The Bullying Meme

Submitted by MGlobules on

The Detroit papers have been pretty much in lockstep the last two days, leading with quotes from Lewan and Schofield about UM getting bullied during recent games between the teams and the need to be tougher this year. Wojo also considers this theme in today's column.

There's a lot to be said on the topic (and MSU fans are saying some of it on message boards and in comments right now). But. . . simple question: will such rhetoric prove productive for Michigan, psychologically or otherwise, for this or future games? 

maizenbluenc

October 29th, 2013 at 11:03 AM ^

is a Narduzzi quote.

Well, the comforting thing I saw last week, when the unnecessary roughness was called in the end zone for the hit on Gardner - half the o-line was in the face of the guy who hit Gardner. Gallon pulled them off, but that guy was informed he went too far and there would be no more of it.

It's going to be rough going at Staae this weekend, but I think Lewan and Schofield will have the o-line ready to set the "Tom"-foolery straight.

I also think our defense is constructed for State and Wisconsin - not Indiana - so they will have a better game.

Now, if Devin can just be ND Devin ...

M-Wolverine

October 29th, 2013 at 2:21 PM ^

Used the full quote-

 

“Oh yeah, we talk about it all the time,” senior offensive tackle Michael Schofield said. “The way they described it was 60 minutes of unnecessary roughness, and that’s pretty much how we describe it.”

From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20131029/SPORTS0201/310290027#ixzz2j…

jtmc33

October 29th, 2013 at 10:54 AM ^

I like it.   There are only 28 guys that were on that team in 2011 that are still playing for UM.  That means there are a slew of guys that are thinking "I'm not going to let anyone bully me".  Having a guy like Lewan and Schoffield say "it happened to us, don't let it happen to you" is going to serve its purpose.   Let's the young kids know that MSU is tough and they better be ready, and at the same time, let them know there is payback for UM.

EDIT:  I also love how no one at UM is talking about last year's win.   It's all about revenge for 2011.   "We're not done yet..."

MVictors97

October 29th, 2013 at 10:57 AM ^

Personaly I'd like to see Lewan stop saying stuff like this in public. I know he was just answering a quesion here but its not the first time he has said stuff along these lines.

I have no problem with WHAT he says, I'd just rather him do it behind closed doors and not in public.

I remember last year after the oline got pushed around the first few games he came out talking about how things are going to change and they are going to be more physical and went on to talk about the Michgan oline tradition. And I loved what he said but nothing really changed last year (or this year for that matter).

After the Akron game he made the comments about how embarassing it was and how it won't happen again. Only to have it happen again the next week.

Now this talk about not being bullied by MSU again. 

Again I agree with everything he says but after awhile it just becomes empty rhetoric. Just go prove it on the field. He's not obligated to give the media any of this material.

 

allintime23

October 29th, 2013 at 11:02 AM ^

I agree. Enough is enough. Let's play football. Last years game was completely a normal football game to me. The 2011 game was ridiculous but if a team wants to take 200 penalty yards and look like idiots with no guidance , so be it. I think Saturday we see two teams playing for a division title, every snap counts. There won't be time to give things away via penalties.

alum96

October 29th, 2013 at 7:50 PM ^

100% agree.  I know he is trying to be a leader but save it for your team behind closed doors.  I remember all the incidents you mentioned and nothing changed.  There is only so much "toughness" that is going to be matched when you have 23 year old Tyler Hoover playing 18/19 year old Bosch.  And there is only so much OL improvement you are going to have between week 3 and 4 or week 8 and 9 when you had all spring, summer to improve.  It is what it is now - there will be adversity... the most important toughness will be Devin's mental.  I was upset with how he seemed defalted at points in the Akron and Uconn games after mistakes.  He seemed better in the PSU game but only after halftime - I'd like to see him immediately forget the mistake and move on, we cannot give away 4-5 drives in a row waiting for a halftime break if there is an issue in the middle of first quarter etc.

WolverineMac

October 29th, 2013 at 11:20 AM ^

To run the ball down there throats and I want absolutely no penalties doing it. Now I don't think we can run down their throats completely but do think we will keep them off balance and run enough to expose them. Play man and well throw high to fun chess and find Gallon in space. I'm also comfortable setting the staee personal foul over/under at 3 and taking the over.

Michigan 34-27. I think the magic number is 28. Tough for us to get there but I think that puts too much pressure on their offense to match.

Soulfire21

October 29th, 2013 at 11:41 AM ^

One would think that it should, and I'd much rather hear this sort of talk than something lighter, but after Lewan called the Akron win "embarrassing" and then we came out against UConn looking the way we did, it's not always the case that the rhetoric leads to on-field performance.

As I said though, being aggressive and tough starts with (IMO) thinking and speaking that way.

mGrowOld

October 29th, 2013 at 12:09 PM ^

This whole idea of toughness as defined by "running the ball down their throat" drives me nuts.  Like it somehow more manly to run the ball into a brick wall of defenders for -2 yards instead of swinging it outside to a wide out for an easy 7 yards.

Somebody should poll the Penn State players which team they thought was "tougher".  The one that ran the ball straight at them for negative yards (and scored 40 in basically 5.25 quarters of play) or the one that ran bubble screen after bubble screen and scored 63 in 3.5 quarters.

I know which team they'll answer was smarter.

crazyjoedavola

October 29th, 2013 at 12:57 PM ^

Being good at running the ball up the gut makes a team tough.  Against PSU we tried to be tough but failed because we are not tough, and apparently Borges didn't figure that part out during the first 5 games and in the first half of that one.  Since then, we looked semi-tough against Indiana, so obviously Borges will spend the entire day attacking MSU up the middle.

Tater

October 29th, 2013 at 12:56 PM ^

I'm all for the occasional mea culpa, but saying "we were bullied" makes Michigan sound like a directional school.  It is certainly giving Sparty fans a lot of reason to laugh at the Wolverines and at us for being their fans.  

Hopefully, the maize and blue get this year's version of the "last laugh" on Saturday.

Ernis

October 30th, 2013 at 12:02 AM ^

Agreed, from a PR perspective. Using the word "bully" makes us sound like victims... damn all that. Gotta take the noble path -- call them out for being dishonorable goons, fine, but saying they "bully" us around just makes them sound stronger.

Howeva, perhaps Lewan really knew what he was doing, chosing this lingo that makes us sound weak, for the purpose of lighting a proverbial fire under the team's proverbial ass, to use the parlance of our times.

Spunky

October 29th, 2013 at 2:04 PM ^

After the MSU basketball game at Crisler, I remember a quote from Trey about knowing that Sparty would try to bully the team.

Personally, I feel like football is just a dirty game, but MSU players seem to go too far with the unnecessary roughness at times. And Michigan isn't the only fan base to complain about their style of play. 

markusr2007

October 29th, 2013 at 2:07 PM ^

None of it matters. The word "bullying" strikes a chord with a lot of people now.   Michigan has to overcome  the "unnecessary roughness", facemasks, holding and pass interference, and just play football. 

In my opinion, there's really no excuse why Michigan football, which has recruited at a level superior to MSU for many, many years, should be losing football games to MSU on a regular basis.  Now there are very good reasons for those past 4 losses and the one butt-hair win like last year, but there's really no excuse for it. 

That all said, I can dislike Dantonio all I want, but I think MSU football is in a far better state now than it ever achieved under far better coaches like Darryl Rodgers, George Perles and Nick Saban. 

I think MSU's days of beating Michigan on the regular are over though, probably starting next year.

But mark my words, Spartan fans will  no doubt surf these 4 or 5 "dominating" wins over Michigan for the next half century. 

 

Mr. Yost

October 29th, 2013 at 2:32 PM ^

I can see the Lewan 15 yard penalty from here.

At least his 15 yarders are for suplexing dudes at the whistle and not choking or punching guys on the ground.

Taylor, just pick a good time...like if it's 3rd and 15 around their 40. I'll take 4th and 30 from our 45 if it means you get to get your rocks off for a play.

The Shredder

October 29th, 2013 at 2:55 PM ^

The RCMB has pinned Lewan as a racist, bully and dirty... I am waiting for them to pin the word "murderer" on him. But that message board is like middle school so.. you know its expected.

DrewGOBLUE

October 29th, 2013 at 10:00 PM ^

I actually get a kick out of reading the RCMB once in a while. I mean, any thread you click on somehow ties Michigan into the conversation. With that said though, the difference in intellectual aptitude between the RCMB and MGoBlog is simply staggering. And to think, the entire community on that message board takes pride in that they are supposedly all "college educated," MSU alumni...

MetricSU

October 29th, 2013 at 10:57 PM ^

who threatens to rape a fellow student if she presses charges for rape against your football player buddy? And that part of the Gibbons story is indisputable. Lewan sent a text to the young woman saying he would rape her because Gibbons didn't. And Lewan clearly had Gholston by the facemask pulling his head into the ground before "the punch." Really, how do you hypocrites live with yourselves? Oh, right. You only talk back and forth to each other on this board.

SFBlue

October 29th, 2013 at 8:24 PM ^

I think this is all terribly overblown. 

1.  Has everyone forgotten that Michigan beat State 13-10 last year in a physical game that is exactly the type that now it is widely believed Michigan cannot play, yet alone win? 

2.  What happened in the 2011 game was not bullying, but Sparty, Gholston especially, engaged in Buckeye-level cheapshots that would make George Perles blush. 

3.  The best team, not the toughest team, or by extension the team that takes the most cheap shots, usually wins this game.  I think it's great that Sparty's head is swelling right now.  See, Sparty has never lacked for confidence.  Stupid and cocky is the mark of a true Sparty.  The truth is that this is an evenly matched game, as Michigan has the playmakers to offset what Sparty does on defense, and as a team Michigan has a higher ceiling.  Anyone who is confident in winning a close game is a fool.  (See Jeff Seidel's article where he is "98.2%" certain that State will win by 3.) 

4.  There is more upside than downside risk for Michigan in this game, so let's relax. Losing this game is not going to ruin the season.  Sparty is favored, and if Michigan loses a close game so be it.  After the UCONN game it was clear to me this was a Gator Bowl team.  If you want to talk about frustration due to the lack of progress the program has made this year, your case is already made with the Akron, UCONN, and Penn State games. But it is likely central Florida for the Holidays either way.         

 

NelzQ

October 29th, 2013 at 10:35 PM ^

It is clear that State is in Michigan's heads. That is the very reason you play a physically intimidating style of defense. As a defensive back in my playing days I purposely honed a reputation as a fearless, no-regard-for-personal-safety hitter. I wanted opponents to think that I was a little bit nutso. I hit a receiver at every opportunity on every single play as if I were trying to run through him. This resulted in many a dropped pass as the receiver turned to locate me before securing the pass so that he could brace for the contact. Because he knew it was coming. I had more than my share of opponents carted off the field. Call it dirty if you wish.

Really good defenses have a twelveth man on the field. His name is intimidation. Those of you old enough to have witnessed the 1997 Michigan defense firsthand know very well what I am talking about. That defense delivered blows that stopped play while bodies were carted off the field on numerous occasions. How ironic that Michigan State has now adopted this style of defense.

The very reason you play a physically punishing style is so that your opponent cannot concentrate solely on offensive execution. He must also factor in self preservation.

I loved that Michigan 1997 defense. This 2013 Indiana offense would have been completely out of rhythm against that defense. There would have been hits that made us cringe. There would have been receivers short-arming passes. There would have been receivers starting fist fights out of frustration. What there would not have been is receivers snatching balls away from DBs.

Until Michigan plays defense like that again, we will wait for another national championship.

 

NelzQ

October 30th, 2013 at 12:25 AM ^

I agree that the Spartans are coached for '60 minutes of unnecesarry roughness' whereas the 1997 team was coached to 'lay the wood'. This is by no means 'apples to apples'. That said, you can be physically intimidating without being dirty. The rules allow for physical intimidation without the Spartans brand of thugery. Our defense can certainly stand to be more physical. I don't recall the last time a Michigan DB laid an impressive stick. Too often I see them pass up the opportunity to make a hit.

NelzQ

October 30th, 2013 at 12:32 AM ^

The hit voted most ferocious in college football belongs to the 1997 Michigan football squad.

"1997 What hit could possibly top this list after the collisions you've just seen? How about a hit that immediately ended the careers of both players involved? Michigan safety Daydrion Taylor hit Penn State tight end Bob Stephenson so hard on the final play of the first quarter in the teams' 1997 game in Happy Valley that it horrifyingly knocked both players out. Stephenson was later diagnosed with a Grade 3 concussion, while Taylor underwent neck fusion surgery. Our choice for the Biggest Hit in College Football History is so legendary that the Big Ten Network did a feature on it last fall on the 15-year anniversary of the play, showing the permanent effect it had on both Taylor's and Stephenson's lives. We're just glad neither player was permanently injured during a hit that looked like two freight trains colliding."

Hi Gang

October 30th, 2013 at 1:09 AM ^

And quite possibly the weakest scheme in the proud history of UofM football.

And during the week of the #6 rated rivalry game, er...non-rival game.  This is too much.  What happened to you guys? 

Try scheming O and D game plans, and leave influencing the refs/media to bush-league teams.

Was that really Lewan's statement?  Was that a Brandon script, or was that actually Lewan offering the now-popular bullying line?  Lewan is a victim of bullying?  Can't believe Lewan was actually the spokesman to start this tactic.  Anyone realize how absurd that is?

So UofM is being bullied by MSU?  Any idea'r how hilarious that is?  Could anyone imagine Bo saying that OSU/Hayes is bullying UofM?  Even if MSU gets a couple cheap call against them as a result of this campaign, any long-time UofM fan has to feel embarrassed with this strategy.  Lewan is being bullied.  Honestly, I want to hear more.  I want to read more.  Bullied?  Ha!!! Wow.  Bullied by "little brother".  This is too funny.

I never thought I'd see the day when UofM football would go to the recess lady about being bullied...by their non-rival little brother.  This is too much:)

 

 

flashOverride

October 30th, 2013 at 2:47 AM ^

Can we PLEASE cut the "non-rival" shit? That is one of the most blatant straw men I have ever heard. I don't know any Michigan fans who don't consider MSU a rival. The few that I've ever heard say it did so solely because there were Sparties present and they thought it would get their collective goat...which it often does.

As for Lewan, I don't know what article you read, but the one I read told me he was referring to the fact that they were generally intimidated and manhandled in the trenches by MSU two years ago. But go ahead and make it "whining", I guess, if that serves your purpose.