Given today's announcement by RR of all three QB's playing vs. Western, there are a couple of interpretations/reactions that spring to mind (there may be others but I'm a couple hours into some social drinking at the moment). The first is that with two true freshman and one so far terrible QB, that the decision to play all three is completely prudent and the only rational decision to make. As RR said, you don't really know how good they are until you see them in action vs. real opponents.
The other possibility is that no one has really separated himself from the others, which could cause some (given last year's terrible QB situation and play) to be mildly disappointed given our hunger for a clear starter to emerge and thrive.
As for me, my vote is squarely for the former. I think this is exactly what we should do given this year's team and the current QB situation. Let them prove themselves live, and have the competition continue through the early season. I'd only be slightly disappointed if someone didn't emerge by end of season, but even then if we're winning and getting effective play, it's all good.
to have picked up and mastered Carr's non-committal coach speech. I wouldn't read to much into. We all saw Tate's potential in the spring game and the alleged improvements w/ Sheridan.
If he truly does have 3 viable QBs, then we're way ahead of the game.
Edit: My suggested plan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3tr5gzyCd8