Anyone still opposed to bringing in Taysom Hill?

Submitted by Maizen on

Because if O'Korn goes down Speight ain't winning them anything.

M-Dog

November 28th, 2015 at 3:23 PM ^

I was.  Now I'm not.

We desperately need to acclimate to a running QB.  

If anything, it gives our D a good look at a running QB in practice.

M-Dog

November 28th, 2015 at 4:34 PM ^

The running QB IS what killed us today.  Take out Barrett, and replace him with a conventional QB, and even w/ Elliott and the Ohio State OL, it is not the same team.

We have a long history of trouble with running QBs, and today was the epitome.

Danwillhor

November 28th, 2015 at 3:27 PM ^

it's crazy how long it took most to admit we're a terrible running team. It was clear that we were below-average from the jump and no OL/HB progress had been made. The defense just isn't manned to stop that offense when they're clicking. Too slow, no LBs. Rudock is the guy that improved the most, IMO. Hill would be welcome if we needed him but we'll see. I'm not happy with losing but I think we over achieved this year on top of the "shoulda" game vs msu and I think we beat Utah if Rudock plays in place of Ruddock. Anyway, yeah, QB play didn't lose this game. Same old game plan by osu: run because they can't stop it.

gord

November 28th, 2015 at 3:21 PM ^

As if people on a message board make the decision.  I've never seen one person "opposed" to giving him one of 85 scholarships if he wants to come here as a married 25 year old man.

backusduo

November 28th, 2015 at 3:24 PM ^

What good did this year do us bringing in Rudock? We went 9-3 instead of 6-6 and have no Proven QB for next year. I don't want to repeat that for 9 win seasons.

A Fan In Fargo

November 28th, 2015 at 3:29 PM ^

I'd worry about getting a linebacker transfer over that guy. No offense to the guys without the speed and power to contest them buckeye skill guys. Need way more speed and power there though. They'll be just as good next year. Wowsers!!