Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2014 Recruiting Board, Offense
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Yet Another Da'Shawn Hand post
    canzior - 1 week ago
  • Baseball Recruiting—Hello: Nick Azar (+ other items)
    Raoul - 1 week ago
  • 2013 Women's Football Academy
    maizemama - 1 week ago
  • This Day In History: June 10, 1944 - Alumnus Ed Tipper
    wildbackdunesman - 1 week ago
  • Future Non-Conference Recruiting Watch, Vol. I, No. 3
    EGD - 1 week ago
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 5
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 1,457 views
  • Devin and the White Rainbow
    MCalibur - 1,062 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 1,046 views
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 1,004 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 787 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 52 comments
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 32 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 19 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 13 comments
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 6-18-13
    Ace - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Video: Trey Burke with Jalen Rose and Bill Simmons
    1 replies
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    12 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    16 replies
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules (Quiz)?
    50 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    109 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    26 replies
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    25 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    12 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    59 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    28 replies
  • Story on MBB Pete Kahler's Family
    5 replies
  • More Camp Offers, 2014 WR and 2014 CB
    23 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    97 replies
  • ESPN projects next three seasons, ranks M #5 ($)
    56 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    12 replies
  • Video: Trey Burke with Jalen Rose and Bill Simmons
    1 replies
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    142 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    15 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    97 replies
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules (Quiz)?
    50 replies
  • Very OT: Job Searching
    73 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    109 replies
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    25 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    26 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    28 replies
  • OT- Alabama Installing Waterfalls In Football Locker Rooms
    62 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    59 replies
  • MGoProfile to Return This Week
    76 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • OT'ish: Michigan or Harvard?
    176 replies
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    142 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    132 replies
  • OT: Man Of Steel. Wow
    129 replies
  • OT: City of Detroit Epic Comeback? (Business Insider)
    125 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • ND to play ASU in football series
    112 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    109 replies
  • OT-4* recruit (non Michigan) posting really dumb things
    101 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    97 replies
  • OT: Tigers/afternoon baseball Open Thread
    97 replies
  • John U. Bacon on the GA Student Section
    97 replies
  • OT: Cool Story Bro!
    96 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • SF Kameron Chatman Talks UConn

    ...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)

    0 comments
  • AIRBHG Invades Steelemas!

    wow

    0 comments
  • NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke (With Scouting Report!)

    Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.

    0 comments
  • 2013 World Dwarf Games to be held at MSU

    Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition

    0 comments
  • NBA draft rumors: Pistons like Cody Zeller, but not Trey Burke - Detroit Bad Boys

    just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.

    4 comments
  • New college grads: Don’t sell your time for a living

    this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech

    9 comments
  • College World Series Misspells "College" On Dugout

    no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE

    0 comments
  • Michigan no longer looking for a transfer quarterback, Brady Hoke says

    not a surprise

    0 comments
  • Babcock: 'Glendening will play at the next level, for sure''

    premature congrats. One thing we can be sure of: he'll take fewer asinine penalties than Abdelkader

    1 comments
  • Spurrier may have to come up with a new UT spelling joke.

    Thanks to ugly transitions between Fulmer/Kiffin/Dooley/Davis, Tennessee is on the edge of APR penalties for football.

    1 comments
  • Report: NCAA ditching domes prior to Final Four

    i approve of this message

    0 comments
  • San Antonio Spurs may be doing something right by drafting international athletes

    strong indictment of AAU right heah

    0 comments
  • NBA draft 2013 Toss Up: Better PG prospect, Trey Burke or Michael Carter-Williams

    Glockner sides with justice

    0 comments
  • Brady Hoke-coached fantasy camp raises $140K for prostate cancer research

    a good cause, and a good time

    0 comments
  • Michigan men's basketball receives high academic honor with APR Public Recognition Award

    good job gents

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Brandon Graham wants 4 Down Linemen:

65 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
November 4th, 2010 at 8:51 AM
#1
w2j2
Joined: 11/23/2008
MGoPoints: 413
Brandon Graham wants 4 Down Linemen:

“I think Coach Robinson is real good,” he said. “He was somebody who really tried to teach you the game. ‘These are why we’re calling these plays or these blitzes now.’”

Graham said his concerns were purely schematic.

“You’ve got to have four down linemen. You’ve got to,” he said. “Or five. You’ve got to stop them holes, and you got to get to the quarterback. You got to trust the cornerbacks are going to do their job.”

http://www.annarbor.com/sports/um-football/is-the-3-3-5-the-source-of-michigans-defensive-woes-brandon-graham-thinks-so/

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • football

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 4th, 2010 at 8:52 AM | The great BG speaks the (Score:1)
HttV Wolverine
HttV Wolverine's picture
Joined: 08/02/2010
MGoPoints: 7363

The great BG speaks the truth. Please someone listen to him, GERG, RR, someone.

“What the mind can conceive, the mind can achieve and those who stay will be champions.” - Bo 

][V][

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 10:20 AM | yes. lets trust james rogers (Score:1)
Mr.Jello
Mr.Jello's picture
Joined: 10/07/2010
MGoPoints: 823

yes. lets trust James Rogers and Courtney Avery in coverage. Thats what we should do.

 

Edit: not even to mention having Freshman Vinopal at deep safety. This would be suicide

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 10:33 AM | What difference would it make... (Score:1)
SlymCyke
SlymCyke's picture
Joined: 08/21/2009
MGoPoints: 300

We're still giving up 80+ yard drives with the "bend-not-break" defense.  Why not try sending more men at the quarterback?  Yeah we may get torched a couple times, but it's no different than giving up long, sustained drives. 

Apparently Avery played more man coverage in high school, so this would actually play to his strength.  It's worth a shot at least.  With Illinois having a freshman QB, I think it's more important get to him quicker, forcing him to make bad decisions. 

-Rob-

"The true test of leadership, ... always comes when things go poorly" - Lloyd Carr

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 10:53 AM | Avery (Score:1)
mgohopkins
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 227

As we've notice Avery tends to play man coverage whether the D is in man or zone so might as well play to his "I'm playing man no matter what" tendency...

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 10:55 AM | I'm not saying I know... (Score:1)
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 02/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2414
"What difference would it make...We're still giving up 80+ yard drives with the "bend-not-break" defense."
 
I think the philosophy is that the opposing team is far more likely to make mistakes when they have to run 10 plays to get that 80 yards than when they only have to run 1 or 2 plays to gain those yards.
 
Our defense can't force turnovers so we have to hope they screw up. I am not saying I love this game plan, I hate it as much as anyone. I am just not sure selling out on every play and leaving this secondary to play man to man is the answer.
 
I get the "let's try it, it can't be worse" thing, maybe they will try and it will work better than what we are seeing now....I would love that, but with theplayers we have I think there is always the potential for things to get worse.....unfortunalely.
  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 11:27 AM | That is not possible (Score:1)
WolverineEagle
WolverineEagle's picture
Joined: 07/22/2009
MGoPoints: -199

This defense is as bad of a defense that I have ever seen.You cannot worse that this inept group.

The team, the team, the team.-Bo Schembechler

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 11:29 AM | Believe me, I understand... (Score:1)
SlymCyke
SlymCyke's picture
Joined: 08/21/2009
MGoPoints: 300

Maybe it's just the knee-jerk reaction, or buying into the "definition of insanity".  I understand the only way they'll really get better is through experience, tackling better, fundamentals, etc.  It's just frustrating.  You just hope something can change that will ignite a spark, although deep down you know there really is no instant cure-all.  Although, I really do believe we need to rush more guys, especially against a young QB.  We'll see this Saturday, either way.

-Rob-

"The true test of leadership, ... always comes when things go poorly" - Lloyd Carr

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 1:08 PM | There's a competing factor (Score:1)
Starko
Starko's picture
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 540

There's a competing factor though.  All things equal, more plays = more mistakes.  But things aren't equal.  If you sell out and get pressure, you are more likely to force a mistake on a given play.  I think the gamble is worth it.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 11:11 AM | No you're right.  Let's just (Score:1)
Wolverine90
Wolverine90's picture
Joined: 10/02/2008
MGoPoints: 157

No you're right.  Let's just use 2 down linemen, and toss the rest of the D in the secondary to support our corners, so we can get gashed for 6-8 yards through the porous line every play, giving up huge runs game after game.  Let's also protect our secondary by giving them 15 yard cushions off the line of scrimmage on 3rd and 7. 

Let's keep not trusting our young secondary, and keep bleeing 80 yard, 7 minute, demoralizing drives, vs a scheme that shuts down the run, gets an occasional sack (wtf is a sack?  I forgot what they look like), maybe gets a turn over or two, but yeah, gives up 4 or so bombs each half.

I'll take my chances.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 11:27 AM | And that's different from (Score:1)
HttV Wolverine
HttV Wolverine's picture
Joined: 08/02/2010
MGoPoints: 7363

And that's different from what we are doing now how? Our corners are getting beat up as it is, might as well try to get some more pressure on the QB. 

“What the mind can conceive, the mind can achieve and those who stay will be champions.” - Bo 

][V][

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 11:49 AM | suicide is about all we've (Score:1)
griesecheeks
griesecheeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 638

suicide is about all we've got... the only chance we have is getting to the QB quickly, and that's only happening with pressure. I'll go with Brandon Graham's opinion over yours. Those young corners need to grow up fast. if we get to the qb quickly, we would actually be helping them along, rather than hoping they can cover someone for 10 seconds,

'my head take's a lickin' but it keeps on tickin' just the same'

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 1:14 PM | So letting a passer sit back with no pressure is better? (Score:1)
iawolve
iawolve's picture
Joined: 11/03/2008
MGoPoints: 2491

If you don't trust BG, listen to Ron Simpkins on Rivals saying the same thing. He was only our All-American LB and played about 8 years in the NFL. http://michigan.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1147738

Just sayin', listen to the experts.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 3:31 PM | posted from iPhone (Score:1)
MgoDlu
MgoDlu's picture
Joined: 08/07/2010
MGoPoints: 156

Honestly maybe it's because I watch a lot of philly eagles football, but I would like to have a lot more dline pressure and put our purest corners on their wr and let them learn the hard way if necessary. This death by a thousand paper cuts is no way to go imo. It takes away opportunities from our O, tires our D, and just seems like a big momentum killer after giving up a first down on each third and long. Even I can complete those passes with the amount of time other teams qb gets.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 12:27 PM | I agree, putting pressure on (Score:1)
mgoblahhh
mgoblahhh's picture
Joined: 11/20/2008
MGoPoints: 209

I agree, putting pressure on the QB makes this very young  secondaries job easier.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 8:54 AM | too bad (Score:1)
trueblue262
trueblue262's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 2030

that BG's job security isn't in question

GRwolverine73

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 8:57 AM | I want (Score:1)
Mtruck
Joined: 09/21/2010
MGoPoints: 108

Brandon Graham to somehow earn 4 more years of eligability and come back!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:03 AM | Well damn it, give him 4 down linemen (Score:1)
Young Pretty an...
Young Pretty and Heartless's picture
Joined: 09/21/2010
MGoPoints: 6293

and give him a jersey as well, I think he could get by as # J Black for a while. But when he gets 10 sacks in one game it may raise some flags

"Look up, get up, and don't ever give up"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:07 AM | I wouldn't say no to brandon (Score:1)
willywill9
willywill9's picture
Joined: 09/22/2008
MGoPoints: 11262

I wouldn't say no to brandon graham... you know what happens when you do?

Touchdown Michigan!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:15 AM | That hit never gets old (Score:1)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10491

Brandon Graham punished Winston more than the legal system or his coach ever did.

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:28 AM | You could same about (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6423

You could same about Dantonio, but it wouldn't be saying much.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 10:32 AM | St. Dantanna... (Score:1)
WestCBlue
Joined: 04/08/2009
MGoPoints: 577

what a joke he is on discipline.

Go Blue!!!!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:32 AM | That felt good (Score:1)
MeijerWolverine
MeijerWolverine's picture
Joined: 10/06/2010
MGoPoints: 395

I just watched that about 15 times.. sweet baby jesus that felt good.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:44 AM | That's not so great. (Score:1)
Firstbase
Firstbase's picture
Joined: 09/30/2009
MGoPoints: 3123

I could do that. 

Uh...

But I don't want to.

; )

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 10:11 AM | This video makes me feel warm (Score:1)
dwinning
dwinning's picture
Joined: 10/02/2009
MGoPoints: 370

This video makes me feel warm and calm.  It should be made into a slow-mo GIF so I can meditate with it. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 10:17 AM | Irony (Score:1)
VictorValiant
VictorValiant's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 347

This play only had 3 down lineman. /irony

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 7:23 PM | +1 (Score:1)
BrewCityBlue
BrewCityBlue's picture
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 1468

i was going to say the same thing.

Though they did have 3 guys standing on the line, 2 of whom blitzed gaps i believe.

Still, ironic and funny, don't ya think? (it's like rain on my wedding day.. blah blah blah)

HAIL.

"Where's the threat? Oh, it's right here, and it's devouring us alive." -Ace<

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 12:24 PM | Something tells me that A.J. (Score:1)
Louie C
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2034

Something tells me that A.J. Sturges would approve of this video.

"It's the only place to get the inside story on Wolverine football, so blee bluhh tahh!" - Bo

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:08 AM | Roh (Score:1)
Motown20
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 98

My hope is that we keep Roh at DE for every play and let him go to work.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 11:48 AM | I agree completely (Score:1)
Yooper
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 1886

I think BG is right about 4 down linemen, and the 4th should be Roh.  He is so much more effective as a lineman than at linebacker in coverage. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:09 AM | I like how he gave his opinion and showed support (Score:1)
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2689

Now this is how you support the program, while giving your opinion about what should be done. I like that BG supported Greg, but called out the scheme.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:23 AM | even (Score:1)
blueheron
blueheron's picture
Joined: 03/26/2009
MGoPoints: 2316

Braylon could learn from Brandon.

"..."

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:43 AM | Let's be honest (Score:1)
Laser Wolf
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 1700

There's quite a few people Braylon could learn from.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:11 AM | This article is interesting for a couple of reasons..... (Score:1)
DamnYankee
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 267

1) It sounds like RR is forcing Gerg to run something in which he either doesn't have expertise or  a high comfort level

2)  It hints at the major internal philosphical differences on the staff which leads to confusion on the field.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:17 AM | This is like 6 levels of (Score:1)
imafreak1
imafreak1's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1375

This is like 6 levels of assumption.

My problem regarding this 3-3-5 stack mandate from RichRod idea is, he must have told the DC's before they took the job this is what he wanted. They must have said "yep, OK, will do." That is if all this comes as a mandate from RichRod. If that's the case, then I can't see how the DC would be mad about it now.

Give it to Wheatley!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:26 AM | What assumptions are being made? (Score:1)
Greg McMurtry
Greg McMurtry's picture
Joined: 02/25/2009
MGoPoints: 4063

BG says that he doesn't know why they switched to he 3-3-5 instead of GR's defense that was previously being used. That sounds to me like GR was implementing his own style of defense but RR chose to move to a 3-3-5 defense.

...confidence is the stain they can't wipe off...

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 11:20 AM | BG says he doesn't know why (Score:1)
imafreak1
imafreak1's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1375

BG says he doesn't know why they switched.

You ASSUME it was because RichRod mandated it.

You just said it.

That assumption has some merit. The second point the dude made regarding the 'great philosophical differences' leading to confusion on the field took it a step further into fantasy land. 

It's not like the defense went from lights out in 2009 to this. It wasn't very good in 2009 either and then lost 32 DBs and the two best players.

Give it to Wheatley!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:32 AM | I'm not sure I agree with you... (Score:1)
DamnYankee
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 267

With quotes like this from BG

“Let Coach Robinson play his defense,” Graham said. “Let him do what he knows. He was thrown off, I would say. I know the 3-3-5 is what he (Rodriguez) has been doing for so long. He’s just got to adjust to the Big Ten.”     and this....

“I’m surprised they didn’t stick with what Coach Robinson was running,” Graham said of the 3-4 the team deployed in 2009, its first year under Robinson.

This sounds like it was strongly "suggested" from above.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:41 AM | “Let Coach Robinson (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6423

“Let Coach Robinson play his defense,” Graham said. “Let him do what he knows. He was thrown off, I would say. I know the 3-3-5 is what he (Rodriguez) has been doing for so long. He’s just got to adjust to the Big Ten.”

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:11 AM | Amen Brandon. Amen... (Score:1)
Webber's Pimp
Webber&#039;s Pimp's picture
Joined: 09/12/2010
MGoPoints: 1575

Amen Brandon. Amen...

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:12 AM | Couldn't agree more (Score:1)
Greg McMurtry
Greg McMurtry's picture
Joined: 02/25/2009
MGoPoints: 4063

With BG.

...confidence is the stain they can't wipe off...

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:14 AM | He speaks (Score:1)
Dallas Wolverine
Joined: 01/04/2010
MGoPoints: 937

He speaks the truth! Will someone please listen?

GMW

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:23 AM | And to be consistent, RR (Score:1)
wolfman81
wolfman81's picture
Joined: 12/17/2008
MGoPoints: 447

And to be consistent, RR should listen to this:

“Let Coach Robinson play his defense,” Graham said. “Let him do what he knows. He was thrown off, I would say. I know the 3-3-5 is what he (Rodriguez) has been doing for so long. He’s just got to adjust to the Big Ten.”

Especially since there was a large group of people who wanted Rodrigues to basically keep the offense the same (do spread-lite) in his first year here until he had a bit more talent.  And he said (I'm paraphrasing) "We're going to coach what we know."  Doesn't Greg Robinson get the same consideration?

I don't know that the 3-3-5 must fail in the Big 10, but I'm pretty sure that a teacher is only effective teaching what he knows.  You can't take the world's best english literature professor and stick him in a french lit class and expect him to be just as dynamic and knowledgable.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:24 AM | You can't run that play baby! C'mon! (Score:1)
jerseyblue
jerseyblue's picture
Joined: 12/20/2008
MGoPoints: 1154

I want BG to stalk the sidelines and Schembechler Hall and have him crush people ala Terry Tate when he sees we're doing something wrong.(like not going with 4DL like many of us have been begging for.)

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:30 AM | do we have (Score:1)
BlueinLansing
BlueinLansing's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 4263

enough people to run 4 downlinemen and what cause do we have to trust our CB's especially now that we are starting a true Freshmen and a 5th year, 1st year seeing the field player.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:31 AM | You have to trust three (Score:1)
The Impaler
The Impaler's picture
Joined: 07/28/2009
MGoPoints: 932

You have to trust three freshman DBs...oops...not going to happen.

All in and always in

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 10:10 AM | Trust (Score:1)
Zvornik Bosna
Zvornik Bosna's picture
Joined: 09/07/2010
MGoPoints: 1024

First time I've heard trust and our corner backs in the same sentence... 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 9:34 AM | Why are people so hot about 4 down linemen? (Score:1)
lilpenny1316
lilpenny1316's picture
Joined: 11/19/2009
MGoPoints: 2728

NFL and college teams run 3-4s with plenty of success.  His old teammate on the western side of the state, Lamar Woodley, plays in a 3-4 with the Steelers.  The three down lineman scheme is not the problem.  How we are coaching and executing it is the issue.

I want someone to explain how using 4 down linemen all the time will suddenly turn this into an average defense.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 10:49 AM | 3-4 vs 3-3-5 vs 4-3 (Score:1)
flemgoblue
Joined: 04/16/2010
MGoPoints: 319

I think BG was calling for 4 down lineman because he feels that our D line would be a greater source of strength as opposed to our linebacking corp or our defensive backs. I don't think he's saying that three down linemen can't work, just that one should play to their strengths.


  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 11:33 AM | Exactly (Score:1)
CAwolverine
CAwolverine's picture
Joined: 01/18/2010
MGoPoints: 274

We need to get more guys up front to put pressure on the QB. Something we have struggled at with 3 down lineman. We have tried a lot of changes, why not try this, especially with our lack of secondary players.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 4th, 2010 at 12:32 PM | We ran a lot of 4-4 against MSU (Score:1)
lilpenny1316
lilpenny1316's picture
Joined: 11/19/2009
MGoPoints: 2728

And I believe we showed more 4 man fronts against Iowa.  MSU was a debacle.  Iowa, not so much, but still not great.  In neither game did the QBs get rattled.  They sat back and picked apart our defense. 

While I think a 4-man front may allow for fewer mistakes, I would counter that we may be able to get more QB pressure with a 3 man front.  I think our injury situation may force the abandonement of the 3-3-5, but we're not exactly healthy up front either.  I think we could be more creative in disguising our blitzes with a 3 man front.  If the QB knows we're coming, but him nor his linemen know which one is coming, it gives them something extra to think about.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.