Do they think it takes anything more than possessing a video that is not a copyright infringement to "make" Youtube?
Animated RichRod evaluation makes Youtube
this is a published article?
Makes youtube. Love it.
But I also knew it wasn't going to be very funny because there was a news article about it.
That means it wouldn't have nearly enough profanity for my juvenile sense of humor to laugh at.
So the "journalist" who penned that piece didn't even have the guts to identify themself? What do they have to be ashamed of? (/s)