Another example of a mistake/bias/crappy writing by [fill in blank media]

People can post what they want, I get that. But I think most people that frequent Mgoblog are well aware that many MSM outlets are shoddy, biased, or just plain dumb ("MSM, You are so dumb. Really really dumb. Fo' real.") That's why we flock to Mgoblog. As Brian has pointed out, he wears his bias on his sleeve and gains credibiltiy from the content of his writing, not the false cloak of "objectivity" that allows for half the claptrap that gets published on CFN, the Freep, or other sources. But it seems that the MGoBoard is constantly littered with examples of articles that have either a minor typo or full on Sharp-ian ridiculousness re: UM football. My suggestion - stop reading sites you don't find credible. Stop reading papers you think are populated by shitty writers. And if you can't stop that, stop posting them on an incredibly popular UM blog that inevitably will lead to clickthroughs to said shitty writers and shitty sites. I just don't get the need to constantly post about (or even sometimes link) about crappy articles that will inevitably cause a few curious Wolverine fans to click through or search for them, giving the site a few more hits. NOTE: I'm not trying to criticize those that do it. Trust me - I'm a UM junky, too. I'll read threads on OSU message boards full-well knowing they'll infuriate me ONLY because there may be a post or two about UM. But I really do think posting about every single one of them on a popular blog only helps such claptrap survive.