Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (42)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 6 hours ago
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 2 days ago
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 3 days ago
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 1 week ago
  • MGoAcceptance: Another MGoAnecdote
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 week ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,341 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 493 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 356 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 31 views
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 50 comments
  • MGoAcceptance: Another MGoAnecdote
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 13 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 2 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • BBall year in review Deleted...
    7 replies
  • OT: RIP Dick Trickle and Ken Venturi
    11 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    43 replies
  • Softball Open Thread 7pm vs Valpo ESPN3
    33 replies
  • OT Staee shutout by Penn St 9-0 in baseball
    19 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    89 replies
  • OT - The Friday Night Alcoholics - Early Edition Thread
    59 replies
  • Trey Burke current on ESPN2 at NBA Combine
    28 replies
  • OT: End of Drew and Mike on 101WRIF
    37 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    72 replies
  • The Talented Shallmans
    41 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    71 replies
  • Speight to compete in Oakland Elite 11 camp
    45 replies
  • Nice Article on Michigan Baseball Signee Hector Gutierrez
    7 replies
  • 2013 Mott Takeover Open Thread
    60 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Speight to compete in Oakland Elite 11 camp
    45 replies
  • OT: End of Drew and Mike on 101WRIF
    37 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    89 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    71 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    43 replies
  • Trey Burke current on ESPN2 at NBA Combine
    28 replies
  • OT: RIP Dick Trickle and Ken Venturi
    11 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    72 replies
  • Hawaii football changing name back to Rainbow Warriors
    59 replies
  • OT Staee shutout by Penn St 9-0 in baseball
    19 replies
  • BBall year in review Deleted...
    7 replies
  • OT - The Friday Night Alcoholics - Early Edition Thread
    59 replies
  • OT: Notre Dame 2013, pretty much BCS or bust
    44 replies
  • 2013 Mott Takeover Open Thread
    60 replies
  • OT: The Office series finale thread (may contain spoilers)
    43 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings @ Ducks Game 7 Open Thread
    229 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Shane Morris to wear the famed #7 jersey, J.J. McGrath #46
    175 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • Brady Hoke Calls Notre Dame A Chicken
    162 replies
  • Hello: Lawrence Marshall
    124 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Saturday night drinking thread
    121 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • Notre Dame's Nix fires back at Coach Hoke
    110 replies
  • GoBlueWolverine's Dre Barthwell: Marvin Robinson to leave Michigan
    96 replies
  • Sparty losing recruits to the rap game
    95 replies
  • Wading in the waters of tRCMB, post Marshall
    95 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    89 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    1 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  • Spectacular images of the madness that was the first FA Cup final

    And you think you're crowded at Michigan Stadium

    0 comments
  • Bear Vs. Monkey Bicycle Race Ends With Bear Eating Monkey

    IMPORTANT: Ondre Pipkins not involved.

    11 comments
  • Damon Bullock Has the Greatest Vine Account of All Time

    this is amazing

    7 comments

BSD - Conference Expansion: Delany Goes Corleone

70 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
May 25th, 2012 at 11:54 AM
#1
MGoShoe
MGoShoe's picture
Joined: 04/23/2009
MGoPoints: 19230
BSD - Conference Expansion: Delany Goes Corleone

An excellent primer from Black Shoe Diaries on the impetus behind all of the conference realignments that occurred from the early 1990s to today. That impetus is, of course, cash money.

...why are universities so eager to realign today? As best I can tell, there are five top reasons, as follows:

  1. Money.
  2. Money, to fill gaps caused by bankrupt state budget cuts.
  3. Money, to fuel the fleet of university jets that universities can't afford not to have.
  4. Money, as future media rights payouts go through the roof. And,
  5. "Stability", defined as membership in a conference that will maintain its place at the (money) feeding trough.

More to the point, it's football driven TV money.

...the TV networks say that basketball sucks. ABC/ESPN told the ACC that they can have all the alley-oops they want; they can have a big alley-oop party in the middle of Tiananmen Square and it won't make a lick of difference, because basketball ads don't bring 30% of what football ads bring. Only football maters. Or, at least, that's how Clemson's Athletic Director explained it.

So what does this mean for the B1G?

...the payout to that 2-win Minnesota team (thanks, Hawkeyes!) is in the $20+ million range, and climbing. That's right, Tomahawk Nation. Minnesota and Indiana raked in north of $60 million over the last 3 years, winning an FCS-assisted average of a grand total of 3.57 football games, while you were making $11 - $12 million slogging it out against Oklahoma and Florida in your non-con. Doesn't that thought make you want to vomit? And that number is only going to increase, by the way.

The Big Ten Network is a cash cow that's only getting fatter; and, the Big Ten is the one power conference that has NOT renegotiated its first-tier (ABC/ESPN) football rights in the last couple of years, as far as I'm aware of. Yep - the Big Ten makes the most money today, with the oldest set of contracts, in a fast growth market. The ABC/ESPN deal expires in 2016/17. When that contract comes up for renegotiation, just watch out.

The post goes on to speculate about the desirability of several ACC schools and comes to the standard conclusion that Notre Dame is the only school that is worth the B1G's pursuit. My only comment to that is that perhaps it is, but if a next round of realignment occurs, the B1G will be looking for ND+1 or ND+3 or if ND stays steadfast in its desire to be an independent OR they go to the Big XII, the B1G will have to look for 2-4 candidates who may not be all that and a bag of doughnuts, at least from the straight cash, homie perspective. Candidate schools will have to:

  1. Help the B1G capture or solidify key TV markets (NYC, Washington, DC, Atlanta)
  2. Be good to semi-good in football
  3. Be good fits for the CIC
  4. Have intangibles that make up for something lacking in 1-3 (MBB, other sports) * +

Lots of ACC schools fit that profile to some degree or another, but especially Syracuse, Maryland, UVA, Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech (geographically speaking (not only are these schools aligned north to south, but also east to west!)).

As a resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia and a parent of UVA and VT students, my biases are plain. Get the B1G into the Old Dominion, Jim Corleone.

* My absolute favorite VT intangible.

+ My absolute favorite UVA intangible.

LSA '89 - MBB Natl Champions, Big 10/Rose Bowl Champions | @MGoShoe

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • B1G Cash Cow
  • black shoe diaries
  • Conference Realignment
  • football
  • jim delaney

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
May 25th, 2012 at 12:05 PM | What about North Carolina?  (Score:3 Normal)
Schembo
Schembo's picture
Joined: 01/06/2011
MGoPoints: 913

What about North Carolina?  Other than that, no other school in the East really does it for me, except maybe Va Tech.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:30 PM | they would probably only come (Score:5 Normal)
Vader
Vader's picture
Joined: 12/12/2011
MGoPoints: 290

they would probably only come with Duke, so.... no.

"I find your lack of faith disturbing... This is Michigan fergodsakes"

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 3:10 PM | syracuse (Score:1)
yzerman19
yzerman19's picture
Joined: 02/03/2012
MGoPoints: 371

i have always thought syracuse was a good fit for the B1G; Syracuse and ND would be ideal, add NC and Duke and you have my ideal 16 team B1G. 

 

I will fucking cunt punt the next person I hear about doing something like that, and I don't give a fuck if you SOR me, I WILL FUCKING ASSAULT YOU.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:08 PM | Schools that fit the profile (Score:2 Normal)
Blue Durham
Blue Durham's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 982

Pitt used to be mentioned by some, as it is a pretty decent school.

Nebraska was a great get.  The problem is there are fewer Nebraskas out there. 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:09 PM | I would love to add VA and VA (Score:4 Normal)
JBE
JBE's picture
Joined: 08/18/2008
MGoPoints: 8341

I would love to add VA and VA Tech to the conference.

Sent From My Commodore 64

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 8:44 PM | UVA intangible:  students run (Score:2 Normal)
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 6362

UVA intangible:  students run around naked at graduation time.  That should count for something.

M'Dog

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 8:53 PM | I don't know where the hell (Score:4 Normal)
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 11799

I don't know where the hell you got that idea. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Streaking the Lawn is not limited to only graduation time.

"We've beaten Michigan the last four years.  So where's the threat?"

- Mark Dantonio

Blogging the Virginia Cavaliers at http://fromoldvirginia.blogspot.com/<

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:20 PM | been a long time (Score:0 Normal)
Bodogblog
Bodogblog's picture
Joined: 06/08/2010
MGoPoints: 7577

"Yep - the Big Ten makes the most money today, with the oldest set of contracts, in a fast growth market."

The B1G is a fast growth market?  Can't remember the last time I heard this region referred to in that way.  Both coasts and the south are much too fond of referring to this as the Rust Belt.  The author could be referring to CFB as the fast growth market, though that would seem redundant given the content of the article.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:25 PM | Rights fees (Score:3 Normal)
Wolverine 73
Joined: 08/03/2009
MGoPoints: 563

That's the market that he means is growing fast, at least that's how it reads to me.

wolverine 73

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:54 PM | In terms of population and stuff (Score:4 Normal)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9529

The B1G market does have one huge thing going for it - Big Cities. Maybe Detroit proper isn't as big as it once was, but the metropolitan area's growth has been flat (people leave the city for the suburbs). Not to mention nationally huge cities like Chicago, Indianapolis, Minneapolis, and to an extent Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. Plus all of Ohio.

Check out the B1G footprint vs. the SEC footprint in terms of population:

States in the B1G Footprint: Iowa: 3M, Illinois: 13M, Indiana: 6.5M, Michigan: 10M, Minnesota: 5M, Nebraska: 2M, Ohio: 11.5 M, Penn: 12.5M, Wisky: 5.5M. Total of 69M people

States in the SEC Footprint: Alabama: 5M, Arkansas: 3M, Florida: 19M, Georgia: 10M, Louisiana: 4.5M, Tennesee: 6M Kentucky: 4M, South Carolina: 4.5M. Total of 56M People

Numbers rounded and taken from here: http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepoliticalsystem/a/2012-Electoral-Votes-By-State.htm

The reports of population dearth in the midwest are exaggerated

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 4:38 PM | Yeah but (Score:1)
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2677

the midwest are all old people, or people too worried about the safety of football, over much safer sports like say hockey .....    /s

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:14 PM | I think (Score:3 Normal)
bjk
bjk's picture
Joined: 11/27/2009
MGoPoints: 830

he means CFB/TV market.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 3:45 PM | Very Fast (Score:2)
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 8703

It isn't so much about local economies as it is about viewership and rights, and those transcend traditional regional boundaries, of course.

As I recall, the Big Ten is second overall in football ratings per Nielsen, and first in basketball (behind the SEC in football, and just in front of the ACC in basketball). This site ESPN blog entry has the contract breakdown - http://espn.go.com/blog/playbook/dollars/post/_/id/705/college-tv-rights-deals-undergo-makeovers

Some of the highlights -

* First-tier (ESPN): $1 billion through 2016

* Second-tier: $2.8 billion through 2032

* Select contracts with CBS (basketball) for $72 million through 2017 and Fox (bowl coverage) for $145 million through 2016 (although I wonder how this one actually works).

Whether the valuations of these contracts given the viewership numbers is appropriate would be a separate debate, but if Larry Scott can get a $3 billion deal for first-tier rights (and somehow still come in under Big Ten numbers in per school average revenue), then I'll say that rights and licensing in general is a growth market, and it is growing the fastest in conferences with greater viewership.

If the potential revenue from such deals is a primary driver in further realignment, then it is interesting to note that third in overall football viewership is the ACC.

"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."

Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:22 PM | I think Pitt is a good add. (Score:1 Normal)
ryebreadboy
ryebreadboy's picture
Joined: 12/02/2010
MGoPoints: 1786

I think Pitt is a good add. Revive that rivalry with PSU, although I guess you're not adding much in the way of new tv markets. I could get on board with VT and UVa (if we had to take UVa, which we would to get VT). Add GaTech if ND finally gets with the program, and you have yourself a 16 team conference.

Denard has spent the offseason working really hard and smiling at people.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:41 PM | Before joining the Big Ten, (Score:2)
Blue Durham
Blue Durham's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 982

Penn State used to play both Maryland and Syracuse fairly regularly, and have played UVa 7 times, but have never played VaTech.  But I don't think the rest of the Big Ten has much if any history with these schools.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:43 PM | Disagree (Score:5 Normal)
bluedog10
bluedog10's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 103

I've lived in Pittsburgh and worked on Pitt's campus for two years now.  I disagree that they would be a good addition to the B10.  First, their football team plays in Heinz field and rarely if ever sell that out.  So much so they struggled to sell-out ND and WVU the past two years and those are their "biggest" games.  Secondly, Pitt has incredibly fickle fans.  Few people in Pittsburgh care about Pitt football because of the Steelers and not many more care about Pitt basketball unless they are in the top-3 of their conference (See 2011-2012 season and attendance figures).  Finally, adding Pitt adds no extra TV markets or regional draw.  PSU has already accomplished whatever the B10 could hope to accomplish with Pitt.  The only reason Pitt is thrown around is their relatively comparable academic standards.  I don't think it's a good fit as much as I enjoy Pittsburgh and Pitt athletics.

 
 

 

 
  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:25 PM | no freaking more!!!! (Score:2 Normal)
Joshisbowler
Joined: 08/04/2010
MGoPoints: 133

we don't need anybody else in the Big 10, 12 is plenty, and Va isn't good enough and screw V Tech, we dont need those kind of teams in our conference, no more expansion!!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:38 PM | Agreed (Score:1)
Roachgoblue
Joined: 08/29/2011
MGoPoints: 1477

VaTech has fairweather fans that don't travel well. People say their fans travel well, except their AD is begging people to buy tickets most years. It is just like Nebraska football a few years ago when alumnus had to but a shitload of tickets to keep their "sellout streak" alive. You have 80,000 seats, no MSU, EMU, CMU and no other pro teams within driving distance. Yeahhhh look at you go! No more teams!

[Caved troll is caved. Sorry, Mobile app users.]

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:29 PM | I like the idea of adding (Score:4 Normal)
MichiganManOf1961
MichiganManOf1961's picture
Joined: 05/18/2012
MGoPoints: 800

I like the idea of adding UNC/UVa, could make the Big 10 the public-ivy conference. Great for our academic standing

Stop the uniform changes! Contact Dave Brandon 734-764-9416.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:29 PM | Not a big fan of adding VT (Score:3 Normal)
Wolverine 73
Joined: 08/03/2009
MGoPoints: 563

Fine for football, but there are plenty of other schools with better academics that would fit.  One of the unique things about the Big Ten is the high academic standing of the institutions, generally speaking.  I thought adding Nebraska hurt that a bit.  Virginia would be a great addition from the academic perspective, VT less so.

wolverine 73

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:38 PM | I agree, but... (Score:2 Normal)
Hagen
Hagen's picture
Joined: 03/03/2012
MGoPoints: 175

UVA and VT are a package deal.  UVA was essentially forced by the state legislature to fight for VT's acceptance into the ACC.  Though VT isn't as great academically, they are no worse IMO than some of the lower tier B1G schools,  but what they do have is an energetic and large fanbase.

For me, the always fun hypothetical question of  "If we have to expand to 16 because super conferences are coming to eat our children" would be answered by adding ND, UVA, VT, and either Maryland or Rutgers.  I think that would keep balance in terms of academics and athletics, and then the conference divisions actually could be re-created to have an east/west balance for football that includes a power football/crappy football balance.

Your father wouldn't want to hear this, Sonny.  This is business, not personal.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:21 PM | The whole idea of that package deal is way overblown imo. (Score:4 Normal)
Mr Miggle
Mr Miggle's picture
Joined: 10/07/2010
MGoPoints: 1600

Going from the Big East to the ACC meant a lot to VT and UVA was in a position to either help them or blackball them. UVA won't have that kind of power again and VT might well find it's way into the SEC if the ACC were to disintegrate. Considering that expanding footprints is driving expansion, why would the Big Ten even consider adding two schools from VA? Any expansion candidates are going to compete with schools that add a desirable new market or a national following. 

Eating is murder.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:31 PM | I agree.  I don't think (Score:3 Normal)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17601

I agree.  I don't think they're the package deals every thinks they are.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:47 PM | I agree and said it before: (Score:3 Normal)
Blue Durham
Blue Durham's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 982

UVa and VaTech are as much of a package deal as South Carolina and Clemson, Georgia and Georgia Tech, Florida and Florida State, and Texas and Texas A&M are.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 8:47 PM | Especially if VT finds a (Score:1)
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 6362

Especially if VT finds a happy home in the B12.  Then VA could go to the B1G and the Virginia legis is happy too.

M'Dog

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:31 PM | You realize (Score:1)
bjk
bjk's picture
Joined: 11/27/2009
MGoPoints: 830

that guarantees an LSU/Bama '11 situation every year, plus Appy State or Western Michigan advancing to the semi-final every seven years or so? This is fine by me, but imagine the howling if UGA had beaten LSU in their conference championship this past season.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:34 PM | I like the VT bass fishing (Score:4 Normal)
Baldbill
Baldbill's picture
Joined: 04/09/2009
MGoPoints: 2002

I like the VT bass fishing team. Man could the B10 use a bass fishing league or what, we have got the lakes and rivers that would clearly make us the top conference in that sport.

 

Semper Fidelis

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:43 PM | We can also use Kevin Van (Score:2)
Schembo
Schembo's picture
Joined: 01/06/2011
MGoPoints: 913

We can also use Kevin Van Damn as a recruiting tool, but the SEC would counter with Bill Dance and Hank Parker.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 12:36 PM | My Favorite Hypothetical 16 team B1G (Score:1 Normal)
El Tigre
El Tigre's picture
Joined: 03/14/2011
MGoPoints: 552

B1G Original Teams Division

Michigan

Illinois

Minnesota

Northwestern

Purdue

Wisconsin

Indiana

Iowa

 

B1G New Teams Division

Ohio

MSU

PSU

Nebraska

Notre Dame

Boston College ( could replace with pick one of Maryland/Rutgers/Syracuse)

VA Tech

UVA  (could replace with UNC if VA legislature allows it)

 

Play 12 Conference games, sorry MAC and Pac12 see you in Rose Bowl, plus CCG.

7 intradivisional games + 2 permanent crossovers (Ohio and MSU) leaves 3 games out of 6 opponents.  So you would play everyone frequently.  Now that would be a schedule.

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:53 PM | If there's going (Score:2 Normal)
bjk
bjk's picture
Joined: 11/27/2009
MGoPoints: 830

to be a big change, the first thing I would do is get UM/OSU back into the same division. I don't know how deadly serious DB was about prioritizing a once-every-nine-year-or-so UM/OSU matchup in the neutral-site conference championship; for me, when the annual UM/OSU matchup ceases to be a central event in CFB, then CFB is a strange and new sport to me. You can molify me if you move the championship to the home venue of the higher-ranked division winner and UM and OSU both win their division three years in a row. In the meantime, the split into separate divisions puts our favorite game at high risk over time.

As far as VTech, I'm not sure this conforms to what we learned last go-round, which is that Universities make ten or more times the money off research grants correlated to membership in the AAU than they do off Football/TV. When speculating on conference realignment, I would consult this list first.

What's the latest on Nebraska's AAU status? Apropos which, this guy said the following, which I hadn't heard before:

The application process to the AAU, assuming initial academic standards are met, requires a vote among the existing AAU members. A relatively small block of schools can blackball a university. For example, the 12 CIC (B1G plus Chicago) members were not able to protect Nebraska's membership from the jilted Big XII schools. As such, Nebraska's membership has been put on hold.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:03 PM | I really don't want Virginia (Score:2)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17601

I really don't want Virginia Tech - they're a solid football program, but not histrorically, and they bring nothing else to the table.  I'd much rather have UNC, UVA, Maryland or Syracuse, in that order (in addition to ND, of course).  BC, no thanks.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:41 PM | I read your header and I was (Score:3 Normal)
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 11799

I read your header and I was like EFF YOU and then I read your post and I was like NEVER MIND.

In all seriousness, I know I should be flattered when I see people say they want UVA in the B1G, but really the opposite is what happens because I don't want to be in the B1G at all.

And then really I take it a step farther than that, and can't understand why people aren't happy with the 12-team conference we've got.  I feel like it's some kind of new toys phenomenon.  Gotta collect em all.  But why should we (Michigan, I mean now) have any desire to play UNC or GT or UMD or UVA as conference mates?  Bored with Iowa and Wisconsin?  The B1G is a midwestern conference, I don't even remotely get the desire to start adding these outliers that are totally different from the schools we have now.

"We've beaten Michigan the last four years.  So where's the threat?"

- Mark Dantonio

Blogging the Virginia Cavaliers at http://fromoldvirginia.blogspot.com/<

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:46 PM | Yeah, I agree with you, I'e (Score:2)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17601

Yeah, I agree with you, I'e like to stay put if possible.  It's more of a "if we need to add, who should it be" discussion.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:54 PM | For my edification, what (Score:2)
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 11799

For my edification, what would be a scenario where the B1G needs to add anyone?  All I can think of: Needing a 14th team for balance if ND joins.

This is why, by the way, I think notions of the ACC disintegrating are far-fetched.  The B1G is much more likely to sit tight than to act as a lifeboat for ACC teams.  The B1G is in the best place of any of the major conferences.  Their renegotiation window is the soonest, and even then, they don't even have to renegotiate to boost their revenue stream.  The BTN will keep pumping out money basically forever.  ACC schools are roughly half the size of B1G schools, so I really don't think the B1G can add enough revenue with any of them to offset the extra payment.

"We've beaten Michigan the last four years.  So where's the threat?"

- Mark Dantonio

Blogging the Virginia Cavaliers at http://fromoldvirginia.blogspot.com/<

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 3:36 PM | Yeah, the only scenarios (Score:2)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17601

Yeah, the only scenarios where that would come up would be if ND wanted in and we needed a pair or the landscape was such that all major conferences needed 14 or 16 teams. 

However, I think a team like UNC would bring more than they take.  They would probably be slightly above average compared to other Big Ten teams in terms of revenue - their football team ranges from meh to pretty good (like much of the Big Ten), and their basketball, baseball and lacrosse teams are top notch.  They would be better than Minnesota, Indiana, Illinois, Purdue, Northwestern and MSU in terms of revenue. 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 4:29 PM | And it's hard to see the (Score:2)
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 4159

And it's hard to see the second scenario, given that the Pac 12 is now landlocked by the newly stable Big 12. Since the Pac 12 is now fundamentally the Big 10's partner conference, I don't know where the outside pressure to expand would come from.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 8:54 PM | Delaney has said repeatedly (Score:1)
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 6362

Delaney has said repeatedly that he would like to expand the B1G's footprint into areas of the country that are growing . . . Maryland/DC, Virginia, NC, Atlanta would all do this if he is indeed serious about it.  

 

M'Dog

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 8:54 PM | The outside pressure I see is (Score:2)
dayooper63
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 527

The outside pressure I see is losing out on expanding the footprint of both the BTN and the ABC/ESPN teir 1 contract.  If the "good" teams, the ones that will bring in more large markets are snapped up before we get around to expanding the footprint, we stay put.  That may sound great to you and me, but to the AD departments of the exsiting B1G schools, that's unacceptable.  If the SEC takes VTU and NCST while the Pac 12 makes an Eastern Pod with UNC, Duke, UVA and Maryland and the Big XII snaps up ND, GT, FSU, Miami, Clemson, and Louisville, we can't expand the footprint and lose out on money.

The ACC, if it loses FSU, Clemson, and VTU will be severly hurt as a football conference.  Will it die?  Not in a million years.  But the money they can bring in will be severley hurt because they will become a non entity in the landscape of college football.  IMO, The B1G will make a play for some of those ACC schools when those schools realize that they can't make enough money to support their other programs (read Title IX).  If or when those schools are ready, the B1G will listen and probably expand.

Tradition is something you can't bottle.  But it is there to sustain you when you need it most.  I've called upon it time and time again.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:10 PM | If you added ND, than Texas (Score:1)
BrandonGarrison
Joined: 05/23/2011
MGoPoints: 54

If you added ND, than Texas would be a willing participant to join the B1G. I think you could snatch both of them and add Syracuse/rutgers and Virgina and that in itself would bring huge payouts.



ND and Texas would minimize their losses by joining the same conference and something that was rumored to happen.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:34 PM | Do you think (Score:1)
bjk
bjk's picture
Joined: 11/27/2009
MGoPoints: 830

UTx's entitlement issues will survive the 16-team conference era?

I have trouble seeing them go gently into this dark night.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 4:32 PM | No one else is leaving the (Score:2)
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 4159

No one else is leaving the Big 12 for at least 6 years, since all the schools have pledged their first and second tier media rights to the conference for that time. That means that even if they were to switch conferences, the right to broadcast Texas games and the revenues that come from them, would go to the Big 12. 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 8:57 PM | Texas has alrady broken up (Score:1)
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 6362

Texas has alrady broken up two conferences.  

When a woman is smoking hot but you find out she's been divorced twice in a row, you've got to believe in the interest of self preservation that something's up.

 

M'Dog

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:17 PM | Miami? (Score:1 Normal)
BlueHurricane
BlueHurricane's picture
Joined: 04/24/2012
MGoPoints: 8

If Miami somehow decides to stop all of the ridiculous violations could they be a plausible choice? We bring a national fanbase, a lot of tradtion, the most fertile recruiting ground in the nation, and our academics have improved drastically over the past 10 years.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:43 PM | Hardly, on all counts.  Does (Score:3 Normal)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17601

Hardly, on all counts.  Does Miami have a national fanbase?  I've lived in a handful of places outside of the South, and I don't remember seeing many Canes fans at all. 

A lot of tradition?  Miami was a nobody team until the 80s, and they were a great program (from a W/L perspective) until about 2002, and now they're again just above average.  20 years of good football (that we now know was riddled with scandal) does not mean "a lot of tradition."

Academics are borderline (and not up to par with the other schools we would consider) and although the recruiting ground is certainly fertile, there are already tons of schools fighting over that area.  I don't think that's enough.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 2:45 PM | Okay, thanks for clarifying. (Score:1)
BlueHurricane
BlueHurricane's picture
Joined: 04/24/2012
MGoPoints: 8

Okay, thanks for clarifying. I was just wondering where Miami might stand. I wasn't sure about the national fanbase idea, and it just seems that a large portion of our fanbase continuously plasters that on message boards. I would just like to see my school not get left out of a BCS conferenc. Where do you think, if anywhere, Miami will end up?

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 7:35 PM | Miami may be in the process (Score:2)
Zone Left
Zone Left's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 13952

Miami may be in the process of getting nuked by the NCAA and until that's settled, they're probably radioactive (see the synergy there, eh??) to the power conferences. They also have never really been committed from a school standpoint to football. They don't have an on-campus stadium, don't sell out games, and have subpar facilities. 

Miami is a good fit for the SEC from a geographic standpoint, but otherwise, I don't see them as a great fit anywhere besides the ACC. Miami is a long, long way from Tallahassee, much less Austin, TX, which I think would be the nearest school to them in the current Big 12 membership.

Bottom line, I think they're going to struggle if another round of realignment happens soon. That said, Miami does have one of the best recruiting grounds in the country. If they get serious and start winning again, they can still be a player and be an attractive candidate for the SEC or Big 12 if things fall right for them.

It's all John Navarre's fault.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 1:26 PM | If money is the object, then BC is on the table (Score:0 Overrated)
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 1294

I still don't understand why people ignore BC in favor of other schools. They are often mediocre in football, but they do occasionally have bouts of quality; meanwhile, you would suddenly be dumping the B1G network in the massive Boston metroplex. And if you're looking at schools like Syracuse, this is geographically more appropriate than a Southern school like UNC. 

The problem is that after a hypothetical pickup of Notre Dame, all the best football teams are off the table for the B1G (we are not getting FSU or Miami), so you're looking at secondary qualities. UNC and Duke as a package deal would expand the B1G footprint and be a monster basketball move, but UNC's football program isn't very good and Duke would fight Indiana for the basement every year. Va Tech is a football plus, but they aren't a "name brand" and UVA is no better at football than BC. The upside is that the B1G Network could move in on the DC metroplex. 

I suppose Georgia Tech, allegedly a sound academic institution, would be a nice add to get a foothold in the South, but... Georgia Tech?

 

Servant. Pastor. Husband. Michigan fan in Duluth. 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 2:09 PM | Agree. (Score:1)
French West Indian
French West Indian's picture
Joined: 12/28/2011
MGoPoints: 928

I'm also a bit surprised that BC isn't mentioned more.  If Notre Dame is in the mix then the BC would seem like a natural.  Football is definitely popular in New England and BC is really the only major team up there.  Seems like low hanging fruit to me.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 2:47 PM | Football in New England (Score:2)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

I lived in Boston for four years, and I didn't get the impression that many people cared about BC.  I didn't get the impression that people cared much about football at all until the Pats started winning...I'm not saying that my impression was necessarily right, but I do question NE as a college football market. 

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
May 25th, 2012 at 5:03 PM | This is correct (Score:3 Normal)
DoubleB
Joined: 11/19/2008
MGoPoints: 188

The last time big-time college football mattered in the Northeast was when the Ivies were still giving out athletic scholarships and Army was a top 5 program.

First off, like New York, Boston is a pro sports town. Secondly, there are very few D-IA schools in the area. In the 6 New England states, only BC, UConn, and I guess now UMass are D-I. Only BC has any history and it's a small, private school to begin with.

So you have a school with few alumni in the area for a sport that isn't supported in the area in the first place. High school football isn't particularly big in this region as well and other sports do fill the void: lacrosse, hockey, etc.

It's somewhat analogous to Rutgers in New York, although at least that's a state school and New Jersey really likes its high school football.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.