Tom Izzo and the "more with less" fallacy

Submitted by ClearEyesFullHart on

     Izzo inherited a ridiculously loaded MSU team in 1995. Quinton Brooks is largely hailed as one of the best small forwards to lace 'em up for MSU. Power forward Jamie Feick went on to play for the 76'ers. Ray Weathers went on to play for the Suns. Jon Garavaglia was a McDonalds All American and Mr. Basketball. In his first year, he also brought in Morris Peterson of the Toronto Raptors and Antonio Smith. Izzo took that team all the way to the second round of the NIT.

     Then on Feb.17, 1996 There was a rollover accident on M-14 involving U-M player Maurice Taylor’s Ford Explorer. Teammates Robert Traylor, Louis Bullock, Willie Mitchell, Ron Oliver and recruit Mateen Cleaves were all in the vehicle.

   

     Izzo capitalized, adding Mateen Cleaves(Pistons) and David Thomas(founder of Wendy's) who helped MSU all the way back to the second round of the NIT. The parade of blue chips continued with Charlie Bell(Suns) and Andre Hutson(Beat up Chuck Norris when Matt Trannon was but a twinkle in his father's eye). This ushered in the Golden Age of MSU basketball('98,'99, 00) when MSU would bookend a National Championship with two additional Final 4's. Loaded as those teams were, this Golden Age led to the great Tom Izzo “More with Less” fallacy. Because MSU does not recruit on the level of Kentucky, Kansas and Duke(them and 342 other schools) Izzo somehow gained the “Beilein” reputation, the coach who advances in the tournament despite his (Perceived) lack of talent.

     Izzo has led the Spartans for 19 long years. Impressively, he has had them in the NCAA Tournament for the last 17 of them(One or two of those came with a wink and a nod from the selection committee, but we'll come back to that). That's not quite the 34 year bowl streak Michigan enjoyed under Bo-Mo-Carr, but that kind of consistency is rare in college basketball. Under Izzo's reign, MSU has been to 6 Final Fours and won a National Championship. They've also been bounced in the first round 4 times and lost in the Sweet 16 4 times. Until recently, MSU just dominated Michigan in terms of head to head as well as the post-season. Beilein has obviously turned that around in the last 4 years, winning 6 of the last 9. But that is a local issue. You don't come up with an OP title like that simply because there's a new sheriff in town. No, what leads me to believe that the end is near for Izzo is something much more sinister. Recruiting.

     Despite what the media would have you believe, Izzo has simply never HAD to do more with less. He has always been a good recruiter, and he has always had more. I went back and looked at some recruiting numbers and outcomes. There are a number of caveats here. Trey Burke and Caris Lavert were 3* recruits. But to some extent you can look at it as a numbers game(like fantasy football). There's something like a 60% chance that Fantasypros(or Rivals) is going to have each player ranked correctly, a 20% chance they'll be significantly better, and a 20% chance they're going to be worse(Unless you're John Beilein). But if you look at MSU's elite recruit Rivals numbers as far as they go back adding a star for each year of experience(assuming that a sophomore 4* is equal to a freshman 5* and that a 3* player encompasses too great a range to even consider) you find:


2002: 5* Elite 8
2003: 4* 5* First Round
2004: 4* 5* Final 4
2005: bupkis(Roster score of 32) First Round
2006: 4* 4*(RS 28) Second Round
2007: 4* 4* 4*(RS 37) Sweet 16
2008: 4* 5* (RS 36) Runner Up
2009: 4* 4*(RS 51!) Final 4
2010: 4* 5 *(RS 53) First Round
2011: 5*(RS 43) Sweet 16
2012: 5*(Harris) 4* 4*(RS 46) Sweet 16
2013: bupkis(RS 38) Elite 8
2014: 4*(RS 24)

     That's a score of 24 for next year. The next lowest would be the 28 from 2006, the year where MSU scraped into the tournament(wink, nod) .500 in conference and got bounced the first weekend. That team was a 4* player better than next year's roster.  The next lowest was the 2005 team(two 4* players better) that also went .500 in conference and lost in the first round.  For reference, 2009's Final 4 team was rated 51.  For those keeping score at home, in the measurable past that's a Roster Average of 40 points(the equivalent of 8 5* freshmen). More with more.

     Assuming that Dawson stays and Harris leaves, on paper this coming year's State team will be the worst (from a rivals ratings and experience standpoint) since the modern era of recruiting sites(turn of the century). With Izzo reaching for 3* recruits these days, and the NCAA taking steps to weed out thug ball, I don't see much help on the horizon for them either. You're looking at Dawson as a 5* senior, Valentine and Costello as 4* juniors, and that 4* freshman point guard who can't shoot coming in. That's it.

So what happened to Izzo's recruiting? Several things.

     Somewhere in the early 2000's, the NBA stopped playing defense. You see that 5* all the way up there next to 2003? That's Shannon Brown. That's the last one of the guys represented here that went on to the NBA. You're looking at a decade of player development failure.  Obviously, the NBA is the dream for a lot of recruits, and Izzo just plain isn't getting it done. Draymond Green(3* recruit not included) should also be mentioned. Not only is he getting 20 minutes per game in the NBA despite playing for MSU, but he is doing it as an undersized defensive specialist. In a league where the regular season has become the all star game.

 

Facilities.

breslin1

 

 

breslin 2

 

 

The Breslin Center was state of the art in 1989, but it has barely been touched since then. I'm no interior decorator, but moldy concrete is generally not the way to go. 

     Style: Michigan State's defensive mandate is clear: If your man gains an advantage on you, push him, grab him, do what you've got to do. It works great if you can get away with it, but this year MSU is collecting personal fouls like Pokemon cards

I can understand Izzo's feelings of entitlement, as he has benefitted from lazy Big Ten officiating for his entire career, but if you make contact with your hand, arm or elbow away from your body, it is a foul.  It has always been a foul.  He made jokes after the UConn game about his players not being allowed to "touch anybody" and I can totally see where he's coming from.  Who would have ever thought they'd make him play by the rules?

 

     (Related)Results: Call it Karma. Call it correlation without causation. But MSU has badly underperformed their talent level against Michigan(JMo foul trouble aside) or more importantly in the post-season since the Wonders Hall incident. It sounds great, they made it to the Sweet 16 three times. But before the Virginia upset their post season scalps were pretty weak.  St. Louis, Long Island, Valpo, Memphis, Delaware, Harvard. Sixth Seed Memphis is the only one that even moves the needle.  2010 stands out as Izzo's most glaring failure, as their most talented team(RS 53) lost out in the first round.  With a 4-6 year window to grab the attention of high school kids, Izzo's time is running out.

 

(Related) Disillusionment. Izzo seems generally unhappy, and his interaction with the press has lost an air of...sanity.

     If you're keeping score at home, he comes into the press conference near tears. He rips his own recruiting, whining that he has to play guys he hasn't played in a month. Then he cries about the officiating. Then he cries at the officiating again. Then he complains about poor Keith Appling's wrist.

I don't know if many recruits want to play for a sniveling whining excuse machine.

Then you've got the UConn press conference.  His team was just upset by a team that by most accounts has no business in the Final 4, and Izzo seems...Relieved

I dont know of many coaches who would seem that happy that their season was over, that they wouldn't have to coach that particular group of players again.  With this group though, he probably wasn't alone.

 

     This is the most concerning if I am a Michigan State fan. The man calls attention to the Federal Rape Investigation that has been kept out of the media...For no other reason than that he is addicted to making excuses. Then he calls it “ridiculous” and says that he's “sick of it”. Now, whatever you think of the Wonder's Hall incident...Put yourself in the shoes of the victim. Then look at what the mouthpiece of your school is saying about the event that changed your life. Even if that's what you're thinking...What kind of human being is so self-absorbed and stupid that they can spout off PUBLICLY about such a terrible allegation as a personal annoyance? And then when they asked him to elaborate, he told members of the press, “Don't mess with me right now”. You brought it up sir.  The MSU student newspaper just broke the story that Federal Authorities are investigating the victim's claim that the University "engaged in activities to malign her character" in retaliation for her reporting the assault.  I am sure the victim is quite sorry for inconveniencing a man of Izzo's stature. http://statenews.com/article/2014/04/student-claimed-msu-retaliated-against-her-for-reported-assault 

 

Personality.

Most players dont like being trashed in the media and getting the full Bobby Knight treatment in front of their friends and family.  Even the biased MSU media admits that he goes too far http://www.freep.com/article/20140113/BLOG05/301130041/hey-joe-michigan-state-spartans-tom-izzo  But Izzo seems unable to coach any other way, and his talent level is shifting accordingly.

They say that you want to leave a program “Better than you found it”, and the guy won a Championship and went to a bunch of Final 4's, but if he bailed for the NBA or even retired with the roster in its current state...What would that do to his legacy? Everyone has an instinct for self-preservation,but the words “cowardly” and “selfish” might come up. Not in the media of course, they write what he tells them to write. I mean in living rooms and around water coolers.

 

With all of this said, Izzo could pull through this in two or three years. For MSU, that simple metric does seem to predict season outcome pretty well, but if you look at it, Beilein won a Big Ten Championship with a roster score of 5.  Beilein made it to the NCAA Championship game with a roster score of 13. But Tom Izzo is no John Beilein. Can you imagine what Beilein would do with the 40's Izzo has averaged over his career? I very much look forward to finding out.

 

Comments

detrocks

April 4th, 2014 at 12:25 PM ^

I'm not sure why there's this clear need on this board to denigrate Izzo's accomplishments. Yeah, his standing with the media may outweigh reality, but calling him "Jud Heathcote 2.0" is ridiculous. Did he benefit from Michigan flaming out?  Probably, but he's turned Michigan State into one of the best programs in the country, when it wasn't much of anything before he got there.

That being said, I think its reasonable to question where they go from here. I've never thought that there was "doing more with less" argument for his program (hello, that 's Mark Dantonio's meme). He's consistently gotten good players. He's not doing that now, so we'll see how far they go given the poor classes he's pulled in over the last couple of years.

Despite the success of his teams, given Izzo's lack of success getting players drafted, I'm not sure why a high ranking player would go to State at all. While Gary Harris will likely go in the 1st round, in the 19 years that Izzo has been at State, only 6 players have been drafted in the first round-- and only 2 have gone in the top 15. State hasn't had a player go in the first round since 2006.

As pointed out by the OP, it's not he hasn't had talent. Izzo's had tons of guys who came in highly ranked and ended up doing nothing in the pros such as Kelvin Torbert, Marcus Taylor, Paul Davis. Who is the last guy from State that was even a regular starter in the NBA? Jason Richardson? Zach Randolph? Izzo may win a lot of games, but his track record of getting guys to pros leaves much to be desired.

 

 

 

spartanfan123

April 4th, 2014 at 2:14 PM ^

Pretty sure the 1st and 3rd pictures are Spartan Stadium, not the Breslin. 

 

Edit: Or at least I haven't seen anything like that in the Breslin when I've been in it this year. Looks a lot more like Spartan Stadium to me. 

ClearEyesFullHart

April 4th, 2014 at 3:06 PM ^

One is your very attractive fallout shelter-er-concourse(taken before one of MSU's 3 victories unfortunately).  Two is a shot of my actual seats at said event.  Three was stolen from a Buckeye posting board, entitled "Singing the fight song in the Breslin tunnel".  I can remember a shot of Beilein getting interviewed in the same "abandoned warehouse" tunnel post-game, but I just couldn't find it.  Hence the theft.

champswest

April 4th, 2014 at 9:25 PM ^

Don't agree with your premise, but I do agree with many of your points. Izzo will leave at some point and then it will be apparent that this time was indeed the start of the downward slide. He is a good but not great coach. Mostly, I just don't like his coaching style.

west2

April 5th, 2014 at 11:47 AM ^

perspective and agree with most. Some of Izzos coaching style might emanate from that older style intense grade management approach that Bo-Woody were famous for, Bobby knight, Nick Saban etc. It doesn't play well with current players and doesn't work in the NBA and I believe factored into Izzos not jumping to the pros. Annoying as Izzo may be he has elevated their program and calling him overrated isn't accurate, but I agree with the dire outlook for sparty bb short term however. Enjoyed the provocative analysis, keep up the good work!

dahblue

April 5th, 2014 at 1:44 PM ^

Interesting interview on 105.1 yesterday with Frieder who (while saying he is friends with Izzo) said that Izzo is lucky Fisher got fired.  I'll paraphrase in that Frieder felt he "owned" Flint and that Izzo never would have gotten many of his great recruits if it weren't for the firing of Fisher (which he called the biggest mistake the program ever made).

For PR purposes alone, maybe we did need to part ways with Fish, but the guy is clearly a great coach and Frieder's overall sentiment gets to the heart of the matter with Izzo...He's a good coach, but timing and circumstance have led folks to think he's a lot better than he really is.

TheLastHarbaugh

April 8th, 2014 at 2:16 AM ^

   Somewhere in the early 2000's, the NBA stopped playing defense.

LOL Wut? NBA defenses in the 2000s were some of the best in NBA history. So much so that the NBA had to overhaul the rules so that offenses stood a chance.

The idea that they don't play defense in the NBA is one of the single worst sports myths that exists. It's totally embarrassing every time someone pushes this tripe.

This thread is completely ridiculous. You are seriously pushing the downfall of a guy whose team won the Big Ten Tournament, finished 2nd in the Big Ten, and went to the Elite 8.

Next year's State team might take a step back, but they aren't a smoking crater. Trice, Valentine, and Dawson are a solid 1 2 3 punch. Then they've got Costello and Kaminski as the goons down low. They've got a top 70ish recruit in point guard Lourawls Nairn coming in, and already have a top 50 commit in Deyonta Davis for 2015.

Izzo put a lot of stock into this Payne/Appling/Harris group, so they're necessarily going to have to rebound from losing those guys, but they'll be fine. 

I also don't think that the rise of Michigan basketball will have much impact on State. Beilein and Izzo don't really go after the same recruits, and I think there is more than enough talent to go around.

I remember a lot of people saying Izzo and MSU would be in trouble prior to the 2011-12 season.

In 2010-11 they had seniors Kalin Lucas, Durrell Summers, and Delvon Roe. Three guys who had huge roles on two Final Four teams, one of which lost in the National Championship game. They totally bombed, going 19-15, 9-9 in the Big Ten and lost in the 2nd round of the NCAA Tournament. They also lost Korie Lucious to a team violation. 

People were down on Izzo, thinking that the team might be in some trouble, and they went 29-8, won the Big Ten (in a 3 way tie with Michigan and OSU), won the Big Ten Tournament, were a #1 seed in the NCAA Tournament and advanced to the Sweet 16. 

Not bad for a squad that wasn't even ranked in the pre-season USA Today coaches poll or the AP poll.

ClearEyesFullHart

April 10th, 2014 at 9:16 AM ^

"The idea that they don't play defense in the NBA is one of the single worst sports myths that exists.   It's totally embarrassing every time someone pushes this tripe" 

First off, a cursory glance at statistics shows the nba's decline in defensive efficiency(points per 100 posessions).

Year Defensive Efficiency Best Team Worst Team

2013 97 109

2012 97 109

2011 95 107

2010 97 110

2009 100 110

2008 99 112

2007 82 96

2006 82 95

2005 84 97

2004 82 96

2003 79 94

 2002 81 93

The numbers tell the story.  The best defensive team today(97 points per 100 posessions) is less effective than the worst defensive team(95 points per 100) from when Shannon Brown was drafted in 2006.

And yeah, 2010 will go down as one of biggest coaching failures in program history(2010: 4* 5 *(RS 53) First Round ) but they still had a TON of talent on the roster.  I believe they gave Izzo B1G coach of the year the next year based entirely on how totally inept he'd been the year before.  Looking at next year...there's just nobody left.  Do you really think playing Trice for 30 minutes is going to work out?  Who is he going to guard?