Burke and Iverson

Submitted by Alumnus93 on

Since I first saw Burke play, more and more does his game remind me of Allen Iverson's game. I'm no basketball expert, and perhaps its the similar sinze and position, but when I see him play, the first thing that comes to mind is Iverson.

I remember Iverson being great at Georgetown but what I don't remember is how good he was as a true freshman, and wonder if anyone can chime in on Burke's progress at this point vs Iverson as a true freshman. 

Regardless, I think Burke will be at Iverson's level when he entered the NBA after his senior year. Burke is a bona-fide star....   and I digress...... by the way, so is Hardaway, but in a few ways Burke's success has masked Hardaway's skills....ie say if Burke wasn't on our team, we'd be relying alot more on Hardaway and you've seen bursts of absolute dominance by Hardaway......  Both Burke and Hardaway are NBA locks.....and I am happy.

 

Champeen

March 10th, 2012 at 7:59 PM ^

The difference is, Lebron may take the majority of his teams shots, but the guy also shot at or over 50%.  THERE IS A REASON WHY IVERSON WAS NOT A WINNER BUT LEBRON IS.

Do you actually think a player can take a teams majority shots, shoot 39% from the field, and win a championship?  Heck, i can score 20 points if you let me take 35 shots a game too, and be one of the leading scorers in the NBA, but i guarantee you, my team WONT make the playoffs!!!

The lack of sense is unbelievable here!  WOW!

You think scoring 25 points, going 11 of 30 from the field, 3 for 10 from 3 point land is good?  Yeah, most here obviously would because my god, he scored 25 points so he must be one of the all time best!  FEED HIM THE BALL, HES A SCORER! 

Remind me, when im looking for a chemical engineer to work on a project at Hemlock Semiconductor, to not come seeking for one on this board.

Sorry for the rant folks, but some peoples rationale blows my mind.

JCV16

March 10th, 2012 at 10:00 AM ^

I love burke, and he can play in the NBA (hopefully not next year), but just search for iverson georgetown on youtube and you will realize that no. 

 

 

 

TheLastHarbaugh

March 10th, 2012 at 12:39 PM ^

If Burke stays for one more year, wins Big Ten POTY (Iverson won Big East POTY both years at Georgetown, so Burke is already behind the curve), and averages close to 25ppg, then you can kinda start to make comparisons.

If his splits look similar to 21.1ppg, 6.7apg, 3.7rpg, in his first NBA season and he wins Rookie of the Year, then we can start to make serious comparisons.

SWFlaBlue

March 10th, 2012 at 10:03 AM ^

college player except Isiah was surrounded by monster talent as a freshman and sophomore at IU, something Trey will get to experience next year. Very similar penetration and control of the floor.

bacon1431

March 10th, 2012 at 10:05 AM ^

Not only do they not have similar attributes when it comes to speed and quickness, but they also have much different games. Seems the only similarities are that they do not have prototypical PG size and are African-American.

R Kelly

March 10th, 2012 at 10:11 AM ^

I don't like the Allen Iverson comparison at all.  I think they have very different playing styles.  Trey Burke reminds me more of a shorter Deron Williams.  Both have a very good mid-range game, both are strong finishers around the basket, and both are deceptively fast.

myblueheaven

March 10th, 2012 at 10:28 AM ^

There are some legitimate comparisons in characteristics, like the fact that they are both immensely more talented at such a young age than what the typical 18 and 19 year old first year players are. The both of them are very effective and have the heart or that will to win, a specialty that cannot be taught in any manner. However Iverson was much more quicker than Burke, though Trey is such a heady player the combination of his sound decision making and play making ability not to mention his tremendous range kind of neutalizes that difference. Also if Trey has a sophomore season of this magnitude next year then like Ivo I expect him to leave and be a first round pick though probably not the first pick. The most important difference for me is that Burke is much more mentally stable and not the hot head Iverson is. I do not know how that will translate to the court on the next level but at least you will not be hearing about Trey smacking someone in the face with a bar stool. He will be one of the better ambassadors of the game and I wish him all the success in the future but for now I hope he brings that national championship to Michigan before he decides to leave which by his Junior year I know he can accomplish.

Blue boy johnson

March 10th, 2012 at 11:38 AM ^

I will go old school, the guy who Trey reminds me of; 76'er great Maurice Cheeks. Both very smart players, who get the most out of their talent. Neither have the talent level of an Isaiah or Iverson, but really talented nonetheless, and truly dedicated to the game.

Blue boy johnson

March 10th, 2012 at 11:20 AM ^

I heard an interesting Tom Izzo clip on WWJ a week or so ago. Izzo was responding to someones statement, "if you take Draymond Green of MSU they aren't that good". Izzo laughed and said, paraphrasing,"you can say that about alot of teams, How good is OSU without Sullinger,or Michigan without Burke, you take a great player off a team and of course they aren't going to be as good". Everyone realizes just how good Burke is and he is only a freshman.

I would love to hear Tim (Texas two step) Hardadway's opinion of Trey Burke. Hardaway has probably seen Burke more than any NBA scout. I'm sure we would just get fluff, but I'd eat it up anyway.

Gameboy

March 10th, 2012 at 11:49 AM ^

You take any of the Iverson's 76'er teams during his prime and replace him with Burke. There is no way even NBA Burke (5 years more mature) would get those teams to playoffs let alone NBA finals (I don't think you if you replaced Iverson with Chris Paul, they get to the finals).

So, go ahead and build your championship team with Burke. Without surrounding him with franchise players, that team isn't going anywhere.

pdgoblue25

March 10th, 2012 at 11:58 AM ^

Iverson is a hall of famer and one of the best athletes to play the game. Watching Iverson's handle was mesmerizing, it was like the ball was a yo-yo. In his prime I would put his quickness and agility up against anyone.

DefenseWins

March 10th, 2012 at 12:06 PM ^

The fact that this thread exists is an absolute absurdity.  There is no comparison.  Iverson, for all his faults, was one of the greatest scorers to ever play in the NBA.  I love Trey, but he's not Iverson.  That is all.

JaySoul

March 10th, 2012 at 2:24 PM ^

A.I was electric... you knew he was the best player as soon as the ball was tipped. He was so explosive. I think Burke is stronger just because of his build, he is put together pretty solid. A NBA PG that compares to Burke pretty good would be Jameer Nelson, and college would be Jordan Taylor. You can't be mad at either of those... but dont say AI again

Business Time

March 10th, 2012 at 12:27 PM ^

Iverson was one of the most inefficient players in the history of the NBA. In his prime he regularly took 25 shots a game at an abysmal 40-42% clip, not to mention the 4 TOs he averaged. People tend to think he's better than he was, because he scored a lot of points (through sheer volume of shot attempts) and looked good while doing it.

VermontMichiganFan

March 10th, 2012 at 12:54 PM ^

Iverson is one of the top NBA scorers of all time. He was incredible. Burke is a freshman in college lets not get ahead of ourselves here. Iverson is one of the best players ever maybe relax on the comparisons...

Slim_Hype

March 10th, 2012 at 1:13 PM ^

Dont see it at all... Trey reminds me of Tony Parker in so many ways but hes built like a bull dog.. very similar to Raymond Felton but he plays like Tony Parker

AHM16

March 10th, 2012 at 1:26 PM ^

This makes sense. Burke is FAR more efficient than Iverson. Iverson jacked up 25-30 shots a game to get his 30. Burke's is still growing as a player the sky is the limit

dmuthalovinmase2

March 10th, 2012 at 3:21 PM ^

AI... has always been selfish with the ball... its kind of a horrible comparison... Trey is a good athlete with the ball in his hands but no where on the same level as AI... When looking at Trey's freshman year it reminds me a lot of Chris Paul when he first devleoped at Wake Forest than AI at Georgetown...

Mr. Yost

March 11th, 2012 at 4:37 AM ^

Some of you guys are ridiculous.

Point blank, argue about his character all you want. Argue about him being a team player all you want.

But some of you saying he's overrated or he wasn't good? Are you kidding me?!

Iverson is one of the greatest single players, EVER. Period. That is undeniable. Few could play the game of basketball the way A.I. could. Don't let all the other stuff distract you from that fact.

So again, the other stuff, very debateable...and A.I. brought that on himself. But you don't lead your team to the finals. You don't win multiple MVPs. You don't do what he did over the course of his career without being an outstanding player.

STOP HATING.

SysMark

March 13th, 2012 at 9:25 AM ^

No doubt Iverson is one of the most talented players in NBA history.  Question will always be is a player like Burke more valuable by what he brings to he team as a whole - does he make you more likely to win a championship but elevating everyone around him.