|Team||kenpom||sagarin||massey||lrmc||Average||Single Plays||Record||Remaining Schedule|
|michigan||2||2||1||3||2.00||205.75||6 – 1||60.02|
|indiana||3||5||7||2||4.25||269.00||6 – 1||37.73|
|minnesota||9||11||17||11||12.00||289.00||3 – 4||53.25|
|osu||10||8||14||13||11.25||259.00||5 – 2||38.36|
|msu||16||14||12||19||15.25||353.50||6 – 2||38.30|
|wisconsin||15||17||29||16||19.25||165.50||5 – 2||60.84|
|iowa||34||39||57||40||42.50||2 – 5|
|illinois||56||51||39||49||48.75||2 – 5|
|purdue||63||55||80||78||69.00||4 – 3|
|nw||88||75||70||97||82.50||3 – 5|
|nebraska||154||124||108||142||132.00||2 – 6|
|psu||201||170||190||212||193.25||0 – 8|
- I decided to compile some of the computer rankings that are regarded highly and then average them out.
- Then, I went through and summed up all of the single plays that each of the upper tier teams has (lower number indicates an easier set of single plays).
- Lastly, I decided to show the current conference record and then an average ranking of the upcoming schdule (lower number suggesting harder difficulty, on average).
The one thing I didn't account for in the single plays or in the remaining schedule was any impact road/home games would have...mostly because I wasn't sure how to fairly do that. Still, I think it gives you a pretty good idea without any adjustments of how teams stand.
Hope the formatting works out properly for the chart...