Yet Another CC Roundup: Ranking the 12!

Submitted by Eye of the Tiger on

I've now done three (one, two, three) CC candidate roundups. In each, I profiled 4 legitimate and 1 not-so-legitimate candidates. Now I rank the 12 legitimate ones according to how desirable a candidate they are, but with close calls determined by plausibility. (As you'll notice, some candidates are more plausible than others.) In other words, if I were Hackett, I'd just go down this list--maybe skipping the pipe dreams, but more likely just putting out feelers and politely backing off if the answer is "thanks but no thanks."

So what makes an ideal coaching candidate for Michigan in 2015? The demonstrated ability to coach + the demonstrated ability to win QUICKLY with a roster like ours + the likely ability to manage the uniquenesses of a "blue blood" program and its vested interests. That last bit really shouldn't matter as much as it does, but it undoubtedly does. And not just at Michigan: at Notre Dame, Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Alabama, USC and Tenessee too. Programs that feel the weight of history require coaches who can not only win but simultaneously embody and transcend tradition. Bo would be a perfect example, but there are others from more recent history, coaches who took the reins of once mighty "blue bloods" fallen on hard times and brought them back to glory. Bob Stoops, Pete Carroll, etc.

The Michigan job is further complicated by the fact that, like Notre Dame, we pride ourselves on academics and high integrity. Ideally we do not want to cut corners in our push (back) to the top. This is admirable, but it does make the job of finding the right person harder, as some of the best coaches out there are inveterate corner cutters. A Bob Stoops still makes the cut, but Pete Carroll? Not sure.

But enough about all that. Here's my ranked list of previously profiled CC candidates:

 

1. Jim Harbaugh

CASE: Harbaugh is the best available coach (to the unknowable degree that he is available) and the candidate who best “gets” what makes Michigan unique and special. Also shares Schlissel’s views on the academics/athletics balance.

LIKELIHOOD HE COMES IF OFFERED: 40%. It’s possible, maybe even more than possible, but he’s also going to have NFL options, and coaches with NFL options don’t often switch to college.

 

2. Gary Patterson

CASE: The best not available coach who's name nevertheless keeps coming up in every CC discussion at every major school. Patterson's long-term success at TCU speaks for itself—there’s a reason, after all, why his name keeps coming up. Unfortunately, it may not be worth the bandwidth to email an offer, because he’s not coming.

LIKELIHOOD HE COMES IF OFFERED: 1%. Anything's possible, but some things are so implausible that they might as well not be. In other words, he’s not coming.

 

3. John Harbaugh

CASE: Like little brother Jim, but less abrasive. Has won Super Bowl and grew up in Ann Arbor. Good NFL coaches (hell, even pretty good NFL coaches) tend to do well in college.

LIKELIHOOD HE COMES IF OFFERED: 10%. A neat idea, but hard to see “John Harbaugh, Michigan Football Coach” becoming reality. After all, unlike little brother Jim, he’s not being pushed out of his NFL gig for clash-of-personality reasons.

 

4. Les Miles

CASE: Big-time winner at LSU, and clearly a very good football coach. Former letterman and assistant coach under Bo too. Also the guy we maybe should have hired in 2007. However, is on the old side now and hiring Miles might exacerbate rather than heal our factional wounds.

LIKELIHOOD HE COMES IF OFFERED: 99%. He’s been non-obliquely hinting at it lately, and straight up told John U. Bacon in Three and Out that he was ready in 2007. If we want him, he’s coming.

 

5. Bret Bielema

CASE: Like most people, I thought this was crazytalk the first time I encountered it. But the more I think about it, the more sense it makes. Would be able to take this roster and make it competitive right away. And as has been said, Bielema wins with a brand of football that roughly corresponds to what Hoke and Brandon wanted to re-establish but couldn't. On the other hand, his teams at Wisconsin were mostly of the “almost-but-not-quite-great” variety. That sounds pretty good from where we are right now, but could wear thin after some time.

LIKELIHOOD THAT HE’D COME IF OFFERED: 33%. There is a solid speculative case for why he’d be interested, but it’s airy speculation (i.e. there are no sources or rumors, just logic). Astronomical buyout might render this dead in the water.

 

6. Dan Mullen

CASE: Has won more games at Mississippi State than previously thought possible. Is also a disciple of Urban Meyer, who wins a lot of games for our rival school. That said, he hasn’t really won that much at Mississippi State, (it took Mullen 6 years to reach 10 wins), and may favor recruiting practices we'd prefer to avoid.  

LIKELIHOOD THAT HE’D COME IF OFFERED: 33%. He’s got to realize that his stock will never be higher, and at the least, should use that to renegotiate his current contract. But may be comfortable where he is, or at least in the SEC. You'd think Florida was a sure thing, but apparently it's not. May wait to see if the LSU job opens.

 

7. Todd Graham

CASE: Wins a lot. Runs modern offense, but is a defensive guy. Modern offense plus good defense = WANT. At the same time, “cultural fit” might be an issue here (or not). Also, Graham is pretty mercenary in his approach to jobs, and would easily bolt after one year if he felt it was in his interests to do so.

LIKELIHOOD THAT HE’D COME IF OFFERED: 20%. He’s a good coach and would probably be interested in any gig that pays more/has a bigger spotlight, but Graham-to-Michigan doesn’t seem like an intuitive match for either party--especially after his old boss' bad experience here.

 

8. Jim McElwain

CASE: Like Nussmeier but with experience/success as a head coach. Like Bielema, could plausibly take what we have and make it work. But also not a thrilling (potential) hire. 

LIKELIHOOD THAT HE’D COME IF OFFERED: 50% 20%. McElwain will have options, but Michigan (and the salary we could pay) would be at or near the top something he'd look at. Would we offer? Depends on that $7.5m buyout. Also rumored to be a he appears to be the top Florida target.

 

9. Tom Herman

CASE: Really good OC at Ohio State. Urban Meyer coaching tree. Can recruit Ohio! However, lack of experience as HC means on-the-job learning, and we’re probably not in the mood for more of that.

LIKELIHOOD THAT HE’D COME IF OFFERED: 80%. I’d put it higher, but there’s always the chance he wouldn’t want to face his mentor every year in THE rivalry game. Or maybe that’s not an issue? In any event, I see him moving to a Tulsa or Cincinnati before making the big jump. But of all the coordinator-level candidates, Herman is the one I have the most faith in.

 

10. Paul Chryst

CASE: A low-transition-cost, ultra-safe idea. Who knows--could be a Dantonio-type? May, however, be another Hoke.

LIKELIHOOD THAT HE’D COME IF OFFERED: 99%. Can’t see him saying no. We’re pretty far down the list if we’re offering, though.

 

11. Bob Stitt

CASE: A true innovator on offense. Long-term success at FCS level. But lack of even mid-major experience likely a dealbreaker

LIKELIHOOD THAT HE’D COME IF OFFERED: 99%. Can’t see him saying no, but he's not a serious candidate for HC. Now, if we're talking OC, then we're really talking. Yes please!

 

12. Greg Schiano

CASE: We prefer not to win or sell season tickets.

LIKELIHOOD THAT HE’D COME IF OFFERED: 99%. Welcome to my nightmare.

 

 

Comments

The_Mad Hatter

December 3rd, 2014 at 11:55 AM ^

While I mostly agree with what you're saying, I think you're wrong about Miles' contract.  If I recall correctly, the provision is that he has to pay LSU $1.25 million if he leaves for Michigan.  No other school is mentioned.

That to me makes it seem like he would take the job if offered.  The provision was added in 08 and has been retained for each contract extension. 

WolvinLA2

December 3rd, 2014 at 12:04 PM ^

And I don't get the Stitt love.  Sure, he has a unique school that typically doesn't lend itself to great football players, but is that enough to make up for his not-amazing performace there?  He hasn't exactly had Brian Kelly-level D2 success, and he still went to CMU before going to a big-ish school.  Stitt is in his 15th years as the HC at CSM, he has just won his 3rd conference title and has won 1 playoff game in his career there.  I'm not sure that's what we're looking for.

Ghost of Fritz…

December 3rd, 2014 at 10:05 AM ^

Why does Jim Mora. Jr. never make these lists?

His work at UCLA seems good enough to get him on the list of people to consider, albeit well below the A level possibilities.

I am not necessarily pushing Mora, Jr., but is there some reason  that he rarely even gets mentions on this board?

Some people have put David Shaw on the list.  Doesn't Mora Jr. have a better case than Shaw?

WolvinLA2

December 3rd, 2014 at 12:10 PM ^

I think the thought process here is that Mora hasn't been in Westwood all that long, and if he leaves, it will be for the NFL.  Last year he was offered the job at Washington, his alma mater, and he turned it down to stay at UCLA.  If he won't leave for Washington, he likely won't leave for Michigan.  He's as likely as Patterson, though, and he was included.  I guess it just depends on how many "most certainly won't happen" candidates you want on the list.

Ghost of Fritz…

December 3rd, 2014 at 2:27 PM ^

...Shaw gets mentioned and he is unlikley to leave Stanford.  Patterson gets mentioned and he is unlikely to leave TCU.  Mora, Jr. is probably more likely to accept a Michigan offer today (end of his 3rd years at UCLA) than Shaw or Patterson. 

I am not pushing Mora, Jr.  It  just seems that he should be on the list of candidates, at least at the early phase of casting a wide net.

I'd certainly take Mora, Jr., over Schiano though. 

treetown

December 3rd, 2014 at 10:11 AM ^

Your final point is important to keep in mind.

The Michigan job is further complicated by the fact that, like Notre Dame, we pride ourselves on academics and high integrity. Ideally we do not want to cut corners in our push (back) to the top. This is admirable, but it does make the job of finding the right person harder, as some of the best coaches out there are inveterate corner cutters.

The whole CFB universe has changed - HC are expected to compete sooner, winnsooner, and win big sooner. Just as many people here point out that ND is no longer a plum job well face it, the UM job is no longer an automatic plum job either. When coaches are being dropped at 9-3 by Nebraska we are long past the Bo/Woody/Bear Bryant days where institutional advantages translated to on-field advantages. Now basically nearly every team which is serious about D1 CFB has similar situations - yes, some are very nice (like Oregon's new athletic palace courtesy of Phil Knight) but the huge differences of the past are gone.

Like a lot of people I'm at a lost to name a sure fire hire outside of the Harbaughs. Neither to me seem likely or a long shot to coming back to college FB with all of it headaches, when coaching in the NFL seems a more straightforward coaching job - evaluate, prepare, game coach, watch tape - no recruiting, no working with the development office, no dealing with eligibility, no central campus/NCAA stuff, ability to cut and sign players.

Ghost of Fritz…

December 3rd, 2014 at 10:35 AM ^

It is true that schools like Michigan and ND no longer have as much of a natural advantage as in the 70s or 80s.

But I still think that Michigan (and the other blue bloods) still do have a decided advantage. 

Considering just the Big Ten, Michigan OSU, Penn State and Nebraska still have a much an easier time attracting quality coaching candidates (and recruits) than the rest of the conference. 

I too am at a loss to name a sure fire hire for Michigan (besides Harbaigh).  But that is not becasue Michigan is 'no longer a plumb job.'  It still is one of the best jobs in college football.  But sure fire hires for any school are extremely rare.  Urban Meyer is not sitting in a TV booth for the taking very often. 

If Saban decides to retire tomorrow, even Alabama would be hard pressed to find a sure fire hire. 

And it is much, much harder for non-blue blood schools.  If Dantonio retires tomorrow, MSU won't have a sure fire replacement.  They would probably promote Narduzzi, but that is not a sure fire hire for the many reasons that have been discussed dozens of times on this board.

Hey, Michigan is actually ahead of the game!  Michigan has perhaps a 20% chance of hiring a near guaranteed winner (Harbaugh).  Very few schools have even that. 

Is McElwain a sure fire hire for Florida?  No. 

Would Frost be a sure fire hire for Nebraska?  No. 

Sarkesian at USC?  He's no Harbaugh.

Strong at Texas?  Also no Harbaugh.  Only time will tell. 

BlueBadger

December 3rd, 2014 at 10:18 AM ^

wanted Chryst BAD when they hired Anderson. He hasn't had a ton of success since then, but I'd move him up. I may have been convinced by people here in Madison a couple of years ago.

funkifyfl

December 3rd, 2014 at 11:33 AM ^

I'm of the opinion that if we can't get a Harbaugh, this decision should come down to Miles vs. Graham. Only Jim and Jack know whether Jim has any desire to return to Michigan, and John seems unlikely to me. Miles would be a safe hire - I think he could reestablish UM to a baseline of 8 wins. But, Graham is the best realistic option otherwise. Patterson is likely not coming and I am unimpressed with Mullen's resume.

Sauce Castillo

December 3rd, 2014 at 3:10 PM ^

Gary Patterson ahead of John Harbaugh, the same John Harbaugh who is a couple years removed from winning a Super Bowl, the hardest thing to accomplish as a football coach.

 HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA.

That is all

Moonlight Graham

December 3rd, 2014 at 8:40 PM ^

I predicted Mullen, and around 24 hours later here I am having second thoughts. He's plausible but I'd probably put Herman ahead of him. The whole Mensa-man + 2012 recruiter of the year + butt-kicking offense has me very intrigued. 

We need someone who can go toe-to-toe with Meyer and D'Antonio. Herman's offense just housed D'Antonio and Narduzzi's vaunted defense. Guy seems to have the chops. I don't know how he would differ from Stoops or Fisher as a coordinator-turned-HC. 

Blue Bass

December 5th, 2014 at 4:04 PM ^

I'm new, therefor I can't start my own thread. This is the best place I can think to post this:

 

Has anyone given any consideration to Bill Cowher?

 

-He has no college experience, but I don't see that as much of an issue. If he were to decide to come back to coaching, his name alone would make up for his inexperiences in recruiting. 

-He's 57. Which, IMO, is not too old.

It'd be a lights out hire that no one would be expecting at all....

Yourmyboyblue

December 5th, 2014 at 6:21 PM ^

I'm sure it probably would not happen but why not RR? The one piece he would be missing is a mobile quarterback. Despite the past "failure" here, if we give him more support, he will succeed over time. Besides Harbaugh, maybe Miles, no one on that list is attractive as RR to me. A new T-shirt will be created...R2A2... P.S...this would be RR with Casteel on staff...