Bacari will be the next head coach at UofD

Submitted by Maizen on

Detroit and Michigan assistant Bacari Alexander are finalizing a deal, sources told ESPN.

— Jeff Goodman (@GoodmanESPN) April 20, 2016

Erik_in_Dayton

April 20th, 2016 at 5:27 PM ^

This could be a win-win for Michigan and BA.  I think the staff at Michigan needs a shake up (hardly an original thought, I realize).  And obviously it's great for BA to have the chance to be a head coach.  I hope he or Coach Jordan do well enough to come back as Michigan's head coach at some point.

Maizen

April 20th, 2016 at 5:40 PM ^

I don't think a shakeup is going to do squat. This is Beilein's show and if that isn't abundantly clear by now it never will be. For some spectacularly stupid reason offers will still be contingent on an academic tour after June 15th, we will still recruit stiffs in the post and guys with mid major recruiting profiles, and things like defense and rebounding will continue to be ignored on the floor.

Best of luck to both LaVall and BA. They did what they could in trying to influence Beilein, but the problems are too systemic and have now gone on with two different sets of assistants for me to think meaningful change is coming to this program in the areas it badly needs.

Contrasting how Harbaugh operates and how Beilein does makes me want to bash my head against the wall. 

Naked Bootlegger

April 20th, 2016 at 6:25 PM ^

That was SO 2 to 3 years ago.   It's time for us to collectively rage at the machine that missed the NCAA tourney last year and barely qualified this year - without Caris.   Fire JB!  Offer scholarships to 7 graders!  Rescind scholarships after missed dunks!  

 

BTW, good luck BA.   I, for one, appreciate your service.

Maizen

April 20th, 2016 at 7:27 PM ^

Beilein will be living off those two years the rest of his career with some here. They are outliers in an otherwise ordinary career.

No one can sit here with a straight face and say they aren't concerned about some things in the basketball program right now. The mid major level recruiting is down right strange given the resources Beilein has available. The ineptness on defense and on the glass are astounding. 

It's not like Beilein is one of the highest paid coaches in the country with a 100 million dollar basketball complex at his disposal. Oh wait.

I'm not the only one who feels this way, just look at the season ticket renewal list for the maize rage.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

April 20th, 2016 at 7:33 PM ^

Look at the program pre-Beilein.

Now look at the program with Beilein.

Do you see a difference?

The fact that you think this program is in bad shape right now is a direct function of the high expectations that Beilein personally brought back to the program.  "Ordinary career"?  Do you remember anything at all pre-2007?

Maizen

April 20th, 2016 at 7:40 PM ^

Why would I compare Beilein to the worst era in Michigan basketball history. Should I compare every football coach to the Rich Rod/Hoke years? Or should I compare them to the Schembechler, Moeller, Carr, etc years.

Michigan fell in the gutter because it made a bad coaching hire and because the AD was so far in the red it could do nothing to enhance the bottomless pit that was Crisler Arena. 100 million dollar facility later and a HC salary that next year will rank 6th in the country, excuse me for having expectations. How old are you? Do you not remember this program was a power house in the 80's and 90's? 

BigBlue02

April 20th, 2016 at 8:04 PM ^

I would love for you to compare him to the best era in Michigan basketball. I'll sit back and watch you somehow say our third winningest coach is somehow bad because of what you know will happen in the future, just like all those people who were pissed about missing the tournament last year, this year, and next year

ST3

April 20th, 2016 at 9:07 PM ^

Is a function of how many cupcakes you schedule in the non-conference season. If you think our schedules are soft now, you should check the cream puffs Frieder scheduled. Big 10 championship wise, he's doing better than Frieder and Fisher. Not sure about Orr, but that's going back a long way. Keep hating, if that makes you feel better.

WindyCityBlue

April 20th, 2016 at 9:18 PM ^

Then compare...

...winning % in the big ten for each of those coaches. That might give you a better indication. Let me know what you find.

Either way, comparing JB to any other previous coach is irrelevant to how we perform now and going forward.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Maizen

April 20th, 2016 at 9:23 PM ^

Steve Fisher made 3 final 4's and won a national title. Who cares if he didn't win a Big Ten title. He finished 2nd twice, 3rd three times, and 5th, 6th, and 8th all one time. Compare that to Beilein who has finished 7th or worse 5 times in 9 years. 

BigBlue02

April 20th, 2016 at 11:55 PM ^

It is pretty awesome how you use B10 winning percentage further down in this thread to point out how much better other Michigan coaches are than Beilein and then say no one cares that Fisher didn't win a Big Ten title. That is called talking out of both sides of your mouth. Then you use stats from games that were vacated for cheating. Yeah, totally objective take on Beilein

BigBlue02

April 20th, 2016 at 9:40 PM ^

It's hard to take anything you say seriously when you are so biased you will use Fisher's winning percentage as if he didn't vacate wins and have a lower winning percentage than Beilein because of it. You can compare Beilein to the coach who oversaw one of the biggest scandals in basketball history if you want

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

April 20th, 2016 at 11:11 PM ^

That "etc." is a crock of crap because it implies there is this huge list of coaches Beilein's win % is worse than.  There is, of course, Osborne Cowles (who coached for two years), George Veenker (who coached for three), and E.J. Mather, who coached in the early '20s when the schedule included such luminaries as Oakland Motor Company, Detroit Athletic Club, and the Louisville YMHA.

So in an apples to apples comparison, there's Frieder, Fisher, and Orr, no "etc."

I needn't remind you that Orr, Frieder, and Fisher all had consecutive tenures, and therefore had no rebuilding job to do.  And as you kindly pointed out, Beilein followed the worst era in Michigan basketball, so the first year was naturally more difficult than, say, Fisher, who literally inherited a national championship caliber team.

WindyCityBlue

April 20th, 2016 at 7:44 PM ^

Stop looking back and using it as a barometer...

...and instead look forward. What we did in the past has little if anything to do with how we can be going forward. Using your logic, means Florida should have never become a football powerhouse. Same goes for MSU in basketball.

I give 2 shits about what we did 5, 10, or 15 years ago. Or what TA, BE, and SF did in the past. I see our program trending in the wrong direction, accepting mediocrity, and conceding dominance to MSU, OSU and Wisconsin. People like you use some historical benchmark to rationalize/accept the situation. It's so Un-Michigan.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BigBlue02

April 20th, 2016 at 8:08 PM ^

We are trending in the wrong direction because after 1 bad year, the guy who could coach guys up like no other coach is somehow now never going to coach anyone up, including every returning player from last year's team and the three incoming freshmen. None will get better now because of that one bad year. The guy who coached up all that talent and made the tournament starting two walk ons at PG can no longer develop talent. The Beilein bashing because of 1 bad year is starting to get real old

WindyCityBlue

April 20th, 2016 at 10:48 PM ^

I'll give you Wagner.

For MAAR, I guess stats-wise he improved. Still seemed like the same player (but a good one at that)

I'm not giving you Donnal. He went from horrendously unplayable to just somewhat unplayable with flashes of good. He had such a low base to start, there was no reason he shouldn't have improved just by showing up.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BigBlue02

April 20th, 2016 at 11:19 PM ^

MAAR was better in every aspect of his game, from shooting percentage to three point percentage to passing. Stats wise he improved. Overall he improved. I'm not sure how that means he was the same player, but I guess I can't really argue with your eye test. Same with Donnal. His numbers this year weren't far off from McGary's career numbers at Michigan. One is hailed for a big ten championship he didn't contribute for and a tournament run he was awesome in and the other people are fine kicking off the team for not being good enough. I'm not suggesting Donnal is as good as McGary, but we didn't need him to be to win 10 Big 10 games. Donnal led the team in blocks and was fifth in the Big 10 in field goal percentage, which is crazy for someone who this board complains about constantly for missing shots. The problem with everyone saying no one got better is that we won more games and more B10 games this year, so either a bunch of people got better or everyone in the B10 got worse.

WindyCityBlue

April 21st, 2016 at 12:11 AM ^

You've lost remaining credibility...

When you tried to compare donnal to McGary. I know you qualified it, but it's ridiculous to even try to rationalize Donnal by using McGary. McGary was drafted, Donnal will be lucky to play in Haifa, Israel.

Furthermore, saying Donnal lead the team in blocks means absolutely nothing ...since Michigan was almost last in the nation in blocks.

I will agree that we improved from the previous year, but not much overall. I know the record reflected otherwise, but this year's team was some of the worst basketball I have seen in a LONG time.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BigBlue02

April 21st, 2016 at 10:01 AM ^

McGary was drafted on potential, not on actual basketball played at Michigan. People seriously romanticize his time here way too much. He started 14 games total in 2 years here. He started less than 20% of our games here and didn't average double figures in points or rebounds. I love McGary and I think he could have been amazing and I am hoping he succeeds in the NBA, but he didn't actually contribute much to our team winning games other than an amazing championship game run. We won a lot of games those two years and he was on the bench for most of them. Morgan and Horford were the centers on those teams. Morford was the center when we won the big 10 by 3 games. We don't need our bigs to be amazing so I'm not sure why Donnal looking like a competent option at the 5 is always prefaced by "he still sucked." He improved drastically but everyone likes to say it doesn't count because he didn't average a double double.

WindyCityBlue

April 20th, 2016 at 9:16 PM ^

I don't know where to start:

1. Who were the 2 walk-ons that started at PG this year? Perhaps you are talking about a different year that we made the tournament. I don't know where you are getting this stat.

2. No one is really debating that JB can develop talent, because let's be honest, JB has no choice if he wants to keep his job- he's an average recruiter at best. So he rarely recruits high ceiling type of guys anyway . That's the issue - even after squeezing every bit of talent out of this players, they rarely amount to high impact players. The question is whether JB can develop the talent at a greater pace than his cohorts and do so to account for the supreme talent the top members of the b10 have, like Indiana, MSU, OSU, and Wisconsin.

3. I can't remember who said this, but our trend against top 25 teams over the past few years is something like 5-30 (I don't have the exact number). Plus all that momentum against Izzo has absolutely swung the opposite way, because that's what happens to good (not elite) coaches like JB when they face better coaches and recruiters. JB can't really beat Wisconsin anyway.

4. Except for maybe XS, we really shouldn't expect any incoming freshman to contribute. But we'll see what happens here. I could be wrong.

5. I honestly think with the exception of Wagner, the current team has his it development ceiling.

6. I'm not alone in my thinking. I think I read recently that season and single game tickets are at a 7 year low.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BigBlue02

April 20th, 2016 at 9:53 PM ^

Beilein went to the tournament with Merritt and Lee at PG. Apparently he has forgotten how to develop talent since then. And you yourself say that no one doubts Beilein can develop talent, then go on to say we have seen the ceiling of Chatman, MAAR, Donnal, and Wilson, all sophomores. So he can develop talent, which no one is arguing. We are just arguing that the entire team made up of 2 seniors next year, is as good as they will get. Ok? And I'm sick of people thinking Izzo is going to dominate because of one class. If Davis, the McDonalds all American, taught us anything this past year, Izzo will start Shilling, Harris, and Tum Tum next year and none of the amazing freshmen will produce worth shit. You can choose to think he will treat them like Gary Harris and let their talent actually shine. I will choose to think Harris is the outlier and that Izzo will do exactly what he did with Davis, Payne, Appling, and Dawson, all 5 star talent that wasted numerous years behind upperclassmen. I am not going to anoint this class good until I see Izzo actually play good freshmen and not teach them lessons, like he did while Davis sat on the bench and MSU was on the wrong end of the worst upset in tournament history

WindyCityBlue

April 20th, 2016 at 10:41 PM ^

Seriously?!

You are using Lee and Merritt and examples of JB's development chops?!? I don't have the stats in front of me, but they started out of necessity the first year of JB (where we won 10 games). Then next year (tourney year), I can't remember them ever starting (I could be wrong). We had stu and zack at the helm if I remember correctly.

There are better examples. And yes, someone may be a good developer of talent and still hit a ceiling - a ceiling that other coaches can't hit. The key is recruiting players with a high ceiling. JB typically doesn't.

Another thing, you seem to think another year means players will automatically be better, while ignoring that under JB we were at our best when we were very young (and talented). I believe we were the youngest team in the tourney the year we made the finals. Experience isn't as strong factor in basketball compared to football.

With regards to MSU. It's not about the one class, it's about us losing 4 straight to them with little indication that it will change. And about that class: it's fucking good, really good. We'll see what izzo does, but I think it wishful thinking on your part to think he won't deploy that talent to the fullest extent by the end of the year. Besides, even if he uses them sparingly, they still will field a better team that plays a physical style of basketball that we are incompetent of challenging.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BigBlue02

April 20th, 2016 at 11:48 PM ^

This is the problem with going off memory. Merritt and Lee each started 14 games the year they went to the tournament. In other words, they started 80% of the games that year. I don't think players will automatically get better. I think they will get better because I think Beilein knows how to develop talent. Something the majority of Michigan basketball fans thought as of 2 years ago and now no longer do because we missed the tournament once. I don't know why you think we can't challenge MSU because of 4 games. That's two years, one of which we weren't a good team. Next year we will start two seniors and have upperclassmen throughout the lineup. Morgan and Horford were the last seniors to play against MSU and that was 3 years ago. Maybe we see how next year plays out? Naaaaa, you're right. All players are done developing

WindyCityBlue

April 21st, 2016 at 12:27 AM ^

As mentioned, I really couldn't remember what Lee and Merritt did...

...but if you want to use those 2 as shining examples of JB's development abilities 8 years ago, then more power to you.

And only a very few people think JB can't develop talent. So you can stop that crusade.

And again, using horford and Morgan as seniors as some sort of indication of how well we perform against MSU. When we were beating them, we were a super young and talented team. Being a senior meant very little. Izzo is almost as good of a talent developer as JB (some may say better), but is a far better recruiter than JB. So maybe instead of losing by 20 (or whatever it was) to MSU, we'll lose by 10. Improvement I guess.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BigBlue02

April 21st, 2016 at 10:23 AM ^

Considering we bring back the entire team next year and no one thinks we'll be better, that means Beilein won't develop anyone any more and everyone is at their ceiling, right? So how does that mean no one thinks Beilein can't develop talent? And you saying we had young talent on those teams that beat MSU is because Beilein developed them. Not every player develops like Burke and Hardaway and Stauskas, but we have plenty of highly ranked guys on the roster. You are saying they have all reached their potential. I am not. But don't act like all talent will emerge as freshmen and be amazing. Burke, Hardaway, Stauskas, Morris, LeVert....all those guys were top 150ish guys that developed quick. Wagner, Wilson, Teske, Davis, Donnal...those are too 150ish guys who aren't developing as quickly, but I still think they can contribute. We haven't seen anywhere near their ceilings. And that isn't counting guys like MAAR and Robinson, who weren't highly ranked and are playing well, or Chatman and Irvin and Walton, who were ranked highly and still could get better when they aren't coming back from injury. And I mentioned Merritt and Lee because there was way less talent on that team and we were fine. We won the B10 with Nivak and Douglas and Morgan. My point was that we will be fine

BigBlue02

April 21st, 2016 at 3:20 PM ^

We won the B10 with little to no talent other than Hardaway and Burke. And that was freshman Burke, who was good but wasn't national player of the year good. Here are the other contributors to that team: Novak, Douglas, Morgan, Smotz, Vogrich, Brundidge, McLimans. Winning the B10 is "fine" with me with that little of talent. We actually have arguably more overall talent on this team because of the sharp drop off after Hardaway and Burke