Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2014 Recruiting Board, Offense
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Diaries Tim's blog

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 15 hours ago
  • APR And Big Ten Football: A High-Level Summary
    LSAClassOf2000 - 18 hours ago
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 5 days ago
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 5 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 5
  • ››
more
  • Yet Another Da'Shawn Hand post
    canzior - 2,943 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 1,441 views
  • Devin and the White Rainbow
    MCalibur - 1,056 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 1,029 views
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 993 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 52 comments
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 32 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 12 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 10 comments
  • Some Interesting Facts About Big Ten Scoring Offenses: 2000-Present
    LSAClassOf2000 - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules?
    0 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    97 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    22 replies
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    21 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    12 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    57 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    27 replies
  • Story on MBB Pete Kahler's Family
    5 replies
  • More Camp Offers, 2014 WR and 2014 CB
    23 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    90 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    89 replies
  • ESPN projects next three seasons, ranks M #5 ($)
    56 replies
  • VOTE-B1G Preseaon Offensive POY (Devin)
    24 replies
  • OT - Pavel Datsyuk signs 3-yr extension with Red Wings
    43 replies
  • OT- Alabama Installing Waterfalls In Football Locker Rooms
    61 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules?
    0 replies
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    21 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    97 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    22 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    90 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    89 replies
  • MGoProfile to Return This Week
    76 replies
  • More Camp Offers, 2014 WR and 2014 CB
    23 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    27 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    12 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    57 replies
  • OT- Alabama Installing Waterfalls In Football Locker Rooms
    61 replies
  • One of the top DE in 2015 commits to GameCocks and trashes their academics!
    37 replies
  • (Mostly) OT: Michelle Chamuel of UM can win The Voice tonight (with votes)
    37 replies
  • Story on MBB Pete Kahler's Family
    5 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • OT'ish: Michigan or Harvard?
    176 replies
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    139 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    132 replies
  • OT: Man Of Steel. Wow
    129 replies
  • OT: City of Detroit Epic Comeback? (Business Insider)
    125 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • ND to play ASU in football series
    112 replies
  • OT: Big storm coming
    103 replies
  • OT-4* recruit (non Michigan) posting really dumb things
    101 replies
  • OT: Tigers/afternoon baseball Open Thread
    97 replies
  • John U. Bacon on the GA Student Section
    97 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    97 replies
  • OT: Cool Story Bro!
    96 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    90 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • SF Kameron Chatman Talks UConn

    ...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)

    0 comments
  • AIRBHG Invades Steelemas!

    wow

    0 comments
  • NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke (With Scouting Report!)

    Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.

    0 comments
  • 2013 World Dwarf Games to be held at MSU

    Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition

    0 comments
  • NBA draft rumors: Pistons like Cody Zeller, but not Trey Burke - Detroit Bad Boys

    just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.

    4 comments
  • New college grads: Don’t sell your time for a living

    this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech

    9 comments
  • College World Series Misspells "College" On Dugout

    no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE

    0 comments
  • Michigan no longer looking for a transfer quarterback, Brady Hoke says

    not a surprise

    0 comments
  • Babcock: 'Glendening will play at the next level, for sure''

    premature congrats. One thing we can be sure of: he'll take fewer asinine penalties than Abdelkader

    1 comments
  • Spurrier may have to come up with a new UT spelling joke.

    Thanks to ugly transitions between Fulmer/Kiffin/Dooley/Davis, Tennessee is on the edge of APR penalties for football.

    1 comments
  • Report: NCAA ditching domes prior to Final Four

    i approve of this message

    0 comments
  • San Antonio Spurs may be doing something right by drafting international athletes

    strong indictment of AAU right heah

    0 comments
  • NBA draft 2013 Toss Up: Better PG prospect, Trey Burke or Michael Carter-Williams

    Glockner sides with justice

    0 comments
  • Brady Hoke-coached fantasy camp raises $140K for prostate cancer research

    a good cause, and a good time

    0 comments
  • Michigan men's basketball receives high academic honor with APR Public Recognition Award

    good job gents

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Your Tuesday Bubble Watch Rooting Guide

By Tim — March 1st, 2011 at 3:56 PM — 47 comments
Filed under:
  • basketball
  • bubble watch

In the same spirit as yesterday's post. Check out jamiemac's Diary on the Bracket Matrix for more breakdowns as they specifically relate to Michigan.

Tales from Last Night

All the games in which Michigan had a semi-serious rooting interest last night went the wrong way (though most of those results were expected):

  • Notre Dame beat Villanova 93-72.
  • Florida Gulf Coast beat USC Upstate 81-65.
  • Bethune-Cookman beat NC Central 73-60.
  • Kansas State beat Texas 75-70. The Longhorns have singlehandedly choked their way into getting Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas State onto the bubble.
  • Gonzaga beat Cal State-Bakersfield 96-49.

None of these were killers, to say the least, but Kansas State is solidly in the tournament at this point.

The Bubble

The Matrix hasn't been updated since last night's results, so consider it a day-ish behind. The information isn't changing quickly enough for that to be a huge hindrance to our purposes.

Per the Bracket Matrix:

  Bids Bubble In Bubble Out Change
Big East 11 Marq (10)   None.
SEC 6 Tenn (9), UGa (10), Bama (12)   None.
Big Ten 6 Ill (10), MSU (11), Mich (12) Minn, PSU MSU down from 10, Mich in, Minn out.
ACC 5 BC (12), VT (10), FSU (9) Clem, Mary Seeds reshuffled.
Big 12 5 KSU (8) Neb, Bay, Colo, OkSt KSU up from 9.
Pac-10 3 Wash (9), UCLA (8) USC, Washington St. Washington down from 8.
Atlantic 10 3 Richmond (11) Dayton Duquesne gone.
Mountain West 3 UNLV (8) Colo St None.
West Coast 2 Zaga (12), St Mary's (11)   None.
Colonial 2 Old Domin (8) VCU None.
CUSA 2 Memphis (11), UAB (12) USM, UTEP, Marsh, UCF None.
WAC 1 Utah State (9)    
Horizon 1 Butler (12) Cleve St, UW-Mil  
Summit 1 1-bid Oakland (13)    
Ivy 1 1-bid Princeton (13) Harvard Princeton in, Harvard out.

I've excised all of the conferences that are going to have 1 bid no matter what, because they won't affect our bubble watch (unless a past Michigan opponent goes on a crazy run and wins the conference tourney, of course).

Today's Games

As always, your general principle is to root against all teams on the bubble, whether they're in the tournament for now, or just barely on the outside. Things get a little more complicated when Michigan's past opponents are involved.

  • Illinois @ Purdue (7:00 ESPN). Since Michigan played each of these teams only once, I think you want Purdue to win. The Wolverines are fighting with Illinois for a bubble spot.
  • Baylor @ Oklahoma State (7:00 ESPN2). Both of these teams are on the outside of the Big 12 bubble. I think you want Baylor to win, since they're more likely to lose their final game to Texas (well, with the way Texas is playing, who knows?) than Oklahoma state is to lose to Oklahoma.
  • Alabama @ Florida (7:00 ESPNU). You want Florida to win. They are solidly in the tournament, whereas Alabama is a hardly-deserving bubble team. This could knock them out.
  • Gardner-Webb @ Coastal Carolina (7:00 Gametracker). Gardner-Webb is a past Michigan opponent. They're facing Big South 1-seed Coastal Carolina in the first round of the conference tournament. An upset here would be nice, since this is a 1-bid conference either way.
  • Kent State @ Bowling Green (7:30 ESPN3). Bowling Green is a past opponent. Kent State currently leads the MAC, but it is a 1-bid league either way.
  • Missouri @ Nebraska (8:00 ESPN3). Missouri is solidly in the tournament, whereas Nebraska is barely on the bubble. This would definitely knock the Huskers out for good.
  • Ohio State @ Penn State (9:00 BTN). I'm torn on this game. With a sweep of the Nittany Lions under our belt, you want them to be a top-50 RPI team. On the other hand, that means they strengthen their bubble position, harming Michigan. I still think a tiebreaker of 2-0 head-to-head between UM and PSU would swing things in Michigan's way. I'll say watch this game closely, but no clear rooting interest.
  • Boston College @ Virginia Tech (9:00 ESPNU). This is another game that you could go either way on. One team will knock the other onto the wrong side of the bubble for the time being. I'll say you want BC to lose, since they have a near-automatic win (against Wake Forest at home) up next. You'll be rooting HARD for Clemson to beat Virginia Tech on Saturday.

Get your rootin' shoes on. Hopefully, it'll go better than last night. It should, as you want Kenpom's favored team to win 4 of the 7 games in which there's a clear rooting interest - he also favors Ohio State to knock Penn State down the pecking order, for what it's worth. Last night, we were pulling almost exclusively for underdogs (and a crappy Texas team).

  • Tim's blog
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
March 1st, 2011 at 3:49 PM | Disagree on two games. (Score:1)
mfan_in_ohio
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 1905

I think you want Oklahoma State to beat Baylor.  Baylor is closer to the bubble, and the road win means more to them.  The loss would knock them down, but not bring Ok. St. up enough to really worry about. 

I also think you definitely want OSU to beat Penn State.  As much as you would  think it would  help to have a team we swept on the bubble with us, that has never stopped the committee from putting in the team with the stronger resume that lost head-to-head against a particular bubble team.  Penn State has quietly built a solid resume, and you can make the argument that they are just about even with Michigan right now (I disagree with that argument, but still).  Keep in mind that they only played both Indiana and Iowa twice, so they had by far the hardest B1G conference schedule. If they get to 10-8 and win their first BTT game, they may be in, possibly at our expense.  I want to keep Michigan in that 4-5 game against an Illinois team that has a high RPI but is stumbling right now.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:01 PM | Agreed on Okie State. They're (Score:1)
wlubd
wlubd's picture
Joined: 02/26/2009
MGoPoints: 4972

Agreed on Okie State. They're a bit like Minnesota is in the Big Ten. They need to win out just to get to 2 games below .500. Barring a major run in the Big XII tournament they shouldn't be getting in. Baylor on the other hand is right on the bubble line.

Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:11 PM | I think Baylor and Oklahoma (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

I think Baylor and Oklahoma State are both out with a 1-1 record in their final two games, as long as they don't make a run in the Big 12 tournament. Thus, I went with the rooting interest that is most likely to achieve that result.

There's definitely an argument either way.

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:26 PM | I agree on Baylor needing to go 2-0. (Score:1)
mfan_in_ohio
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 1905

I just think that they have a decent chance to beat Texas on Saturday at home, and I'd rather have that not quite be enough to get them in.  Ok. State has a decent RPI but their only road win all year was at Tulsa, so they're not getting in without a huge run in the  Big XII tournament.  Baylor has more bad losses, but has a sweep against Texas A&M already on their resume.  A win over Ok.St. plus Gameday at the Baylor-Texas game could do for them what the Duke game did for Virginia Tech.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 7:41 PM | Texas (Score:1)
Hachgoblue
Joined: 02/25/2009
MGoPoints: 87

I'm not sure you want to rely on Texas to finish off Baylor since they've been boosting Big 12 bubble teams for two weeks now. Especially playing on the road at Baylor.

Right now, Oklahoma State is barely even a bubble team. Wins over Baylor and Oklahoma shouldn't change that too much. To even have a chance they probably need a run to the Big 12 finals.

www.hellomediocrity.wordpress.com

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:13 PM | I think Michigan and Penn (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

I think Michigan and Penn State are close enough in resume right now that if both were to finish in the RPI top 50, it would actually swing the comparison in Michigan's favor. It would make a huge dent in PSU's RPI top-50 record, while boosting Michigan's. 

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 3:59 PM | Notre Dame beating Villanova (Score:1)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7198

is a good thing, no?

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:06 PM | No. Neither of those teams is (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

No. Neither of those teams is anywhere near the bubble, but Marquette (the only current bubble team in the Big East) has a 2-game split with Notre Dame but a loss to Villanova. The Irish winning slightly improves MU's RPI and strength of schedule.

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:01 PM | OSU (Score:1)
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 11227

Since the rooting interest as between OSU and PSU is a toss up, I plan to root against OSU.  That is my default mode - root against OSU.  (Even when an OSU win would help Michigan, I have a hard time rooting for them).

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:05 PM | I don't think it's a toss up (Score:1)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7198

PSU has a higher RPI than ours (barely, but still) and wins over Michigan State, Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota.  Add OSU to the list, and I think there's a very good chance they get in over us, even though we beat them twice.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:09 PM | But if both Michigan and Penn (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

But if both Michigan and Penn State end up in the RPI top 50 (as they would if PSU wins tonight and any bubble discussion for Michigan becomes relevant), that adds 0-2 to PSU's record against those teams, and 2-0 to Michigan's - which the Wolverines could REALLY use on Selection Sunday. When you add those factors together, along with 2-0 head-to-head and no loss to Maine, I still think Michigan would get the nod.

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:13 PM | I can see the argument (Score:1)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7198

I just think (perhaps too much) that the Committee strongly emphasizes big wins.  We're 0-7 against the RPI top 25.  If Penn State beats OSU they'll be 2-4.  I could see that trumping head-to-head, and I'm not sure it would be wrong if that happened.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:58 PM | PSU only has 15 wins. (Score:1)
bluebyyou
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 2709

PSU only has 15 wins.  Assuming a loss tonight, there is no guarantee they will beat Minnesota and have more than one win in the B1G tournament.  Even if they beat Minnesota, they will have 17 wins...we should have a minimum of 19.  

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 5:08 PM | Georgia once got an 8 seed (Score:1)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7198

despite going 16-14.  That was an extreme example, because they played the toughest schedule in the country and had an absurdly high RPI, but the Committee cares about other things besides total number of wins.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 5:36 PM | The Michigan and Penn State (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

The Michigan and Penn State schedule strengths should be comparable (with PSU's slightly higher). If Michigan finishes with 3-4 more wins, well...

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:13 PM | I don't think they look at the head-to-head that much. (Score:1)
mfan_in_ohio
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 1905

I remember a similar situation with Arizona and Arizona State a few years ago.  One swept the other, but the team that got swept got in by virtue of a better resume.  Also, sure, they lost to Maine, but we lost to Indiana.  That's not much better.  They'd also have a top-10 win, and our best win (MSU) would be a bubble team. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:18 PM | Uh, losing to Maine at home (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

Uh, losing to Maine at home is MUCH MUCH worse than losing to Indiana on the road. Maine is outside the RPI top-200, whereas Indiana is not. 

It shouldn't make that big of a difference, but 200+ losses are a Big Deal in the eyes of the committee, fair or not, and losing to one on your home court is a huge hit.

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 7:48 PM | Barely 200+. (Score:1)
mfan_in_ohio
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 1905

Maine is currently #206, and has a good chance to get a couple wins in their conference tournament.  Indiana is #176 and has to play Wisconsin, at Illinois, and then whoever the 6th seed is (hopefully Michigan State or Penn State).  Yes, there is a home/road difference, but I think both are just classified as "bad loss".  After all, Illinois has its loss to #288 UIC, and that's not keeping them out of the tournament. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:13 PM | We want OSU to win (Score:1)
cp4three2
Joined: 08/03/2009
MGoPoints: 791

PSU beating OSU means they'll have a good chance at going 10-8 in the Big Ten and getting the 4 seed, most likely knocking us to 6 regardless of beating MSU.  It basically makes our sweep of them null.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:19 PM | About yesterday's games: (Score:1)
mfan_in_ohio
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 1905

I think the Kansas State win was a net positive for Michigan.  The perception that Texas is plummeting serves to negate the huge boost that Colorado got from beating them.  If it turns out that Texas was a bit of a paper tiger and starts dropping to a 4 or 5 seed, Colorado's win over them won't be near enough to make up for their bad RPI and bad losses.  Also, I think Kansas State was fairly safe even before that game.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:23 PM | Until the end of the season, (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

Until the end of the season, we won't know whether it was a net positive or negative, but I definitely agree that it wasn't a horrible thing for the Wolverines.

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:38 PM | Catch-22 (Score:1)
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 1973

Colorado swept Kansas St this year.  No matter which team won it probably was going to help CU some.  I guess maybe UM would have wanted Texas to try and knock KState down a few notches.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:22 PM | This isn't the PWR. (Score:1)
MillerTime
MillerTime's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 128

In the hockey rankings, a win over a top opponent is only that, one win. Thus, when looking at the PSU-UM comparison, UM looks better. But when you get in to basketball, it's not that simple. The selection committee looks at "signature wins" which Michigan lacks (death to backboards) and beating OSU - currently ranked #1 - would be just that for PSU. Signature wins aren't all that matter, but when you're comparing teams, a squad with a signature win - especially this late in the season - looks better than a team with two additional wins over RPI Top 50 teams.

"The Strength of the Wolf is the Pack, and the Strength of the Pack is the Wolf."

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:24 PM | Good points. At the end of (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

Good points.

At the end of the day, I think it's fair to say that if we're scraping and clawing against Penn State for the final NCAA Tournament bid, we haven't done our work over the final few games of the season.

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:28 PM | I think we want Illinois to win. (Score:1)
cps2010
Joined: 08/08/2009
MGoPoints: 3750

If everything else goes chalk, we'd be playing the #4-seed Illini and they'd likely be a top 50 RPI win if they win out.  Then if we can get the Bucks, lock the bid down.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:31 PM | MSU puts us firmly inside the (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11375

MSU puts us firmly inside the bubble. I think beating Illinois would lock us in and every win after that decreases our seed.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:32 PM | No. (Score:1)
wlubd
wlubd's picture
Joined: 02/26/2009
MGoPoints: 4972

Wouldn't make a difference seed-wise for the BTT but Illinois is not a tournament lock yet. If Purdue winning hurts them then yes please. They won't fall from top 50 in RPI with a loss anyway.

Besides, if we're in a situation where we're playing OSU in the BTT, then we've already locked up a spot in the tournament.

Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 8:25 PM | I disagree - unless Illinois (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 18038

I disagree - unless Illinois loses to Indiana at home, they're in the tournament, at least over us.  They'd have the same conference record, better (any?) OOC wins, and a better SOS and RPI.  The only way we can hope Illinois falls off the bubble is if they lose to Indiana like I said, but I severly doubt that happens.

So, I think we root for Illinois to win.  That way, after we beat MSU, we'll play Illinois in the BTT, and we'll either lose to a higher RPI team or beat a higher RPI team, and when all is said and done, we will have played Illinois twice and Purdue once. 

However, if Illinois loses to Purdue, root like hell that they lose to Indiana too - that would open up a spot for us.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:29 PM | If PSU wins both games, they (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11375

If PSU wins both games, they pass us, no matter what. If PSU loses both games, they are for sure out of the top 50. If they beat Minn and lose to OSU, their RPI goes up, and they don't have the resume builder in OSU. If they beat OSU and lose to Minn, their RPI goes up (but not as much as if they split the other way because of the 1.4/0.6 thing) and they get the win over OSU.

So doesn't it seem that OSU beating PSU and PSU beating Minn is the best way to go? At this point, I don't think they can make it into the top 50 (although the jump from OWP after OSU could help them), but if they have a chance, this is the only way they are going to do it without winning out. I think you have to root for OSU in this one.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:50 PM | From UM's standpoint, you (Score:1)
Srock
Joined: 02/04/2010
MGoPoints: 278

From UM's standpoint, you need PSU to split their last 2 games, and losing to OSU also denies them a big signature win. UM needs to be rooting for a 4 way tie for 4th place in the Big Ten - Ill, PSU, MSU and UM all at 9-9. UM wins the tie breaker and is #4 seed in BTT. Also, this would mean no additional signature wins for Illinois (vs. Purdue tonight) and PSU (vs. OSU tonight). It also assumes State beats Iowa (though I want Iowa to win), and of course UM beating State on Saturday. If this occurs, I think it would be hard for the selection committee to keep the #4 team out of the Dance, regardless of BTT results. Though, if UM gets to the Semis of the BTT (as the #4 seed or worse) then I do believe they are in. 

Also - if UM makes it as a 12 seed, or one of the play-in games. I like our change in a neutral court in Dayton, OH. That's what, 3 to 4 hour drive?? I am sure there would be a good sized UM crowd for that game so I like our chances there too...

 

In all - like Tom VH said in Sept in regard to recruiting - just win.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 5:02 PM | If Michigan makes it into a (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

If Michigan makes it into a first-4 game, they had damn well better win, even if it's in Timbuktu.

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 4:57 PM | Good stuff (Score:1)
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7902

Good stuff, Tim. I did a Bubble Breakdown on tonight's games over at the JCB.

I think it's pretty clear that all Michigan fans shouls cheer against BC, Alabama and Baylor tonight. They are 3 teams that most folks feel are equal footing with Michigan, so losses by those three are big wins for the Wolverines. It strengthens their spot at the top of the bubble pecking order.

BC and Bammer are probably a loss away from being ditched out of most of the mock brackets that currently have them in. Both are on the road, against teams that are locks. Well, maybe not the Hokies, but they are pretty darn close. A BC loss tonight, and I think they need to at least make the ACC semi's, if not finals to get an at large, so there is a lot more upside to them losing.

If Baylor goes 2-0 this week, I think they are in great position. 1-1 and I dont think so.

And, here's hoping Missou figures out their road woes and puts the final stake through Nebraska's heart.

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 8:39 PM | Jamie, my good man, you need (Score:1)
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7576

Jamie, my good man, you need to update your signature!

"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."

- Jack Handey

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 5:39 PM | OK, a word on M v. PSU (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

All from the RPI:

Penn State Michigan
Wins RPI Top 25
13 Wisconsin  
Wins RPI 25-50
38 Illinois @ 40 Michigan State
40 Michigan St. 44 Harvard
Wins RPI 50-100
61 Minnesota @ 56 Penn State
88 Fairfield 56 Penn State
@ 95 Northwestern 60 Oakland
95 Northwestern @ 61 Minnesota
99 Duquesne 69 Clemson
  95 Northwestern
Wins RPI 100-200
120 Furman 110 Utah
150 Central Connecticut St. 178 Indiana
@ 178 Indiana @ 183 Iowa
183 Iowa 183 Iowa
187 St. Joseph's  
Wins RPI 200+
219 Lehigh 250 Bowling Green
227 Mount St. Mary's 254 Bryant
  262 NC Central
  267 Gardner-Webb
  305 USC-Upstate
Losses RPI Top 25
@ 3 Ohio State 2 Kansas
@ 6 Purdue @ 3 Ohio State
6 Purdue 3 Ohio State
@ 13 Wisconsin 6 Purdue
  @ 13 Wisconsin
  13 Wisconsin
  N 16 Syracuse
Losses RPI 25-50
@ 38 Illinois @ 38 Illinois
@ 40 Michigan State  
Losses RPI 50-100
@ 53 Virginia Tech 61 Minnesota
@ 57 Michigan N 70 UTEP
57 Michigan @ 95 Northwestern
@ 73 Mississippi  
83 Maryland  
Losses RPI 100-200
  @ 178 Indiana
Losses RPI 200+
205 Maine  

So what do we have? Breakin' it down again:

  Penn State Michigan
v. Top 25 1-4 0-7
v. Top 50 3-6 2-8
v. Top 100 8-11 8-11
v. 100-200 5-0 5-1
v. 200+ 0-1 5-0

It's possible (maybe even likely) that Duquesne moves out of the top-100, and though Fairfield is the #1 seed in the MAAC tournament, if they're upset in the quarterfinals, they could move out too. Northwestern is also at risk of moving out, dropping 2 wins from the Penn State top-100.

On the other side, Northwestern is the only Michigan opponent at risk of moving out of the top-100, and it's probably more likely that Oakland moves into that category. Should Michigan and Penn State both move into the top 50, that adds two losses in the category for PSU, and 2 more wins for the Wolverines.

Penn State's current top RPI records are in danger of getting much, much worse, whereas Michigan's opponents defeated in the 50-100 range are more likely to move up than down.

Considering the Wolverines will have a better win percentage (in the event that this becomes relevant, of course), along with a comparable RPI and a 2-0 record head-to-head, Michigan gets in over Penn State with a Wolverine win and barring some craziness in the Big Ten Tourney.

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 7:59 PM | I agree with this. (Score:1)
mfan_in_ohio
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 1905

At least, right now.  If PSU beats OSU, that's two marquee wins.  While they are going to be hurt by their terrible road record, a win over OSU would open a lot of eyes, like beating Texas did for Colorado, except Penn State's resume is already better than Colorado's.  If PSU goes 2-0 this week, their resume will look better than ours.  That said, if we win our next two we'll be in no matter what.  The team that should really pull for Ohio State is MSU, because if Michigan wins on Saturday, MSU might be fighting with PSU for the last spot coming out of the Big Ten.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 8:45 PM | Re: Oakland (Score:1)
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7576

Do you mean that Oakland could move into top-50 RPI status with a successful run through the Summit League tournament?  I think that's what you are saying.  Currently they are at 60 according to the chart.

"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."

- Jack Handey

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 5:51 PM | We want OSU over PSU (as much (Score:1)
sportsfreak0819
Joined: 10/31/2010
MGoPoints: 114

We want OSU over PSU (as much as it pains me to write that) because OSU is not a bubble team and PSU is.

 

Also Crisler is sold out for this Saturday's game...

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 6:02 PM | Uh, it's much much more (Score:1)
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12643

Uh, it's much much more complicated than that.

Yeastbound and Down

Great Lax State

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 8:43 PM | lol (Score:1)
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7576

After your very well-written post with charts and figures and arguments, I couldn't help but laugh out loud at this incredibly simplified post.

And only 12 minutes after yours!

"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."

- Jack Handey

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 7:39 PM | Right now, I rather see PSU (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12617

Right now, I rather see PSU denied any type of status/charcter win for their resume.  If they beat OSU, they almost could lose the Minny game, going 1-1 in the B10 tourney, and get in over UM just because people will remember their "big" wins against Wiscy and OSU over the lack of any marquee ones by UM.  

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 8:56 PM | We really need Florida to (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 18038

We really need Florida to pick their shit up in the second half.  Alabama winning this game would put them ahead of us and we need them behind us.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 9:09 PM | I feel like we need a Bubble (Score:1)
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7576

I feel like we need a Bubble Watch Open Thread.  But I don't actually want to make one, because that would require effort on my part.

"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."

- Jack Handey

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 9:58 PM | We really need Florida to pick their shit up in the second half. (Score:1)
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7576

Yeah, uh, I think they heard you.

    1   2   Total    
 
  Alabama 30 21 51 Final
     
(14) Florida 30 48 78  

 

"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."

- Jack Handey

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 9:50 PM | So are we all agreed now? (Score:1)
mfan_in_ohio
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 1905

Alabama is not a tournament team.  They shouldn't even host an NIT game.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 10:02 PM | Well Florida (Score:1)
bleedzblue
bleedzblue's picture
Joined: 09/03/2009
MGoPoints: 1146

Well Florida took care of business in the second half and ending up blowing out Bama, and it  looks like Purdue is going to take care of Illinois up 6 with 3 seconds left. So far so good for us.

HAIL TO THE VICTORS VALIANT, HAIL TO THE CONQUERING HEROES!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 11:05 PM | thus far (Score:1)
MH20
MH20's picture
Joined: 10/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7576

Purdue took care of Illinois - yay

OK-State took care of Baylor - yay

Florida gave 'Bama a 2nd-half beating - yay

Coastal Carolina beat G-W - bad I guess, but I don't think it matters much either way

Kent St. beat BGSU - again, sort of meh

Mizzou got pounded by Nebraska - drrrr

OSU is slaughtering PSU - yay (sort of)

VT is getting worked by BC (at home no less) - come on, man

"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."

- Jack Handey

  • Login or register to post comments
March 1st, 2011 at 11:39 PM | I'm rooting for the B1GT first-round bye tonight (Score:1)
Muttley
Muttley's picture
Joined: 07/07/2009
MGoPoints: 4624

Of course, I'm expecting us to beat MSU.

The backup plan is for Illinois to lose expectedly to Purdue ( ✓ ) and in a stinker at home to Indiana. (unlikely)

Plan A is for PSU to lose as expected tonight (lookin' good, 55-33 tOSU w/ 12min to play), or to make me nervous Sunday as they play @ a hopefully-still-motivated Minnesota.

I don't think beating MSU is enough to lock up a spot. While Lunardi has us in his last four in, his snapshot bracket doesn't attempt to account for the non-at-large-projected surprise-league-champions that knock a projected auto-bid onto the at-large list in front of us.

Thus I think anything that helps us go deeper in the B1GT is something to root for. And playing on Thursday not only would expose us to a possible non-gimme upset at the hands of a near-home Indiana, it would also expend 40 minutes of leg energy.

And so I say, let's just beat MSU, Illinois?, and then take it to the Bucks and the Boilers.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.