if Hoke wins 10 games next year and the offense has a strong season, there will be those who are calling for Borges' head, and Hoke's too.
The only way out of this mess is to have consecutive seasons with 10 or more wins. Only then will everyone jump on board.
January 7th, 2014 at 8:03 PM ^
a lot of people on here will be pissed off because they'd hate Hoke even if he went 12-0.
I know that this is your opinion, but it's wrong.
January 7th, 2014 at 8:21 PM ^
Incorrect. We would worship him if he went 12-0.
January 7th, 2014 at 8:33 PM ^
Simply crazy.
January 7th, 2014 at 9:59 PM ^
If Hoke goes12-0 next year he will be immediately deified. At the end of the day, all the fans want is to win football games. We heard this same BS excuses with RR about how some mythical group of alumni had a vendetta against the guy and was trying to sabotage the program for unspecified reasons. It's just not the case.
January 8th, 2014 at 1:07 AM ^
Sure, there'd be a few kooks who'd still hate Hoke after a 12-0 season, but then you can find people who hate the idea of electricity and indoor plumbing, too. They're not relevant.
January 8th, 2014 at 2:10 AM ^
How many people even hate him now? Most of his doubters begin their takes with "He's a nice guy BUT..."
January 7th, 2014 at 7:36 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:38 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:39 PM ^
The second year of transition to Borges' scheme has to be better than the first.
January 7th, 2014 at 7:39 PM ^
If the interior o-line isn't performing up to expectation, it really doesn'y matter who the fucking offensive coordinator is.
January 7th, 2014 at 8:33 PM ^
There's really no solid starter at any position. Maybe Graham but even he'll probably be bouncing positions all year
January 7th, 2014 at 7:39 PM ^
Like Auburn... will we get every call, every break.... every SPOT!? I didn't watch the game, but have it on excellent authority that's what happened. Even more interestingly, Big 10 officials.
January 7th, 2014 at 7:50 PM ^
your excellent authority needs his confirmation bias checked.
The p.i. in the endzone could easily have been over looked.
January 7th, 2014 at 8:40 PM ^
Easily overlooked?! It was a blatantly obvious call. There's no question more officiating blunders went Auburn's way last night.
January 7th, 2014 at 7:39 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:41 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 7:45 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 8:08 PM ^
January 7th, 2014 at 8:29 PM ^
I think Countess is definitely a playmaker. I also think Ramon Taylor is actually pretty good, and could make the jump next year. IMO, there may be a few more that could cross that threshold as well.
I totally agree with you that it is very unlikely that 2014 will be the return of the 2006 defense. But besides '06, I think it will be the best defense we've had in quite a while.
Despite ending the season in a poor fashion, I still have a high degree of faith in Mattison. But as I think many of us are feeling for next year, he/Borges/the coaches in general will really be the "difference makers" as to whether or not 2014 is a successful season.