Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 4 days ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 3 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 3 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1,453 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 237 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 9 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Michigan Alumni Club Scholarship Golf Tournament featuring Honorary Chair Glen Rice - This Saturday in Miami!
    5 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    117 replies
  • OT: UCL Semi-final First Legs
    14 replies
  • More evidence of awful culture at MSU, volleyball this time
    62 replies
  • OT: Rick Pitino Rumored to be Candidate for Detroit Mercy Job
    79 replies
  • New Jersey DE Aeneas DiCosmo: Prospect we should all want at UM
    55 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    125 replies
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    29 replies
  • Crootin': Joey Velazquez
    78 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    90 replies
  • LaMarr Woodley Opening K-8 School in Saginaw
    43 replies
  • SIAP: Jay Feely prom "controversy"
    36 replies
  • Pep and Partridge Pressers
    11 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    83 replies
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    12 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 6
  • ››
  • New Q&A with Cam McGrone, video
    3 replies
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    29 replies
  • Coach B w Andy Katz podcast
    3 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    125 replies
  • Michigan Alumni Club Scholarship Golf Tournament featuring Honorary Chair Glen Rice - This Saturday in Miami!
    5 replies
  • OT: Rick Pitino Rumored to be Candidate for Detroit Mercy Job
    79 replies
  • New Jersey DE Aeneas DiCosmo: Prospect we should all want at UM
    55 replies
  • Pep and Partridge Pressers
    11 replies
  • OT: UCL Semi-final First Legs
    14 replies
  • Crootin': Joey Velazquez
    78 replies
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    12 replies
  • LaMarr Woodley Opening K-8 School in Saginaw
    43 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    83 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    90 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    59 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 6
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    164 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    129 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    125 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    117 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    107 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    96 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    92 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    90 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    89 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    88 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Big Ten Basketball 2013: DBTH. Just another good conference

44 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
March 31st, 2013 at 8:47 AM
#1
NateVolk
NateVolk's picture
Joined: 07/19/2010
MGoPoints: 5548
Big Ten Basketball 2013: DBTH. Just another good conference

Deep and rugged with good to very good teams it might be, it's nowhere near nationally dominant.

It's been proven once again. This time with an exclamation point because this was the year when the hype was the biggest.

A miracle effort Friday by the likely national player of the year is the only thing currently preventing a total skunking in next week's Final 4.    Scorecard: 4 teams in the sweet 16 who all played semi-home games in the early rounds and when the games went truly neutral and competition stiffened, they couldn't produce.

Syracuse absolutely embarrasses the league champion. Then the Big East plants 3 in the elite 8. After Louisville clobbers Duke tonight, the eye test wins again. When you watch Big East top teams play: bigger better athletes, deeper with those athletes, and  with elite coaching. 

I am the biggest Big Ten fan ever, but let's be real. It's more or less a legend (or leader) in it's own fantasy land. Year in, year out.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • basketball

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
March 31st, 2013 at 9:06 AM
#2
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 35030
Maybe my perception is off,

Maybe my perception is off, but didn't the B1G do well in the non-conference though? I just think drawing large conclusions from a huge single elimination tournament (in a high variance sport such as college basketball) is generally not the best way to judge the finality of the best teams. It's what makes March Madness so good; often the best teams don't win.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:23 AM
(Reply to #2) #3
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 81410
Big Ten In Non-Conference Play...

If we're going by record, then the answer to your initial question is "yes". The Big Ten played 201 non-conference games and collectively amassed a record of 152-49 in those games. That is good for a 0.756 winning percentage. The next three down the list by winning percentage in non-conference play would be the Big 12 (0.744), the Mountain West (0.732) and  the Big East (0.722). 

Also, for the board's edification, overall RPI for this season from StatSheet:

Rank Conference Overall RPI
1 Big Ten 0.581
2 Mountain West 0.578
3 Big East 0.575
4 ACC 0.562
5 Big 12 0.556

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 11:13 AM
(Reply to #22) #4
spartanfan123
Joined: 02/15/2012
MGoPoints: 633
I think you have that wrong,

I think you have that wrong, the MWC had a higher RPI (.5802) than the B1G (.5712) according to CBSSports and RealTimeRPI. Maybe you mixed up the numbers. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 12:33 PM
(Reply to #30) #5
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 17278
Pre-NCAA Tournament

I believe that the CBS Sports' RPI standings are pre-NCAA Tournament.  WarrenNolan.com's RPI standings are up the minute and have the B1G on top:

Conference RPI Rank Non-Conf N-C Win %
Big Ten 0.5805 1 121 - 31 0.7961
Big East 0.5742 2 151 - 34 0.8162
Mountain West 0.5733 3 87 - 26 0.7699
ACC 0.5613 4 114 - 37 0.7550
Big 12 0.5536 5 89 - 33 0.7295
Pac 12 0.5522 6 109 - 41 0.7267
Atlantic 10 0.5452 7 145 - 77 0.6532
Missouri Valley 0.5393 8 75 - 45 0.6250
SEC 0.5390 9 117 - 58 0.6686
West Coast 0.5323 10 71 - 45 0.6121
Conference USA 0.5172 11 94 - 63 0.5987
Horizon League 0.4964 12 61 - 54 0.5304
Western Athletic 0.4963 13 57 - 54 0.5135
MAAC 0.4905 14 57 - 64 0.4711
Sun Belt 0.4863 15 47 - 54 0.4653

http://warrennolan.com/basketball/2013/conferencerpi

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 11:14 AM
(Reply to #22) #6
spartanfan123
Joined: 02/15/2012
MGoPoints: 633
I think you have that wrong,

I think you have that wrong, the MWC had a higher RPI (.5802) than the B1G (.5712) according to CBSSports and RealTimeRPI. Maybe you mixed up the numbers. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 12:24 PM
(Reply to #22) #7
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 17278
not the same as RPI, but Kenpom's measurement agrees B1G=best

(Ranking of conferences by averaging AdjO and AdjD of the teams)

Conference Rating
1 Big Ten Conference .8616
2 Big East Conference .8204
3 Atlantic Coast Conference .7786
4 Pac 12 Conference .7754
5 Mountain West Conference .7474
6 Big 12 Conference .7401
7 Southeastern Conference .7297
8 Atlantic 10 Conference .6886
9 Missouri Valley Conference .6855
10 West Coast Conference .6517
11 Conference USA .5191
12 Horizon League .4825
13 Western Athletic Conference .4703
14 Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference .4595
15 Mid American Conference .4101

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:46 AM
(Reply to #2) #8
Michael Scarn
Michael Scarn's picture
Joined: 01/21/2011
MGoPoints: 1603
Exactly what I came to say.

Exactly what I came to say.  I love March Madness, but anyone who thinks it accurately picks the best team in the country as a champion is outta their mind.  Single game elimination in basketball? Yea that will work perfectly.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 8:56 AM
#9
gremlin
gremlin's picture
Joined: 01/13/2009
MGoPoints: 593
Officiating in Big Ten needs

Officiating in Big Ten needs to change, because it's too difficult to adjust to how a game is supposed to be called come tournament time.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:11 AM
(Reply to #3) #10
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 35030
Absolutely agree.  Granted I

Absolutely agree.  Granted I don't watch a ton of college basketball (at least not like football), but I feel like we have upper level B1G teams that are built for doing really well in the B1G (read: Wisconsin mostly) that have figured out how to win the conference based on the style of play (and berating refs who they see all the time), but aren't built to make deep runs in the tourney. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:36 AM
(Reply to #9) #11
coldnjl
Joined: 12/31/2009
MGoPoints: 12627
You are aware that Wisconsin

You are aware that Wisconsin has had quite a bit of success in the tourney? See there record in the NCAA throughout the years: http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/tournament/history/_/team1/8023

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:52 AM
(Reply to #15) #12
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 35030
Under Bo Ryan, I see one

Under Bo Ryan, I see one Elight Eight.  in 2000, I see a Final Four (pre-Ryan).  That's all since 1994.  This is for a team that has never finished below, 4th in the Big Ten under Ryan, and has won three conference championships, and two other tournament championships.  That's more conference success than Tom Izzo has had in the same period.  And Izzo has an Elight Eight, three Final Fours, and a National Runner-Up in that same period as well.  So yeah, that pretty much re-enforces my point.  Consistantly in the upper crust of the B1G (figured out how to win the B1G), yet aren't made for the tourney.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:54 AM
(Reply to #19) #13
coldnjl
Joined: 12/31/2009
MGoPoints: 12627
They are 20-14 in the NCAA

They are 20-14 in the NCAA tournament since 2000. 4 Sweet 16 trips (2003, 2008, 2011, and 2012), 1 elite 8 in 2005, and a final 4 in 2000. How many other teams have had such sustained success? And then you say they are just built for the B1G, yet you forget that they are Wisconsin. How many elite recruiting classes do they get? We would kill for that success in the tournament over a sustained period with that level of player development. I think they have overachieved already, but what you are saying is that there is another philosophy that UW could adopt and be better....So..What is that philosophy?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 11:14 AM
(Reply to #29) #14
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 35030
The OP posted an opinion

The OP posted an opinion about the B1G based on the teams left in the Elight Eight/Final Four, or lact there of.  I gave an opinion that Wisconsin is an upper crust team that has figured out how to win the B1G and performed consistantly on the high levels of the B1G, but isn't built for deep runs into the NCAA tourny, which seems how many judge conference strength including the OP.  You presented data to seemingly refute my opinion, but I believe it actually backs it up.  Notice nowhere in my original post did I say UW has no success; only that they aren't built for deep runs.  And I stand by that after looking at the available data.  Do you consider the Sweet Sixteen a deep run?  It's a good record, and UW has only lost twice in the first round under Ryan.  But I would consider only one Elight eight under Ryan, especially for a team that has had some of the most sustained success in the entire conference, a little underperforming. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 11:42 AM
(Reply to #15) #15
A2MIKE
A2MIKE's picture
Joined: 10/10/2009
MGoPoints: 1751
additionally

In addition to that they have finished outside the kenpom top 15 exactly 2 times in the last 10 years... part of the reason kenpom should be taken with a grain of salt and wisconsin clearly has figured out how to manipulate their schedule and the B1G, but when they get on a neutral court against a team that they havent scouted to death, they usually don't do well when the competition stiffens.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:15 AM
(Reply to #3) #16
Jinxed
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1375
You'd have a point if Mike

You'd have a point if Mike Kitts and Ted Valentine weren't screwing it up in the Big East, ACC, and NCAA tournament all the time. Pretty sure Mike Kitts reffed the UNC vs Kansas game actually...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:48 AM
(Reply to #3) #17
Smash Lampjaw
Smash Lampjaw's picture
Joined: 11/10/2011
MGoPoints: 2025
I did not see Wisconsin lose

but it looked to me like both OSU and MSU could not adjust when "ticky-tac" fouls were called. It is hard to adjust when ticky-tac fouls are your game plan. I wonder if the same refs call B1G games differently than when officiating other games. After all, what do you do when every player is fouling at the same time on the same play? I was curious to see if Michigan met OSU in the final, if the officials would revert to calling it as a B1G style game. We won't find out this year.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 12:28 PM
(Reply to #3) #18
SHub'68
SHub'68's picture
Joined: 09/29/2010
MGoPoints: 2836
MSU and OSU Both Defend

using smash, clutch and grab.  Indiana does this, too - at least in post play.  I felt going into the tourney that Michigan had the best chance of all the BIG teams because we do not rely on the foul to defend.  MSU and OSU - especially OSU - had to make make big adjustments in order to defend in the tourney, and it showed in their barely surviving earlier rounds to looking dismal yesterday.

How effective was Kraft in stopping Wichita State from slashing into the lane?  He got burned over and over again.  How is it that Trey Burke can't beat Kraft consistently, and this kid from Wichita State can?  Because when Burke played him, BIG officials allowed a 40 minute mugging, that's how.

How many times did Duke get to the line against MSU?  A bunch.  I didn't watch that whole game, but every time I looked up Duke was shooting free throws - they went 24-26 from the line.  With MSU getting shut out by Duke's D and giving away 24 points when the clock's not moving, it killed any chance MSU had of pulling off a comeback like ours against Kansas.  And then there was that...

What happened just prior to Burke's 3,000 foot three?  Kansas missed the FRONT END of a one-and-one.  A front end becase it was just their 10th free throw (KU was 7-10 from the line).  We didn't give them excessive freebies and it kept all our best players in the game at all the crucial moments.  Yes, we gave up tons in the paint, maybe we should have fouled some more in there - but then it's probably Mitch not in the game when we needed him most...

Our lack of "toughness" cost us games this year - the BIG regular season title, too, but it is paying off now.  Michigan defends the way you need to in a tourney not full of refs that let you play football.  I agree with the poster above - this has got to change.  It makes for sucky basketball like Wiscy and takes players like GRIII and Stauskas out of games when they get frustrated after getting hacked over and over again on their way to hole.  It sucks.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 8:57 AM
#19
evenyoubrutus
evenyoubrutus's picture
Joined: 11/04/2008
MGoPoints: -7
I would say until you get to

I would say until you get to the Final Four, there is a lot of luck involved. Not saying it is everything, but it is like gauging the Big Ten based on their bowl record in a given year. Never mind that we always get overmatched.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:05 AM
#20
Jinxed
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1375
Could you give me my state's

Could you give me my state's lottery numbers for next week while you're at it?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:06 AM
#21
bacon1431
Joined: 07/26/2008
MGoPoints: 10328
People try to draw too much

People try to draw too much out of single elimination tournaments. The B1G was the best conference in bball this year. Just because Wisconsin lost a game they shouldn't have, doesn't mean they are a bad team.

I hate that people point to national titles as a sign of a good conference. Look at the teams that have won since 2000. Mostly the blue blood programs. We have one blue blood -IU. Doesn't mean we don't have the best conference. The Big East had 5 teams knocked out in the round of 64. We have two more wins than them despite having one less team. I don't really care how the rest of the tournament plays out because it doesn't undo the rest of the season. And I know, the tourney is what really matters blah blah blah. It matters. But it is not an end all be all for me.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:09 AM
(Reply to #6) #22
Jinxed
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1375
Pretty sure the only way the

Pretty sure the only way the Big East stays neutral in terms of wins expected according to seeding is if Louisville and Cuse get to the championship game. Right now they're in the negative. The OP is talking out of his ass.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:08 AM
#23
dinsdale613
dinsdale613's picture
Joined: 05/20/2010
MGoPoints: 595
I disagree

I don't agree that the Big East is more talented.  The Big Ten has as much NBA talent as anyone.  I think it's a crap shoot when you get into the tournament.  I think the better argument is style of play.  Michigan is probably the least "Big Ten like" of the tourament teams.  Perhaps their style of play allows them to adapt better in the tournament.  Take OSU last night.  Once they got down 15 or so, you knew they wouldn't come back.  They just didnt have the firepower to do it. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:28 AM
(Reply to #7) #24
teldar
teldar's picture
Joined: 07/14/2009
MGoPoints: 4483
osu

Living in Columbus has given me real hate for osu (the fans, actually. Don't care about the school other than their fans deserve pain) but, cumong, man. They came from 20 down to lose by 4. They had a real chance to win that game. You're fooling yourself if you want to say they didn't have a chance.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:15 AM
#25
Michigan Arrogance
Michigan Arrogance's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 15317
sample size, bro. use your

sample size, bro. use your brains

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:21 AM
#26
UMgradMSUdad
UMgradMSUdad's picture
Joined: 07/02/2011
MGoPoints: 9518
The B1G may or may not have

The B1G may or may not have the best team in the country, but both the regular season and the NCAA tournament has shown that it has more teams in the top 16 than any other conference.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:21 AM
#27
g_reaper3
g_reaper3's picture
Joined: 10/03/2010
MGoPoints: 2238
The B1G needs to win National Titles for respect nationwide.

Since our win in 1989, the B1G has only 1title, State in 2000. That's pretty bad. During that timespan the ACC, Big East and SEC have quite a few. And it's not just blueboods like Duke, NC and Kentucky although they have 10 in that stretch I believe. Schools like Arkansas, Maryland, UNLV, Arizona, Syracuse each have a title. UConn came out of nowhere and won 3.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:29 AM
#28
AZBlue
AZBlue's picture
Joined: 09/14/2008
MGoPoints: 7808
If Michigan wins today

The conference will have roughly performed to their seeding - which was the best of the majors.



Remember: (1) best conference does not equal best teams. (2) "Luck" affects all conferences. Marquette should have been out in round one - actually needing "help" from the other team to pull it out (3) Several experts noted pre-NCAA that really only IU and M truly had the athletes be serious title contenders. (This was BEFORE they saw the easy draw that OSU squandered)



If anything, I feel it is the Big East that was over-rated or given the sympathy as part of its "farewell tour" - ND, Pitt, and G'town all performed far below their seeds and only 3 of the 8 teams made it to the 2nd weekend, most losing in round 1 iirc. (I refuse to call the play-in games round 1)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:44 AM
(Reply to #14) #29
goblue1213
Joined: 01/09/2011
MGoPoints: 649
OT

One thing I do hate about the play-in round, is that's its always teams who are conference champions. Make the "Last 4 In" play those games, and let the teams who won their conferences automatically go to the field of 64. Like their berth is supposed to be.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:13 AM
(Reply to #16) #30
Abomb4480
Abomb4480's picture
Joined: 07/28/2011
MGoPoints: 2750
I agree, partially. The last

I agree, partially. The last 4 in DO play in the play in games, as well as 4 other low major conference champs. But I get your point, should be last 8 at larges in that have to play.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 9:59 AM
#31
Dustinlo
Joined: 01/11/2011
MGoPoints: 1121
The conference is by far the

The conference is by far the deepest but, as the number of remaining B10 teams show, doesn't have the best top team. IU was the most dominant all year and choked the most at the end.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:26 AM
(Reply to #18) #32
UMgradMSUdad
UMgradMSUdad's picture
Joined: 07/02/2011
MGoPoints: 9518
The IU fans were getting on

The IU fans were getting on Zeller for saying something to the effect that he kept waiting for fouls to be called on those defending him.  At least in the case of one player on one team, that might be evidence for officiating affecting play, but even the IU fans were all over him for expecting the officiating to adjust to him rather than the other way around.  

Having said that, part of the reason IU was as successful in league play as it was, was because Zeller could count on the officials to whistle fouls on any defenders getting a bit rough. 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 12:51 PM
(Reply to #23) #33
SHub'68
SHub'68's picture
Joined: 09/29/2010
MGoPoints: 2836
And To Not Do The Reverse

I vividly recall the first match-up at Assembly Hall where Stauskas and GRIII got mugged and clutched out of the game early.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:22 AM
#34
Hardware Sushi
Hardware Sushi's picture
Joined: 03/08/2010
MGoPoints: 6379
WTF are you talking about?

WTF are you talking about?

This is not college football. There are 347 basketball teams in division 1. That the Big Ten represented as well as it has is proof it was a dominant conference.

Big Ten is 11-6 in the tournament this year (i.e. the best 60ish teams in the country plus conference champions) unless I counted wrong.

7-1 in the round of 64 with 2 upsets for the Big Ten and one against (Wisconsin)

4 sweet sixteen - 25% - exactly what the Big Ten was seeded.

2 elite eight - 25% - exactly what the Big Ten was seeded.

Fifth place Michigan beat the Big 12 champ, Big 12 runner up, 4th place BE Pitt, preseason hype and NBA talent filled NC State, and won our preseason tourny. Oh ya we also have not lost to a non-Big Ten team.

Indiana be Big East champ Georgetown. Illinois won Maui and beat teams like Gonzaga and Butler. Or you can look at Kenpom and most other tempo free stats to see how strong the top 10 teams in the Big Ten are.

Nobody should be saying the Big Ten is untouchable, but it's clearly and by far the best league this year. Not acknowledging that is the only fantasy in this post. And as much as I hate OSU, they got hardcore jobbed yesterday by the refs. Not a fan of that statement, but it's true. That officiating was an embarrasment.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:45 AM
(Reply to #21) #35
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 14048
6-1 in the round of 64. We

6-1 in the round of 64. We only had 7 teams. Also, as I count it, we are 6-1, 4-2, 2-2, and 0-1 in the rounds so far, pending Michigan's game today. That makes the B1G 12-6 so far.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:48 AM
#36
blueheron
blueheron's picture
Joined: 03/26/2009
MGoPoints: 2579
data

This is unpleasant to contemplate, but I think NateVolk has a point, at least as far as the top ends of the conferences are concerned. (Depth is another matter.) Sure, the tourney can be random, but the cream generally rises to the top.

Which Big Ten pre-tourney non-conference wins were *really* good (retrospectively, without regard to the opposing team's ranking at the time)?

Indiana: Georgetown
OSU: 0
MSU: Kansas
UM: 0
Wisconsin: 0
Illinois: 0
Minnesota: 0

Two.

I'm serious. On the subject of Kansas, they didn't really play anyone, either, and benefitted (as they have, very often, over the past 20+ years) from playing in a crappy conference. Still, both Michigander wins count as good ones, I think. Georgetown (early tourney exit aside) did well in a tough conference.

Duke beat Minnesota and OSU (and Louisville) in the preseason. Miami beat MSU. Marquette and Florida beat Wisconsin. (As in the prior paragraph, I'm focusing on games involving high tourney seeds. Gonzaga, for obvious reasons, just doesn't count.)

I still think the Big Ten is in a good near-term position. Recruiting has gone well and they should have some more good years. This year, though, I'd have to go with the Big East (again, at the top end).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 10:29 AM
#37
umchicago
umchicago's picture
Joined: 02/05/2009
MGoPoints: 16168
mmmm

if i did my math right, the big east is 10-6 right now in the tourny and the BIG is 12-6. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 11:16 AM
#38
ak47
Joined: 05/05/2011
MGoPoints: 14391
For people saying not to use

For people saying not to use the tournament I get what you are saying but at the end of the day when you look at the fnal four in most years it is made up of teams who were there all year.  Just look at this years elite 8, duke, l'ville, syracuse, michigan, florida, osu, marquette, wichita state.  Of those teams only two spent most of the year not ranked in the top 10 and I think that is true most years.  I honestly believe that the style of play that is predominant in the big ten is not good for top teams.  If you have a better team it behooves you to get more possesions.  The big ten was certainly the deepest league in the country this year, but that doesn't mean the top 2 or 3 teams in the country played in it so it depends which measure you care about more.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 11:31 AM
#39
1989 UM GRAD
1989 UM GRAD's picture
Joined: 03/08/2012
MGoPoints: 1512061
The original post feels a bit like a troll, but...

...by any substantive measure the Big Ten was the best conference in basketball this year.

In addition to all of the stats cited above, a quick look at Kenpom reveals that the Big Ten still has 5 teams in the top 12, even after our losses in the tournament.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 11:56 AM
#40
MidnightBlue
MidnightBlue's picture
Joined: 03/15/2010
MGoPoints: 330
Agreed

I was taken aback by how big and imposing Syracuse looked versus Indiana, they all looked like Payne on msu

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 12:07 PM
#41
JHendo
JHendo's picture
Joined: 10/25/2008
MGoPoints: 13718
Believe or not, the same

Believe or not, the same reason why the NCAA tourney is so exciting is the same reason why you can't necessarily judge the strength of a conference by how many of their teams make it to the final four:  It's a one and done tournament where anything can happen.  All the teams that are in the tourney, from 1 seeds to 16 seeds, are there because they've shown the propensity that they can possibly beat almost any other team on any given day.  While the cream pretty much always rises to top in the end regardless, you're going to have a lot of unforseen outcomes that wouldn't hold true if it was in a best of 7 series.  Besides, 2 teams in the elite 8 and 4 in the sweet 16 is pretty damn good.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 12:42 PM
#42
SHub'68
SHub'68's picture
Joined: 09/29/2010
MGoPoints: 2836
The BIG Is "Collectively" The Best

Conference in College Basketball 2012-2013.  Individually, though, there may be four or five teams from other conferences that are better than our best teams.  This, plus a couple lousy games can distort the perception of who's great and who's not in the tournament.  Our 3,4,5,6 place teams are better than other conferences 3,4,5,6 place teams.  Both Illinois and Minnesota played well against  teams seeded a few notches above them.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 12:54 PM
#43
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 14048
Just curious, if Michigan

Just curious, if Michigan were to win the championship, would that change your opinion of the conference? That would be the B1G representing 25% of the sweet 16, elite 8, and final 4 plus winning it all. The B1G would be 15-6 at that point while the Big East could be 12-8 at best (10-8 at worst).

If Michigan lost to Louisville in the championship game, the B1G would have one more win and the same number of losses as the Big East.

In either of those scenarios, I would have to think that the B1G would still be looked at as a better conference than the Big East. It seems kind of silly to think that the opinion of the B1G rides on one team, though.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 31st, 2013 at 1:51 PM
#44
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56299
The Big Ten is 12-6 with

The Big Ten is 12-6 with Michigan still alive.  Let's not bury the conference just yet.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.