Ali G Bomaye

May 16th, 2016 at 11:09 AM ^

It's also objectively a weak logo.  It's busy, it appears to be a crossed-out M, and the "Michigan" font on the bar isn't used anywhere else.  The block M is a far superior logo.

And regardless of Brandon's overemphasis on branding, it's also kind of dumb to have two different block M's representing the school.

ST3

May 16th, 2016 at 1:48 PM ^

with the split M logo on his avatar.

Personally, I like the split M, for the same reason as Mad Hatter - it's something I grew up with. My first wool winter hat had the split M logo on it. 

UM Fan from Sydney

May 16th, 2016 at 3:57 PM ^

OOOOOOOHHHHHHH I'll bet you think you're sooooooo clever! I did not create the avatar, bro. I chose it because of its hilarity, not the awful split M logo. I, too, grew up with the split M, but that doesn't make it cool.

LSAClassOf2000

May 16th, 2016 at 11:32 AM ^

Although, as we approach about 200% funded for HTTV, surely there is now sufficient money to at least get a little sidebar about other conferences in there. I mean, even if the Pac-12 coverage amounts to a line to the effect of "Where Mike Riley Used To Go 6-6 A Lot", it's something, right? It wouldn't be Athlon-level detail though.