It's a chart-a-ganza! But really, I love this series.
I did not make this headline up
Synopsis: After 7 games, Michigan is currently ranked #17 in scoring offense and #82 in scoring defense. Based on these rankings, M maintains a 43% chance for a +5 WLM (9-4 or better) season and an 83% chance for a winning season. The offense was plagued for the second week in a row by TOs (and by penalties), which turned 522 yards of total offense into just 28 points (yuck!). The defense actually played relatively well and allowed just 383 yards (the lowest yardage total since UConn – excluding the baby seal BGSU). But, the offensive (pun intended) TOs eliminated scoring chances for M, created a short field for the defense, and put the D back on the field earlier and more often. Iowa's second and third TDs both started at about mid-field after an interception and a blocked FG.
I use scoring stats because yardage stats are inherently flawed. (If you don't believe that, I guess M won the game with Iowa – 522 yards to 383 yards.) Being #82 in scoring defense is not good but U-Ms defense is not as bad as the #105 (an improvement of 7 places from last week) in total defense indicates. According to the FEI rankings at Football Outsiders, Michigan is ranked #83 in total defense.
Based on the FEI (Fremeau Efficiency Index), Michigan is predicted to win between 7.8 and 7.9 games (excluding bowl game but adjusted with +1 for U-M's one FCS opponent). Based on the FEI, M would have been expected to win 3.9 FBS games to date (we have won 4.0 FBS games to date).
Using a rough calculation based on the FEI, Michigan will be favored by 16 points over Penn State (I'll add the real FEI prediction when it comes out after our bye week– usually Thursday after the bye). Using the Sagarin Predictor, M will be favored by 2.8 points. (Vegas Odds Opened with M favored by ??). All these will be updated after the bye week but will probably not change very much.
Just as I was confused the game with Iowa was predicted so close last week, I am confused this week why Sagarin has the PSU game relatively close. Unless M implodes with TOs, this should be a win.
This line chart differentiates between OOC and Big Ten points per possession. It shows what has happened since the start of conference play. In the Big Ten, U-M is averaging only 2.5 points per possession (PPP) and 42 YPP. The defense is giving up 3.1 PPP and 42 YPP. With an average of 12 possessions per game for each team, this translates into a 7.2 point disadvantage for Michigan. (In OOC games, this was a 20 point advantage.)
For those who want yardage stats, here they are – split by OOC and Big10 games. Offensively, total yards per game are moderately lower in conference play (13% less), rushing yards are significantly lower in conference play (35%), while passing yards are moderately higher (18%). Defensively, total yards allowed in conference play have increased significantly (24%), rushing yards allowed are up just moderately (16%), while passing yards allowed are up significantly (28%).
DETAILS: Here are the FEI numbers ( FEI Forecasts and Football Outsiders FEI ). FEI is a weighted and opponent-adjusted season efficiency, and is expressed as a percentage as compared with an average FBS team. The average team will have an index of approximately 0.00. Teams below average have negative index values.
Note that FEI completely excludes all non-FBS data (the W-L record is only for FBS games, etc.). Therefore, you need to add 1 to FBS-MW to get the final predicted wins for M this year. Or, if you use FBS-RMW, you need to add 1 to the current W-L record to get the final predicted wins for M this year. BTW, the difference between FBS-MW and FBS-RMW is the number of FBS games each team would have been expected to win to date.
The FEI is a drive based analysis considering each of the nearly 20,000 drives each year in college football. The data is filtered to eliminate garbage time (at the half or end of game) and is adjusted for opponent. A team is rewarded for playing well against good teams (win or lose) and is punished more severely for playing poorly against bad teams than it is rewarded for playing well against bad teams. I've included the GE basic data so you can see the impact of adjusting for opponent. (See: Football Outsiders Our Basic College Stats )
Here are the Sagarin Ratings.
Sagarin uses two basic ratings: PREDICTOR (in which the score MARGIN is the only thing that matters) and ELO-CHESS (in which winning and losing only matters, the score margin is of no consequence). The overall rating is a synthesis of the two diametrical opposites, ELO-CHESS and PREDICTOR.
Per Sagarin: ELO-CHESS is “very politically correct. However, it is less accurate in its predictions for upcoming games than is PREDICTOR”.
Here is the U-M vs. Penn State National Statistical Rankings with the advantage for each category indicated (all categories within 10% are considered a "push").
Here are the week by week National Statistical Rankings for Michigan (cumulative thru the week indicated):
I have included the major rankings for offense and defense but scoring rankings show the best correlation to winning and losing. Scoring rankings are based on PPG. Rushing, Passing, and Total rankings are based on YPG.
Here is the basic data for Michigan (each individual week followed by totals and then average per game). I've included Total Possessions for Offense & Defense along with the calculated data per possession. Number of possessions do not include running out the clock at the half or end of game. Offense Plays and Defense Plays are better indicators than Time of Possession.
Using Scoring Offense and Scoring Defense National Rankings for the past 5 years (FBS AQ teams only), this table shows the percentage of teams that finish the season with a +WLM and a +5 WLM. For example, teams that finished in the Top 40 in both offense and defense had a 100% chance to be +WLM and an 82% chance to be +5 WLM (9-4 or better).
Each year, of the 66 FBS AQ teams, 65% (43 teams) end up with a + WLM and 36% (24 teams) end up with a +5 WLM.
It's a chart-a-ganza! But really, I love this series.
We don't have the 120th ranked passing defense in the country anymore.
PSU definitely looks winnable, but this is yet another game where the questions is probably more "Will our offense perform like OOC Offense?" as opposed to "Will our defense be able to bend-not-break?", again. PSU's defense still scares me, especially when they have a game or two of film on how to get coverage on our WRs, which seems to be the way teams have beat us (by forcing us into mistakes with throwing into coverage when all other options have been exhausted).
Anyway, I don't think the spread will be more than a TD (barring a PSU implosion in week 7) since it is in Happy Valley, at night, near Halloween, and we're still a Big 10 question mark.
Based on the health of Penn State's defense, we might not need to throw the ball, but if we do, we'll probably have all day to do it.
Based on Penn State's offense, we might need to score one TD to win.
What starting players are injured for PSU? I know that a few of their offensive linemen, tight end, and defensive end are out for the Michigan game.
|Andrew Dailey||S||Undisclosed||Prob Sat - 10/20/10||Dailey is dealing with an undisclosed injury but is expected to play Saturday against Minnesota.|
|Bani Gbadyu||LB||Leg||Prob Sat - 10/20/10||Gbadyu missed last game with a leg injury but expects to play Saturday against Minnesota.|
|Michael Mauti||LB||Ankle||Prob Sat - 10/20/10||Mauti missed last game against Illinois due to an ankle injury but expects to play Saturday against Minnesota.|
|Curtis Drake||WR||Leg||Prob Sat - 10/20/10||Drake continues to recover from a broken leg and is expected to return Saturday against Minnesota.|
|Sean Stanley||DE||Academics||Ques Sat - 10/17/10||Stanley missed last game against Illinois as he continues to deal with academic issues he remains questionable for Saturday's game against Minnesota.|
|Gerald Hodges||LB||Leg||Ques Sat - 10/18/10||Hodges continues to recover from a left leg injury and is questionable to play Saturday against Minnesota.|
|Andrew Szczerba||TE||Back||Ques Sat - 10/18/10||Szczerba is recovering from a chronic back injury and remains questionable for Saturday's game against Minnesota.|
|Eric Latimore||DE||Wrist||Doub Sat - 10/18/10||Latimore is expected to miss Saturday's game against Minnesota because of an injured wrist.|
|Jack Crawford||DE||Foot||Doub Sat - 10/20/10||Crawford missed last game against Illinois with an ankle injury and is doubtful to play Saturday against Minnesota.|
|Derrick Thomas||CB||Academics||Doub Sat - 10/20/10||Thomas missed last game against Illinois due to academic issues and is expected to miss Saturday's game against Minnesota.|
|Garry Gilliam||TE||Knee||out for season - 10/6/10||Gilliam will miss the remainder of the season because of a torn ACL.|
|Lou Eliades||G||Knee||out for season - 10/6/10||Eliades will miss the remainder of the season after tearing his ACL.|
Glaring Stewie. Gets me every time.
Papercuts, carpal tunnel syndrome, etc. can be hard to bounce back from.
If you concentrate too hard you can burst a blood vessel in your forehead. Clearly the NCAA doesn't have the player's best interest in mind when it comes to head injuries.
But I'm hoping for 7 touchdowns. That would make me feel good.
let's just score a shitload of points.
A road game at night gives a good advantage to the home team.
has been bad against good defenses and good against bad defenses.
We don't have a good defense. This should be a close game.
Kevin Newsome will be holding a clip board, while Denard and Co put up points.
Turnovers are equalizers when one team has a significantly better offense. We can't have them.