Does he really complain about MSU losing Penn State, (admitting it was never a big deal) simply because Penn State was a good team, then complain that MSU has a hard schedule next year? Nebraska for PSU seems like fair trade.
U-M, OSU on top; MSU not so much
The whole thing was pretty weak. OSU is a winner because they get to play Indiana, Illinois, and Purdue every year, but Wisconsin is a loser... because they have to play Indiana, Illinois, and Purdue every year? Huh?
That was a really disjointed piece. He calls us a "winner" but then talks about how the Game will be ruined.
Sparty plays their only major rival each season and doesn't have to play PSU each year. What's the problem? They're in a better position to win the conference...it still won't happen, but they're in a better position.
• Michigan: The last two seasons of mediocrity did nothing to tarnish the Wolverines' reputation. It's hard to look at their placement and schedule and not conclude they came out smelling like roses -- not that they'll be smelling them any time soon.
not only is that stupid and very likely not true, but theres no reason to add that other than to be a giant douchebag